FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Biology of reproduction2023; 108(6); 887-901; doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioad041

Reprogramming efficiency and pluripotency of mule iPSCs over its parents†.

Abstract: The mule is the interspecific hybrid of horse and donkey and has hybrid vigor in muscular endurance, disease resistance, and longevity over its parents. Here, we examined adult fibroblasts of mule (MAFs) compared with the cells from their parents (donkey adult fibroblasts and horse adult fibroblasts) (each species has repeated three independent individuals) in proliferation, apoptosis, and glycolysis and found significant differences. We subsequently derived mule, donkey, and horse doxycycline (Dox)-independent induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSCs, diPSCs, and hiPSCs) from three independent individuals of each species and found that the reprogramming efficiency of MAFs was significantly higher than that of cells of donkey and horse. miPSCs, diPSCs, and hiPSCs all expressed the high levels of crucial endogenous pluripotency genes such as POU class 5 homeobox 1 (POU5F1, OCT4), SRY-box 2 (SOX2), and Nanog homeobox (NANOG) and propagated robustly in single-cell passaging. miPSCs exhibited faster proliferation and higher pluripotency and differentiation than diPSCs and hiPSCs, which were reflected in co-cultures and separate-cultures, teratoma formation, and chimera contribution. The establishment of miPSCs provides a unique research material for the investigation of "heterosis" and perhaps is more significant to study hybrid gamete formation.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-04-12 PubMed ID: 37040346PubMed Central: PMC10266948DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioad041Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the reprogramming efficiency and pluripotency of adult fibroblasts from mules compared to their parents, horses and donkeys. The results suggest that mule fibroblasts have a higher efficacy for reprogramming and possess superior pluripotency and differentiation, providing a unique research material for studies on heterosis and hybrid gamete formation.

Study on Mule Fibroblasts

In this research, adult fibroblasts of mules, horse, and donkey were studied. The fibroblasts from each species were derived from three independent individuals.

  • The properties of the respective species’ fibroblasts in terms of proliferation, apoptosis, and glycolysis were examined initially. It was observed that those of the mule displayed significant differences compared to their parents, horses and donkeys.
  • Based on these findings, induce pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) – mule (miPSCs), donkey (diPSCs), horse (hiPSCs) – were then derived from fibroblasts of three independent individuals of each species using doxycycline (Dox).
  • In the process of deriving these cells, it was found that the reprogramming efficiency of mule adult fibroblasts (MAFs) was significantly higher than that of the parent species.

Pluripotency Examination

Subsequent to the derivation process, the pluripotency of the derived iPSCs were evaluated.

  • All iPSCs expressed high levels of crucial endogenous pluripotency genes, namely POU5F1, SOX2, and NANOG.
  • The iPSCs of the mule (miPSCs) exhibited faster proliferation and demonstrated higher pluripotency and differentiation abilities when compared to the diPSCs and hiPSCs. This was observed in different settings – in co-cultures and separate-cultures, teratoma formation, and chimera contribution.

Significance of the Study

This research highlights the superior reprogramming efficiency and pluripotency of mule fibroblasts, creating a basis for further investigation on the phenomenon of “heterosis” – the improved or increased function of any biological quality in a hybrid offspring.

  • The establishment and study of miPSCs offers a unique and valuable material, which could potentially stimulate deeper research into hybrid vigor in mules and their biological superiority over their parent species.
  • The study may hold implications for hybrid gamete formation, an area that can be explored in future research.

Cite This Article

APA
Zhang J, Zhao L, Fu Y, Liu F, Wang Z, Li Y, Zhao G, Sun W, Wu B, Song Y, Li S, Hao C, Wuyun B, Wu R, Liu M, Cao G, Nashun B, Surani MA, Sun Q, Bao S, Liu P, Li X. (2023). Reprogramming efficiency and pluripotency of mule iPSCs over its parents†. Biol Reprod, 108(6), 887-901. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioad041

Publication

Biology of reproduction
ISSN: 1529-7268
NlmUniqueID: 0207224
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 108
Issue: 6
Pages: 887-901

Researcher Affiliations

Zhang, Jia
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Zhao, Lixia
  • College of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China.
Fu, Yuting
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Liu, Fangyuan
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Clinical Medical Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China.
Wang, Zixin
  • Inner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
Li, Yunxia
  • Inner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
Zhao, Gaoping
  • Inner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
  • National Center of Technology Innovation for Dairy Industry, Hohhot 010020, China.
Sun, Wei
  • Inner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
  • National Center of Technology Innovation for Dairy Industry, Hohhot 010020, China.
Wu, Baojiang
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Song, Yongli
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Li, Shaohua
  • College of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China.
Hao, Chunxia
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Wuyun, Bilige
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Wu, Rihan
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Liu, Moning
  • Key Laboratory of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Cao, Guifang
  • Key Laboratory of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Nashun, Buhe
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Surani, M Azim
  • Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Sun, Qingyuan
  • Fertility Preservation Lab, Reproductive Medicine Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou 510317, China.
Bao, Siqin
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Liu, Pentao
  • School of Biomedical Science, Stem Cell and Regenerative Consortium, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
  • Centre for Translational Stem Cell Biology, Building 17W, The Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Li, Xihe
  • The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
  • Inner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
  • Cellular Reprogramming
  • Equidae
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Cell Differentiation / genetics
  • Fibroblasts
  • Octamer Transcription Factor-3 / genetics

