Response of horses to sweet, salty, sour and bitter solutions.
Abstract: The two-choice preference test was used to
characterize the test reactions of five immature
horses to sweet, salty, sour and bitter tasting
solutions. Sucrose was preferred ('>60% of total
fluid as test solution) to tap water by the foals at
concentrations ranging from 1.25 to 10 g/100 ml.
Concentrations above and below this range result-
ed in indifference (40 to 60% of fluid consumed as
test solution). The horses were indifferent to NaCI
until a concentration of.63 g/100 ml was reached.
At this level the mean response changed to
rejection (<40% of total fluid as test solution).
Further increases in the concentration of NaCI to 5
g/I00 ml brought about strong rejection
responses. Foals wcrc indifferentto aceticacid up
to .16 ml/100 ml. At this and higher concentra-
tions,rejectionresponses occurred. Taste reactions
to quinine fell into the nondiscrimination zone
from .16 to 10 rag/100 ml. At higher
concentrations (20, 40, 80 mg/100 ml), the foals
rejected quinine. A comparison of the taste
reactions of the young horses with those of some
ruminant specieswould indicatethat the immature
horse responds quite similarlyto sheep in itstaste
behavior. As with ruminant species, individual
horses arc quite variablc in their response to a
particular test chemical.
Publication Date: 1978-07-01 PubMed ID: 711642DOI: 10.2527/jas1978.47151xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study focuses on the taste preferences of young horses, finding that their reactions to sweet, salty, sour, and bitter substances echo those of certain ruminant animals.
Introduction to the Study and Methodology
- The research used a two-choice preference test to understand the taste reactions of five young horses to sweet, salty, sour, and bitter tasting solutions.
- The test worked by offering the horses two choices of fluids – one being tap water and the other being the test solution.
Findings from the Research
- The horses exhibited a preference for sucrose (sugar), consuming it at greater than 60% of their total fluid intake, at concentrations between 1.25 and 10 grams per 100 ml.
- When the sucrose solution had a concentration higher or lower than this range, the horses showed no preference for it (consuming it at 40% to 60% of their fluid intake).
- The horses didn’t show any interest in NaCI (salt) until it reached .63 grams per 100 ml concentration. Beyond this concentration, the horses started to reject the solution, with rejection becoming more pronounced as NaCI concentration increased to 5 grams per 100 ml.
- The horses remained indifferent to acetic acid (that gives vinegar its sour taste) up to a concentration of .16 ml per 100 ml. Beyond this concentration, the horses started to reject the solution.
- The horses maintained a non-partisan stance towards quinine (a bitter compound) at concentrations between .16 to 10 mg per 100 ml, but started to reject it at higher concentrations (20, 40, 80 mg per 100 ml).
Comparison with Ruminant Species
- The study noted that the taste reactions of young horses were very similar to those of some ruminant species, such as sheep.
- Just like ruminant species, individual horses demonstrated considerable variability in their response to a particular test compound.
Cite This Article
APA
Randall RP, Schurg WA, Church DC.
(1978).
Response of horses to sweet, salty, sour and bitter solutions.
J Anim Sci, 47(1), 51-55.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.47151x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Acetates
- Animals
- Female
- Horses / physiology
- Male
- Quinine
- Sodium Chloride
- Sucrose
- Taste / physiology
Citations
This article has been cited 7 times.- de Laat MA, Warnken T, Delarocque J, Reiche DB, Grob AJ, Feige K, Carslake HB, Durham AE, Sillence MN, Thane KE, Frank N, Brojer J, Lindase S, Sonntag J. Carbohydrate pellets to assess insulin dysregulation in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Jan;37(1):302-314.
- Lindinger MI. Oral Electrolyte and Water Supplementation in Horses. Vet Sci 2022 Nov 10;9(11).
- Stachurska A, Tkaczyk E, Różańska-Boczula M, Janicka W, Janczarek I. Horses' Response to a Novel Diet: Different Herbs Added to Dry, Wet or Wet-Sweetened Oats. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 24;12(11).
- Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
- Lane HW, Warren DC, Squyres NS, Cotham AC. Zinc concentrations in hair, plasma, and saliva and changes in taste acuity of adults supplemented with zinc. Biol Trace Elem Res 1982 Jun;4(2-3):83-93.
- Laska M, Rivas Bautista RM, Hernandez Salazar LT. Gustatory responsiveness to six bitter tastants in three species of nonhuman primates. J Chem Ecol 2009 May;35(5):560-71.
- Smith L, Moran AW, Al-Rammahi M, Daly K, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Determination of sweetener specificity of horse gut-expressed sweet taste receptor T1R2-T1R3 and its significance for energy provision and hydration. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1325135.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists