Analyze Diet

Streptococcus equi subsp. equi isolated from horses in Southern Brazil: molecular and phenotypic analyses.

Abstract: Streptococcus equi subsp. equi (S. equi) is the etiological agent of strangles, a contagious equine disease characterized by lymph node abscess and respiratory complications. To clarify the epidemiology and virulence factors of isolates, this study demonstrated phenotypic and genotypic differences between S. equi obtained from nasal secretions and lymph node aspirates of clinical strangles cases. Additionally, circulating alleles were differentiated through sequencing of the 5' end of the seM gene. A total of 23 clinical isolates collected from horses with strangles over the past decade were analyzed for phenotypic characteristics such as colony morphology, sugar fermentation, capsule production, biofilm formation, and antimicrobial susceptibility, as well as genotypic features. The analysis revealed phenotypic variability, particularly differences in sugar metabolism and capsule expression associated with colony morphology. Most isolates exhibited weak biofilm formation and susceptibility to cephalothin, ceftiofur, and streptomycin, while resistance to tetracycline was most common. Sequencing of the N-terminal region of the seM gene identified four alleles: seM-115, seM-158, seM-270, and seM-271. Of these, only seM-115 had previously been reported in Rio Grande do Sul State (southern Brazil). Phylogenetic analysis showed distinct clustering patterns, especially among the newly detected alleles (seM-270 and seM-271). These findings highlight the importance of integrated phenotypic and genotypic analyses to understand the diversity and potential virulence of circulating S. equi strains.
Publication Date: 2025-10-01 PubMed ID: 41032072PubMed Central: PMC12660551DOI: 10.1007/s42770-025-01783-xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study analyzed the molecular and phenotypic characteristics of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi isolates collected from horses diagnosed with strangles in Southern Brazil.
  • The research aimed to understand the diversity, virulence factors, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of different strains to better inform epidemiology and control measures.

Background

  • Pathogen: Streptococcus equi subsp. equi is the causative agent of strangles, a contagious disease in horses characterized by lymph node abscess formation and respiratory issues.
  • Clinical relevance: Strangles is a significant disease in equine populations due to its contagiousness and clinical severity.
  • Need for study: Variations in phenotypic traits and genetic makeup of circulating strains impact disease management, vaccine development, and treatment strategies.

Objectives

  • To characterize phenotypic differences among S. equi isolates from nasal secretions and lymph node aspirates in clinical cases.
  • To analyze genotypic variation by sequencing the 5′ end of the seM gene, a known virulence marker.
  • To determine antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance patterns to guide effective treatment.

Methodology

  • Sample collection: 23 clinical isolates were obtained from horses diagnosed with strangles over approximately 10 years in Southern Brazil’s Rio Grande do Sul state.
  • Phenotypic analyses:
    • Colony morphology observation.
    • Sugar fermentation profiling to detect metabolic differences.
    • Capsule production assessment, important for virulence.
    • Biofilm formation tests, relevant to bacterial persistence and infection severity.
    • Antimicrobial susceptibility testing focused on antibiotics such as cephalothin, ceftiofur, streptomycin, and tetracycline.
  • Genotypic analyses: Sequencing of the N-terminal (5′) region of the seM gene to identify allelic variations among isolates.
  • Phylogenetic analysis: Constructed to observe clustering patterns and compare newly identified alleles with known ones.

Key Findings

  • Phenotypic Variability:
    • Differences in sugar metabolism were linked to colony morphology variations, showing metabolic diversity among strains.
    • Capsule expression also varied, influencing potential virulence.
    • Most isolates showed weak biofilm formation, suggesting limited capacity for persistent colonization or survival.
  • Antimicrobial Susceptibility:
    • Isolates were generally susceptible to cephalothin, ceftiofur, and streptomycin.
    • Tetracycline resistance was the most frequently observed resistance trait, indicating potential treatment challenges.
  • Genotypic Diversity:
    • Four alleles of the seM gene were detected: seM-115, seM-158, seM-270, and seM-271.
    • Only allele seM-115 had been previously reported in the same geographical region, showing new alleles emerging or previously undetected.
    • Phylogenetic clustering showed distinct groups, notably for the newly detected alleles seM-270 and seM-271, indicating genetic divergence.

Significance and Implications

  • The combination of phenotypic and genotypic analyses provides a comprehensive understanding of S. equi diversity in Southern Brazil.
  • Detection of new seM gene alleles suggests ongoing evolution or introduction of new strains in the region, which could affect vaccine efficacy and disease control.
  • Antibiotic resistance findings highlight the need for regional antimicrobial stewardship and careful selection of treatment regimens.
  • Understanding phenotypic traits like capsule expression and biofilm formation helps predict the virulence and persistence potential of strains, aiding in risk assessment.
  • These results support the development of targeted diagnostics and inform epidemiological tracking of strangles outbreaks.

Cite This Article

APA
Seeger MG, de Vargas APC, Vogel FSF, Cargnelutti JF. (2025). Streptococcus equi subsp. equi isolated from horses in Southern Brazil: molecular and phenotypic analyses. Braz J Microbiol, 56(4), 2987-2996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-025-01783-x

Publication

ISSN: 1678-4405
NlmUniqueID: 101095924
Country: Brazil
Language: English
Volume: 56
Issue: 4
Pages: 2987-2996

Researcher Affiliations

Seeger, Marlane Geribone
  • Graduate Program in Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
de Vargas, Agueda Palmira Castagna
  • Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Center of Rural Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flores
  • Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Center of Rural Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. floresfefe14@gmail.com.
Cargnelutti, Juliana Felipetto
  • Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Center of Rural Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. jucargnelutti@gmail.com.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Brazil / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Phylogeny
  • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
  • Streptococcal Infections / microbiology
  • Streptococcal Infections / epidemiology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Phenotype
  • Genotype
  • Virulence Factors / genetics
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Biofilms / growth & development
  • Streptococcus / isolation & purification
  • Streptococcus / genetics
  • Streptococcus / classification
  • Streptococcus / drug effects

Grant Funding

  • 001 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • 140599/2022-3 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • 302142/2022-3 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • 308991/2023-0 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Boyle AG, Rankin SC, Duffee L, Boston RC, Wheeler-Aceto H. detection polymerase chain reaction assay for equine nasopharyngeal and guttural pouch wash samples. J Vet Intern Med 30:276–281.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13808pmc: PMC4913660pubmed: 26678318google scholar: lookup
  2. Waller AS, Paillot R, Timoney JF. : A pathogen restricted to one host. J Med Microbiol 60:1231–1240.
    doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.028233-0pubmed: 21757503google scholar: lookup
  3. Junior OAC, Murad JCB. Animais de Grande Porte II, first edn. .
  4. IBGE. Censo agropecuário 2023. .
  5. Libardoni F, Machado G, Gressler LT, Kowalski AP, Diehl GN, dos Santos LC, Corbellini LG, de Vargas AC. Prevalence of Streptococcus Equi subsp. Equi in horses and associated risk factors in the state of Rio Grande do sul, Brazil. Res Vet Sci 104:53–57.
    pubmed: 26850537doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.11.009google scholar: lookup
  6. Veiga RF, Clarindo LN, Fensterseifer AL, Pompelli LH, Sfaciotte RAP, Schwarz DGG, Eloy LR, Ferraz SM. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated from horses in Santa Catarina state, Southern Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 55:4147–4155.
    doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01479-8pmc: PMC11711425pubmed: 39155341google scholar: lookup
  7. Alessa M, Kahtan M, Hussein HM, Helmy E, Mohamed M, Abdulaziz A, Adel A, Saad S, Hussein B, Hussam I, Maged E, Sabry E. Molecular investigation and potential risks associated with infection in horses with upper respiratory tract infection. J Adv Vet Res 14:1220–1226.
  8. Holden MT, Heather Z, Paillot R, Steward KF, Webb K, Ainslie F, Jourdan T, Bason NC, Holroyd NE, Mungall K, Quail MA, Sanders M, Simmonds M, Willey D, Brooks K, Aanensen DM, Spratt BG, Jolley KA, Maiden MC, Kehoe M, Chanter N, Bentley SD, Robinson C, Maskell DJ, Parkhill J, Waller AS. Genomic evidence for the evolution of : host restriction, increased virulence, and genetic exchange with human pathogens. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000346.
  9. Moraes CM, Vargas AP, Leite FP, Nogueira CE, Turnes CG. Adenite equina: Sua etiologia, Diagnóstico e controle. Cienc Rural 39:1944–1952.
  10. Boschwitz JS, Timoney JF. Inhibition of C3 deposition on subsp. by M protein: a mechanism for survival in equine blood. Infect Immun 62:3515–3520.
  11. Harrington DJ, Sutcliffe IC, Chanter N. The molecular basis of infection and disease. Microbes Infect 4:501–510.
    doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01565-4pubmed: 11932201google scholar: lookup
  12. Meehan M, Muldowney DA, Watkins NJ, Owen P. Localization and characterization of the ligand-binding domain of the fibrinogen-binding protein (FgBP) of Streptococcus Equi subsp. Equi. Microbiology 146:1187–1194.
    doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-5-1187pubmed: 10832647google scholar: lookup
  13. Anzai T, Kuwamoto Y, Wada R, Sugita S, Kakuda T, Takai S, Higuchi T, Timoney JF. Variation in the N-terminal region of an M-like protein of and evaluation of its potential as a tool in epidemiologic studies. Am J Vet Res 66:2167–2171.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.2167pubmed: 16379663google scholar: lookup
