Noncontact infrared thermometer measurements offer a reasonable alternative to rectal temperature measurement in afebrile horses.
Abstract: To assess the repeatability of infrared thermometer temperature readings and evaluate the correlation between digital rectal temperature and infrared thermometer temperatures taken at different locations in healthy afebrile horses. Methods: 101 afebrile horses ≥ 1 year old. Methods: Digital rectal temperatures and infrared temperatures from the eye, gingiva, neck, axilla, and perineum were obtained in a climate-controlled environment and at 2 outdoor ambient temperatures (study period, November 1, 2021, to April 30, 2023). Results: Infrared temperature measurements were well tolerated by horses, including those resistant to rectal temperature. There was significant correlation between rectal temperature and infrared temperature taken at the perineum (R = 0.57; P < .001) and eye (R = 0.37; P < .001). Infrared temperature measurements were highly repeatable, allowing for calculation of reference ranges for the perineum (36.0 to 37.8 °C) and eye (35.7 to 37.1 °C) in climate-controlled conditions. There was increased variance in outside temperatures compared to climate-controlled conditions for the eye (P = .002), gingiva (P = .047), and perineum (P = .005). Conclusions: While infrared thermometer temperatures were not numerically the same as rectal temperature using a digital thermometer, measurements at the perineum and eye were correlated with rectal temperature readings. Further, the repeatability of infrared readings allows for computation of reference ranges that make the infrared thermometer a viable alternative for the practicing veterinarian when obtaining a temperature in uncooperative horses. The infrared thermometer was reliable outdoors for the eye, but not the perineum. Additional validation of infrared temperature reference ranges in febrile horses and warmer ambient temperatures is warranted.
Publication Date: 2024-03-08 PubMed ID: 38467108DOI: 10.2460/javma.23.12.0714Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research outlines the potential use of infrared thermometers as an alternative to rectal temperature measurements in horses, highlighting the notable correlation between temperatures recorded at the perineum and eye using an infrared thermometer and those acquired rectally.
Study Design and Methodology
- The study involved 101 healthy, afebrile (non-feverish) horses who were at least one year old.
- Digital rectal temperature and infrared temperatures taken from various locations including the eye, gingiva, neck, axilla, and perineum were collected.
- Measurements were taken in different environments: a controlled climate and two outdoor settings with varying ambient temperatures.
- The study continued from November 1, 2021, to April 30, 2023, to ensure diverse weather conditions were incorporated.
Results
- Infrared thermometer measurements were well tolerated by horses and even accepted by those who showed resistance to rectal temperature measurements.
- There was a significant correlation found between the rectal temperature and the infrared temperature taken at the perineum and the eye with correlation coefficients (R) of 0.57 and 0.37 respectively, both statistically significant with P < .001.
- These infrared temperature measurements were highly repeatable, allowing for the calculation of reference ranges for the perineum and eye in climate-controlled conditions.
- There was increased variance in outdoor temperatures compared to the climate-controlled conditions for the eye, gingiva, and perineum, suggesting that the surrounding environment has an impact on the readings.
Conclusions
- Although the temperatures recorded with the infrared thermometer and the rectal thermometer were not numerically the same, the correlational data reflects a reasonable level of similarity, especially in the case of the perineum and the eye.
- The consistency in the infrared readings allows for the creation of reference ranges that could make the infrared thermometer a practical alternative for vets dealing with uncooperative horses.
- This method was dependable outdoors for the eye, but not the perineum.
- The research suggests further refinement of the infrared temperature reference ranges in febrile horses and during warmer ambient temperatures is necessary.
Cite This Article
APA
Zobrist CN, Bishop RC, McCoy AM.
(2024).
Noncontact infrared thermometer measurements offer a reasonable alternative to rectal temperature measurement in afebrile horses.
J Am Vet Med Assoc, 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.23.12.0714 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists