FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Aust Vet J / Stakeholder perceptions of thoroughbred yearling sales endos...
Australian veterinary journal2024; doi: 10.1111/avj.13332

Stakeholder perceptions of thoroughbred yearling sales endoscopy in Australia: can we do better?

Abstract: To identify thoroughbred industry stakeholders' views on the yearling sales endoscopy in Australia. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative group interviews with equine veterinarians, thoroughbred breeders and yearling purchasers. Methods: Twenty-nine experienced thoroughbred industry stakeholders participated in online focus groups: (1) equine veterinarians involved in yearling endoscopy; (2) thoroughbred breeders; and (3) yearling buyers. The focus groups were audio and video recorded and digital whiteboards were available. Data was transcribed, live-coded and analysed thematically. Results: The main themes identified included the uncertainty surrounding the relationship between yearling laryngeal function and future performance, especially the significance of yearlings with grade 3 out of 5 laryngeal function; interobserver variability in the laryngeal function grade assigned by veterinarians to the same endoscopic exam; and the presence of intra-horse variability in laryngeal function over different time points. Conclusions: Stakeholders raised multiple concerns about the current yearling sales endoscopy process in Australia. Recommendations to address these concerns include further investigation into the race performance of yearlings identified with grade 3 laryngeal function; training of veterinarians to reduce inter-observer variability; and the need to determine the most appropriate grading system to use in yearlings. Future research should evaluate the significance of intra-horse variability in a yearling population.
© 2024 The Authors. Australian Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Veterinary Association.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-04-09 PubMed ID: 38590275DOI: 10.1111/avj.13332Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discusses the concerns and views of stakeholders in Australia’s thoroughbred industry regarding the process of yearling sales endoscopy. It identifies issues such as uncertainty in interpreting laryngeal function, calculation discrepancies between veterinarians, as well as notable variations in laryngeal functionality over time.

Research Methodology

  • The research was carried out in a qualitative manner through semi-structured group interviews.
  • Participants in the study were 29 knowledgeable stakeholders from the thoroughbred industry who formed three focus groups, comprising equine veterinarians, thoroughbred breeders, and yearling buyers.
  • The discussions in the focus groups were digitally captured via audio and video recordings, with a digital whiteboard available for reference.
  • The recorded data was then transcribed, coded in real-time and thematically analysed to identify the primary themes.

Research Findings

  • The research extracted several key themes from the focus groups discussions. These included:
    • An element of uncertainty regarding the connection between a yearling’s laryngeal function and future racing performance, with particular emphasis on yearlings with a grade 3 laryngeal function.
    • Inconsistencies in the grading of a yearling’s laryngeal function by different veterinarians, with each giving differing scores for the same endoscopic exam.
    • Variances noticed in the laryngeal functionality of individual horses over a series of time points.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • The research concluded that stakeholders raised multiple concerns about the current method of yearling sales endoscopy in Australia.
  • Several suggestions were put forward to address these issues, including further investigation into the racing performance of yearlings identified with grade 3 laryngeal function.
  • The training of veterinarians to reduce the discrepancy between observers and finding the most suitable grading system for yearlings were also highlighted.
  • Future research was recommended to delve into the significance of variations in laryngeal function within individual horses in the yearling population.

Cite This Article

APA
Hardwick JL, Ahern BJ, Franklin SH. (2024). Stakeholder perceptions of thoroughbred yearling sales endoscopy in Australia: can we do better? Aust Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13332

Publication

Australian veterinary journal
ISSN: 1751-0813
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Hardwick, J L
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, South Australia, 5371, Australia.
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.
Ahern, B J
  • The University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Equine Specialist Hospital, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia.
Franklin, S H
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, South Australia, 5371, Australia.

