Analyze Diet
iScience2024; 27(7); 110356; doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110356

Oxytocin homogenizes horse group organization.

Abstract: The oxytocinergic system has been suggested to make up an important part of the endocrine basis of group cohesion. However, controlled studies in open-group settings have not been performed. We here investigated the impact of exogenous intranasal oxytocin on the group-level social organization of 5 groups of horses ( = 58; 12 mares and 46 geldings) through GPS tracking and social network analysis. We find oxytocin flattened social differentiation across levels. Most strikingly, oxytocin did not simply reinforce existing bonds but selectively shifted social preferences toward homogenization - individuals and pairs who otherwise rarely associated spent more time close together, while individuals and pairs with the highest baseline association instead spent more time further apart. This resulted in a more distributed structure and lower clustering coefficient at the network level. These effects reinforce and extend oxytocin's role in collective behavior, social organization, and the evolution of group-based sociality across taxa.
Publication Date: 2024-06-24 PubMed ID: 39071893PubMed Central: PMC11277748DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110356Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates how the hormone oxytocin impacts the social organization of horse groups, finding it encourages a more evenly distributed social structure.

Objective of the Study

The researchers in this study aim to understand how the hormone oxytocin, which is often connected with social bonding and cohesion, influences the group-level social organization of horses. They conducted the study with 5 groups of horses (total 58 horses: 12 mares and 46 geldings).

Methodology

  • The researchers administered exogenous intranasal oxytocin, an artificially-created version of the hormone, to the horses.
  • They used GPS tracking devices and social network analysis to study the impact of the hormone on the horses’ movement and social interactions.

Findings

  • The study found that oxytocin reduced differences across social levels. This means that interactions among the horses became more evenly distributed following the introduction of oxytocin.
  • The hormone also altered existing social preferences among the horses. Instead of strengthening existing bonds, oxytocin led horses who rarely interacted to spend more time together. Conversely, horses who often associated with each other spent more time apart after oxytocin was introduced.
  • Overall, the hormone led to a more distributed social structure among the horses and reduced clustering at the network level.

Significance of the Study

This investigation’s findings lend empirical support to the idea that oxytocin plays a crucial part in group cohesion and social organization among species. The researchers posit that this study contributes to our understanding of oxytocin’s role in collective behavior, social organization, as well as the evolution of group-based sociality across different species (taxa).

Cite This Article

APA
Brooks J, Maeda T, Ringhofer M, Yamamoto S. (2024). Oxytocin homogenizes horse group organization. iScience, 27(7), 110356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.110356

Publication

ISSN: 2589-0042
NlmUniqueID: 101724038
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 27
Issue: 7
Pages: 110356
PII: 110356

