FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Drug testing and analysis2021; 13(10); 1768-1775; doi: 10.1002/dta.3131

Robustness of digital PCR and real-time PCR against inhibitors in transgene detection for gene doping control in equestrian sports.

Abstract: Gene doping is a threat to fair competition in sports, both human and equestrian. One method of gene doping is to administer exogenous genetic materials, called transgenes, into the bodies of postnatal humans and horses. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based transgene detection methods such as digital PCR and real-time PCR have been developed for gene doping testing in humans and horses. However, the significance of PCR inhibitors in gene doping testing has not been well evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the effects of PCR inhibitors on transgene detection using digital PCR and real-time PCR against gene doping. Digital PCR amplification was significantly inhibited by high concentrations of proteinase K (more than 0.1 μg/μl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (more than 5 nmol/μl), and heparin (more than 0.05 unit/μl) but not by ethanol or genomic DNA. In addition, phenol affected droplet formation in the digital PCR amplification process. Real-time PCR amplification was inhibited by high concentrations of phenol (more than 1% v/v), proteinase K (more than 0.001 μg/μl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (more than 1 nmol/μl), heparin (more than 0.005 unit/μl), and genomic DNA (more than 51.9 ng/μl) but not by ethanol. Although both PCR systems were inhibited by nearly the same substances, digital PCR was more robust than real-time PCR against the inhibitors. We believe that our findings are important for the development of better methods for transgene detection and prevention of false negative results in gene doping testing.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-07-21 PubMed ID: 34270866DOI: 10.1002/dta.3131Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study researches the efficacy and resistance of digital PCR and real-time PCR transgene detection methods against certain inhibitors, in order to improve testing for gene doping in equestrian sports. The research found that while both types of PCR were impeded by close to identical substances, digital PCR was more resilient.

Analysis of PCR-based Transgene Detection Techniques

  • The goal of the research was to enhance the understanding of gene doping detection, which uses exogenous genetic materials called transgenes.
  • Gene doping is a concern in both human and equestrian sports, compromising the fairness of competition.
  • This study focuses on Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based transgene detection methods such as digital PCR and real-time PCR. PCR is a widely-used molecular biology technique for amplifying DNA to detectable levels.
  • Specifically, it evaluates the influence of PCR inhibitors on transgene detection capacity, addressing a gap in prior research that insufficiently examined the significance of such inhibitors in gene doping testing.

Influence of Various PCR Inhibitors

  • Different inhibitors were tested on digital PCR and real-time PCR for their effects. Inhibition signifies a reduction in the effectiveness of PCR reaction, which can produce false negative results in gene doping tests – indicating the absence of doping when it is actually present.
  • Inhibitors tested include high concentrations of proteinase K, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), heparin, ethanol, genomic DNA, and phenol.
  • Digital PCR amplification was significantly impeded by proteinase K, EDTA, and heparin, but was unaffected by ethanol or genomic DNA. Phenol disrupted droplet formation in the digital PCR amplification process.

Comparison of Digital PCR vs Real-Time PCR

  • Real-time PCR amplification was inhibited by phenol, proteinase K, EDTA, heparin, and genomic DNA, similar to the substances that impeded digital PCR. However, real-time PCR was not affected by ethanol.
  • In comparison, digital PCR proved more resistant or robust against the tested inhibitors than real-time PCR, particularly notable with respect to genomic DNA, an inhibitor that affected real-time PCR but not digital PCR.
  • The researchers suggest that this makes digital PCR potentially more reliable for gene doping testing, as it can provide accurate results despite the presence of inhibitors.

Implications for Gene Doping Detection

  • The results of this study provide vital information for improving transgene detection methods and preventing false negatives in gene doping testing.
  • By understanding the robustness of the PCR systems against certain inhibitors, scientists can develop better testing methods to maintain fair competition within equestrian and potentially other sports.

Cite This Article

APA
Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Kikuchi M, Ishige T, Kakoi H, Hirota KI, Kusano K, Nagata SI. (2021). Robustness of digital PCR and real-time PCR against inhibitors in transgene detection for gene doping control in equestrian sports. Drug Test Anal, 13(10), 1768-1775. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3131

Publication

Drug testing and analysis
ISSN: 1942-7611
NlmUniqueID: 101483449
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 10
Pages: 1768-1775

Researcher Affiliations

Tozaki, Teruaki
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Ohnuma, Aoi
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Kikuchi, Mio
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Ishige, Taichiro
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Kakoi, Hironaga
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Hirota, Kei-Ichi
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Kusano, Kanichi
  • Equine Department, Japan Racing Association, Minato, Tokyo, Japan.
Nagata, Shun-Ichi
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Doping in Sports / prevention & control
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Transgenes