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Proops L, Burden F, Osthaus B. Mule cognition: a case of hybrid vigour?. Anim Cogn 2009 Jan;12(1):75-84.
    pubmed: 18636282doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0172-1google scholar: lookup
  2. Xiao R, Yuan Y, Zhu F, He S, Ge Q, Wang X, Taha R, Chen K. Transcriptomics and proteomics-based analysis of heterosis on main economic traits of silkworm, Bombyx mori.. J Proteomics 2020 Oct 30;229:103941.
    pubmed: 32805450doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103941google scholar: lookup
  3. Li H, Yuan J, Wu M, Han Z, Li L, Jiang H, Jia Y, Han X, Liu M, Sun D, Chen C, Song W, Wang C. Transcriptome and DNA methylome reveal insights into yield heterosis in the curds of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L var. italic).. BMC Plant Biol 2018 Aug 13;18(1):168.
    pmc: PMC6090608pubmed: 30103674doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1384-4google scholar: lookup
  4. Huang X, Yang S, Gong J, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhan Q, Zhao Y, Li W, Cheng B, Xia J, Chen N, Huang T, Zhang L, Fan D, Chen J, Zhou C, Lu Y, Weng Q, Han B. Genomic architecture of heterosis for yield traits in rice.. Nature 2016 Sep 29;537(7622):629-633.
    pubmed: 27602511doi: 10.1038/nature19760google scholar: lookup
  5. Troyer AF. Adaptedness and heterosis in corn and mule hybrids. Crop Sci 2006; 46:528–543.
  6. Singh AM, Dalton S. The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming.. Cell Stem Cell 2009 Aug 7;5(2):141-9.
    pmc: PMC2909475pubmed: 19664987doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.07.003google scholar: lookup
  7. Panopoulos AD, Yanes O, Ruiz S, Kida YS, Diep D, Tautenhahn R, Herrerías A, Batchelder EM, Plongthongkum N, Lutz M, Berggren WT, Zhang K, Evans RM, Siuzdak G, Izpisua Belmonte JC. The metabolome of induced pluripotent stem cells reveals metabolic changes occurring in somatic cell reprogramming.. Cell Res 2012 Jan;22(1):168-77.
    pmc: PMC3252494pubmed: 22064701doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.177google scholar: lookup
  8. Cheung HH, Liu X, Rennert OM. Apoptosis: reprogramming and the fate of mature cells. ISRN Cell Biol 2012; 2012:1–8.
  9. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors.. Cell 2007 Nov 30;131(5):861-72.
    pubmed: 18035408doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019google scholar: lookup
  10. Liao J, Cui C, Chen S, Ren J, Chen J, Gao Y, Li H, Jia N, Cheng L, Xiao H, Xiao L. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from adult rat cells.. Cell Stem Cell 2009 Jan 9;4(1):11-5.
    pubmed: 19097959doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.013google scholar: lookup
  11. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors.. Cell 2006 Aug 25;126(4):663-76.
    pubmed: 16904174doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024google scholar: lookup
  12. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, Thomson JA. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells.. Science 2007 Dec 21;318(5858):1917-20.
    pubmed: 18029452doi: 10.1126/science.1151526google scholar: lookup
  13. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, Utikal J, Eminli S, Arnold K, Stadtfeld M, Yachechko R, Tchieu J, Jaenisch R, Plath K, Hochedlinger K. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution.. Cell Stem Cell 2007 Jun 7;1(1):55-70.
    pubmed: 18371336doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014google scholar: lookup
  14. Aasen T, Raya A, Barrero MJ, Garreta E, Consiglio A, Gonzalez F, Vassena R, Bilić J, Pekarik V, Tiscornia G, Edel M, Boué S, Izpisúa Belmonte JC. Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes.. Nat Biotechnol 2008 Nov;26(11):1276-84.
    pubmed: 18931654doi: 10.1038/nbt.1503google scholar: lookup
  15. Cao H, Yang P, Pu Y, Sun X, Yin H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Fang F, Zhang Z, Tao Y, Zhang X. Characterization of bovine induced pluripotent stem cells by lentiviral transduction of reprogramming factor fusion proteins.. Int J Biol Sci 2012;8(4):498-511.
    pmc: PMC3314191pubmed: 22457605doi: 10.7150/ijbs.3723google scholar: lookup
  16. Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.. Nature 2008 May 22;453(7194):519-23.
    pmc: PMC5328678pubmed: 18497825doi: 10.1038/nature06968google scholar: lookup