Researcher Affiliations

Brooks, James
  • Institute for Advanced Study, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Maeda, Tamao
  • Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Research Center for Integrative Evolutionary Science, The Graduate University of Advanced Science (SOKENDAI), Hayama, Japan.
Ringhofer, Monamie
  • Department of Animal Sciences, Teikyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Yamamoto, Shinya
  • Institute for Advanced Study, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Conflict of Interest Statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 90 references
  1. De Dreu C.K.W.. Oxytocin modulates cooperation within and competition between groups: An integrative review and research agenda.. Horm. Behav. 2012;61:419–428.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.009pubmed: 22227278google scholar: lookup
  2. De Dreu C.K.W., Kret M.E.. Oxytocin Conditions Intergroup Relations Through Upregulated In-Group Empathy, Cooperation, Conformity, and Defense.. Biol. Psychiatry 2016;79:165–173.
  3. Triki Z., Daughters K., De Dreu C.K.W.. Oxytocin has ‘tend-and-defend’ functionality in group conflict across social vertebrates.. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2022;377.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0137pmc: PMC8977669pubmed: 35369742google scholar: lookup
  4. Stallen M., De Dreu C.K.W., Shalvi S., Smidts A., Sanfey A.G.. The herding hormone: oxytocin stimulates in-group conformity.. Psychol. Sci. 2012;23:1288–1292.
    doi: 10.1177/0956797612446026pubmed: 22991128google scholar: lookup
  5. Lemoine S.R.T., Samuni L., Crockford C., Wittig R.M.. Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism.. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2022;377.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0149pmc: PMC8977654pubmed: 35369746google scholar: lookup
  6. Brooks J., Yamamoto S.. The evolution of group-mindedness: comparative research on top-down and bottom-up group cooperation in bonobos and chimpanzees.. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2022;47.
  7. Kirsch P., Esslinger C., Chen Q., Mier D., Lis S., Siddhanti S., Gruppe H., Mattay V.S., Gallhofer B., Meyer-Lindenberg A.. Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans.. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:11489–11493.
  8. Fuchs A.-R., Fuchs F.. Endocrinology of human parturition: a review.. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1984;91:948–967.
  9. Feldman R.. Oxytocin and social affiliation in humans.. Horm. Behav. 2012;61:380–391.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.01.008pubmed: 22285934google scholar: lookup
  10. Kendrick K.M., Guastella A.J., Becker B.. Overview of Human Oxytocin Research. Behavioral Pharmacology of Neuropeptides: Oxytocin Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 2018;pp. 321–348.
    doi: 10.1007/7854_2017_19pubmed: 28864976google scholar: lookup
  11. Nagasawa M., Mitsui S., En S., Ohtani N., Ohta M., Sakuma Y., Onaka T., Mogi K., Kikusui T.. Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds.. Science 2015;348:333–336.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1261022pubmed: 25883356google scholar: lookup
  12. Romero T., Nagasawa M., Mogi K., Hasegawa T., Kikusui T.. Oxytocin promotes social bonding in dogs.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014;111:9085–9090.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322868111pmc: PMC4078815pubmed: 24927552google scholar: lookup
  13. Lim M.M., Young L.J.. Neuropeptidergic regulation of affiliative behavior and social bonding in animals.. Horm. Behav. 2006;50:506–517.
    doi: 10.1016/J.YHBEH.2006.06.028pubmed: 16890230google scholar: lookup
  14. Walum H., Young L.J.. The neural mechanisms and circuitry of the pair bond.. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018;19:643–654.
    doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0072-6pmc: PMC6283620pubmed: 30301953google scholar: lookup
  15. Brooks J., Kano F., Yeow H., Morimura N., Yamamoto S.. Testing the effect of oxytocin on social grooming in bonobos.. Am. J. Primatol. 2022;84.
    doi: 10.1002/ajp.23444pubmed: 36214311google scholar: lookup
  16. Crockford C., Wittig R.M., Langergraber K., Ziegler T.E., Zuberbühler K., Deschner T.. Urinary oxytocin and social bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees.. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2013;280.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2765pmc: PMC3574389pubmed: 23345575google scholar: lookup
