FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / EFSA J / Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an esse...
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2022; 20(2); e07159; doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7159

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from the flowers of Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook.f. & Thomson (ylang ylang oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).

Abstract: Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of an essential oil from the flowers of Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook.f. & Thomson (ylang ylang oil), when used as a sensory additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the essential oil under assessment is safe up to the maximum proposed use levels in complete feed of 1 mg/kg for chickens for fattening, 1.5 mg/kg for laying hens, turkeys for fattening and rabbits, 2 mg/kg for piglets, 2.5 mg/kg for pigs for fattening, 3 mg/kg for sows, 4.5 mg/kg for cattle for fattening, sheep, goats and horses, 5 mg/kg for veal calves (milk replacer), fish, dogs and ornamental fish. For cats, the calculated safe concentration in complete feed is 1 mg/kg feed. The FEEDAP Panel considered that the use in water for drinking is safe provided that the total daily intake of the additive does not exceed the daily amount that is considered safe when consumed via feed. No concerns for consumer safety were identified following the use of the additive up to the maximum proposed use level in feed. The essential oil under assessment should be considered as irritant to skin and eyes, and as a skin and respiratory sensitiser. The use of the additive in animal feed under the proposed conditions of use was not expected to pose a risk for the environment. Ylang ylang oil is recognised to flavour food. Since its function in feed would be essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy is considered necessary.
© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-02-24 PubMed ID: 35233254PubMed Central: PMC8867525DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7159Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on determining the safety and effectiveness of essential oil from Cananga odorata flower, also known as ylang ylang oil, as a sensory add-on in food and drinking water for all types of animals.

Objective of the Study

  • The main aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an essential oil from the flowers of Cananga odorata, known as ylang ylang oil, when used as a sensory additive in animal feed and drinking water for all animal species.

Methods Used in the Study

  • The EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion in response to a request from the European Commission.
  • The evaluation was conducted considering proposed maximum use levels of the essential oil in complete animal feed.

Findings of the Study

  • The panel established that the oil is safe up to the proposed maximum use levels in complete feed. These levels vary depending on the animal species, for example, 1mg/kg for chickens for fattening, 2.5mg/kg for fattening pigs, and 5mg/kg for veal calves, fish, dogs and ornamental fish.
  • A calculated safe concentration for cats was set at 1mg/kg of feed.
  • It was also established that the use of ylang ylang oil in drinking water is safe, provided the total daily intake of the additive does not exceed the safe daily amount when consumed via feed.

Safety Assessment Findings

  • The study found no consumer safety concerns following the use of the additive up to the maximum proposed use level in feed.
  • The essential oil under assessment was considered to be irritant to skin and eyes, and as a skin and respiratory sensitiser.
  • No risk was anticipated for the environment from using the additive in animal feed under the proposed conditions.

Efficacy of Ylang Ylang Oil

  • The study concluded that ylang ylang oil, recognized for its food flavoring properties, does not need further demonstration of efficacy as its function in feed would be the same as in food.

Cite This Article

APA
Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Fašmon Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. (2022). Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from the flowers of Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook.f. & Thomson (ylang ylang oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA J, 20(2), e07159. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7159

Publication

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
NlmUniqueID: 101642076
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 20
Issue: 2
Pages: e07159

Researcher Affiliations

Bampidis, Vasileios
    Azimonti, Giovanna
      Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
        Christensen, Henrik
          Fašmon Durjava, Mojca
            Kouba, Maryline
              López-Alonso, Marta
                López Puente, Secundino
                  Marcon, Francesca
                    Mayo, Baltasar
                      Pechová, Alena
                        Petkova, Mariana
                          Ramos, Fernando
                            Sanz, Yolanda
                              Villa, Roberto Edoardo
                                Woutersen, Ruud
                                  Brantom, Paul
                                    Chesson, Andrew
                                      Westendorf, Johannes
                                        Manini, Paola
                                          Pizzo, Fabiola
                                            Dusemund, Birgit

