FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS Negl Trop Dis / Seroprevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infect...
PLoS neglected tropical diseases2025; 19(12); e0013303; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013303

Seroprevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild, domestic and companion animals in urban informal settlements from Salvador, Brazil.

Abstract: Toxoplasma gondii is a globally neglected zoonotic parasite, particularly prevalent in socioeconomically vulnerable areas. Various animal species serve as reservoirs for T. gondii across different regions, including domestic cats, livestock, and a variety of wild and synanthropic animals. In urban areas, especially informal settlements, the close coexistence of humans, domestic animals, and wildlife may influence local transmission dynamics. This study evaluated the seroprevalence and associated risk factors for T. gondii infection in domestic and synanthropic animals from two low-income neighborhoods in Salvador, Brazil. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the neighborhoods of Marechal Rondon and Pau da Lima from October 2021 to February 2023. Blood samples were collected from domestic animals (288 dogs, 112 cats, 27 chickens, and six horses) and synanthropic species (54 brown rats and 75 big-eared opossums). Serological tests were performed using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody test. Questionnaires were used to collect environmental, demographic, and socioeconomic data from households where sampling took place. Generalized linear mixed models were applied to identify predictors of exposure. Seroprevalence was highest in chickens (66.7%), followed by dogs (37.2%), rats (24.1%), cats (22.3%), opossums (20%), and horses (16.7%). No significant factors were found to be associated with T. gondii seroprevalence in chickens, horses, rats, or opossums. Nevertheless, in dogs and cats, homemade diets increased the odds of infection by nearly six times compared to commercial feeding. Dogs from Pau da Lima were twice as likely to be infected as those from Marechal Rondon. These findings underscore the importance of promoting safe pet management, improving sanitation, and monitoring sentinel species to mitigate zoonotic risks in urban informal settlements.
Copyright: © 2025 Bazan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-12-16 PubMed ID: 41401226PubMed Central: PMC12725734DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013303Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Objective Overview

  • This study investigated the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection among various domestic and wild animals living in low-income urban areas of Salvador, Brazil, and identified factors that increase the risk of infection.

Background

  • Toxoplasma gondii is a parasite that can infect most warm-blooded animals, including humans, and is transmitted through contact with infected animals or contaminated environments.
  • The parasite is especially important in socioeconomically vulnerable areas due to close living quarters and poor sanitation.
  • Animals like domestic cats, livestock, and wild animals can act as reservoirs, maintaining and spreading the parasite in communities.
  • Urban informal settlements often have close interaction between humans, pets, livestock, and wild animals, affecting how the parasite spreads locally.

Study Design

  • A cross-sectional study was carried out from October 2021 to February 2023 in two low-income neighborhoods of Salvador, Brazil: Marechal Rondon and Pau da Lima.
  • Blood samples were collected from multiple animal species living in these areas, including:
    • Domestic animals: 288 dogs, 112 cats, 27 chickens, and 6 horses
    • Synanthropic (wild species living close to humans): 54 brown rats and 75 big-eared opossums
  • Serological testing was performed using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody test to detect antibodies against T. gondii, indicating exposure/infection.
  • Household-level questionnaires captured environmental, demographic, and socioeconomic information to analyze potential risk factors for infection.
  • Generalized linear mixed models were used statistically to identify factors predicting seropositivity among animals.

Key Findings: Seroprevalence by Species

  • Highest seroprevalence was observed in:
    • Chickens: 66.7%
    • Dogs: 37.2%
    • Rats: 24.1%
    • Cats: 22.3%
    • Opossums: 20%
    • Horses: 16.7%
  • The presence of infection in a broad range of species highlights the wide environmental contamination and potential for transmission in urban informal settlements.

Risk Factors Associated with Infection

  • No significant risk factors were identified for infection in chickens, horses, rats, or opossums.
  • For dogs and cats, important risk factors related to feeding practices were found:
    • Animals fed homemade diets had nearly six times greater odds of T. gondii infection compared to those fed commercial pet food.
    • This could indicate contamination risks from raw or undercooked meat or food preparation practices associated with homemade diets.
  • Geographical difference:
    • Dogs from Pau da Lima were twice as likely to be infected than those from Marechal Rondon, suggesting local environmental or management differences influencing exposure risk.

Public Health Implications

  • These findings demonstrate that multiple animal species in urban informal settlements carry T. gondii, potentially placing humans living nearby at increased risk of infection.
  • Improving pet management practices, such as promoting safe feeding habits (reducing homemade/raw diets), could decrease infection rates in companion animals.
  • Enhancing sanitation measures to reduce environmental contamination is critical to controlling transmission in these vulnerable neighborhoods.
  • Monitoring animals like dogs and cats as sentinel species can help track T. gondii presence and guide interventions to lower zoonotic transmission.

Conclusion

  • The study emphasizes the importance of integrated approaches combining environmental sanitation, education on pet feeding, and surveillance of domestic and synanthropic animals to mitigate Toxoplasma gondii infection risks in socioeconomically vulnerable urban areas.

Cite This Article

APA
Bazan L, Argibay HD, Borges-Silva W, Pita Gondim LF, Dos Santos Mattos TA, Santana JO, da Silva EM, Begon M, Khalil H, Costa F, de Oliveira Carneiro I. (2025). Seroprevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild, domestic and companion animals in urban informal settlements from Salvador, Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 19(12), e0013303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013303

Publication

PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
NlmUniqueID: 101291488
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 19
Issue: 12
Pages: e0013303
PII: e0013303

Researcher Affiliations

Bazan, Leonela
  • Institute of Biology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Argibay, Hernán Darío
  • Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Borges-Silva, Waléria
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Pita Gondim, Luís Fernando
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Dos Santos Mattos, Thaís Auxiliadora
  • Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Santana, Juliete Oliveira
  • Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
da Silva, Eduardo Mendes
  • Institute of Biology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Begon, Michael
  • Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behavior, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Khalil, Hussein
  • Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Costa, Federico
  • Institute of Biology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
de Oliveira Carneiro, Ianei
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Brazil / epidemiology
  • Seroepidemiologic Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Toxoplasmosis, Animal / epidemiology
  • Toxoplasmosis, Animal / parasitology
  • Toxoplasma / immunology
  • Toxoplasma / isolation & purification
  • Cats
  • Dogs
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Pets / parasitology
  • Animals, Domestic / parasitology
  • Rats
  • Animals, Wild / parasitology
  • Antibodies, Protozoan / blood
  • Male
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Chickens / parasitology
  • Zoonoses / epidemiology
  • Zoonoses / parasitology
  • Opossums / parasitology

