Analyze Diet
Injury1989; 20(4); 189-192; doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90108-3

Performance of horse-riding helmets in frontal and side impacts.

Abstract: Cases of head injury are reviewed in which riders wearing jockey skull caps have suffered impacts to the front, back or side of their helmets. The design and constructional materials of such helmets are assessed. Impact tests that simulate the accidents confirm the low energy absorption potential of some helmets for lateral impacts. Most pedal or motorcycle helmet designs afford better lateral impact protection.
Publication Date: 1989-07-01 PubMed ID: 2592089DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90108-3Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article evaluates the effectiveness of horse-riding helmets during frontal and side impacts, with a focus on those with designs similar to jockey skull caps. The study appraises the design and materials, highlighting a shortfall in energy absorption during side impacts.

Objective and Methodology

  • The goal of this research was to give an account of the performance of horse-riding helmets during accidents, particularly frontal and side impacts.
  • As part of the methodology, real-world examples of head injuries where riders with jockey-style helmets were involved in frontal, side, or rear impacts were taken into consideration.
  • Based on these real-world examples, testing was conducted to simulate the same scenarios. This helped ascertain the efficacy of these helmets in absorbing impact energy.

Findings

  • Findings from this research suggest that some helmets used in horse-riding offer low energy absorption potential during side or lateral impacts.
  • Though the helmets were able to handle frontal impacts to an extent, the material and design did not hold up as well under side impacts.

Comparison with Other Helmets

  • The research also draws comparisons with other helmets used in activities such as cycling or motorcycle riding.
  • Most designs of pedal or motorcycle helmets were found to offer better protection during lateral impacts, suggesting that the design principles of these helmets may be better suited for such impacts.

Implications

  • The study points towards potential improvements in horse-riding helmet design in order to increase safety and minimize head injuries during side impacts.
  • It also opens up a discussion on the need for more rigorous standards for horse-riding helmets, perhaps drawing from the design insights gained from other helmet types.

Cite This Article

APA
Mills NJ, Whitlock MD. (1989). Performance of horse-riding helmets in frontal and side impacts. Injury, 20(4), 189-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(89)90108-3

Publication

ISSN: 0020-1383
NlmUniqueID: 0226040
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 20
Issue: 4
Pages: 189-192

Researcher Affiliations

Mills, N J
  • School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham.
Whitlock, M D

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Athletic Injuries / prevention & control
    • Craniocerebral Trauma / prevention & control
    • Equipment Design
    • Head Protective Devices
    • Horses
    • Humans
    • Protective Devices

    Citations

    This article has been cited 9 times.
    1. McCrory P, Turner M, LeMasson B, Bodere C, Allemandou A. An analysis of injuries resulting from professional horse racing in France during 1991-2001: a comparison with injuries resulting from professional horse racing in Great Britain during 1992-2001. Br J Sports Med 2006 Jul;40(7):614-8.
      doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.028449pubmed: 16687479google scholar: lookup
    2. Turner M, McCrory P, Halley W. Injuries in professional horse racing in Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland during 1992-2000. Br J Sports Med 2002 Dec;36(6):403-9.
      doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.6.403pubmed: 12453834google scholar: lookup
    3. Moss PS, Wan A, Whitlock MR. A changing pattern of injuries to horse riders. Emerg Med J 2002 Sep;19(5):412-4.
      doi: 10.1136/emj.19.5.412pubmed: 12204987google scholar: lookup
    4. Clements K, Yates B, Curran M. The prevalence of chronic knee injury in triathletes. Br J Sports Med 1999 Jun;33(3):214-6.
      doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.3.214pubmed: 10378077google scholar: lookup
    5. Whitlock MR. Injuries to riders in the cross country phase of eventing: the importance of protective equipment. Br J Sports Med 1999 Jun;33(3):212-4.
      doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.3.212pubmed: 10378076google scholar: lookup
    6. Paix BR. Rider injury rates and emergency medical services at equestrian events. Br J Sports Med 1999 Feb;33(1):46-8.
      doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.1.46pubmed: 10027058google scholar: lookup
    7. Munro J, Coleman P, Nicholl J, Harper R, Kent G, Wild D. Can we prevent accidental injury to adolescents? A systematic review of the evidence. Inj Prev 1995 Dec;1(4):249-55.
      doi: 10.1136/ip.1.4.249pubmed: 9346041google scholar: lookup
    8. Watt GM, Finch CF. Preventing equestrian injuries. Locking the stable door. Sports Med 1996 Sep;22(3):187-97.
    9. Bixby-Hammett D, Brooks WH. Common injuries in horseback riding. A review. Sports Med 1990 Jan;9(1):36-47.