                                              References

                                              This article includes 67 references
                                              1. Anthony A, Caldwell J, Hutt AJ, Smith RL. Metabolism of estragole in rat and mouse and influence of dose size on excretion of the proximate carcinogen 1'-hydroxyestragole.. Food Chem Toxicol 1987 Nov;25(11):799-806.
                                                pubmed: 3121480doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(87)90257-2google scholar: lookup
                                              2. van den Berg SJPL, Restani P, Boersma MG, Delmulle L, Rietjens IMCM. Levels of genotoxic and carcinogenic compounds in plant food supplements and associated risk assessment.. Food and Nutrition Sciences 2011;2:989–1010.
                                              3. Bleasel N, Tate B, Rademaker M. Allergic contact dermatitis following exposure to essential oils.. Australas J Dermatol 2002 Aug;43(3):211-3.
                                                pubmed: 12121401doi: 10.1046/j.1440-0960.2002.00598.xgoogle scholar: lookup
                                              4. Burdock GA. Fenaroli’s handbook of flavor ingredients. 2009;6th Edition;243, 2019‐2030 pp.
                                              5. Court MH, Greenblatt DJ. Molecular basis for deficient acetaminophen glucuronidation in cats. An interspecies comparison of enzyme kinetics in liver microsomes.. Biochem Pharmacol 1997 Apr 4;53(7):1041-7.
                                                pubmed: 9174118doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00072-5google scholar: lookup
                                              6. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in contact with Food (AFC) on a request from the Commission Flavouring Group Evaluation 6, Revision 1 (FGE.06Rev 1): Flavouring Group Evaluation 6, Revision 1 (FGE.06Rev1): straight‐ and branched‐chain aliphatic unsaturated primary alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and esters from chemical groups 1 and 4 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000 of 18 July 2000). EFSA Journal 2008;6(5):616, 75 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.616google scholar: lookup
                                              7. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (AFC) on a request from Commission on Flavouring Group Evaluation 87, (FGE.87) bicyclic secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters. EFSA Journal 2008;918, 109 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.918google scholar: lookup
                                              8. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (AFC) on a request from the Commission on FGE54rev1 Consideration of benzyl derivatives evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting) structurally related to benzyl alcohols, benzaldehydes, a related acetal, benzoic acids and related esters evaluated by EFSA in FGE.20Rev1 (2009). EFSA Journal 2009;1025, 73 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.1025google scholar: lookup
                                              9. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Compendium of botanicals reported to contain naturally occurring substances of possible concern for human health when used in food and food supplements. EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2663, 60 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2663google scholar: lookup
                                              10. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 62, Revision 1 (FGE.62Rev1): consideration of linear and branched‐chain aliphatic unsaturated, unconjugated alcohols, aldehydes, acids, and related esters evaluated by JECFA (61st and 68th meeting) structurally related to branched‐ and straight‐chain unsaturated carboxylic acids and esters of these with aliphatic saturated alcohols evaluated by EFSA in FGE.05Rev2 (2010) and to straight‐ and branched‐chain aliphatic unsaturated primary alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and esters evaluated by EFSA in FGE.06Rev1 (2008). EFSA Journal 2010;8(11):1407, 47 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1407google scholar: lookup
                                              11. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 20, Revision 2 (FGE.20Rev2): benzyl alcohols, benzaldehydes, a related acetal, benzoic acids, and related esters from chemical groups 23 and 30. EFSA Journal 2010;8(7):1405, 136 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1405google scholar: lookup
                                              12. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Guidance on the data required for the risk assessment of flavourings. EFSA Journal 2010;8(6):1623, 38 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2010.1623google scholar: lookup
                                              13. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 25, Revision 2 (FGE.25Rev2): aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31. EFSA Journal 2011;9(6):2177, 126 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2177google scholar: lookup
                                              14. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 82, Revision 1 (FGE.82Rev1): consideration of epoxides evaluated by the JECFA (65th meeting). EFSA Journal 2014;12(6):3708, 32 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3708google scholar: lookup
                                              15. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 18, Revision 3 (FGE.18Rev3): aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic saturated and unsaturated tertiary alcohols, aromatic tertiary alcohols and their esters from chemical groups 6 and 8. EFSA Journal 2015;13(5):4118, 115 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4118google scholar: lookup
                                              16. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 25, Revision 3 (FGE.25Rev3): aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31. EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4069, 116 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4069google scholar: lookup
                                              17. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 78, Revision 2 (FGE.78Rev2): consideration of aliphatic and alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons evaluated by JECFA (63rd meeting) structurally related to aliphatic hydrocarbons evaluated by EFSA in FGE.25Rev3. EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4067, 72 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4067google scholar: lookup
