Abstract: Endometritis is a major cause of infertility in intensively farmed donkeys. Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus (SEZ) is a predominant pathogen that readily forms biofilms in equine endometritis, conferring resistance to conventional treatments. Objective: This study aimed to characterize the biofilm dynamics of SEZ isolates obtained from donkeys and to evaluate potential anti-biofilm strategies with different drug combinations. Methods: Uterine lavage samples were collected from 30 Dezhou Black donkeys with clinical endometritis. Bacterial cultures were performed on blood agar and MacConkey agar. SEZ isolates were identified by 16S rDNA PCR sequencing. Antimicrobial sensitivity test of SEZ isolates was performed with broth microdilution methods. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was used for strain characterization, and in vitro biofilm dynamics were assessed using crystal violet assays. Six agents-Tris-EDTA, hydrogen peroxide, DMSO, penicillin potassium, ceftiofur, and ciprofloxacin-were tested individually or in combination for their inhibitory effects on SEZ biofilms. Results: Thirteen SEZ isolates were obtained from a total of 31 bacterial isolates (41.9%), representing four novel MLST types: STnovel, ST554, ST555 and ST556. Rapid formation of biofilm was observed at 12-24 h. Strain-dependent inhibitory patterns were observed in SEZ biofilms. Hydrogen peroxide showed the strongest inhibitory effect on STnovel biofilms (73.73 ± 1.48%), while ceftiofur-Tris-EDTA, ciprofloxacin-DMSO and penicillin-DMSO combinations exhibited the highest inhibition against ST554 (66.52 ± 3.66%), ST555 (82.60 ± 2.97%) and ST556 (83.35 ± 1.19%) biofilms. Conclusions: Strain-dependent inhibitory patterns were observed in SEZ biofilms. Antibiotic-non-antibiotic combinations showed promising effects in vitro, highlighting new therapeutic avenues for controlling SEZ biofilm-associated infections in donkeys.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study investigated the biofilm-forming behavior of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus (SEZ) strains isolated from donkeys with endometritis and evaluated various antibiotic and non-antibiotic combinations for inhibiting these biofilms.
Results revealed strain-specific differences in biofilm inhibition and showed that combinations of antibiotics with agents like Tris-EDTA or DMSO could effectively disrupt SEZ biofilms, suggesting new treatment strategies for managing endometritis in donkeys.
Background and Purpose
Endometritis, an inflammation of the uterus lining, is a significant cause of infertility in intensively farmed donkeys.
SEZ is a predominant pathogen in equine endometritis and is known for forming biofilms—complex bacterial communities adhering to surfaces—which contribute to treatment resistance.
The goal was to characterize the biofilm patterns of SEZ isolated from donkeys and to assess potential anti-biofilm strategies using various drug combinations.
Methods
Sample Collection: Uterine lavage fluids were collected from 30 Dezhou Black donkeys diagnosed with clinical endometritis.
Bacterial Isolation and Identification: Samples were cultured on blood agar and MacConkey agar, followed by 16S rDNA PCR sequencing to confirm SEZ isolates.
Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing: Broth microdilution methods were used to determine the susceptibility profiles of the SEZ isolates against antibiotics.
Strain Typing: Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) classified the isolates into different genetic types to understand strain diversity.
Biofilm Assessment: In vitro biofilm formation was studied over time using crystal violet staining to quantify biomass.
Biofilm Inhibition Testing: Six agents—Tris-EDTA, hydrogen peroxide, DMSO, penicillin potassium, ceftiofur, and ciprofloxacin—were tested alone and in combinations for their ability to inhibit biofilm formation or disrupt established biofilms.
Key Findings
Prevalence and Diversity: Out of 31 total bacterial isolates, 13 (41.9%) were identified as SEZ.
Strain Types: Four novel MLST sequence types were identified—named STnovel, ST554, ST555, and ST556—indicating genetic diversity.
Biofilm Formation: SEZ strains formed biofilms rapidly within 12 to 24 hours, highlighting the importance of timely intervention.
Strain-Dependent Inhibition:
Hydrogen peroxide showed the strongest inhibition against biofilms formed by the STnovel strain (about 74% inhibition).
Combination therapies were more effective on other strains:
Ceftiofur combined with Tris-EDTA inhibited ST554 biofilms by approximately 67%.
Ciprofloxacin combined with DMSO inhibited ST555 biofilms by about 83%.
Penicillin combined with DMSO inhibited ST556 biofilms by approximately 83%.
Conclusions and Implications
The study demonstrated that SEZ biofilm inhibition varies significantly depending on the strain, emphasizing the need for tailored therapeutic approaches.
Combining antibiotics with non-antibiotic agents like Tris-EDTA or DMSO can enhance anti-biofilm effects, offering promising new strategies for treating SEZ-related endometritis in donkeys.
These findings could lead to improved clinical management by overcoming biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance and reducing infertility caused by persistent uterine infections.
Cite This Article
APA
Ma S, Luo T, Zheng Y, Wang Y, Yu J, Qu H, Liu B, Wang T, Wu C, Zhu Y, Bai X, Wang Z, Li J.
(2026).
Molecular typing, biofilm characteristics and biofilm-targeted inhibition strategies of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus isolated from donkey endometritis.
J Equine Vet Sci, 162, 105891.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105891
College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health and Safety, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Luo, T
College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health and Safety, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Zheng, Y
College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health and Safety, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Wang, Y
National Engineering Research Center for Gelatin-based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dong-E-E-Jiao Co. Ltd., No.78, E-jiao Street, Done-E Country, Liaocheng, Shandong 252201, China.
Yu, J
National Engineering Research Center for Gelatin-based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dong-E-E-Jiao Co. Ltd., No.78, E-jiao Street, Done-E Country, Liaocheng, Shandong 252201, China.
Qu, H
National Engineering Research Center for Gelatin-based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dong-E-E-Jiao Co. Ltd., No.78, E-jiao Street, Done-E Country, Liaocheng, Shandong 252201, China.
Liu, B
National Engineering Research Center for Gelatin-based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dong-E-E-Jiao Co. Ltd., No.78, E-jiao Street, Done-E Country, Liaocheng, Shandong 252201, China.
Wang, T
National Engineering Research Center for Gelatin-based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dong-E-E-Jiao Co. Ltd., No.78, E-jiao Street, Done-E Country, Liaocheng, Shandong 252201, China.
Wu, C
School of Life Sciences and Food Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, No. 19 Taiji Road, Handan 056038, China.
Zhu, Y
College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health and Safety, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; XinJiang Zhaosu County Xiyu Horse Industry Co., Ltd, Training Center of Zhaosu Stud Farm, Yili Prefecture, Xinjiang 835600, China.
Bai, X
China Horse Industry Association, Building 1, No. 1, Maxinzhuang, Beijing 101399, China.
Wang, Z
College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health and Safety, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; XinJiang Zhaosu County Xiyu Horse Industry Co., Ltd, Training Center of Zhaosu Stud Farm, Yili Prefecture, Xinjiang 835600, China. Electronic address: zixuanw@cau.edu.cn.
Li, J
College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health and Safety, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: jlivet@cau.edu.cn.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.