Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2025; 54(8); 1537-1548; doi: 10.1111/vsu.70032

Plate fixation of small metacarpal and metatarsal bone fractures in 27 horses.

Abstract: To present fracture cases selected for plate fixation (PF), describe surgical techniques and assess their association with postoperative complications and return-to-work outcomes in horses undergoing PF for small metacarpal/metatarsal (SMCT) fractures. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study. Methods: A total of 27 horses. Methods: Horses treated with PF of a SMCT fracture between 2008 and 2023 across three hospitals were included. Medical records and imaging were reviewed. Long-term outcomes were established by readmission to the hospital, telephone interviews, and/or race records. Univariable and multivariable regression models evaluated variables associated with return to intended use. Results: PF of fractures was performed in 27 horses. Fractures were all in the proximal SMCT, with 20/27 (74.1%) articular, 22/27 (96.3%) comminuted, and 24/27 (81.5%) displaced. Of horses with follow-up, 19/25 (76%) returned to prior work level. Postoperative complications occurred in 9/27 (33.33%) horses. No individual explanatory variable was significantly associated with return to use in the univariable analysis. Racehorse earnings per start were lower postoperatively compared to preoperatively (p = .02). Conclusions: Most horses treated for SMCT fractures with PF returned to prior work level, although postoperative complications were common. None of the explanatory variables were significantly associated with return to use. Conclusions: PF for proximal SMCT fractures is effective, yielding high return-to-work rates and better outcomes than previously reported case series.
Publication Date: 2025-10-02 PubMed ID: 41036668PubMed Central: PMC12618157DOI: 10.1111/vsu.70032Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study examined the use of plate fixation (PF) to treat small metacarpal and metatarsal bone fractures in horses, analyzing surgical methods, complications, and how well horses returned to their prior levels of work or racing.
  • The research found that most horses successfully returned to their previous activity levels after surgery, despite a notable rate of postoperative complications, with outcomes better than those reported in earlier studies.

Study Objective and Design

  • The primary goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of plate fixation as a treatment method for small metacarpal and metatarsal (SMCT) fractures in horses.
  • The study aimed to describe surgical techniques used, assess the frequency and nature of postoperative complications, and determine factors influencing successful return to intended use (work or racing).
  • A retrospective multicenter approach was utilized, reviewing veterinary cases from three hospitals spanning 2008 to 2023.
  • Data sources included medical records, imaging studies, follow-up hospital visits, telephone interviews with horse owners/trainers, and race records to assess long-term outcomes.

Patient Population and Fracture Characteristics

  • Total of 27 horses treated with plate fixation for SMCT fractures were included.
  • All fractures were located in the proximal segment of the small metacarpal or metatarsal bones.
  • Fracture-specific details:
    • 74.1% (20/27) were articular fractures, meaning they involved the joint surface.
    • 96.3% (22/27) were comminuted fractures, indicating the bone was broken into multiple pieces.
    • 81.5% (24/27) were displaced fractures, meaning the broken bone ends were misaligned.

Surgical Technique and Follow-up

  • Plate fixation involved surgical stabilization of the fractured bone segments using metal plates designed for small fractures.
  • The surgical method was tailored for the proximal SMCT fractures considering their location and complexity.
  • Long-term follow-up was conducted through:
    • Monitoring hospital readmissions for complications or re-evaluation.
    • Telephone interviews with caretakers to assess recovery and use.
    • Reviewing official race records to determine if racehorses returned to competitive work.

Outcomes and Complications

  • Return to previous work level:
    • Out of 25 horses with follow-up data, 19 (76%) successfully returned to their prior level of work or activity.
  • Postoperative complications:
    • Complications occurred in 9 out of 27 cases (approximately 33.3%).
    • Details of specific complications were not provided, but this rate indicates that such issues are relatively common after PF in these fractures.
  • Effect on racing performance:
    • For racehorses, earnings per start post-surgery were statistically significantly lower than preoperative earnings (p = .02), indicating some reduction in economic performance after surgery.

Statistical Analysis and Factors Affecting Outcome

  • Univariable and multivariable regression models were used to explore factors that might predict return to intended use.
  • No individual explanatory variable (such as fracture type, displacement, or comminution) was found to be significantly associated with successful return to use.
  • This suggests that return to work is likely influenced by multiple factors or that the sample size limited detection of significant predictors.

Conclusions and Significance

  • Plate fixation for proximal SMCT fractures is a viable and effective surgical option in horses, providing a high rate of return to prior work activity.
  • The study’s outcomes demonstrate improved success compared to earlier case series, indicating advancements in surgical technique or case selection.
  • Despite the relatively high frequency of postoperative complications, the majority of horses recovered functionally.
  • The lack of clear predictive factors for return to work highlights the complexity of fracture healing and recovery in equine patients and suggests further research is needed.
  • Overall, PF should be considered a strong treatment choice for complex small metacarpal/metatarsal fractures in horses, especially for those intended to return to athletic use.

Cite This Article

APA
Melly V, Ortved KF, Stewart HL, Stefanovski D, Richardson DW, Bubeck KA, Hogan PM, García-López JM. (2025). Plate fixation of small metacarpal and metatarsal bone fractures in 27 horses. Vet Surg, 54(8), 1537-1548. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70032

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 54
Issue: 8
Pages: 1537-1548

Researcher Affiliations

Melly, Virginia
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Ortved, Kyla F
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stewart, Holly L
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stefanovski, Darko
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Richardson, Dean W
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bubeck, Kirstin A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.
Hogan, Patricia M
  • Hogan Equine at FairWinds Farm, Cream Ridge, New Jersey, USA.
García-López, José M
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / injuries
  • Horses / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Fractures, Bone / veterinary
  • Fractures, Bone / surgery
  • Bone Plates / veterinary
  • Female
  • Male
  • Metatarsal Bones / injuries
  • Metatarsal Bones / surgery
  • Metacarpal Bones / injuries
  • Metacarpal Bones / surgery
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / veterinary
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods
  • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
  • Treatment Outcome

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this report.

References

This article includes 17 references
  1. Richardson DW. Fractures of the small metacarpal and metatarsal bones. In: White NA, Moore JN, eds. Current Practice of Equine Surgery. Lippincott; 1990:636‐641.
  2. Jackson M, Fürst A, Hässig M, Auer J. Splint bone fractures in the horse: a retrospective study 1992‐2001. Equine Vet Educ 2007;19(6):329‐335.
    doi: 10.2746/095777307X207169google scholar: lookup
  3. Jenson PW, Gaughan EM, Lillich JD, Bryant JE. Segmental ostectomy of the second and fourth metacarpal and metatarsal bones in horses: 17 cases (1993–2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224(2):271‐274.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.224.271pubmed: 14736073google scholar: lookup
  4. Bowman KF, Evans LH, Herring ME. Evaluation of surgical removal of fractured distal splint bones in the horse. Vet Surg 1982;11(4):116‐120.
  5. Peterson PR, Pascoe JR, Wheat JD. Surgical management of proximal splint bone fractures in the horse. Vet Surg 1987;16(5):367‐372.
  6. Baxter GM, Doran RE, Allen D. Complete excision of a fractured fourth metatarsal bone in eight horses. Vet Surg 1992;21(4):273‐278.
  7. Trumble TN, Brown MP, Merritt JS. Effect of sequential removal of parts of the second metacarpal bone on the biomechanical stability of the equine carpus. Vet Surg 2012;41(6):747‐755.
  8. Sherlock CE, Archer RM. A retrospective study comparing conservative and surgical treatments of open comminuted fractures of the fourth metatarsal bone in horses. Equine Vet Educ 2008;20(7):373‐379.
    doi: 10.2746/095777308X329163google scholar: lookup
  9. American Association of Equine Practitioners. Guide for Veterinary Services and Judging of Equestrian Events. AAEP Monograph Vol 1; 1991.
  10. Sisson S, Grossman JD. The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 4th ed. W.B. Saunders; 1953.
  11. Bowman KF, Fackelman GE. Surgical treatment of complicated fractures of the splint bones in the horse. Vet Surg 1982;11(4):121‐124.
  12. Du Preez P. Fractures of the small metacarpal and metatarsal bones (splint bones). Equine Vet Educ 1994;6(5):279‐282.
  13. Lescun TB. Complications of splint bone fractures. In: Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ, eds. Complications in Equine Surgery. Wiley; 2021:718‐729.
  14. Auffret V, Bonilla AG. Standing surgical management of splint bone fractures in 13 horses: a comparison to management under general anaesthesia. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2023;36(3):148‐156.
    doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761241pubmed: 36758616google scholar: lookup
  15. Colgate V, Robinson N, Barnett T. Outcome and racing performance following standing fracture repair in 245 horses. Equine Vet J 2024;56(5):914‐923.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14016pubmed: 37803880google scholar: lookup
  16. Florin M, Arzdorf M, Linke B, Auer JA. Assessment of stiffness and strength of 4 different implants available for equine fracture treatment: a study on a 20° oblique long‐bone fracture model using a bone substitute. Vet Surg 2005;34(3):231‐238.
  17. James FM, Richardson DW. Minimally invasive plate fixation of lower limb injury in horses: 32 cases (1999‐2003). Equine Vet J 2010;38(3):246‐251.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406776866291pubmed: 16706280google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.