Grant Funding

  • Wellcome Trust

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 81 references
  1. Carellos EVM, Caiaffa WT, Andrade GMQ, Abreu MNS, Januário JN. Congenital toxoplasmosis in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil: a neglected infectious disease?. Epidemiol Infect 2014;142(3):644–55.
    pmc: PMC9151124pubmed: 23823156
  2. Mareze M, Benitez AdN, Brandão APD, Pinto-Ferreira F, Miura AC, Martins FDC. Socioeconomic vulnerability associated to Toxoplasma gondii exposure in southern Brazil. PLoS One 2019;14(2):e0212375.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212375pmc: PMC6375698pubmed: 30763391google scholar: lookup
  3. Moncada PA, Montoya JG. Toxoplasmosis in the fetus and newborn: an update on prevalence, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2012;10(7):815–28.
    doi: 10.1586/eri.12.58pubmed: 22943404google scholar: lookup
  4. Molan A, Nosaka K, Hunter M, Wang W. Global status of Toxoplasma gondii infection: systematic review and prevalence snapshots. Trop Biomed 2019;36(4):898–925.
    pubmed: 33597463
  5. Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology 2012;139(11):1375–424.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182012000765pubmed: 22776427google scholar: lookup
  6. Tenter AM, Heckeroth AR, Weiss LM. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. Int J Parasitol 2000;30(12–13):1217–58.
    doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00124-7pmc: PMC3109627pubmed: 11113252google scholar: lookup
  7. Dubey JP. Chapter 1 - The history and life cycle of . In: Weiss LM, Kim K, editors. Toxoplasma gondii (Third Edition). Third Edition. Academic Press; 2020. p. 1–19.
  8. Shapiro K, Bahia-Oliveira L, Dixon B, Dumètre A, de Wit LA, VanWormer E. Environmental transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: Oocysts in water, soil and food. Food Waterborne Parasitol 2019;15:e00049.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00049pmc: PMC7033973pubmed: 32095620google scholar: lookup
  9. Dumètre A, Dardé ML. How to detect Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in environmental samples?. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2003;27(5):651–61.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00071-8pubmed: 14638417google scholar: lookup
  10. Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii oocyst survival under defined temperatures. J Parasitol 1998;84(4):862–5.
    doi: 10.2307/3284606pubmed: 9714227google scholar: lookup
  11. Torrey EF, Yolken RH. Toxoplasma oocysts as a public health problem. Trends Parasitol 2013;29(8):380–4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.06.001pubmed: 23849140google scholar: lookup
  12. Hill D, Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii: transmission, diagnosis and prevention. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8(10):634–40.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00485.xpubmed: 12390281google scholar: lookup
  13. Freitas AR, Delai RR, Kmetiuk LB, da Silva EC, Martini R, Brandão APD. Seropositivity of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in owners and their dogs living on island and mainland seashore areas of southern Brazil. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022;7(10):252.
    pmc: PMC9611663pubmed: 36287993
  14. Mortari APG, Tagarra LG, de Souza ML, Roman IJ, Ratzlaff FR, Braunig P. Increased seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs in southern Brazil after an outbreak of human toxoplasmosis. Parasitol Res 2023;122(4):1009–14.
    pubmed: 36881160
  15. Pinto-Ferreira F, Pasquali AKS, Thomaz-Soccol V, Mitsuka-Breganó R, Caldart ET, Leandro A de S. Epidemiological relevance of dogs for the prevention of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Leptospira spp.. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2019;28(3):383–94.
    doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612019043pubmed: 31390432google scholar: lookup
  16. Yan C, Fu L-L, Yue C-L, Tang R-X, Liu Y-S, Lv L. Stray dogs as indicators of Toxoplasma gondii distributed in the environment: the first report across an urban-rural gradient in China. Parasit Vectors 2012;5:5.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-5pmc: PMC3271967pubmed: 22217112google scholar: lookup
  17. Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis - a waterborne zoonosis. Vet Parasitol 2004;126(1–2):57–72.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.005pubmed: 15567579google scholar: lookup
  18. Dubey JP, Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Murata FHA, Kwok OCH, Yang YR, Su C. All about toxoplasmosis in cats: the last decade. Vet Parasitol 2020;283:109145.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109145pubmed: 32645556google scholar: lookup
  19. Ellwanger JH, Chies JAB. The triad “dogs, conservation and zoonotic diseases” - An old and still neglected problem in Brazil. Perspect Ecol Conserv 2019;17(3):157–61.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.06.003pmc: PMC7148981pubmed: 32572390google scholar: lookup
  20. Schmidt PL. Companion animals as sentinels for public health. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009;39(2):241–50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2008.10.010pubmed: 19185191google scholar: lookup
  21. Moré G, Maksimov P, Pardini L, Herrmann DC, Bacigalupe D, Maksimov A. Toxoplasma gondii infection in sentinel and free-range chickens from Argentina. Vet Parasitol 2012;184(2–4):116–21.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.012pubmed: 21962965google scholar: lookup
  22. Galeh TM, Sarvi S, Montazeri M, Moosazadeh M, Nakhaei M, Shariatzadeh SA. Global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2020;7.
    pmc: PMC7411222pubmed: 32851037
  23. Dini FM, Caffara M, Magri A, Cantori A, Luci V, Monno A. Sentinels in the shadows: Exploring Toxoplasma gondii and other Sarcocystidae parasites in synanthropic rodents and their public health implications. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2024;24:100939.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.100939pmc: PMC11035367pubmed: 38655448google scholar: lookup
  24. Ding H, Gao Y-M, Deng Y, Lamberton PHL, Lu D-B. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in cats in mainland China. Parasit Vectors 2017;10(1):27.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-1970-6pmc: PMC5237326pubmed: 28086987google scholar: lookup
  25. Salb AL, Barkema HW, Elkin BT, Thompson RCA, Whiteside DP, Black SR. Dogs as sources and sentinels of parasites in humans and wildlife, northern Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14(1):60–3.
    doi: 10.3201/eid1401.071113pmc: PMC2600154pubmed: 18258078google scholar: lookup
  26. Li G, Zheng W, Yang J, Qi T, He Y, Chen W. Seroprevalence and epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii in animals in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau area, China. Pathogens 2021;10(4):432.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens10040432pmc: PMC8067442pubmed: 33917355google scholar: lookup
  27. Dubey JP, Pena HFJ, Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Murata FHA, Kwok OCH, Yang YR. Epidemiologic significance of Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens (Gallus domesticus): the past decade. Parasitology 2020;147(12):1263–89.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182020001134pmc: PMC10317745pubmed: 32660653google scholar: lookup
  28. Mogaji H, Aliaga MA, Almeida LF, Henrique J, Argibay H, Salles I. Co-production of slum health: A community based participatory research for building healthy communities in urban slums of Salvador, Brazil. 2024.
    doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11626770google scholar: lookup
  29. Reis RB, Ribeiro GS, Felzemburgh RDM, Santana FS, Mohr S, Melendez AXTO. Impact of environment and social gradient on Leptospira infection in urban slums. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2008;2(4):e228.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000228pmc: PMC2292260pubmed: 18431445google scholar: lookup
  30. Khalil H, Santana R, de Oliveira D, Palma F, Lustosa R, Eyre MT. Poverty, sanitation, and Leptospira transmission pathways in residents from four Brazilian slums. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021;15(3):e0009256.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009256pmc: PMC8041187pubmed: 33788864google scholar: lookup
  31. Santos E, Pinho JAGd, Moraes LRS, Fischer T. O caminho das águas em Salvador: bacias hidrográficas, bairros e fontes. Salvador: ciags/ufba; 2010.
  32. Baqueiro MA, Costa F, Santos de Oliveia D, Cremonose C, Carneiro de Oliveira I. Evaluation of environmental factors associated with seropositivity for Leptospira spp. in dogs residing in informal urban settlements in Salvador, Brazil. Salvador, Bahia: Universidade Federal da Bahia; 2024.
  33. Costa F, Porter FH, Rodrigues G, Farias H, de Faria MT, Wunder EA. Infections by Leptospira interrogans, Seoul Virus, and Bartonella spp. Among Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) from the Urban Slum Environment in Brazil. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 2014;14(1):33–40.
    pmc: PMC3880909pubmed: 24359425
  34. Erickson A, Harbin K, MacPherson J, Rundle K, Overall KL. A review of pre-appointment medications to reduce fear and anxiety in dogs and cats at veterinary visits. Can Vet J 2021;62(9):952–60.
    pmc: PMC8360309pubmed: 34475580
  35. Zeppelini CG, Carvalho-Pereira T, Alves RS, Santiago DCC, Santo VFE, Begon M. Demographic drivers of Norway rat populations from urban slums in Brazil. Urban Ecosyst 2021;24(4):801–9.
    pmc: PMC8550123pubmed: 34720572
  36. Panti-May JA, Carvalho-Pereira TSA, Serrano S, Pedra GG, Taylor J, Pertile AC. A Two-Year Ecological Study of Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a Brazilian Urban Slum. PLoS One 2016;11(3):e0152511.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152511pmc: PMC4807843pubmed: 27015422google scholar: lookup
  37. Waxman S, Orozco M, Argibay H, Rodriguez C, Otero P. Comparison of two protocols for field immobilization of white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris). Eur J Wildl Res 2018;64(4):49.
  38. Conselho Nacional de Controle de Experimentação Animal (CONCEA). Resolução Normativa CONCEA no 37/2018 - Diretriz da Prática de Eutanásia do Conselho Nacional de Controle de Experimentação Animal. Brasília, DF; 2018.
  39. Camargo ME. Improved technique of indirect immunofluorescence for serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1964;6:117–8.