  17. Wittig R.M., Crockford C., Deschner T., Langergraber K.E., Ziegler T.E., Zuberbühler K.. Food sharing is linked to urinary oxytocin levels and bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees.. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014;281.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3096pmc: PMC3906952pubmed: 24430853google scholar: lookup
  18. De Dreu C.K.W., Greer L.L., Van Kleef G.A., Shalvi S., Handgraaf M.J.J.. Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011;108:1262–1266.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015316108pmc: PMC3029708pubmed: 21220339google scholar: lookup
  19. Ma X., Luo L., Geng Y., Zhao W., Zhang Q., Kendrick K.M.. Oxytocin increases liking for a country’s people and national flag but not for other cultural symbols or consumer products.. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2014;8:266.
    doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00266pmc: PMC4122242pubmed: 25140135google scholar: lookup
  20. Zhang H., Gross J., De Dreu C., Ma Y.. Oxytocin promotes synchronized out-group attack during intergroup conflict in humans.. Elife 2018;8:1–38.
    doi: 10.7554/eLife.40698pmc: PMC6347450pubmed: 30681410google scholar: lookup
  21. Samuni L., Preis A., Deschner T., Wittig R.M., Crockford C.. Cortisol and oxytocin show independent activity during chimpanzee intergroup conflict.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019;104:165–173.
  22. Samuni L., Preis A., Deschner T., Crockford C., Wittig R.M.. Reward of labor coordination and hunting success in wild chimpanzees.. Commun. Biol. 2018;1:138.
    doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0142-3pmc: PMC6131550pubmed: 30272017google scholar: lookup
  23. Samuni L., Preis A., Mundry R., Deschner T., Crockford C., Wittig R.M.. Oxytocin reactivity during intergroup conflict in wild chimpanzees.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017;114:268–273.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616812114pmc: PMC5240673pubmed: 28028227google scholar: lookup
  24. Wirobski G., Range F., Graat E.A.M., Palme R., Deschner T., Marshall-Pescini S.. Similar behavioural but different endocrine responses to conspecific interactions in hand-raised wolves and dogs.. iScience 2023;26.
    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.105978pmc: PMC9900400pubmed: 36756369google scholar: lookup
  25. Brooks J., Kano F., Kawaguchi Y., Yamamoto S.. Oxytocin promotes species-relevant outgroup attention in bonobos and chimpanzees.. Horm. Behav. 2022;143.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105182pubmed: 35537292google scholar: lookup
  26. Calcagnoli F., de Boer S.F., Beiderbeck D.I., Althaus M., Koolhaas J.M., Neumann I.D.. Local oxytocin expression and oxytocin receptor binding in the male rat brain is associated with aggressiveness.. Behav. Brain Res. 2014;261:315–322.
    doi: 10.1016/J.BBR.2013.12.050pubmed: 24406721google scholar: lookup
  27. Gulevich R., Kozhemyakina R., Shikhevich S., Konoshenko M., Herbeck Y.. Aggressive behavior and stress response after oxytocin administration in male Norway rats selected for different attitudes to humans.. Physiol. Behav. 2019;199:210–218.
    doi: 10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2018.11.030pubmed: 30472394google scholar: lookup
  28. Hattori T., Kanno K., Nagasawa M., Nishimori K., Mogi K., Kikusui T.. Impairment of interstrain social recognition during territorial aggressive behavior in oxytocin receptor-null mice.. Neurosci. Res. 2015;90:90–94.
    doi: 10.1016/J.NEURES.2014.05.003pubmed: 24929102google scholar: lookup
  29. Madden J.R., Clutton-Brock T.H.. Experimental peripheral administration of oxytocin elevates a suite of cooperative behaviours in a wild social mammal.. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2011;278:1189–1194.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1675pmc: PMC3049071pubmed: 20926437google scholar: lookup
  30. Burkhart J.C., Gupta S., Borrego N., Heilbronner S.R., Packer C.. Oxytocin promotes social proximity and decreases vigilance in groups of African lions.. iScience 2022;25.
    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104049pmc: PMC9042884pubmed: 35496998google scholar: lookup
  31. Robinson K.J., Twiss S.D., Hazon N., Moss S., Pomeroy P.P.. Positive social behaviours are induced and retained after oxytocin manipulations mimicking endogenous concentrations in a wild mammal.. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2017;284.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0554pmc: PMC5454273pubmed: 28539519google scholar: lookup
