Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2025; 21(1); 650; doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04936-0

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and local tolerance at injection site of penicillin and gentamicin administered by intravenous regional limb perfusion in standing horses: comparison between weightbearing and flexed limbs.

Abstract: Intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP) of antibiotics is a therapeutic method used to treat distal limb infections in horses. The objectives of this study were to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters and tolerance of sodium benzylpenicillin (NaBP) administered via IVRLP; to compare the feasibility, tolerance, and efficacy of performing IVRLP on a flexed limb versus a weightbearing limb; and to predict the efficacy of IVRLP using gentamicin or NaBP. A prospective crossover study was conducted with six horses, each undergoing four phases of antibiotic infusion (gentamicin at 2.2 mg/kg vs. NaBP at 7,333 IU/kg of BP) and limb positioning (weightbearing vs. flexed). Each antibiotic administration was followed by serial synovial and blood sampling to assess antibiotic concentrations. Inflammation and sensitivity to palpation were evaluated at both the injection site and the sampled joint. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was carried out to predict the efficacy of IVRLP by estimating area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) index values for various minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Results: High synovial concentrations of NaBP and gentamicin were achieved, with notable variability between horses. NaBP IVRLP was well tolerated, although cephalic vein inflammation scores were significantly higher following NaBP infusion than gentamicin (p = 3.4 × 10). For all horses and both antibiotics, synovial antibiotic exposures were significantly greater in weightbearing limbs than in flexed limbs (p = 0.04 and 0.02 for NaBP and gentamicin, respectively). Cephalic vein inflammation scores were also significantly lower in weightbearing limbs than in flexed limbs (p = 2.5 × 10). In terms of predicted efficacy, a daily dose of 2.2 mg/kg gentamicin should be adequate to treat synovial infections involving Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus, including resistant strains. For NaBP, a daily or every-other-day dose of 7,333 IU/kg of BP should be adequate to treat infections caused by Streptococcus equi and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusions: These findings suggest that daily IVRLP with NaBP (7,333 IU/kg of BP) could be an effective treatment for distal limb infections caused by susceptible bacteria with a MIC of ≤ 2 µg/mL, with only mild local inflammation at the injection site. IVRLP with 2.2 mg/kg gentamicin appears effective for treating infections involving susceptible bacteria with an MIC of ≤ 16 µg/mL. Performing IVRLP on a weightbearing limb resulted in higher antibiotic exposure in the metacarpophalangeal joint and better tolerance than the flexed limb method.
Publication Date: 2025-11-07 PubMed ID: 41204239PubMed Central: PMC12595851DOI: 10.1186/s12917-025-04936-0Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Research Overview

  • This study investigates the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and local tolerance of penicillin and gentamicin antibiotics administered via intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP) in horses.
  • It compares the effects and feasibility of IVRLP when performed on weightbearing versus flexed limbs to treat distal limb infections.

Background and Objectives

  • Intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP): A technique used to deliver high concentrations of antibiotics directly to the distal limbs of horses, targeting infections effectively.
  • Antibiotics studied: Sodium benzylpenicillin (NaBP) and gentamicin.
  • Main goals:
    • Determine the pharmacokinetics (drug behavior within the body) and local tolerance (side effects at the injection site) of NaBP via IVRLP.
    • Compare IVRLP performed on a weightbearing limb versus a flexed limb regarding ease, safety, and antibiotic delivery.
    • Predict the effectiveness of gentamicin and NaBP IVRLP based on pharmacodynamic parameters.

Methods

  • Study design: Prospective crossover with six standing horses.
  • Each horse underwent four IVRLP phases combining two antibiotics (gentamicin at 2.2 mg/kg and NaBP at 7,333 IU/kg) with two limb positions (weightbearing and flexed).
  • After each antibiotic administration:
    • Synovial (joint fluid) and blood samples were collected at multiple time points to measure drug concentrations.
    • Local inflammation and sensitivity at the injection site and sampled joint were assessed.
  • Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling was used to estimate efficacy by calculating the area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio for different MIC values.

Key Results

  • Antibiotic concentrations:
    • Both NaBP and gentamicin achieved high synovial fluid concentrations, though there was significant variability between horses.
    • Synovial antibiotic exposure was significantly higher when IVRLP was performed on weightbearing limbs compared to flexed limbs (p=0.04 for NaBP, p=0.02 for gentamicin).
  • Local tolerance:
    • NaBP IVRLP was generally well tolerated but caused more cephalic vein inflammation than gentamicin (statistically significant difference).
    • Inflammation scores at the cephalic vein were significantly lower in weightbearing limbs than flexed limbs (p=2.5×10⁻³), indicating better local tolerance with the weightbearing method.
  • Predicted efficacy based on PK/PD:
    • Gentamicin at 2.2 mg/kg is predicted to effectively treat synovial infections caused by bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, even some resistant strains (MIC ≤ 16 µg/mL).
    • NaBP at 7,333 IU/kg daily or every other day should be adequate against infections from Streptococcus equi and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains (MIC ≤ 2 µg/mL).