    pubmed: 14177810
  40. Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans. CRC Press; 2016.
  41. Silva NM, Lourenço EV, Silva DAO, Mineo JR. Optimisation of cut-off titres in Toxoplasma gondii specific ELISA and IFAT in dog sera using immunoreactivity to SAG-1 antigen as a molecular marker of infection. Vet J 2002;163(1):94–8.
    doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0629pubmed: 11749142google scholar: lookup
  42. Villanueva-Saz S, Martínez M, Giner J, Pérez MD, Tobajas AP, Yzuel A. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic serologic test to detect the presence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in cats. Vet Clin Pathol 2023;52(2):284–7.
    doi: 10.1111/vcp.13230pubmed: 36849629google scholar: lookup
  43. Wanha K, Edelhofer R, Gabler-Eduardo C, Prosl H. Prevalence of antibodies against Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in dogs and foxes in Austria. Vet Parasitol 2005;128(3–4):189–93.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.11.027pubmed: 15740855google scholar: lookup
  44. Kokkinaki KCG, Saridomichelakis MN, Mylonakis ME, Leontides L, Xenoulis PG. Seroprevalence of and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Cats from Greece. Animals (Basel) 2023;13(7):1173.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071173pmc: PMC10093379pubmed: 37048429google scholar: lookup
  45. Bártová E, Sedlák K, Kobédová K, Budíková M, Joel Atuman Y, Kamani J. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Neospora spp. and Toxoplasma gondii infections among horses and donkeys in Nigeria, West Africa. Acta Parasitol 2017;62(3).
    pubmed: 28682771
  46. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 2015;67(1):1–48.
  47. Bartoń K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. CRAN: Contributed Packages 2010.
  48. Hartig F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level/ Mixed) Regression Models. CRAN: Contributed Packages 2016.
  49. Villaverde C, Chandler M. Commercial vs Homemade Cat Diets: What you need to know. J Feline Med Surg 2022;24(5):415–28.
    doi: 10.1177/1098612X221090389pmc: PMC11104037pubmed: 35311418google scholar: lookup
  50. Sanderson SL. Pros and Cons of Commercial Pet Foods (Including Grain/Grain Free) for Dogs and Cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2021;51(3):529–50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2021.01.009pubmed: 33773644google scholar: lookup
  51. Silva RCd, Souza LCd, Langoni H, Tanaka EM, Lima VYd, Silva AVd. Risk factors and presence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in dogs from the coast of São Paulo State, Brazil. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 2010;30(2):161–6.
  52. Mascolli R, Soto FRM, Bernardi F, Ito FH, Pinheiro SR, Guilloux AGA. Seroprevalence and risk factors for toxoplasmosis and neosporosis in the dog population of Ibiúna, São Paulo, Brazil. Semin Cienc Agrar 2015;36(6):3777.
  53. Gonzales C, Vargas-Calla A, Gomez-Puerta LA, Robles K, Lopez-Urbina MT, Gonzalez AE. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and associated risk factors in cats from Lima, Peru. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 2022;31.
    pubmed: 35569910
  54. Fernandes ARF, Costa DF, Andrade MR, Bezerra CS, Mota RA, Alves CJ. Soropositividade e fatores de risco para leptospirose, toxoplasmose e neosporose na população canina do Estado da Paraíba. Pesq Vet Bras 2018;38(5):957–66.
    doi: 10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5137google scholar: lookup
  55. Bontempo V. Nutrition and health of dogs and cats: evolution of petfood. Vet Res Commun 2005;29(S2):45–50.
    pubmed: 16244924
  56. Hurst CJ. The connections between ecology and infectious disease. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
  57. Michel KE, Willoughby KN, Abood SK, Fascetti AJ, Fleeman LM, Freeman LM. Attitudes of pet owners toward pet foods and feeding management of cats and dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;233(11):1699–703.
    pubmed: 19046026
  58. Hadush Desta A. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Community Towards Zoonotic Importance of <;i>;Toxoplasma<;/i>; Infection in Central Afar Region, North East Ethiopia. IJBSE 2015;3(6):74.
    doi: 10.11648/j.ijbse.20150306.12google scholar: lookup
  59. Arruda IF, Millar PR, Barbosa AdS, Abboud LCdS, dos Reis IC, Moreira ASdC. Toxoplasma gondii in domiciled dogs and cats in urban areas of Brazil: risk factors and spatial distribution. Parasite 2021;28:56.
    pmc: PMC8265318pubmed: 34236311
  60. Constantino C, Pellizzaro M, Paula EFEd, Vieira TSWJ, Brandão APD, Ferreira F. Serosurvey for Leishmania spp., Toxoplasma gondii, Trypanosoma cruzi and Neospora caninum in neighborhood dogs in Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 2016;25:504–10.
    pubmed: 27925057
  61. Magalhães FJR, Ribeiro-Andrade M, Souza FM, Lima Filho CDF, Biondo AW, Vidotto O. Seroprevalence and spatial distribution of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cats, dogs, pigs and equines of the Fernando de Noronha Island, Brazil.. Parasitol Int 2017;66(2):43–6.
    pubmed: 27894907