Grant Funding

  • Japan Racing Association

References

This article includes 35 references
  1. Tozaki T, Hamilton NA. Control of gene doping in human and horse sports. Gene Ther 2021.
    doi: 10.1038/s41434-021-00267-5google scholar: lookup
  2. World Anti-Doping Agency. Laboratory Guidelines-Gene Doping Detection Based on Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). 2021 (Version 1.0) https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/wada_guidelines_for_gene_doping_pcr_test_v1_jan_2021_eng.pdf
  3. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Takasu M. Droplet digital PCR detection of the erythropoietin transgene from horse plasma and urine for gene-doping control. Genes 2019;10(3):243.
  4. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Kikuchi M. Microfluidic quantitative PCR detection of 12 transgenes from horse plasma for gene doping control. Genes 2020;11(4):457.
  5. Haughan J, Jiang Z, Stefanovski D, Moss KL, Ortved KF, Robinson MA. Detection of intra-articular gene therapy in horses using quantitative real time PCR in synovial fluid and plasma. Drug Test Anal 2020;12(6):743-751.
  6. Cheung HW, Wong KS, Lin VYC, Wan TSM, Ho ENM. A duplex qPCR assay for human erythropoietin (EPO) transgene to control gene doping in horses. Drug Test Anal 2021;13(1):113-121.
  7. Baoutina A, Coldham T, Fuller B, Emslie KR. Improved detection of transgene and nonviral vectors in blood. Hum Gene Ther Methods 2013;24(6):345-354.
  8. Neuberger EW, Perez I, Le Guiner C. Establishment of two quantitative nested qPCR assays targeting the human EPO transgene. Gene Ther 2016;23(4):330-339.
  9. Moser DA, Braga L, Raso A, Zacchigna S, Giacca M, Simon P. Transgene detection by digital droplet PCR. PLoS ONE 2014;9(11):e111781.
  10. Katcher HL, Schwartz I. A distinctive property of Tth DNA polymerase: enzymatic amplification in the presence of phenol. Biotechniques 1994;16(1):84-92.
  11. Huggett JF, Novak T, Garson JA. Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon. BMC Res Notes 2008;1(1):70.
  12. Chang CH, Mau-Hsu D, Chen KC, Wei CW, Chiu CY, Young TH. Evaluation of digital real-time PCR assay as a molecular diagnostic tool for single-cell analysis. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):3432.
  13. Tombuloglu H, Sabit H, Al-Suhaimi E. Development of multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. PLoS ONE 2021;16(4):e0250942.
  14. Coryell MP, Iakiviak M, Pereira N. A method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in healthy human stool: a validation study. Lancet Microbe 2021;2(6):e259-e266.
    doi: 10.1016/s2666-5247(21)00059-8google scholar: lookup
  15. de Kock R, Baselmans M, Scharnhorst V, Deiman B. Sensitive detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by multiplex droplet digital RT-PCR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2021;40(4):807-813.
  16. Almeida PR, Eisen AKA, Demoliner M. RT-dPCR in mosquito samples for ZIKV detection: effects of RNA extraction and reverse transcription in target concentration. Viruses 2020;12(8):827.
  17. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Iwai S. Robustness of digital PCR and real-time PCR in transgene detection for gene-doping control. Anal Chem 2021;93(18):7133-7139.
  18. Zanaglio C, Bernardi S, Gandolfi L. RT-qPCR versus digital PCR: how do they impact differently on clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia patients?. Case Rep Oncol 2020;13(3):1263-1269.
  19. Moser DA, Neuberger EW, Simon P. A quick one-tube nested PCR-protocol for EPO transgene detection. Drug Test Anal 2012;4(11):870-875.
  20. Aoki K, Sugasawa T, Yanazawa K. The detection of trans gene fragments of hEPO in gene doping model mice by Taqman qPCR assay. PeerJ 2020;8:e8595.
  21. Yokota M, Tatsumi N, Nathalang O, Yamada T, Tsuda I. Effects of heparin on polymerase chain reaction for blood white cells. J Clin Lab Anal 1999;13(3):133-140.
  22. Steitz TA. A mechanism for all polymerases. Nature 1998;39:231-232.
  23. Qamar W, Khan MR, Arafah A. Optimization of conditions to extract high quality DNA for PCR analysis from whole blood using SDS-proteinase K method. Saudi J Biol Sci 2017;24(7):1465-1469.
  24. Behringer R, Gertsenstein M, Nagy KV, Nagy A. Isolation of high-molecular-weight DNA from mouse yolk sacs and the like. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2019;2019(1):pdb.prot092726.
    doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot092726google scholar: lookup
  25. Chetverina HV, Falaleeva MV, Chetverin AB. Simultaneous assay of DNA and RNA targets in the whole blood using novel isolation procedure and molecular colony amplification. Anal Biochem 2004;334(2):376-381.
  26. Arruda SR, Pereira DG, Silva-Castro MM. An optimized protocol for DNA extraction in plants with a high content of secondary metabolites, based on leaves of Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir. (Leguminosae). Genet Mol Res 2017.
    doi: 10.4238/gmr16039063google scholar: lookup
  27. Green MR, Sambrook J. Precipitation of DNA with ethanol. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2016;2016(12):pdb.prot093377.
    doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot093377google scholar: lookup
  28. Gerdes L, Iwobi A, Busch U, Pecoraro S. Optimization of digital droplet polymerase chain reaction for quantification of genetically modified organisms. Biomol Detect Quantif 2016;7:9-20.
  29. Witte AK, Mester P, Fister S, Witte M, Schoder D, Rossmanith P. A systematic investigation of parameters influencing droplet rain in the Listeria monocytogenes prfA assay-reduction of ambiguous results in ddPCR. PLoS ONE 2016;11(12):e0168179.
  30. Hill EW, McGivney BA, Gu J. A genome-wide SNP-association study confirms a sequence variant (g.66493737C>T) in the equine myostatin (MSTN) gene as the most powerful predictor of optimum racing distance for Thoroughbred racehorses. BMC Genomics 2010;11(1):552.
  31. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Rendahl AK. Genome-wide analysis reveals selection for important traits in domestic horse breeds. PLoS Genet 2013;9(1):e1003211.
  32. Tozaki T, Hill EW, Hirota K. A cohort study of racing performance in Japanese Thoroughbred racehorses using genome information on ECA18. Anim Genet 2012;43(1):42-52.
  33. Tozaki T, Sato F, Hill EW. Sequence variants at the myostatin gene locus influence the body composition of Thoroughbred horses. J Vet Med Sci 2011;73(12):1617-1624.
  34. Rooney MF, Hill EW, Kelly VP, Porter RK. The “speed gene” effect of myostatin arises in Thoroughbred horses due to a promoter proximal SINE insertion. PLoS ONE 2018;13(10):e0205664.
  35. O'Hara V, Cowan A, Riddell D. A highly prevalent SINE mutation in the myostatin (MSTN) gene promoter is associated with low circulating myostatin concentration in Thoroughbred racehorses. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):7916.

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Lu Y, Yan J, Ou G, Fu L. A Review of Recent Progress in Drug Doping and Gene Doping Control Analysis. Molecules 2023 Jul 18;28(14).
    doi: 10.3390/molecules28145483pubmed: 37513354google scholar: lookup
  2. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Kikuchi M, Ishige T, Kakoi H, Hirota KI, Takahashi Y, Nagata SI. Investigation of optimal procedures for storage and use of plasma samples suitable for gene doping tests. J Equine Sci 2023 Jun;34(2):21-27.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.34.21pubmed: 37405066google scholar: lookup
  3. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Nakamura K, Hano K, Takasu M, Takahashi Y, Tamura N, Sato F, Shimizu K, Kikuchi M, Ishige T, Kakoi H, Hirota KI, Hamilton NA, Nagata SI. Detection of Indiscriminate Genetic Manipulation in Thoroughbred Racehorses by Targeted Resequencing for Gene-Doping Control. Genes (Basel) 2022 Sep 4;13(9).
    doi: 10.3390/genes13091589pubmed: 36140757google scholar: lookup
  4. Wu D, Ding S, Liu N, Shi Y, Su P, Shi H, Shi Y, Han B, Cheng S, Ren X, Tian F, Chen P, Wu J, Su X, Li R. Codon changes challenge PCR-based gene doping detection. Gene Ther 2025 Dec;32(6):632-640.
    doi: 10.1038/s41434-025-00569-ypubmed: 41057515google scholar: lookup
  5. Wilkin T, Hamilton NA, Cawley AT, Bhat S, Baoutina A. PCR-Based Equine Gene Doping Test for the Australian Horseracing Industry. Int J Mol Sci 2024 Feb 22;25(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms25052570pubmed: 38473816google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,658 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.