  32. Mooney S.J., Douglas N.R., Holmes M.M.. Peripheral administration of oxytocin increases social affiliation in the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Horm. Behav. 2014;65:380–385.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.02.003pubmed: 24530845google scholar: lookup
  33. Goodson J.L., Schrock S.E., Klatt J.D., Kabelik D., Kingsbury M.A.. Mesotocin and Nonapeptide Receptors Promote Estrildid Flocking Behavior.. Science 2009;325:862–866.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1174929pmc: PMC2862247pubmed: 19679811google scholar: lookup
  34. Duque J.F., Leichner W., Ahmann H., Stevens J.R.. Mesotocin influences pinyon jay prosociality.. Biol. Lett. 2018;14.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0105pmc: PMC5938566pubmed: 29643220google scholar: lookup
  35. Ataei Mehr B., Garner S.R., Neff B.D.. Effect of isotocin on shoaling behaviour of the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Anim. Cogn. 2020;23:827–831.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01381-4pubmed: 32303866google scholar: lookup
  36. Braida D., Donzelli A., Martucci R., Capurro V., Busnelli M., Chini B., Sala M.. Neurohypophyseal hormones manipulation modulate social and anxiety-related behavior in zebrafish.. Psychopharmacology 2012;220:319–330.
    doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2482-2pubmed: 21956239google scholar: lookup
  37. Lindeyer C.M., Langen E.M., Swaney W.T., Reader S.M.. Nonapeptide influences on social behaviour: effects of vasotocin and isotocin on shoaling and interaction in zebrafish.. Beyond Behav. 2015;152:897–915.
    doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003261google scholar: lookup
  38. Reddon A.R., Voisin M.R., O’Connor C., Balshine S.. Isotocin and sociality in the cooperatively breeding cichlid fish, Neolamprologus pulcher.. Beyond Behav. 2014;151:1389–1411.
    doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003190google scholar: lookup
  39. Thompson R.R., Walton J.C.. Peptide Effects on Social Behavior: Effects of Vasotocin and Isotocin on Social Approach Behavior in Male Goldfish (Carassius auratus). Behav. Neurosci. 2004;118:620–626.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.3.620pubmed: 15174940google scholar: lookup
  40. Ramsey M.E., Fry D., Cummings M.E.. Isotocin increases female avoidance of males in a coercive mating system: Assessing the social salience hypothesis of oxytocin in a fish species.. Horm. Behav. 2019;112:1–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.03.001pubmed: 30902535google scholar: lookup
  41. Sigurjónsdóttir H., Snorrason S., van Dierendonck M., Thórhallsdóttir A.. Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion.. Beyond Behav. 2003;140:783–804.
  42. Maeda T., Ochi S., Ringhofer M., Sosa S., Sueur C., Hirata S., Yamamoto S.. Aerial drone observations identified a multilevel society in feral horses.. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:71.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79790-1pmc: PMC7794487pubmed: 33420148google scholar: lookup
  43. Maeda T., Sueur C., Hirata S., Yamamoto S.. Behavioural synchronization in a multilevel society of feral horses.. PLoS One 2021;16.
  44. Mendonça R.S., Pinto P., Inoue S., Ringhofer M., Godinho R., Hirata S.. Social determinants of affiliation and cohesion in a population of feral horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;245.
  45. Stanley C.R., Mettke-Hofmann C., Hager R., Shultz S.. Social stability in semiferal ponies: networks show interannual stability alongside seasonal flexibility.. Anim. Behav. 2018;136:175–184.
  46. Ozogány K., Kerekes V., Fülöp A., Barta Z., Nagy M.. Fine-scale collective movements reveal present, past and future dynamics of a multilevel society in Przewalski’s horses.. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:5096.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40523-3pmc: PMC10480438pubmed: 37669934google scholar: lookup
  47. Librado P., Khan N., Fages A., Kusliy M.A., Suchan T., Tonasso-Calvière L., Schiavinato S., Alioglu D., Fromentier A., Perdereau A.. The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes.. Nature 2021;598:634–640.
    doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04018-9pmc: PMC8550961pubmed: 34671162google scholar: lookup
  48. Hare B.. Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality.. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2017;68:155–186.
    pubmed: 27732802