  62. Benitez AdN, Gonçalves DD, Nino BdSL, Caldart ET, Freire RL, Navarro IT. Seroepidemiology of toxoplasmosis in humans and dogs from a small municipality in Parana, Brazil.. Ciência Animal Brasileira 2017;18:e42102.
  63. Ruffolo BB, Toledo RS, Martins FDC, Bugni FM, da Costa L, Marana ERM. Isolation and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in seronegative urban rats and presence of antibodies in communicating dogs in Brazil.. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2016;58.
    pmc: PMC4826081pubmed: 27074322
  64. Souza IBd, Fernandes PR, Silva TRM, Santos CVB, Silva NMMd, Ubirajara Filho CRC. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in dogs from an urban area of North-eastern Brazil: a spatial approach.. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2019;52.
    pubmed: 30994810
  65. Rocha KdS, Lima MdS, Monteiro TRM, Honorio BET, Pinho APVB, Paz GSd. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cats (Belém, Pará, Brazil).. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2020;29(2):e022719.
    doi: 10.1590/s1984-29612020038pubmed: 32609246google scholar: lookup
  66. Arraes-Santos AI, Araújo AC, Guimarães MF, Santos JR, Pena HFJ, Gennari SM. Seroprevalence of anti- and anti- antibodies in domestic mammals from two distinct regions in the semi-arid region of Northeastern Brazil.. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 2016;5:14–8.
    pubmed: 31014531
  67. Montazeri M, Mikaeili Galeh T, Moosazadeh M, Sarvi S, Dodangeh S, Javidnia J. The global serological prevalence of in felids during the last five decades (1967–2017): a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Parasit Vectors 2020;13(1):82.
    pmc: PMC7026947pubmed: 32066495
  68. Oliveira GMSd, Simões JM, Schaer RE, Freire SM, Nascimento RJM, Pinheiro AMC de M. Frequency and factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and their pets in Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2019;52:e20190250.
    pubmed: 31800920
  69. Zaki L, Olfatifar M, Ghaffarifar F, Eslahi AV, Karimi Pour Saryazdi A, Taghipour A. Global prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in birds: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Parasite Epidemiol Control 2024;25:e00350.
    pmc: PMC11090898pubmed: 38745996
  70. Lopes CS, Franco PS, Silva NM, Silva DAO, Ferro EAV, Pena HFJ. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of two Toxoplasma gondii isolates in free-range chickens from Uberlândia, Brazil.. Epidemiol Infect 2016;144(9):1865–75.
    doi: 10.1017/S0950268815003295pmc: PMC9150643pubmed: 26743347google scholar: lookup
  71. Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens (Gallus domesticus): prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis and public health significance.. Zoonoses Public Health 2010;57(1):60–73.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01274.xpubmed: 19744305google scholar: lookup
  72. Dubey JP, Murata FHA, Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Kwok OCH, Su C. Epidemiological Significance of Toxoplasma Gondii Infections in Wild Rodents: 2009-2020.. J Parasitol 2021;107(2):182–204.
    doi: 10.1645/20-121pubmed: 33662119google scholar: lookup
  73. Dabritz HA, Miller MA, Gardner IA, Packham AE, Atwill ER, Conrad PA. Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild rodents from central coastal California and a review of T. gondii prevalence in rodents.. J Parasitol 2008;94(3):675–83.
    doi: 10.1645/GE-1342.1pubmed: 18605783google scholar: lookup
  74. Horta MC, Ragozo AMA, Casagrande RA, Matushima ER, Souza GOd, De Morais ZM. Ocorrência de anticorpos anti-Toxoplasma gondii, anti-Neospora caninum e anti-Leptospira spp. em gambás (Didelphis spp.) no estado de São Paulo, Brasil.. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci 2016;53(3):1.
  75. Fornazari F, Teixeira CR, da Silva RC, Leiva M, de Almeida SC, Langoni H. Prevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii among Brazilian white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris).. Vet Parasitol 2011;179(1–3):238–41.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.02.005pubmed: 21435790google scholar: lookup
  76. Santori RT, Astúa de Moraes D, Cerqueira R. Diet composition of Metachirus nudicaudatus and Didelphis aurita (Marsupialia, Didelphoidea) in Southeastern Brazil. Mammalia 1995;59(4).
  77. Glebskiy Y, Negrete-González M, Zambrano L, Cano-Santana Z. Evaluation of the diet of Didelphis virginiana in an urban area using stable isotopes. Urban Ecosystems 2024;27(1):231–7.
  78. Carneiro IdO, Santos NdJ, Silva NS, Lima PC, Meyer R, Netto EM. Knowledge, practice and perception of human-marsupial interactions in health promotion. J Infect Dev Ctries 2019;13(4):342–7.
    doi: 10.3855/jidc.10177pubmed: 32045379google scholar: lookup
  79. Bezerra-Santos MA, Ramos RAN, Campos AK, Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Didelphis spp. opossums and their parasites in the Americas: A One Health perspective. Parasitol Res 2021;120(12):4091–111.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07072-4pmc: PMC8599228pubmed: 33788021google scholar: lookup
  80. . Mapeamento cartográfico de Salvador. 2017.
  81. . Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Malhas territoriais. 2017.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,000 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.