Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and local tolerance at injection site of penicillin and gentamicin administered by intravenous regional limb perfusion in standing horses: comparison between weightbearing and flexed limbs.
Abstract: Intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP) of antibiotics is a therapeutic method used to treat distal limb infections in horses. The objectives of this study were to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters and tolerance of sodium benzylpenicillin (NaBP) administered via IVRLP; to compare the feasibility, tolerance, and efficacy of performing IVRLP on a flexed limb versus a weightbearing limb; and to predict the efficacy of IVRLP using gentamicin or NaBP. A prospective crossover study was conducted with six horses, each undergoing four phases of antibiotic infusion (gentamicin at 2.2 mg/kg vs. NaBP at 7,333 IU/kg of BP) and limb positioning (weightbearing vs. flexed). Each antibiotic administration was followed by serial synovial and blood sampling to assess antibiotic concentrations. Inflammation and sensitivity to palpation were evaluated at both the injection site and the sampled joint. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was carried out to predict the efficacy of IVRLP by estimating area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) index values for various minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Results: High synovial concentrations of NaBP and gentamicin were achieved, with notable variability between horses. NaBP IVRLP was well tolerated, although cephalic vein inflammation scores were significantly higher following NaBP infusion than gentamicin (p = 3.4 × 10). For all horses and both antibiotics, synovial antibiotic exposures were significantly greater in weightbearing limbs than in flexed limbs (p = 0.04 and 0.02 for NaBP and gentamicin, respectively). Cephalic vein inflammation scores were also significantly lower in weightbearing limbs than in flexed limbs (p = 2.5 × 10). In terms of predicted efficacy, a daily dose of 2.2 mg/kg gentamicin should be adequate to treat synovial infections involving Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus, including resistant strains. For NaBP, a daily or every-other-day dose of 7,333 IU/kg of BP should be adequate to treat infections caused by Streptococcus equi and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusions: These findings suggest that daily IVRLP with NaBP (7,333 IU/kg of BP) could be an effective treatment for distal limb infections caused by susceptible bacteria with a MIC of ≤ 2 µg/mL, with only mild local inflammation at the injection site. IVRLP with 2.2 mg/kg gentamicin appears effective for treating infections involving susceptible bacteria with an MIC of ≤ 16 µg/mL. Performing IVRLP on a weightbearing limb resulted in higher antibiotic exposure in the metacarpophalangeal joint and better tolerance than the flexed limb method.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Research Overview
This study investigates the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and local tolerance of penicillin and gentamicin antibiotics administered via intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP) in horses.
It compares the effects and feasibility of IVRLP when performed on weightbearing versus flexed limbs to treat distal limb infections.
Background and Objectives
Intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP): A technique used to deliver high concentrations of antibiotics directly to the distal limbs of horses, targeting infections effectively.
Antibiotics studied: Sodium benzylpenicillin (NaBP) and gentamicin.
Main goals:
Determine the pharmacokinetics (drug behavior within the body) and local tolerance (side effects at the injection site) of NaBP via IVRLP.
Compare IVRLP performed on a weightbearing limb versus a flexed limb regarding ease, safety, and antibiotic delivery.
Predict the effectiveness of gentamicin and NaBP IVRLP based on pharmacodynamic parameters.
Methods
Study design: Prospective crossover with six standing horses.
Each horse underwent four IVRLP phases combining two antibiotics (gentamicin at 2.2 mg/kg and NaBP at 7,333 IU/kg) with two limb positions (weightbearing and flexed).
After each antibiotic administration:
Synovial (joint fluid) and blood samples were collected at multiple time points to measure drug concentrations.
Local inflammation and sensitivity at the injection site and sampled joint were assessed.
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling was used to estimate efficacy by calculating the area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio for different MIC values.
Key Results
Antibiotic concentrations:
Both NaBP and gentamicin achieved high synovial fluid concentrations, though there was significant variability between horses.