  49. Hance S.R., Noble J., Holcomb S., Rush-Moore B., Beard W.. Treating Choke with Oxytocin. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the AAEP 1997;Vol. 43.
  50. Rigby S., Hill J., Miller C., Thompson J., Varner D., Blanchard T.. Administration of oxytocin immediately after insemination does not improve pregnancy rates in mares bred by fertile or subfertile stallions.. Theriogenology 1999;51:1143–1150.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)80017-Xpubmed: 10729032google scholar: lookup
  51. Wooldridge A.A., Eades S.C., Hosgood G.L., Moore R.M.. Effects of treatment with oxytocin, xylazine butorphanol, guaifenesin, acepromazine, and detomidine on esophageal manometric pressure in conscious horses.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2002;63:1738–1744.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1738pubmed: 12492291google scholar: lookup
  52. Keith A.. Social Bonding in Horses : Linking Physiology, Behaviour & Reproductive Success. 2019.
  53. Stroeymeyt N., Grasse A.V., Crespi A., Mersch D.P., Cremer S., Keller L.. Social network plasticity decreases disease transmission in a eusocial insect.. Science 2018;362:941–945.
    doi: 10.1126/science.aat4793pubmed: 30467168google scholar: lookup
  54. Hoppitt W.J., Farine D.R.. Association indices for quantifying social relationships: how to deal with missing observations of individuals or groups.. Anim. Behav. 2018;136:227–238.
  55. Csardi G., Nepusz T.. The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research.. Inter. J. Complex Syst. 2005;1695.
  56. Clemente G.P., Grassi R.. DirectedClustering: A Package for computing Clustering coefficient in weighted and directed networks.. 2018.
  57. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.. 2019.
  58. Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S.. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using {lme4.. J. Stat. Software 2015;67:1–48.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01google scholar: lookup
  59. Momennejad I.. Collective minds: social network topology shapes collective cognition.. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2022;377.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0315pmc: PMC8666914pubmed: 34894735google scholar: lookup
  60. Gould R.V.. Collective Action and Network Structure.. Am. Socio. Rev. 1993;58:182–196.
    doi: 10.2307/2095965google scholar: lookup
  61. Marwell G., Oliver P.E., Prahl R.. Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. III.. Am. J. Sociol. 1988;94:502–534.
    doi: 10.1086/229028google scholar: lookup
  62. Derex M., Boyd R.. Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016;113:2982–2987.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518798113pmc: PMC4801235pubmed: 26929364google scholar: lookup
  63. Brosnan S.F., Talbot C.F., Essler J.L., Leverett K., Flemming T., Dougall P., Heyler C., Zak P.J.. Oxytocin reduces food sharing in capuchin monkeys by modulating social distance.. Beyond Behav. 2015;152:941–961.
    doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003268google scholar: lookup
  64. Gamer M., Zurowski B., Büchel C.. Different amygdala subregions mediate valence-related and attentional effects of oxytocin in humans.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010;107:9400–9405.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000985107pmc: PMC2889107pubmed: 20421469google scholar: lookup
  65. Beauchamp G.. Social Predation: How Group Living Benefits Predators and Prey.. 2013.
  66. Hamilton W.D.. Geometry for the selfish herd.. J. Theor. Biol. 1971;31:295–311.
    doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5pubmed: 5104951google scholar: lookup
  67. Smith A.S., Ågmo A., Birnie A.K., French J.A.. Manipulation of the oxytocin system alters social behavior and attraction in pair-bonding primates, Callithrix penicillata.. Horm. Behav. 2010;57:255–262.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.12.004pmc: PMC2824532pubmed: 20025881google scholar: lookup
  68. Anpilov S., Shemesh Y., Benjamin A., Biagini T., Sztainberg Y., Richter-Levin A., Forkosh O., Chen A.. Group social dynamics in a semi-natural setup reveal an adaptive value for aggression in male mice.. bioRxiv 2024.
    doi: 10.1101/2024.04.25.591070google scholar: lookup
  69. Li S., Ma S., Wang D., Zhang H., Li Y., Wang J., Li J., Zhang B., Gross J., De Dreu C.K.W.. Oxytocin and the punitive hub — Dynamic spread of cooperation in human social networks.. J. Neurosci. 2022;42:5930–5943.