Conclusions and Clinical Implications

  • IVRLP using NaBP and gentamicin achieves high drug concentrations in the distal limb joints, essential for treating infections effectively.
  • Administering IVRLP with the horse’s limb weightbearing leads to:
    • Higher synovial concentrations of antibiotics.
    • Less local vein inflammation and better overall tolerance.
    • More feasible and potentially safer treatment compared to the flexed limb position.
  • NaBP at 7,333 IU/kg is a practical option for treating infections by bacteria susceptible at an MIC ≤ 2 µg/mL with mild local side effects.
  • Gentamicin at 2.2 mg/kg IVRLP may provide effective treatment for infections caused by more resistant bacterial strains with MICs up to 16 µg/mL.
  • The research supports the clinical use of daily IVRLP antibiotic administration directly in the distal limbs of standing horses, favoring weightbearing limb positioning for better outcomes.

Cite This Article

APA
Guillot M, Mespoulhes-Rivière C, Bousquet-Mélou A, Lacroix MZ, Roques BB, Lallemand EA. (2025). Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and local tolerance at injection site of penicillin and gentamicin administered by intravenous regional limb perfusion in standing horses: comparison between weightbearing and flexed limbs. BMC Vet Res, 21(1), 650. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04936-0

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
Pages: 650
PII: 650

Researcher Affiliations

Guillot, Marguerite
  • Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, CHUV-Equidés, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Mespoulhes-Rivière, Céline
  • Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, ACAP3, Goustranville, F-14430, France.
  • Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, F-94700, France.
Bousquet-Mélou, Alain
  • INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Lacroix, Marlène Z
  • INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Roques, Béatrice B
  • INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Lallemand, Elodie A
  • INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France. elodie.lallemand@envt.fr.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Gentamicins / pharmacokinetics
  • Gentamicins / administration & dosage
  • Gentamicins / pharmacology
  • Gentamicins / adverse effects
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacokinetics
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Female
  • Prospective Studies
  • Penicillin G / pharmacokinetics
  • Penicillin G / administration & dosage
  • Penicillin G / pharmacology
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Extremities

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study follows national and institutional guidelines for the humane treatment of animals and complies with relevant legislation in France. It was approved by the local ethics committee, Comité d’Éthique ComEth ANSES/ENVA/UPEC (Comité d’éthique Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail / École Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort / Université Paris-Est Créteil), as well as by the national institutional animal care and use committees (Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, APAFIS #34714-202201142131762 v5). The horses were privately owned by an individual who provided informed consent for their participation in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Consent to participate: Not applicable.

References

This article includes 24 references
  1. Rubio-Martínez LM, Elmas CR, Black B, Monteith G. Clinical use of antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in horses: 174 cases (1999–2009).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012;241(12):1650–8.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.241.12.1650pubmed: 23216042google scholar: lookup
  2. Finsterbush A, Weinberg H. Venous perfusion of the limb with antibiotics for osteomyelitis and other chronic infections.. JBJS 1972;54(6):1227.
  3. Cruz AM, Rubio-Martinez L, Dowling T. New antimicrobials, systemic distribution, and local methods of antimicrobial delivery in horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2006;22(2):297–322. vii–viii.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2006.03.006pubmed: 16882477google scholar: lookup
  4. Rubio-Martínez LM, Cruz AM. Antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;228(5):706–12.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.228.5.706pubmed: 16506931google scholar: lookup
  5. Werner LA, Hardy J, Bertone AL. Bone gentamicin concentration after intra-articular injection or regional intravenous perfusion in the horse.. Vet Surg 2003;32(6):559–65.
  6. Whithair KJ, Bowersock TL, Blevins WE, Fessler JF, White MR, Van Sickle DC. Regional limb perfusion for antibiotic treatment of experimentally induced septic arthritis.. Vet Surg 1992;21(5):367–73.
  7. Nieto JE, Trela J, Stanley SD, Yamout S, Snyder JR. Pharmacokinetics of a combination of Amikacin sulfate and penicillin G sodium for intravenous regional limb perfusion in adult horses.. Can J Vet Res 2016;80(3):230–5.
    pmc: PMC4924558pubmed: 27408337
  8. Dahan R, Oreff GL, Tatz AJ, Raz T, Britzi M, Kelmer G. Pharmacokinetics of regional limb perfusion using a combination of Amikacin and penicillin in standing horses.. Can Vet J 2019;60(3):294–9.
    pmc: PMC6380264pubmed: 30872853
  9. Redding LE, Elzer EJ, Ortved KF. Effects of regional limb perfusion technique on concentrations of antibiotic achieved at the target site: A meta-analysis.. PLoS ONE 2022;17(4):e0265971.
  10. Kilcoyne I, Nieto JE. Orthopedic Infections-Clinical Applications of Intravenous Regional Limb Perfusion in the Field.. The Veterinary clinics of North America Equine practice 2021 Aug;37(2).
    pubmed: 34243876
  11. Lallemand E, Trencart P, Tahier C, Dron F, Paulin A, Tessier C. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and local tolerance at injection site of Marbofloxacin administered by regional intravenous limb perfusion in standing horses.. Vet Surg 2013;42(6):649–57.
  12. Lallemand EA, Bousquet-Mélou A, Chapuis L, Davis J, Ferran AA, Kukanich B. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic cutoff values for benzylpenicillin in horses to support the establishment of clinical breakpoints for benzylpenicillin antimicrobial susceptibility testing in horses.. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1282949.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1282949pmc: PMC10634207pubmed: 37954237google scholar: lookup
  13. Toutain P, Pelligand L, Lees P, Bousquet-Mélou A, Ferran AA, Turnidge JD. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic paradigm for antimicrobial drugs in veterinary medicine: Recent advances and critical appraisal.. J vet Pharmacol Therap 2021 Mar;44(2):172–200.
    pubmed: 33089523
  14. Levine DG, Epstein KL, Neelis DA, Ross MW. Effect of topical application of 1% diclofenac sodium liposomal cream on inflammation in healthy horses undergoing intravenous regional limb perfusion with Amikacin sulfate.. Am J Vet Res 2009;70(11):1323–5.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.11.1323pubmed: 19878013google scholar: lookup
  15. Plunkett AH, Schoonover MJ, Young JM, Taylor JD, Holbrook TC. Subtourniquet pressures generated by application of wide-rubber tourniquets in standing, sedated horses.. Vet Surg 2019;48(3):417–23.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13181pubmed: 30773652google scholar: lookup
  16. He S, Cheng Z, Xie F. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-guided gentamicin dosing in critically ill patients: a revisit of the Hartford nomogram. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2022;59(6):106600.
  17. Schoster A, Amsler M, Kirchgaessner C, Saleh L, Schwarzwald C, Schmitt S. Gentamicin plasma concentrations in hospitalized horses and retrospective minimal inhibitory concentrations of gram-negative equine pathogens. J Veterinary Emerg Crit Care 2021;31(3):323–30.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.13035pubmed: 33274835google scholar: lookup
  18. Toutain PL, Bousquet-Mélou A, Damborg P, Ferran AA, Mevius D, Pelligand L. En route towards European clinical breakpoints for veterinary antimicrobial susceptibility testing: A position paper explaining the VetCAST approach. Front Microbiol 2017;8:2344.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02344pmc: PMC5736858pubmed: 29326661google scholar: lookup
  19. Toutain PL, Bousquet-Mélou A, Martinez M. AUC/MIC: a PK/PD index for antibiotics with a time dimension or simply a dimensionless scoring factor?. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60(6):1185–8.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm360pubmed: 17932075google scholar: lookup
  20. Pezzanite L, Chow L, Piquini G, Griffenhagen G, Ramirez D, Dow S. Use of in vitro assays to identify antibiotics that are cytotoxic to normal equine chondrocytes and synovial cells. Equine Vet J 2021;53(3):579–89.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13314pmc: PMC7738387pubmed: 32544273google scholar: lookup
  21. Kadic DTN, Miagkoff L, Bonilla AG. Needle arthroscopy of the radiocarpal and middle carpal joints in standing sedated horses. Vet Surg 2020;49(5):894–904.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13430pubmed: 32333682google scholar: lookup
  22. Beccar-Varela AM, Epstein KL, White CL. Effect of experimentally induced synovitis on Amikacin concentrations after intravenous regional limb perfusion. Vet Surg 2011;40(7):891–7.
  23. Levine DG, Epstein KL, Ahern BJ, Richardson DW. Efficacy of three tourniquet types for intravenous antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in standing horses. Vet Surg 2010;39:1021–4.
  24. Takahashi Y, Igarashi M. Destination of aminoglycoside antibiotics in the ‘post-antibiotic era’. J Antibiot 2018;71:4–14.
    doi: 10.1038/ja.2017.117pubmed: 29066797google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.