Analyze Diet
Scientific reports2025; 15(1); 43190; doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-24885-w

Quantitative holographic analysis in stallion spermatozoa following cryopreservation.

Abstract: This study employs Holographic tomography (HT) to examine structural and biophysical changes occurring during the cryopreservation of stallion sperm. HT is an advanced imaging technique that integrates digital holography with tomography to achieve three-dimensional, quantitative reconstructions of objects without the need for treatment or reporter dyes. By using refractive index (RI) intervals to represent specific structural regions of sperm cells, variations in optical density, surface area, volume, and dry mass across different cryopreservation extenders and donors have been quantified. Three main sperm components, (i) nuclear region, (ii) post-acrosomal region and midpiece and (iii) whole cell were identified and discriminated based on different RI. Our results revealed significant differences in volume of post-acrosomal region and midpiece among stallions as well as between fresh and frozen/thawed sperm, whereas no significant differences were observed between freezing extenders, aligning with our findings on sperm kinetics. A significant stallion-extender interaction underscores the need to personalize the sperm freezing process.
Publication Date: 2025-12-04 PubMed ID: 41345140PubMed Central: PMC12680650DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-24885-wGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study uses Holographic Tomography (HT), a cutting-edge imaging method, to analyze the detailed structural and biophysical changes that occur in stallion sperm cells during the process of cryopreservation (freezing and thawing).
  • It quantitatively measures variations in optical properties and morphological features of sperm cells from different stallions and freezing extenders, highlighting the importance of personalized approaches to sperm freezing.

Introduction to Holographic Tomography (HT)

  • HT combines digital holography with tomography to create three-dimensional, quantitative images without needing dyes or invasive treatments.
  • This allows non-destructive examination of living cells by measuring their refractive indices (RI), which correspond to cellular density and composition.
  • By using RI intervals, researchers can map specific sperm structural regions, such as the nucleus and midpiece, differentiating them based on optical density.

Objectives and Methods

  • To use HT for detailed, quantitative analysis of sperm cells before and after cryopreservation.
  • To identify changes in key parameters such as volume, surface area, dry mass, and refractive index distributions within sperm components.
  • To investigate the influence of different cryopreservation extenders and donors (different stallions) on sperm integrity and structure.

Key Components Analyzed

  • Nuclear region: The head part containing genetic material.
  • Post-acrosomal region and midpiece: Critical for energy production and fertilization processes.
  • Whole cell: The entire spermatozoon encompassing all subregions for comprehensive assessment.

Findings

  • Significant differences were observed in the volume of the post-acrosomal region and midpiece between fresh and frozen/thawed spermatozoa, indicating structural alterations due to cryopreservation.
  • Variability between different stallions was also noted, suggesting individual biological differences influence sperm response to freezing.
  • No significant differences were found between the different freezing extenders tested, which aligns with similar sperm kinetic (motility) results.
  • The interaction between stallion and extender was significant, pointing to the importance of personalized sperm freezing protocols tailored to individual stallions for optimal preservation.

Implications and Importance

  • The use of HT provides a powerful, label-free tool for monitoring the integrity of sperm cells during cryopreservation and assessing subtle structural changes that may impact fertility.
  • Findings emphasize that cryopreservation-induced damage is not uniform; it depends on both individual stallion characteristics and the preservation protocol used.
  • This suggests the necessity for customized cryopreservation approaches to improve post-thaw sperm quality and breeding success.
  • The methodology could be extended to other species or cell types where cryopreservation is essential.

Conclusions

  • Holographic Tomography effectively quantifies structural and biophysical changes in stallion sperm due to cryopreservation.
  • Distinct sperm regions can be discriminated using refractive index data, enhancing the understanding of cryoinjury location and degree.
  • Individual stallion variation and personalized extender choices both play a critical role in sperm preservation outcomes.
  • Future work should focus on optimizing cryopreservation protocols tailored to individual sperm characteristics to maximize fertility potential.

Cite This Article

APA
Ferrara MA, Preziosi G, Boni R, Ruggiero R, Gualandi SC. (2025). Quantitative holographic analysis in stallion spermatozoa following cryopreservation. Sci Rep, 15(1), 43190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24885-w

Publication

ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
Pages: 43190
PII: 43190

Researcher Affiliations

Ferrara, Maria Antonietta
  • Institute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems , Unit of Naples Italian National Research Council (ISASI-CNR) , Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131, Napoli, Italy. antonella.ferrara@na.isasi.cnr.it.
Preziosi, Graziano
  • Institute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems , Unit of Naples Italian National Research Council (ISASI-CNR) , Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131, Napoli, Italy.
Boni, Raffaele
  • Department of Basic and Applied Sciences (DiSBA), University of Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100, Potenza, Italy.
Ruggiero, Raffaella
  • Department of Basic and Applied Sciences (DiSBA), University of Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100, Potenza, Italy.
Gualandi, Stefano Cecchini
  • Department of Basic and Applied Sciences (DiSBA), University of Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100, Potenza, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Male
  • Cryopreservation / methods
  • Horses
  • Spermatozoa / cytology
  • Spermatozoa / physiology
  • Holography / methods
  • Semen Preservation / methods
  • Semen Preservation / veterinary

Grant Funding

  • PRIN EVIDENCE - code number: 2022ERKW4P - CUP MASTER: C53D23005260006 / Italian Ministry for University and Research (MUR)

Conflict of Interest Statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 36 references
  1. Aurich J, Kuhl J, Tichy A, Aurich C. Efficiency of semen cryopreservation in stallions.. (6), 1033 (2020).
    pmc: PMC7341245pubmed: 32545785
  2. Pasch L. Stallion semen cryopreservation: frozen semen preparation, handling and breeding.. 375–380 (2024).
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13943google scholar: lookup
  3. Prien S, Iacovides S. Cryoprotectants & cryopreservation of equine semen: A review of industry cryoprotectants and the effects of cryopreservation on equine semen membranes.. 1–8 (2016).
  4. Sieme H, Harrison R, Petrunkina A. Cryobiological determinants of frozen semen quality, with special reference to stallion.. 276–292 (2008).
  5. Trummer H, Tucker K, Young C, Kaula N, Meacham RB. Effect of storage temperature on sperm cryopreservation.. 1162–1164 (1998).
    doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00349-5pubmed: 9848311google scholar: lookup
  6. Contreras MJ. Cellular and molecular consequences of stallion sperm cryopreservation: recent approaches to improve sperm survival.. 104499 (2023).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104499pubmed: 37105416google scholar: lookup
  7. Morris GJ, Acton E, Murray BJ, Fonseca F. Freezing injury: the special case of the sperm cell.. 71–80 (2012).
  8. Al-Kass Z, Morrell JM. Freezing stallion Semen—What do we need to focus on for the future?. 65 (2024).
    pmc: PMC10893461pubmed: 38393083
  9. Talluri T. Effect of isolation protocols and cryoprotectants on freezing of stallion epididymal spermatozoa.. 134–141 (2023).
    doi: 10.54680/fr23310110312pubmed: 37883166google scholar: lookup
  10. Oldenhof H. Osmotic stress and membrane phase changes during freezing of stallion sperm: mode of action of cryoprotective agents.. 68, 61–11 (2013).
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.104661pubmed: 23325813google scholar: lookup
  11. Boni R. Stallion sperm freezing with different extenders: role of antioxidant activity and nitric oxide production.. (17), 2465 (2024).
    pmc: PMC11394550pubmed: 39272250
  12. Tischner M. Evaluation of deep-frozen semen in stallions.. 53–59 (1979).
    pubmed: 289832
  13. Catalán J. Seminal plasma antioxidants are related to sperm cryotolerance in the horse.. .
    doi: 10.3390/antiox11071279pmc: PMC9311553pubmed: 35883774google scholar: lookup
  14. Blottner S, Warnke C, Tuchscherer A, Heinen V, Torner H. Morphological and functional changes of stallion spermatozoa after cryopreservation during breeding and non-breeding season.. 75–88 (2001).
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00214-1pubmed: 11182510google scholar: lookup
  15. Atroshchenko MM. Reproductive Characteristics of Thawed Stallion Sperm.. .
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121099pmc: PMC6940853pubmed: 31818047google scholar: lookup
  16. O’connell M, Mcclure N, Lewis S. The effects of cryopreservation on sperm morphology, motility and mitochondrial function. 704–709 (2002).
    doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.3.704pubmed: 11870124google scholar: lookup
  17. Di Caprio G et al. Quantitative Label-Free animal sperm imaging by means of digital holographic microscopy. (4), 833–840 (2010).
  18. De Angelis A et al. Combined Raman and polarization sensitive holographic imaging for a multimodal label-free assessment of human sperm function. (1), 4823 (2019).
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41400-0pmc: PMC6423271pubmed: 30886325google scholar: lookup
  19. Dardikman-Yoffe G, Mirsky SK, Barnea I, Shaked NT. High-resolution 4-D acquisition of freely swimming human sperm cells without staining. (15), eaay7619 (2020).
    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay7619pmc: PMC7148098pubmed: 32300651google scholar: lookup
  20. Noy L et al. Sperm-cell DNA fragmentation prediction using label-free quantitative phase imaging and deep learning. (6), 470–478 (2023).
    doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.24703pubmed: 36333835google scholar: lookup
  21. Butola A et al. High spatially sensitive quantitative phase imaging assisted with deep neural network for classification of human spermatozoa under stressed condition. 13118 (2020).
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69857-4pmc: PMC7403412pubmed: 32753627google scholar: lookup
  22. Balasubramani V et al. Holographic tomography: techniques and biomedical applications [Invited]. B65–b80 (2021).
    doi: 10.1364/ao.416902pubmed: 33798138google scholar: lookup
  23. Jiang H et al. Reconstruction of bovine spermatozoa substances distribution and morphological differences between Holstein and Korean native cattle using three-dimensional refractive index tomography. 8774 (2019).
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45174-3pmc: PMC6584538pubmed: 31217533google scholar: lookup
  24. Blottner S, Warnke C, Tuchscherer A, Heinen V, Torner H. Morphological and functional changes of stallion spermatozoa after cryopreservation during breeding and non-breeding season. 75–88 (2001).
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00214-1pubmed: 11182510google scholar: lookup
  25. Davila MP et al. Mitochondrial ATP is required for the maintenance of membrane integrity in stallion spermatozoa, whereas motility requires both Glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. (6), 683–694 (2016).
    doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0409pubmed: 27798283google scholar: lookup
  26. Peña FJ et al. Redox regulation and glucose metabolism in the stallion spermatozoa. (2), 225 (2025).
    doi: 10.3390/antiox14020225pmc: PMC11852293pubmed: 40002411google scholar: lookup
  27. Loomis PR, Graham JK. Commercial semen freezing: individual male variation in cryosurvival and the response of stallion sperm to customized freezing protocols. (1–2), 119–128 (2008).
  28. Samper JC, Morris CA. Current methods for stallion semen cryopreservation: a survey. (5), 895–903 (1998).
    doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00039-9pubmed: 10732098google scholar: lookup
  29. Hoffmann N, Oldenhof H, Morandini C, Rohn K, Sieme H. Optimal concentrations of cryoprotective agents for semen from stallions that are classified ‘good’or ‘poor’for freezing. (1–4), 112–118 (2011).
  30. Carneiro JA, Canisso IF, Bandeira RS, Scheeren VFC, Freitas-Dell’Aqua CP, Alvarenga MA, Dell’Aqua Jr JA. Effects of coenzyme Q10 on semen cryopreservation of stallions classified as having good or bad semen freezing ability. Animal reproduction science 2018, 192, 107–118.
    pubmed: 29502896
  31. Di Palma T et al. Kinematic, bioenergetic and oxidative evaluations of Donkey sperm preserved at + 4°C. 300–307 (2020).
    doi: 10.1017/s096719942000012xpubmed: 32285764google scholar: lookup
  32. Nishikawa Y. Studies on the preservation of Raw and frozen horse semen. 99–104.
    pubmed: 1060880
  33. Sanmartín-Suárez C, Soto-Otero R, Sánchez-Sellero I, Méndez-Álvarez E. Antioxidant properties of dimethyl sulfoxide and its viability as a solvent in the evaluation of neuroprotective antioxidants. 209–215 (2011).
    doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.10.004pubmed: 21059397google scholar: lookup
  34. Kim D et al. Label-free high-resolution 3-D imaging of gold nanoparticles inside live cells using optical diffraction tomography. 160–167 (2018).
    doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.07.008pubmed: 28723583google scholar: lookup
  35. Jung J et al. Label-free non-invasive quantitative measurement of lipid contents in individual microalgal cells using refractive index tomography. 6524 (2018).
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24393-0pmc: PMC5916925pubmed: 29695726google scholar: lookup
  36. https://jasp-stats.org.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.