  17. Gao X, Nowak-Imialek M, Chen X, Chen D, Herrmann D, Ruan D, Chen ACH, Eckersley-Maslin MA, Ahmad S, Lee YL, Kobayashi T, Ryan D, Zhong J, Zhu J, Wu J, Lan G, Petkov S, Yang J, Antunes L, Campos LS, Fu B, Wang S, Yong Y, Wang X, Xue SG, Ge L, Liu Z, Huang Y, Nie T, Li P, Wu D, Pei D, Zhang Y, Lu L, Yang F, Kimber SJ, Reik W, Zou X, Shang Z, Lai L, Surani A, Tam PPL, Ahmed A, Yeung WSB, Teichmann SA, Niemann H, Liu P. Establishment of porcine and human expanded potential stem cells.. Nat Cell Biol 2019 Jun;21(6):687-699.
    pmc: PMC7035105pubmed: 31160711doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0333-2google scholar: lookup
  18. Zhao L, Gao X, Zheng Y, Wang Z, Zhao G, Ren J, Zhang J, Wu J, Wu B, Chen Y, Sun W, Li Y, Su J, Ding Y, Gao Y, Liu M, Bai X, Sun L, Cao G, Tang F, Bao S, Liu P, Li X. Establishment of bovine expanded potential stem cells.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021 Apr 13;118(15).
    pmc: PMC8053967pubmed: 33833056doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018505118google scholar: lookup
  19. Bao L, He L, Chen J, Wu Z, Liao J, Rao L, Ren J, Li H, Zhu H, Qian L, Gu Y, Dai H, Xu X, Zhou J, Wang W, Cui C, Xiao L. Reprogramming of ovine adult fibroblasts to pluripotency via drug-inducible expression of defined factors.. Cell Res 2011 Apr;21(4):600-8.
    pmc: PMC3203662pubmed: 21221129doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.6google scholar: lookup
  20. Nagy K, Sung HK, Zhang P, Laflamme S, Vincent P, Agha-Mohammadi S, Woltjen K, Monetti C, Michael IP, Smith LC, Nagy A. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from equine fibroblasts.. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2011 Sep;7(3):693-702.
    pmc: PMC3137777pubmed: 21347602doi: 10.1007/s12015-011-9239-5google scholar: lookup
  21. Khodadadi K, Sumer H, Pashaiasl M, Lim S, Williamson M, Verma PJ. Induction of pluripotency in adult equine fibroblasts without c-MYC.. Stem Cells Int 2012;2012:429160.
    pmc: PMC3328202pubmed: 22550508doi: 10.1155/2012/429160google scholar: lookup
  22. Whitworth DJ, Ovchinnikov DA, Sun J, Fortuna PR, Wolvetang EJ. Generation and characterization of leukemia inhibitory factor-dependent equine induced pluripotent stem cells from adult dermal fibroblasts.. Stem Cells Dev 2014 Jul 1;23(13):1515-23.
    pmc: PMC4066230pubmed: 24555755doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0461google scholar: lookup
  23. Lee EM, Kim AY, Lee EJ, Park JK, Park SI, Cho SG, Kim HK, Kim SY, Jeong KS. Generation of Equine-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Analysis of Their Therapeutic Potential for Muscle Injuries.. Cell Transplant 2016 Nov;25(11):2003-2016.
    pubmed: 27226077doi: 10.3727/096368916x691691google scholar: lookup
  24. Pessôa LVF, Pires PRL, Del Collado M, Pieri NCG, Recchia K, Souza AF, Perecin F, da Silveira JC, de Andrade AFC, Ambrosio CE, Bressan FF, Meirelles FV. Generation and miRNA Characterization of Equine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Fetal and Adult Multipotent Tissues.. Stem Cells Int 2019;2019:1393791.
    pmc: PMC6525926pubmed: 31191664doi: 10.1155/2019/1393791google scholar: lookup
  25. Yu L, Wei Y, Sun HX, Mahdi AK, Pinzon Arteaga CA, Sakurai M, Schmitz DA, Zheng C, Ballard ED, Li J, Tanaka N, Kohara A, Okamura D, Mutto AA, Gu Y, Ross PJ, Wu J. Derivation of Intermediate Pluripotent Stem Cells Amenable to Primordial Germ Cell Specification.. Cell Stem Cell 2021 Mar 4;28(3):550-567.e12.
    pubmed: 33271070doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.11.003google scholar: lookup
  26. Wang W, Yang J, Liu H, Lu D, Chen X, Zenonos Z, Campos LS, Rad R, Guo G, Zhang S, Bradley A, Liu P. Rapid and efficient reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells by retinoic acid receptor gamma and liver receptor homolog 1.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 Nov 8;108(45):18283-8.
    pmc: PMC3215025pubmed: 21990348doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100893108google scholar: lookup
  27. Ying QL, Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3.. Cell 2003 Oct 31;115(3):281-92.
    pubmed: 14636556doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00847-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  28. Takashima Y, Guo G, Loos R, Nichols J, Ficz G, Krueger F, Oxley D, Santos F, Clarke J, Mansfield W, Reik W, Bertone P, Smith A. Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human.. Cell 2014 Sep 11;158(6):1254-1269.
    pmc: PMC4162745pubmed: 25215486doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.029google scholar: lookup
  29. Gafni O, Weinberger L, Mansour AA, Manor YS, Chomsky E, Ben-Yosef D, Kalma Y, Viukov S, Maza I, Zviran A, Rais Y, Shipony Z, Mukamel Z, Krupalnik V, Zerbib M, Geula S, Caspi I, Schneir D, Shwartz T, Gilad S, Amann-Zalcenstein D, Benjamin S, Amit I, Tanay A, Massarwa R, Novershtern N, Hanna JH. Derivation of novel human ground state naive pluripotent stem cells.. Nature 2013 Dec 12;504(7479):282-6.
    pubmed: 24172903doi: 10.1038/nature12745google scholar: lookup
  30. Theunissen TW, Powell BE, Wang H, Mitalipova M, Faddah DA, Reddy J, Fan ZP, Maetzel D, Ganz K, Shi L, Lungjangwa T, Imsoonthornruksa S, Stelzer Y, Rangarajan S, D'Alessio A, Zhang J, Gao Q, Dawlaty MM, Young RA, Gray NS, Jaenisch R. Systematic identification of culture conditions for induction and maintenance of naive human pluripotency.. Cell Stem Cell 2014 Oct 2;15(4):471-487.
    pmc: PMC4184977pubmed: 25090446doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.07.002google scholar: lookup
  31. Yang J, Ryan DJ, Wang W, Tsang JC, Lan G, Masaki H, Gao X, Antunes L, Yu Y, Zhu Z, Wang J, Kolodziejczyk AA, Campos LS, Wang C, Yang F, Zhong Z, Fu B, Eckersley-Maslin MA, Woods M, Tanaka Y, Chen X, Wilkinson AC, Bussell J, White J, Ramirez-Solis R, Reik W, Göttgens B, Teichmann SA, Tam PPL, Nakauchi H, Zou X, Lu L, Liu P. Establishment of mouse expanded potential stem cells.. Nature 2017 Oct 19;550(7676):393-397.
    pmc: PMC5890884pubmed: 29019987doi: 10.1038/nature24052google scholar: lookup
  32. Glanville-Jones HC, Woo N, Arkell RM. Successful whole embryo culture with commercially available reagents.. Int J Dev Biol 2013;57(1):61-7.
    pubmed: 23585354doi: 10.1387/ijdb.120098ragoogle scholar: lookup
  33. Ruiz S, Panopoulos AD, Herrerías A, Bissig KD, Lutz M, Berggren WT, Verma IM, Izpisua Belmonte JC. A high proliferation rate is required for cell reprogramming and maintenance of human embryonic stem cell identity.. Curr Biol 2011 Jan 11;21(1):45-52.
    pmc: PMC3034649pubmed: 21167714doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.049google scholar: lookup
  34. Zhao Q, Jia X, Zhang Y, Dong Y, Lei Y, Tan X, Williamson RA, Wang A, Zhang D, Ma J. Tetrandrine induces apoptosis in human neuroblastoma through regulating the Hippo/YAP signaling pathway.. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019 Jun 11;513(4):846-851.
    pubmed: 31003773doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.04.075google scholar: lookup
  35. Sun Y, Liu WZ, Liu T, Feng X, Yang N, Zhou HF. Signaling pathway of MAPK/ERK in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis.. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2015;35(6):600-4.
    pubmed: 26096166doi: 10.3109/10799893.2015.1030412google scholar: lookup
  36. Zhang L, Xing D, Gao X, Wu S. Low-power laser irradiation promotes cell proliferation by activating PI3K/Akt pathway.. J Cell Physiol 2009 Jun;219(3):553-62.
    pubmed: 19142866doi: 10.1002/jcp.21697google scholar: lookup
  37. Lin CL, Cheng H, Tung CW, Huang WJ, Chang PJ, Yang JT, Wang JY. Simvastatin reverses high glucose-induced apoptosis of mesangial cells via modulation of Wnt signaling pathway.. Am J Nephrol 2008;28(2):290-7.
    pubmed: 18004065doi: 10.1159/000111142google scholar: lookup
  38. Kim EJY, Anko ML, Flensberg C, Majewski IJ, Geng FS, Firas J, Huang DCS, van Delft MF, Heath JK. BAK/BAX-Mediated Apoptosis Is a Myc-Induced Roadblock to Reprogramming.. Stem Cell Reports 2018 Feb 13;10(2):331-338.
    pmc: PMC5830948pubmed: 29358089doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.12.019google scholar: lookup
  39. Zhou G, Meng S, Li Y, Ghebre YT, Cooke JP. Optimal ROS Signaling Is Critical for Nuclear Reprogramming.. Cell Rep 2016 May 3;15(5):919-925.
    pmc: PMC4856580pubmed: 27117405doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.084google scholar: lookup
  40. Sharpless NE, DePinho RA. Telomeres, stem cells, senescence, and cancer.. J Clin Invest 2004 Jan;113(2):160-8.
    pmc: PMC311439pubmed: 14722605doi: 10.1172/jci20761google scholar: lookup
  41. De Los Angeles A, Ferrari F, Xi R, Fujiwara Y, Benvenisty N, Deng H, Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R, Lee S, Leitch HG, Lensch MW, Lujan E, Pei D, Rossant J, Wernig M, Park PJ, Daley GQ. Hallmarks of pluripotency.. Nature 2015 Sep 24;525(7570):469-78.
    pubmed: 26399828doi: 10.1038/nature15515google scholar: lookup
  42. Huang Y, Osorno R, Tsakiridis A, Wilson V. In Vivo differentiation potential of epiblast stem cells revealed by chimeric embryo formation.. Cell Rep 2012 Dec 27;2(6):1571-8.
    pubmed: 23200857doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.022google scholar: lookup
  43. Segalés J, Perdiguero E, Muñoz-Cánoves P. Regulation of Muscle Stem Cell Functions: A Focus on the p38 MAPK Signaling Pathway.. Front Cell Dev Biol 2016;4:91.
    pmc: PMC5003838pubmed: 27626031doi: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00091google scholar: lookup
  44. Yang W, Klaman LD, Chen B, Araki T, Harada H, Thomas SM, George EL, Neel BG. An Shp2/SFK/Ras/Erk signaling pathway controls trophoblast stem cell survival.. Dev Cell 2006 Mar;10(3):317-27.
    pubmed: 16516835doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.01.002google scholar: lookup
  45. He H, Yin H, Yu X, Zhang Y, Ma M, Li D, Zhu Q. PDLIM5 Affects Chicken Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cell Proliferation and Differentiation via the p38-MAPK Pathway.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Apr 4;11(4).
    pmc: PMC8065989pubmed: 33916517doi: 10.3390/ani11041016google scholar: lookup
  46. Petkov S, Glage S, Nowak-Imialek M, Niemann H. Long-Term Culture of Porcine Induced Pluripotent Stem-Like Cells Under Feeder-Free Conditions in the Presence of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors.. Stem Cells Dev 2016 Mar 1;25(5):386-94.
    pubmed: 26691930doi: 10.1089/scd.2015.0317google scholar: lookup
  47. Morata G, Ripoll P. Minutes: mutants of drosophila autonomously affecting cell division rate.. Dev Biol 1975 Feb;42(2):211-21.
    pubmed: 1116643doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90330-9google scholar: lookup
  48. Zheng C, Hu Y, Sakurai M, Pinzon-Arteaga CA, Li J, Wei Y, Okamura D, Ravaux B, Barlow HR, Yu L, Sun HX, Chen EH, Gu Y, Wu J. Cell competition constitutes a barrier for interspecies chimerism.. Nature 2021 Apr;592(7853):272-276.
    pubmed: 33508854doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03273-0google scholar: lookup
  49. Jónsson H, Schubert M, Seguin-Orlando A, Ginolhac A, Petersen L, Fumagalli M, Albrechtsen A, Petersen B, Korneliussen TS, Vilstrup JT, Lear T, Myka JL, Lundquist J, Miller DC, Alfarhan AH, Alquraishi SA, Al-Rasheid KA, Stagegaard J, Strauss G, Bertelsen MF, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Antczak DF, Bailey E, Nielsen R, Willerslev E, Orlando L. Speciation with gene flow in equids despite extensive chromosomal plasticity.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014 Dec 30;111(52):18655-60.
    pmc: PMC4284605pubmed: 25453089doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412627111google scholar: lookup
  50. Wu J, Platero-Luengo A, Sakurai M, Sugawara A, Gil MA, Yamauchi T, Suzuki K, Bogliotti YS, Cuello C, Morales Valencia M, Okumura D, Luo J, Vilariño M, Parrilla I, Soto DA, Martinez CA, Hishida T, Sánchez-Bautista S, Martinez-Martinez ML, Wang H, Nohalez A, Aizawa E, Martinez-Redondo P, Ocampo A, Reddy P, Roca J, Maga EA, Esteban CR, Berggren WT, Nuñez Delicado E, Lajara J, Guillen I, Guillen P, Campistol JM, Martinez EA, Ross PJ, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Interspecies Chimerism with Mammalian Pluripotent Stem Cells.. Cell 2017 Jan 26;168(3):473-486.e15.
    pmc: PMC5679265pubmed: 28129541doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.036google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Barrachina L, Ivanovska A, Eslami Arshaghi T, O'Brien A, Cequier A, Murphy M, Hollinshead F, Rodellar C, Barry F. Generation of equine induced pluripotent stem cells from cells of embryonic, perinatal and adult tissues. Stem Cell Res Ther 2025 Oct 8;16(1):547.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04671-1pubmed: 41063189google scholar: lookup
  2. Liu F, Zhang J, Kong L, Wu R, Jiang Q, Lu Y, Li X. Comparative Study of Reprogramming Efficiency and Regulatory Mechanisms of Placental- and Fibroblast-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) in Mules. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2025 Aug 19;47(8).
    doi: 10.3390/cimb47080671pubmed: 40864824google scholar: lookup
  3. Huang X, Chen L, Liu X. Constructing Cell-Specific Causal Networks of Individual Cells for Depicting Dynamical Biological Processes. Research (Wash D C) 2025;8:0743.
    doi: 10.34133/research.0743pubmed: 40585960google scholar: lookup
  4. Harper JM. Primary Cell Culture as a Model System for Evolutionary Molecular Physiology. Int J Mol Sci 2024 Jul 19;25(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms25147905pubmed: 39063147google scholar: lookup
  5. Miller JR, Adjeroh DA. Machine learning on alignment features for parent-of-origin classification of simulated hybrid RNA-seq. BMC Bioinformatics 2024 Mar 12;25(1):109.
    doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05728-3pubmed: 38475727google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,579 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.