                                              18. Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Engel KH, Fowler P, Fürst P, Gürtler R, Gundert-Remy U, Husøy T, Mennes W, Moldeus P, Oskarsson A, Shah R, Waalkens-Berendsen I, Wölfle D, Boon P, Crebelli R, Di Domenico A, Filipič M, Mortensen A, Van Loveren H, Woutersen R, Gergelova P, Giarola A, Lodi F, Frutos Fernandez MJ. Re-evaluation of benzyl alcohol (E 1519) as food additive.. EFSA J 2019 Oct;17(10):e05876.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5876pmc: PMC7008871pubmed: 32626148google scholar: lookup
                                              19. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Statement on the use of feed additives authorised/applied for use in feed when supplied via water. EFSA Journal 2010;8(12):1956, 9 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1956google scholar: lookup
                                              20. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2011;9(12):2440, 14 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2440google scholar: lookup
                                              21. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of branched‐chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing branched‐chain alcohols and acetals containing branched‐chain aldehydes (chemical group 2) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(10):2927, 26 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2927google scholar: lookup
                                              22. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic saturated and unsaturated tertiary alcohols and esters with esters containing tertiary alcohols ethers (chemical group 6) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(11):2966, 25 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2966google scholar: lookup
                                              23. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Opinion on the safety and efficacy of furanones and tetrahydrofurfuryl derivatives: 4‐hydroxy‐2,5‐dimethylfuran‐3(2H)‐one, 4,5‐dihydro‐2‐methylfuran‐3(2H)‐one, 4‐acetoxy‐2,5‐dimethylfuran‐3(2H)‐one and linalool oxide (chemical Group 13) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(7):2786, 16 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2786google scholar: lookup
                                              24. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of phenyl ethyl alcohols, phenylacetic acids, related esters, phenoxyacetic acids and related esters (chemical group 15) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(3):2625, 16 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2625google scholar: lookup
                                              25. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and alicyclic ethers (chemical group 16) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(11):2967, 17 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2967google scholar: lookup
                                              26. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of benzyl alcohols, aldehydes, acids, esters and acetals (chemical group 23) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(7):2785, 30 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2785google scholar: lookup
                                              27. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of phenol derivatives containing ring‐alkyl, ring‐alkoxy and side‐chains with an oxygenated functional group (chemical group 25) when used as flavourings for all species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(2):2573, 19 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2573google scholar: lookup
                                              28. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives (chemical group 26) when used as feed additives for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2678, 19 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2678google scholar: lookup
                                              29. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for sensory additives. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2534, 26 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2534google scholar: lookup
                                              30. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2539, 5 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2539google scholar: lookup
                                              31. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of straight‐chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing saturated alcohols and acetals containing saturated aldehydes (chemical group 01) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2013;11(4):3169, 35 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3169google scholar: lookup
                                              32. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of saturated and unsaturated aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and esters with esters containing secondary alcohols belonging chemical group 5 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2015;13(11):4268, 21 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4268google scholar: lookup
                                              33. EFSA Feedap Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4053, 22 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4053google scholar: lookup
                                              34. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Gregoretti L, Manini P, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of 26 compounds belonging to chemical group 3 (α,β-unsaturated straight-chain and branched-chain aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, acids and esters) when used as flavourings for all animal species and categories.. EFSA J 2019 Mar;17(3):e05654.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4512pmc: PMC7009239pubmed: 32626273google scholar: lookup
                                              35. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical Group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species and categories. EFSA Journal 2016;14(1):4339, 17 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4339google scholar: lookup
                                              36. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of secondary alicyclic saturated and unsaturated alcohols, ketones, ketals and esters with ketals containing alicyclic alcohols or ketones and esters containing secondary alicyclic alcohols from chemical group 8 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 2016;14(6):4475, 26 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4475google scholar: lookup
                                              37. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López Puente S, López-Alonso M, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Brantom P, Dusemund B, Hogstrand C, Van Beelen P, Westendorf J, Gregoretti L, Manini P, Chesson A. Safety and efficacy of aryl-substituted primary alcohol, aldehyde, acid, ester and acetal derivatives belonging to chemical group 22 when used as flavourings for all animal species.. EFSA J 2017 Feb;15(2):e04672.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4672pmc: PMC7010084pubmed: 32625398google scholar: lookup
                                              38. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05023.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023pmc: PMC7010039pubmed: 32625313google scholar: lookup
                                              39. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05023.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023pmc: PMC7010039pubmed: 32625313google scholar: lookup
                                              40. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05021.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5021pmc: PMC7009839pubmed: 32625311google scholar: lookup
                                              41. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Dujardin B, Galobart J, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05022.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5022pmc: PMC7009902pubmed: 32625312google scholar: lookup
                                              42. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives.. EFSA J 2018 May;16(5):e05274.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5274pmc: PMC7009555pubmed: 32625911google scholar: lookup
                                              43. Bampidis V, Bastos M, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brock T, de Knecht J, Kolar B, van Beelen P, Padovani L, Tarrés-Call J, Vettori MV, Azimonti G. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment.. EFSA J 2019 Apr;17(4):e05648.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5648pmc: PMC7009194pubmed: 32626279google scholar: lookup
                                              44. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Kouba M, Fašmon Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Galobart J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of expressed lemon oil and its fractions from Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck and of lime oil from Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2021 Apr;19(4):e06548.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6548pmc: PMC8085978pubmed: 33968248google scholar: lookup
                                              45. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). General approach to assess the safety for the target species of botanical preparations which contain compounds that are genotoxic and/or carcinogenic. Endorsed by the FEEDAP Panel during the 153rd Plenary meeting of 17‐18 March 2021. .
                                              46. EFSA SC (EFSA Scientific Committee). Guidance on safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements, on request of EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009;7(9):1249, 19 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2009.1249ppgoogle scholar: lookup
                                              47. EFSA Scientific Committee. Scientific Opinion on the applicability of the Margin of Exposure approach for the safety assessment of impurities which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic in substances added to food/feed. EFSA Journal 2012;10(3):2578, 5 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2578google scholar: lookup
                                              48. Hardy A, Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen KH, More S, Mortensen A, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Silano V, Solecki R, Turck D, Aerts M, Bodin L, Davis A, Edler L, Gundert-Remy U, Sand S, Slob W, Bottex B, Abrahantes JC, Marques DC, Kass G, Schlatter JR. Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.. EFSA J 2017 Jan;15(1):e04658.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658pmc: PMC7009819pubmed: 32625254google scholar: lookup
                                              49. More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bennekou SH, Bragard C, Halldorsson TI, Hernández-Jerez AF, Koutsoumanis K, Naegeli H, Schlatter JR, Silano V, Nielsen SS, Schrenk D, Turck D, Younes M, Benfenati E, Castle L, Cedergreen N, Hardy A, Laskowski R, Leblanc JC, Kortenkamp A, Ragas A, Posthuma L, Svendsen C, Solecki R, Testai E, Dujardin B, Kass GE, Manini P, Jeddi MZ, Dorne JC, Hogstrand C. Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.. EFSA J 2019 Mar;17(3):e05634.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634pmc: PMC7009070pubmed: 32626259google scholar: lookup
                                              50. More S, Bampidis V, Benford D, Boesten J, Bragard C, Halldorsson T, Hernandez-Jerez A, Hougaard-Bennekou S, Koutsoumanis K, Naegeli H, Nielsen SS, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Aquilina G, Crebelli R, Gürtler R, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Mosesso P, Nielsen E, Solecki R, Carfì M, Martino C, Maurici D, Parra Morte J, Schlatter J. Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures.. EFSA J 2019 Jan;17(1):e05519.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5519pmc: PMC7009058pubmed: 32626066google scholar: lookup
                                              51. EMA (European Medicines Agency). Public statement on the use of herbal medicinal products containing estragole. 2nd Draft, Revision 1, EMA/HMPC/137212/2005 Rev 1. 2019.
                                              52. de Groot AC, Schmidt E. Essential Oils, Part IV: Contact Allergy.. Dermatitis 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):170-5.
                                                pubmed: 27427818doi: 10.1097/der.0000000000000197google scholar: lookup
