Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 11; 1303090; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1303090

Revisiting the genotypes of Theileria equi based on the V4 hypervariable region of the 18S rRNA gene.

Abstract: Equine theileriosis, an economically important disease that affects horses and other equids worldwide, is caused by a tick-borne intracellular apicomplexan protozoa . Genotyping of based on the 18S rRNA gene revealed the presence of two, three, four or five genotypes. In previous published reports, these genotypes have been labelled either alphabetically or numerically, and there is no uniformity in naming of these genotypes. The present study was aimed to revisit the phylogeny, genetic diversity and geographical distribution of based on the nucleotide sequences of the V4 hypervariable region of the 18S rRNA gene available in the nucleotide databases. Unassigned: Out of 14792 nucleotide sequences of available in the GenBank™, only 736 sequences of containing the complete V4 hypervariable region of the 18S rRNA gene (>207 bp) were used in multiple sequence alignment. Subsequently, a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the Kimura 2-parameter model (K2+I). Unassigned: The phylogenetic tree placed all the sequences into four distinct clades with high bootstrap values which were designated as clades/ genotypes A, B, C and D. Our results indicated that the genotype B of Nagore et al. and genotype E of Qablan et al. together formed the clade B with a high bootstrap value (95%). Furthermore, all the genotypes probably originated from clade B, which was the most dominant genotype (52.85%) followed by clades A (27.58%), and C (9.78%) and D (9.78%). Genotype C manifested a comparatively higher genetic diversity (91.0-100% identity) followed by genotypes A (93.2-99.5%), and B and D (95.7-100%). The alignment report of the consensus nucleotide sequences of the V4 hypervariable region of the 18S rRNA gene of four genotypes (A-D) revealed significant variations in one region, between nucleotide positions 113-183, and 41 molecular signatures were recognized. As far as geographical distribution is concerned, genotypes A and C exhibited far-extending geographical distribution involving 31 and 13 countries of the Asian, African, European, North American and South American continents, respectively. On the contrary, the genotypes B and D exemplified limited distribution with confinement to 21 and 12 countries of Asian, African and European continents, respectively. Interestingly, genotypes A and C have been reported from only two continents, viz., North and South America. It was observed that genotypes A and C, and B and D exhibit similar geographical distribution. Unassigned: The present study indicated the presence of only four previously described T. equi genotypes (A, B, C and D) after performing the molecular analyses of all available sequences of the complete V4 hypervariable region of the 18S rRNA gene of isolates in the GenBank™.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15 PubMed ID: 38560630PubMed Central: PMC10978764DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1303090Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study re-examines the genetic classification (genotypes) of Theileria equi, a parasite that causes disease in horses, by analyzing a specific variable gene region (V4 region of the 18S rRNA gene).
  • The researchers aimed to clarify the genetic diversity, phylogenetic relationships, and geographical spread of these genotypes using available genetic sequences from public databases.

Background

  • Equine Theileriosis: A significant tick-borne disease impacting horses and related animals worldwide.
  • Cause: The intracellular protozoan parasite Theileria equi.
  • Genotyping Importance: Understanding genotypes based on genetic markers like the 18S rRNA gene helps in epidemiology, diagnosis, and control of the disease.
  • Previous studies identified multiple genotypes (ranging from two to five), but there has been inconsistency in how these genotypes are named.

Study Objective

  • To revisit and standardize the classification of T. equi genotypes based on the nucleotide sequence of the V4 hypervariable region of the 18S rRNA gene.
  • To analyze genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships for all available sequences of this gene region in global databases.
  • To understand the geographical distribution of the identified genotypes.

Methodology

  • Data Collection:
    • From GenBank™, 14,792 T. equi nucleotide sequences were available.
    • Only 736 sequences contained the complete V4 hypervariable region of the 18S rRNA gene (>207 bases) and were selected for analysis.
  • Sequence Alignment:
    • Multiple sequence alignment was performed on these 736 sequences to identify similarities and differences.
  • Phylogenetic Analysis:
    • A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Kimura 2-parameter model (K2+I) to illustrate evolutionary relationships.

Key Findings

  • Genotype Clustering: All sequences grouped into four distinct clades/genotypes, designated as A, B, C, and D, each with strong statistical support.
  • Genotype Relationships: Previously reported genotypes by other researchers (like Nagore and Qablan) corresponded to these clades, for example, Nagore’s genotype B and Qablan’s genotype E grouped together as clade B.
  • Genotype Origin: Clade B is likely the ancestral or most dominant genotype, representing 52.85% of sequences.
  • Frequency of Genotypes:
    • Clade B: 52.85%
    • Clade A: 27.58%
    • Clade C: 9.78%
    • Clade D: 9.78%
  • Genetic Diversity:
    • Clade C showed the highest genetic diversity (sequence identity between 91.0-100%).
    • Clades A, B, and D showed slightly lesser diversity, with identities ranging from 93.2 to 100%.
  • Molecular Signatures: Significant nucleotide variations were found between positions 113-183 in the V4 region, with 41 unique molecular markers identified distinguishing the four genotypes.

Geographical Distribution

  • Genotypes A and C have wide geographic spread:
    • Reported in 31 and 13 countries, respectively.
    • These countries span Asia, Africa, Europe, North America, and South America.
  • Genotypes B and D show more limited distribution:
    • Clade B found in 21 countries across Asia, Africa, and Europe.
    • Clade D found in 12 countries, also in Asia, Africa, and Europe.
  • Note: Genotypes A and C are the only ones reported from the American continents (North and South America).
  • Genotype pairs A/C and B/D tend to have similar distribution patterns, suggesting possible epidemiological linkage.

Conclusions

  • Four distinct genotypes of Theileria equi (A, B, C, D) exist based on the complete V4 hypervariable region analysis.
  • The study clarifies previous discrepancies in genotype naming and classification, offering a uniform genotyping framework.
  • Recognizing molecular signatures aids in rapid identification and tracking of genotypes across global regions.
  • The wide geographic spread of certain genotypes highlights the global significance of T. equi and the need for targeted surveillance.

Cite This Article

APA
Nehra AK, Kumari A, Moudgil AD, Vohra S. (2024). Revisiting the genotypes of Theileria equi based on the V4 hypervariable region of the 18S rRNA gene. Front Vet Sci, 11, 1303090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1303090

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 1303090
PII: 1303090

Researcher Affiliations

Nehra, Anil Kumar
  • Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India.
Kumari, Ansu
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India.
Moudgil, Aman Dev
  • Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India.
Vohra, Sukhdeep
  • Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 55 references
  1. Schein E. Equine babesiosis. In: Ristic M, editor. Babesiosis of domestic animals and man. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; (1988). 197–208.
  2. Mehlhorn H, Schein E. Redescription of Laveran, 1901 as Mehlhorn, Schein 1998. Parasitol Res (1998) 84:467–75.
    doi: 10.1007/s004360050431pubmed: 9660136google scholar: lookup
  3. Knowles D Jr. Equine babesiosis (piroplasmosis): a problem in the international movement of horses. Br Vet J (1996) 152:123–6.
    doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(96)80066-2pubmed: 8680834google scholar: lookup
  4. Wise LN, Pelzel-McCluskey AM, Mealey RH, Knowles DP. Equine piroplasmosis. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract (2014) 30:677–93.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2014.08.008pubmed: 25300637google scholar: lookup
  5. Allsopp MTEP, Lewis BD, Penzhorn BL. Molecular evidence for transplacental transmission of from carrier mares to their apparently healthy foals. Vet Parasitol (2007) 148:130–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.05.017pubmed: 17601669google scholar: lookup
  6. Georges KC, Ezeokoli CD, Sparagano O, Pargass I, Campbell M, D’Abadie R. A case of transplacental transmission of in a foal in Trinidad. Vet Parasitol (2011) 175:363–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.019pubmed: 21051152google scholar: lookup
  7. de Waal DT. Equine piroplasmosis: a review. Br Vet J (1992) 148:6–14.
    doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(92)90061-5pubmed: 1551016google scholar: lookup
  8. Zobba R, Ardu M, Niccolini S, Chessa B, Manna L, Cocco R. Clinical and laboratory findings in equine piroplasmosis. J Equine Vet (2008) 28:301–8.
  9. Wise LN, Kappmeyer LS, Mealey RH, Knowles DP. Review of equine piroplasmosis. J Vet Intern Med (2013) 27:1334–46.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12168pubmed: 24033559google scholar: lookup
  10. Nagore D, García-Sanmartín J, García-Pérez AL, Juste RA, Hurtado A. Detection and identification of equine and species by reverse line blotting: epidemiological survey and phylogenetic analysis. Vet Parasitol (2004) 123:41–54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.04.010pubmed: 15265570google scholar: lookup
  11. Kouam MK, Kantzoura V, Masuoka PM, Gajadhar AA, Theodoropoulos G. Genetic diversity of equine piroplasms in Greece with a note on speciation within genotypes ( and -like). Infect Genet Evol (2010) 10:963–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.06.008pubmed: 20601168google scholar: lookup
  12. Bhoora R, Franssen L, Oosthuizen MC, Guthrie AJ, Zweygarth E, Penzhorn BL. Sequence heterogeneity in the 18S rRNA gene within and from horses in South Africa. Vet Parasitol (2009) 159:112–20.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.004pubmed: 19019541google scholar: lookup
  13. Braga MDSCDO, Costa FN, Gomes DRM, Xavier DR, André MR, Gonçalves LR. Genetic diversity of piroplasmids species in equids from island of São Luís, northeastern Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet (2017) 26:331–9.
    doi: 10.1590/s1984-29612017046pubmed: 28977247google scholar: lookup
  14. Manna G, Cersini A, Nardini R, Bartolome Del Pino LE, Antognetti V, Zini M. Genetic diversity of and infecting horses of central-southern Italy and preliminary results of its correlation with clinical and serological status. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2018) 9:1212–20.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.05.005pubmed: 29752142google scholar: lookup
  15. Salim B, Bakheit MA, Kamau J, Nakamura I, Sugimoto C. Nucleotide sequence heterogeneity in the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene within from horses in Sudan. Parasitol Res (2010) 106:493–8.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1691-7pubmed: 19953269google scholar: lookup
  16. Hall CM, Busch JD, Scoles GA, Palma-Cagle KA, Ueti MW, Kappmeyer LS. Genetic characterization of Theileria equi infecting horses in North America: evidence for a limited source of U.S. introductions.. Parasit Vectors (2013) 6:1–12.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-35pmc: PMC3606381pubmed: 23399005google scholar: lookup
  17. Veronesi F, Morganti G, Ravagnan S, Laus F, Spaterna A, Diaferia M. Molecular and serological detection of tick-borne pathogens in donkeys () in Italy.. Vet Microbiol (2014) 173:348–54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.08.017pubmed: 25213231google scholar: lookup
  18. Torres R, Hurtado C, Pérez-Macchi S, Bittencourt P, Freschi C, de Melo VVC. Occurrence and genetic diversity of and in Chilean thoroughbred racing horses.. Pathogens (2021) 10:714.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060714pmc: PMC8226895pubmed: 34200433google scholar: lookup
  19. Qablan MA, Sloboda M, Jirků M, Oborník M, Dwairi S, Amr ZS. Quest for the piroplasms in camels: identification of and in Jordanian dromedaries by PCR.. Vet Parasitol (2012) 186:456–60.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.070pubmed: 22186193google scholar: lookup
  20. Munkhjargal T, Sivakumar T, Battsetseg B, Nyamjargal T, Aboulaila M, Purevtseren B. Prevalence and genetic diversity of equine piroplasms in Tov province, Mongolia.. Infect Genet Evol (2013) 16:178–85.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.02.005pubmed: 23416256google scholar: lookup
  21. Qablan MA, Obornik M, Petrzelkova KJ, Sloboda M, Shudiefat MF, Horin P. Infections by and in Jordanian equids: epidemiology and genetic diversity.. Parasitology (2013) 140:1096–103.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182013000486pubmed: 23673249google scholar: lookup
  22. Liu Q, Meli ML, Zhang Y, Meili T, Stirn M, Riond B. Sequence heterogeneity in the 18S rRNA gene in from horses presented in Switzerland.. Vet Parasitol (2016) 221:24–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.03.003pubmed: 27084467google scholar: lookup
  23. Ozubek S, Aktas M. Genetic diversity and prevalence of piroplasm species in equids from Turkey.. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis (2018) 59:47–51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2018.08.005pubmed: 30290887google scholar: lookup
  24. Peckle M, Pires MS, da Silva CB, da Costa RL, Vitari GLV, Senra MVX. Molecular characterization of in horses from the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2018) 9:349–53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.11.011pubmed: 29223587google scholar: lookup
  25. Wang J, Liu J, Yang J, Wang X, Li Z, Jianlin X. The first molecular detection and genetic diversity of and in horses of Gansu province, China.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2019) 10:528–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.01.003pubmed: 30670354google scholar: lookup
  26. Camino E, Cruz-Lopez F, de Juan L, Dominguez L, Shiels B, Coultous RM. Phylogenetic analysis and geographical distribution of and sequences from horses residing in Spain.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2020) 11:101521.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101521pubmed: 32993941google scholar: lookup
  27. Tirosh-Levy S, Gottlieb Y, Arieli O, Mazuz ML, King R, Horowitz I. Genetic characteristics of in zebras, wild and domestic donkeys in Israel and the Palestinian authority.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2020) 11:101286.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101286pubmed: 31537490google scholar: lookup
  28. de Sousa KCM, Fernandes MP, Herrera HM, Freschi CR, Machado RZ, André MR. Diversity of piroplasmids among wild and domestic mammals and ectoparasites in Pantanal wetland, Brazil.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2018) 9:245–53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.09.010pubmed: 28941935google scholar: lookup
  29. Beck R, Vojta L, Mrljak V, Marinculić A, Beck A, Živičnjak T. Diversity of and species in symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs in Croatia.. Int J Parasitol (2009) 39:843–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.12.005pubmed: 19367832google scholar: lookup
  30. Criado-Fornelio A, Gónzalez-del-Rıo MA, Buling-Saraña A, Barba-Carretero JC. The “expanding universe” of piroplasms.. Vet Parasitol (2004) 119:337–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.11.015pubmed: 15154598google scholar: lookup
  31. Ros-García A, M’ghirbi Y, Hurtado A, Bouattour A. Prevalence and genetic diversity of piroplasm species in horses and ticks from Tunisia.. Infect Genet Evol (2013) 17:33–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.038pubmed: 23542456google scholar: lookup
  32. Nehra AK, Kumari A, Moudgil AD, Vohra S. Phylogenetic analysis, genetic diversity and geographical distribution of based on 18S rRNA gene.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2021) 12:101776.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101776pubmed: 34271342google scholar: lookup
  33. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms.. Mol Biol Evol (2018) 35:1547–9.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096pmc: PMC5967553pubmed: 29722887google scholar: lookup
  34. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.. Nucleic Acids Res (1994) 22:4673–80.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673pmc: PMC308517pubmed: 7984417google scholar: lookup
  35. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization.. Brief Bioinform (2019) 20:1160–6.
    doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108pmc: PMC6781576pubmed: 28968734google scholar: lookup
  36. Kimura MA. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.. J Mol Evol (1980) 16:111–20.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01731581pubmed: 7463489google scholar: lookup
  37. Battsetseg B, Lucero S, Xuan X, Claveria FG, Inoue N, Alhassan A. Detection of natural infection of with and in Brazilian horses using nested polymerase chain reaction.. Vet Parasitol (2002) 107:351–7.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00131-0pubmed: 12163246google scholar: lookup
  38. Díaz-Sánchez AA, Pires MS, Estrada CY, Cañizares EV, del Castillo Domínguez SL, Cabezas-Cruz A. First molecular evidence of and infections in horses in Cuba.. Parasitol Res (2018) 117:3109–18.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-6005-5pubmed: 30033488google scholar: lookup
  39. Sunday Idoko I, Tirosh-Levy S, Leszkowicz Mazuz M, Mohammed Adam B, Sikiti Garba B, Wesley Nafarnda D. Genetic characterization of piroplasms in donkeys and horses from Nigeria.. Animals (2020) 10:324.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020324pmc: PMC7070495pubmed: 32085574google scholar: lookup
  40. Wu J, Cui Y, Yu F, Muhatai G, Tao D, Zhao A. Prevalence and genetic characterization of and in grazing horses in Xinjiang, northwestern China.. Parasitol Res (2023) 122:387–94.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07749-4pubmed: 36504396google scholar: lookup
  41. Cacciò S, Cammà C, Onuma M, Severini C. The β-tubulin gene of and parasites is an informative marker for species discrimination.. Int J Parasitol (2000) 30:1181–5.
    doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00105-3pubmed: 11027785google scholar: lookup
  42. Morrison DA. Evolution of the Apicomplexa: where are we now?. Trends Parasitol (2009) 25:375–82.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2009.05.010pubmed: 19635681google scholar: lookup
  43. Lack JB, Reichard MV, Van Den Bussche RA. Phylogeny and evolution of the Piroplasmida as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences.. Int J Parasitol (2012) 42:353–63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.02.005pubmed: 22429769google scholar: lookup
  44. Chauhan RP, Kumari A, Nehra AK, Ram H, Garg R, Banerjee PS. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of infecting domestic pigs () in India.. Parasitol Res (2020) 119:3347–57.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06857-3pubmed: 32833051google scholar: lookup
  45. Hunfeld KP, Hildebrandt A, Gray JS. Babesiosis: recent insights into an ancient disease.. Int J Parasitol (2008) 38:1219–37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.001pubmed: 18440005google scholar: lookup
  46. Katzer F, McKellar S, Kirvar E, Shiels B. Phylogenetic analysis of and in relation to the establishment of parasite populations within novel host species and the development of diagnostic tests.. Mol Biochem Parasitol (1998) 95:33–44.
    doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(98)00085-1pubmed: 9763287google scholar: lookup
  47. Allsopp MTEP, Allsopp BA. Molecular sequence evidence for the reclassification of SomeBabesiaSpecies.. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2006) 1081:509–17.
    doi: 10.1196/annals.1373.076pubmed: 17135560google scholar: lookup
  48. Alanazi AD, Said AE, Morin-Adeline V, Alyousif MS, Slapeta J. Quantitative PCR detection of using laboratory workflows to detect asymptomatic persistently infected horses.. Vet Parasitol (2014) 206:138–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.09.019pubmed: 25450724google scholar: lookup
  49. Coultous RM, McDonald M, Raftery AG, Shiels BR, Sutton DGM, Weir W. Analysis of diversity in the Gambia using a novel genotyping method.. Transbound Emerg Dis (2019) 67:1213–21.
    doi: 10.1111/tbed.13454pubmed: 31845493google scholar: lookup
  50. Knowles DP, Kappmeyer LS, Haney D, Herndon DR, Fry LM, Munro JB. Discovery of a novel species, n. sp., infective to equids, highlights exceptional genomic diversity within the genus : implications for apicomplexan parasite surveillance.. Int J Parasitol (2018) 48:679–90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.03.010pubmed: 29885436google scholar: lookup
  51. Sears K, Knowles D, Dinkel K, Mshelia PW, Onzere C, Silva M. Imidocarb dipropionate lacks efficacy against and fails to consistently clear in horses co-infected with . .. Pathogens (2020) 9:1035.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens9121035pmc: PMC7764667pubmed: 33321715google scholar: lookup
  52. Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Sarana A, Barba-Carretero JC. Molecular studies on , and in southern Europe. Part I. epizootiological aspects.. Vet Parasitol (2003) 113:189–201.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00078-5pubmed: 12719133google scholar: lookup
  53. Qablan MA, Kubelová M, Široký P, Modrý D, Amr ZS. Stray dogs of northern Jordan as reservoirs of ticks and tick-borne hemopathogens.. Parasitol Res (2012) 111:301–7.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2839-4pubmed: 22434363google scholar: lookup
  54. Zimmermann DE, Penzhorn BL, Vorster I, Troskie M, Oosthuizen MC. , and in metapopulations of two black rhinoceros () subspecies in South Africa and their potential impact on conservation.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis (2021) 12:101635.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101635pubmed: 33373893google scholar: lookup
  55. Bruning A. Equine piroplasmosis an update on diagnosis, treatment and prevention.. Br Vet J (1996) 152:139–51.
    doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(96)80070-4pubmed: 8680838google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Gupta KK, Gupta N, Kumar S, Srivastava M, Kumar P. Equine piroplasmosis: an emerging tick-borne threat to equine health.. Trop Anim Health Prod 2026 Jan 5;58(1):29.
    doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04829-2pubmed: 41489672google scholar: lookup
  2. Venkatesan T, Panda R, Nehra AK, Ram H, Karikalan M, Pateer DP, Garg R, Pawde AM. Genetic characterization of zoonotic hookworms infecting wild felids in northern India.. BMC Vet Res 2025 Mar 22;21(1):195.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04641-ypubmed: 40119334google scholar: lookup
  3. Fernandes TA, Paulino PG, Dos Santos Juliano D, Rabello CA, de Oliveira NVB, de Souza Santana M, Peckle M, Massard CL, da Costa Angelo I, Jacob JCF, Santos HA. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in draft horses in the Distrito Federal, Brazil.. Trop Anim Health Prod 2025 Feb 19;57(2):72.
    doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04321-xpubmed: 39969660google scholar: lookup
  4. Facile V, Magliocca M, Dini FM, Imposimato I, Mariella J, Freccero F, Urbani L, Rinnovati R, Sel E, Gallina L, Castagnetti C, Galuppi R, Battilani M, Balboni A. Molecular Diagnosis and Identification of Equine Piroplasms: Challenges and Insights from a Study in Northern Italy.. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 5;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030437pubmed: 39943207google scholar: lookup