  70. Insel T.R., Young L.J.. Neuropeptides and the evolution of social behavior.. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2000;10:784–789.
    doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00146-Xpubmed: 11240290google scholar: lookup
  71. Hammock E.A.D., Young L.J.. Microsatellite instability generates diversity in brain and sociobehavioral traits.. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2005;308:1630–1634.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1111427pubmed: 15947188google scholar: lookup
  72. Insel T.R., Shapiro L.E.. Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992;89:5981–5985.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5981pmc: PMC402122pubmed: 1321430google scholar: lookup
  73. Brooks J., Kano F., Sato Y., Yeow H., Morimura N., Nagasawa M., Kikusui T., Yamamoto S.. Divergent effects of oxytocin on eye contact in bonobos and chimpanzees.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2021;125.
  74. Wagner B.K., Relling A.E., Kieffer J.D., Moraes L.E., Parker A.J.. Short communication: pharmacokinetics of oxytocin administered intranasally to beef cattle.. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2020;71.
  75. Parr L.A., Modi M., Siebert E., Young L.J., Rd G.. Intranasal oxytocin selectively attenuates rhesus monkeys’ attention to negative facial expressions.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013;38:1748–1756.
  76. Bauman M.D., Murai T., Hogrefe C.E., Platt M.L.. Opportunities and challenges for intranasal oxytocin treatment studies in nonhuman primates.. Am. J. Primatol. 2018;80:e22913–e22918.
    doi: 10.1002/ajp.22913pmc: PMC6690341pubmed: 30281820google scholar: lookup
  77. MacDonald E., Dadds M.R., Brennan J.L., Williams K., Levy F., Cauchi A.J.. A review of safety, side-effects and subjective reactions to intranasal oxytocin in human research.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2011;36:1114–1126.
  78. Ebitz R.B., Watson K.K., Platt M.L.. Oxytocin blunts social vigilance in the rhesus macaque.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013;110:11630–11635.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305230110pmc: PMC3710816pubmed: 23798448google scholar: lookup
  79. Jiang Y., Platt M.L.. Oxytocin and vasopressin flatten dominance hierarchy and enhance behavioral synchrony in part via anterior cingulate cortex.. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:8201–8214.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25607-1pmc: PMC5974023pubmed: 29844336google scholar: lookup
  80. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S.. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.. J. Stat. Soft. 2019;67:1–48.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01google scholar: lookup
  81. Csardi G., Nepusz T.. The igraph software package for complex network research.. Inter. J. Complex Syst. 2006;1695.
  82. James R.. A network primer. Animal Social Networks 2015;pp. 5–8.
  83. Barrat A., Barthélemy M., Pastor-Satorras R., Vespignani A.. The architecture of complex weighted networks.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004;101:3747–3752.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400087101pmc: PMC374315pubmed: 15007165google scholar: lookup
  84. Newman M.E.J.. Modularity and community structure in Networks.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006;103:8577–8582.
    pmc: PMC1482622pubmed: 16723398
  85. Lancichinetti A., Fortunato S.. Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis.. Phys. Rev. 2009;80.
    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.056117pubmed: 20365053google scholar: lookup
  86. Blondel V.D., Guillaume J.L., Lambiotte R., Lefebvre E.. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks.. J. Stat. Mech. 2008;2008:P10008.
  87. Newman M.E.J.. Mixing patterns in networks - art. no. 026126.. Phys. Rev. 2003;67.
    pubmed: 12636767
  88. Hart J.D.A., Weiss M.N., Brent L.J.N., Franks D.W.. Common Permutation Methods in Animal Social Network Analysis Do Not Control for Non-independence.. bioRxiv 2022.
    doi: 10.1101/2021.06.04.447124pmc: PMC9617964pubmed: 36325506google scholar: lookup
  89. Boyland N.K., Mlynski D.T., James R., Brent L.J., Croft D.P.. The social network structure of a dynamic group of dairy cows: From individual to group level patterns.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;174:1–10.
  90. Brooks J., Onishi E., Clark I.R., Bohn M., Yamamoto S.. Uniting against a common enemy: Perceived outgroup threat elicits ingroup cohesion in chimpanzees.. PLoS One 2021;16.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.