                                              53. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). Oil of ylang‐ylang [Cananga Odorata (Lam.) Hook. f. et Thomson forma genuine]. 2004;Reference number ISO 3063:2004(E), Switzerland.
                                              54. Lautz LS, Jeddi MZ, Girolami F, Nebbia C, Dorne JLCM. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of pharmaceuticals in cats (Felix sylvestris catus) and implications for the risk assessment of feed additives and contaminants.. Toxicol Lett 2021 Mar 1;338:114-127.
                                                pubmed: 33253781doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.11.014google scholar: lookup
                                              55. Miller EC, Swanson AB, Phillips DH, Fletcher TL, Liem A, Miller JA. Structure-activity studies of the carcinogenicities in the mouse and rat of some naturally occurring and synthetic alkenylbenzene derivatives related to safrole and estragole.. Cancer Res 1983 Mar;43(3):1124-34.
                                                pubmed: 6825084
                                              56. . NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Methyleugenol (CAS NO. 93-15-2) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies).. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser 2000 Jul;491:1-412.
                                                pubmed: 12563349
                                              57. Phillips DH, Reddy MV, Randerath K. 32P-post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. II. Newborn male B6C3F1 mice.. Carcinogenesis 1984 Dec;5(12):1623-8.
                                                pubmed: 6499113doi: 10.1093/carcin/5.12.1623google scholar: lookup
                                              58. Randerath K, Haglund RE, Phillips DH, Reddy MV. 32P-post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed in the livers of animals treated with safrole, estragole and other naturally-occurring alkenylbenzenes. I. Adult female CD-1 mice.. Carcinogenesis 1984 Dec;5(12):1613-22.
                                                pubmed: 6499112doi: 10.1093/carcin/5.12.1613google scholar: lookup
                                              59. Sangster SA, Caldwell J, Hutt AJ, Anthony A, Smith RL. The metabolic disposition of [methoxy-14C]-labelled trans-anethole, estragole and p-propylanisole in human volunteers.. Xenobiotica 1987 Oct;17(10):1223-32.
                                                pubmed: 3424869doi: 10.3109/00498258709167414google scholar: lookup
                                              60. Scientific Committee on Food (SCF). Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on Estragole (1‐allyl‐4‐methoxybenzene) - 583 SCF/CS/FLAV/FLAVOUR/6 ADD 2 Final, European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate‐General. 2001;26.09.2001, pp. 1‐10.
                                              61. Stashenko E, Martinez JR, MacKu C, Shibamoto T. HRGC and GC‐MS analysis of essential oil from Colombian ylang−ylang (Cananga odorata Hook fil. Et Thomson, forma genuina). Journal of High Resolution Chromatography 1993;16:441–444.
                                              62. Stashenko EE, Torres W, Martinez Morales JR. A study of the compositional variation of the essential oil of ylang‐ylang (Cananga odorata Hook Fil. et Thomson, forma genuina) during flower development Morales. Journal of High Resolution Chromatography 1995;18:101–104.
                                              63. Stashenko EE, Prada NQ, Martínez Morales JR. HRGC/FID/NPD and HRGC/MSD study of Colombian ylang‐ylang (Cananga odorata) oils obtained by different extraction techniques. Journal of High Resolution Chromatography 1996;19:353–358.
                                              64. Suparmi S, Ginting AJ, Mariyam S, Wesseling S, Rietjens IMCM. Levels of methyleugenol and eugenol in instant herbal beverages available on the Indonesian market and related risk assessment.. Food Chem Toxicol 2019 Mar;125:467-478.
                                                pubmed: 30721739doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.02.001google scholar: lookup
                                              65. Tan LT, Lee LH, Yin WF, Chan CK, Abdul Kadir H, Chan KG, Goh BH. Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, and Bioactivities of Cananga odorata (Ylang-Ylang).. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:896314.
                                                doi: 10.1155/2015/896314pmc: PMC4534619pubmed: 26294929google scholar: lookup
                                              66. Zangouras A, Caldwell J, Hutt AJ, Smith RL. Dose dependent conversion of estragole in the rat and mouse to the carcinogenic metabolite, 1'-hydroxyestragole.. Biochem Pharmacol 1981 Jun 1;30(11):1383-6.
                                                pubmed: 7271835doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(81)90329-4google scholar: lookup
                                              67. Zhou GD, Moorthy B, Bi J, Donnelly KC, Randerath K. DNA adducts from alkoxyallylbenzene herb and spice constituents in cultured human (HepG2) cells.. Environ Mol Mutagen 2007 Dec;48(9):715-21.
                                                pubmed: 17948277doi: 10.1002/em.20348google scholar: lookup

                                              Citations

                                              This article has been cited 2 times.
                                              1. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Schlatter J, Schrenk D, Westendorf J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from the leaves of Laurus nobilis L. (laurel leaf oil) for all animal species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA J 2023 Mar;21(3):e07875.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7875pubmed: 36908566google scholar: lookup
                                              2. Cattaneo I, Kalian AD, Di Nicola MR, Dujardin B, Levorato S, Mohimont L, Nathanail AV, Carnessechi E, Astuto MC, Tarazona JV, Kass GEN, Liem AKD, Robinson T, Manini P, Hogstrand C, Price PS, Dorne JLCM. Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Multiple Chemicals at the European Food Safety Authority: Principles, Guidance Documents, Applications and Future Challenges. Toxins (Basel) 2023 Jan 4;15(1).
                                                doi: 10.3390/toxins15010040pubmed: 36668860google scholar: lookup
                                              Subscribe to our newsletter
                                              Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.