Grant Funding

  • Agrifutures Australia

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Bren O'B. $774 million spent across 2021 sales season. Thoroughbred Daily News Australia New Zealand. Available at: wwwtdausnzcomau. 2021.
  2. Anderson BH, Hope JJ, Cogger N. Grade 3 left laryngeal movements in young thoroughbreds do not impair future racing performance. In: Proceedings of the 64th Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners. 2018;228.
  3. Stick JA, Peloso JG, Morehead JP. Endoscopic assessment of airway function as a predictor of racing performance in thoroughbred yearlings: 427 cases (1997‐2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:962–966.
  4. Garrett KS, Pierce SW, Embertson RM. Endoscopie evaluation of arytenoid function and epiglottic structure in thoroughbred yearlings and association with racing performance at two to four years of age: 2,954 cases (1998‐2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010;236:669–673.
  5. Miller SM. Endoscopic recurrent laryngeal neuropathy grade prevalence in a sample of thoroughbred yearlings at public auction in South Africa (2013‐2019). J S Afr Vet Assoc 2020;91:e1–e5.
  6. Ahern B, Sole A, de Klerk K. Evaluation of postsale endoscopy as a predictor of future racing performance in an Australian thoroughbred yearling population. Aust Vet J 2022;100:254–260.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.13155google scholar: lookup
  7. Fulton IC, Anderson BH, Stick JA. Larynx. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, editors. Equine surgery. Fourth edn. Elsevier, St Louis, Missouri; 2012;592–623.
  8. Dixon P, Robinson E, Wade JF. Consensus statements on equine recurrent laryngeal neuropathy. Havemeyer Foundation monograph series Vol. 11. Stratford‐upon‐Avon, R &W Publications, 2003;93.
  9. Lane JG. Recurrent laryngeal neuropathy. In: Railton D, editor. Proceedings of the fifteenth Bain‐Fallon memorial lectures. Australian Equine Veterinary Association, Glen Huntly, Victoria; 1993;173–192.
  10. Inglis W. Conditions of sale. Available at: https://content.inglis.com.au/uploads/documents/COS.pdf. 2022.
  11. Davison JA, Lumsden JM, Boston RC. Overground endoscopy in 311 thoroughbred racehorses: findings and correlation to resting laryngeal function. Aust Vet J 2017;95:338–342.
  12. Anderson B. Endoscopy of the upper respiratory tract in thoroughbred horses at public auction sales. 42nd Bain Fallon Equine Veterinary Conference. Melbourne. 2022:149–151.
  13. Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, London; 2013.
  14. Silverman D. Doing qualitative research. 5th edition. Sage Publications Ltd, London; 2017.
  15. Christley RM, Perkins E. Researching hard to reach areas of knowledge: qualitative research in veterinary science. Equine Vet J 2010;42:285–286.
  16. Furtado T, Christley R. Study design synopsis: from the horse's mouth: qualitative methods for equine veterinary research. Equine Vet J 2021;53:867–871.
  17. May CF. Discovering new areas of veterinary science through qualitative research interviews: introductory concepts for veterinarians. Aust Vet J 2018;96:278–284.
  18. Furtado T, Preshaw L, Hockenhull J. How happy are equine athletes? Stakeholder perceptions of equine welfare issues associated with equestrian sport. Animals 2021;11:11.
  19. Furtado T, Perkins E, Pinchbeck G. Exploring horse owners' understanding of obese body condition and weight management in UK leisure horses. Equine Vet J 2021;53:752–762.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13360google scholar: lookup
  20. Scantlebury CE, Perkins E, Pinchbeck GL. Could it be colic? Horse‐owner decision making and practices in response to equine colic. BMC Vet Res 2014;10:S1.
  21. Mendez D, Judd J, Speare R. Testing for Hendra virus: difficulties experienced by veterinarians in Queensland prior to 2011. Aust Vet J 2013;91:323–327.
  22. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299–302.
    doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299google scholar: lookup
  23. Morgan D. Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc., London; 2012.
  24. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Routledge, New York; 2017.
  25. Menary J, Stetkiewicz S, Nair A. Going virtual: adapting in‐person interactive focus groups to the online environment. Emerald Open Res 2021;3:6.
  26. Zoom Video Communications. Version 5.14. California, USA 2023. Available at: https://zoom.us.
  27. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo (version 12). Available at: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home. 2018.
  28. Parameswaran UD, Ozawa‐Kirk JL, Latendresse G. To live (code) or to not: a new method for coding in qualitative research. Qual Soc Work 2020;19(4):630–644.
  29. Scott JF. The nature of social research and social knowledge. Theory Pract Sociol 1st edn, Routledge, New York; 2002:15–37.
  30. Equine Veterinarians Australia. Pre‐sales video endoscopy of the laryngopharynx, version 4. 2019.
  31. Doig GS. Evidence‐based veterinary medicine: what it is, what it isn't and how to do it. Aust Vet J 2003;81:412–415.
  32. Elliott S, Cheetham J. Meta‐analysis evaluating resting laryngeal endoscopy as a diagnostic tool for recurrent laryngeal neuropathy in the equine athlete. Equine Vet J 2019;51:167–172.
  33. Marks D, Mackay‐Smith MP, Cushing LS. Use of a prosthetic device for surgical correction of laryngeal hemiplegia in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970;157:429–436.
  34. Goulden BE, Anderson LJ. Equine laryngeal hemiplegia, part 1: physical characteristics of affected animals. N Z Vet J 1981;29:151–154.
  35. Kelly PG, Reardon RJM, Johnston MS. Comparison of dynamic and resting endoscopy of the upper portion of the respiratory tract in 57 thoroughbred yearlings. Equine Vet J 2013;45:700–704.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12061google scholar: lookup
  36. McLellan J, Plevin S. Evaluation of videoendoscopic examinations of arytenoid function in the 2‐year‐old thoroughbred: can we all agree?. Equine Vet J 2019;51:364–369.
  37. Perkins JD, Salz RO, Schumacher J. Variability of resting endoscopic grading for assessment of recurrent laryngeal neuropathy in horses. Equine Vet J 2009;41:342–346.
  38. McGivney CL, Sweeney J, David F. Intra‐ and interobserver reliability estimates for identification and grading of upper respiratory tract abnormalities recorded in horses at rest and during overground endoscopy. Equine Vet J 2017;49:433–437.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12653google scholar: lookup
  39. Berk JT. How to examine and grade the upper airway at public auction. 63rd Annual convention, American Association of Equine Practitioners 2017:34–38.
  40. Vinod SK, Min M, Jameson MG. A review of interventions to reduce inter‐observer variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2016;60:393–406.
  41. Ducharme NG, Hackett RP, Fubini SL. The reliability of endoscopic examination in assessment of arytenoid cartilage movement in horses part II. Influence of side of examination, reexamination, and sedation. Vet Surg 1991;20:180–184.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1991.tb00332.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  42. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods 2017;16:160940691773384.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.