Synovial antibiotic exposure was significantly higher when IVRLP was performed on weightbearing limbs compared to flexed limbs (p=0.04 for NaBP, p=0.02 for gentamicin).
Local tolerance:
NaBP IVRLP was generally well tolerated but caused more cephalic vein inflammation than gentamicin (statistically significant difference).
Inflammation scores at the cephalic vein were significantly lower in weightbearing limbs than flexed limbs (p=2.5×10⁻³), indicating better local tolerance with the weightbearing method.
Predicted efficacy based on PK/PD:
Gentamicin at 2.2 mg/kg is predicted to effectively treat synovial infections caused by bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, even some resistant strains (MIC ≤ 16 µg/mL).
NaBP at 7,333 IU/kg daily or every other day should be adequate against infections from Streptococcus equi and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains (MIC ≤ 2 µg/mL).
Conclusions and Clinical Implications
IVRLP using NaBP and gentamicin achieves high drug concentrations in the distal limb joints, essential for treating infections effectively.
Administering IVRLP with the horse’s limb weightbearing leads to:
Higher synovial concentrations of antibiotics.
Less local vein inflammation and better overall tolerance.
More feasible and potentially safer treatment compared to the flexed limb position.
NaBP at 7,333 IU/kg is a practical option for treating infections by bacteria susceptible at an MIC ≤ 2 µg/mL with mild local side effects.
Gentamicin at 2.2 mg/kg IVRLP may provide effective treatment for infections caused by more resistant bacterial strains with MICs up to 16 µg/mL.
The research supports the clinical use of daily IVRLP antibiotic administration directly in the distal limbs of standing horses, favoring weightbearing limb positioning for better outcomes.
Cite This Article
APA
Guillot M, Mespoulhes-Rivière C, Bousquet-Mélou A, Lacroix MZ, Roques BB, Lallemand EA.
(2025).
Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and local tolerance at injection site of penicillin and gentamicin administered by intravenous regional limb perfusion in standing horses: comparison between weightbearing and flexed limbs.
BMC Vet Res, 21(1), 650.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04936-0
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, CHUV-Equidés, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Mespoulhes-Rivière, Céline
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, ACAP3, Goustranville, F-14430, France.
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, F-94700, France.
Bousquet-Mélou, Alain
INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Lacroix, Marlène Z
INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Roques, Béatrice B
INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Lallemand, Elodie A
INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France. elodie.lallemand@envt.fr.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Horses
Gentamicins / pharmacokinetics
Gentamicins / administration & dosage
Gentamicins / pharmacology
Gentamicins / adverse effects
Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacokinetics
Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
Male
Cross-Over Studies
Female
Prospective Studies
Penicillin G / pharmacokinetics
Penicillin G / administration & dosage
Penicillin G / pharmacology
Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
Horse Diseases / drug therapy
Extremities
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study follows national and institutional guidelines for the humane treatment of animals and complies with relevant legislation in France. It was approved by the local ethics committee, Comité d’Éthique ComEth ANSES/ENVA/UPEC (Comité d’éthique Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail / École Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort / Université Paris-Est Créteil), as well as by the national institutional animal care and use committees (Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, APAFIS #34714-202201142131762 v5). The horses were privately owned by an individual who provided informed consent for their participation in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Consent to participate: Not applicable.
He S, Cheng Z, Xie F. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-guided gentamicin dosing in critically ill patients: a revisit of the Hartford nomogram. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2022;59(6):106600.
Toutain PL, Bousquet-Mélou A, Damborg P, Ferran AA, Mevius D, Pelligand L. En route towards European clinical breakpoints for veterinary antimicrobial susceptibility testing: A position paper explaining the VetCAST approach. Front Microbiol 2017;8:2344.
Toutain PL, Bousquet-Mélou A, Martinez M. AUC/MIC: a PK/PD index for antibiotics with a time dimension or simply a dimensionless scoring factor?. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60(6):1185–8.