  14. Libardoni F, Vielmo A, Farias L, Matter LB, Pötter L, Spilki FR, de Vargas AC. Diversity of seM subsp. isolated from strangles outbreaks. Vet Microbiol 162:663–669.
    pubmed: 23036444doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.09.010google scholar: lookup
  15. Kelly C, Bugg M, Robinson C, Mitchell Z, Davis-Poynter N, Newton JR, Jolley KA, Maiden MC, Waller AS. Sequence variation of the SeM gene of allows discrimination of the source of strangles outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol 44:480–486.
  16. Anzai T, Timoney JF, Kuwamoto Y, Fujita Y, Wada R, Inoue T (1999) In vivo pathogenicity and resistance to phagocytosis of strains with different levels of capsule expression. Vet Microbiol 67:277–286. 10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00051-6n
    doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00051-6pubmed: 10466503google scholar: lookup
  17. Woolcock JB (1974) The capsule of . J Gen Microbiol 85:372–375. 10.1099/00221287-85-2-372n
    doi: 10.1099/00221287-85-2-372pubmed: 4475688google scholar: lookup
  18. Donlan RM (2001) Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis 7:277–281. 10.3201/eid0702.010226
    doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010226pmc: PMC2631701pubmed: 11294723google scholar: lookup
  19. Clutterbuck AL, Woods EJ, Knottenbelt DC, Clegg PD, Cochrane CA, Percival SL (2007) Biofilms and their relevance to veterinary medicine. Vet Microbiol 121:1–17. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.12.029
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.12.029pubmed: 17276630google scholar: lookup
  20. Bustos CP, Marfil MJ, Lanza N, Guida N (2017) Estudio de la capacidad productora de biofilm en subsp. . Rev Vet 28:3–8
  21. Tasca C (2018) Caracterização fenotípica e genotípica de subespécie isolados de equinos doentes e portadores no Rio Grande do Sul. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  22. Macfaddin JF (2000) Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
  23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2013a) Antimicrobial disk and Dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, fourth ed. CLSI document VET01-A4. CLSI, Wayne (PA)
  24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2013b) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-third informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S23. CLSI, Wayne (PA)
  25. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2015) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and Dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, third ed. CLSI supplement VET01S. CLSI, Wayne (PA)
  26. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2024) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and Dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, seventh ed. CLSI supplement VET01S. CLSI, Wayne (PA)
  27. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukic S, Cirkovic I, Ruzicka F (2007) Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by Staphylococci. Apmis 115:891–899. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x
  28. Bustos CP, Muñoz AJ, Guida N (2016) Expression of capsule and biofilm formation by subsp. Equi J Equine Vet Sci 39. 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.02.201
  29. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, third edn. Cold Spring Harbor, New York
  30. Cordoni G, Williams A, Durham A, Florio D, Zanoni RG, La Ragione RM (2015) Rapid diagnosis of strangles ( subspecies ) using PCR. Res Vet Sci 102:162–116. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.008n
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.08.008pubmed: 26412537google scholar: lookup
  31. Staden R (1996) The Staden sequence analysis package. Mol Biotechnol 5:1596–1599. 10.1007/BF02900361
    doi: 10.1007/BF02900361pubmed: 8837029google scholar: lookup
  32. Timoney JF, Suther P, Velineni S, Artiushin SC (2014) The antiphagocytic activity of SeM of requires capsule. J Equine Sci 25:53–56. 10.1294/jes.25.53n
    doi: 10.1294/jes.25.53pmc: PMC4090359pubmed: 25013359google scholar: lookup
  33. Timoney JF (2004) The pathogenic equine Streptococci. Vet Res 35:397–409. 10.1051/vetres:2004025
    doi: 10.1051/vetres:2004025pubmed: 15236673google scholar: lookup
  34. Hyams C, Camberlein E, Cohen JM, Bax K, Brown JS (2010) The capsule inhibits complement activity and neutrophil phagocytosis by multiple mechanisms. Infect Immun 78:704–715. 10.1128/IAI.00881-09n
    doi: 10.1128/IAI.00881-09pmc: PMC2812187pubmed: 19948837google scholar: lookup
  35. Wessels MR (2019) Capsular polysaccharide of group A Streptococcus. Microbiol Spectr 7. 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0050-2018
    pmc: PMC6342470pubmed: 30632480
  36. Kuwamoto Y, Anzai T, Wada R (2001) Microplate sugar-fermentation assay distinguishes from other Streptococci of lancefield’s group C. J Equine Sci 12:47–49. 10.1294iJes.12.47
    doi: 10.1294/jes.12.47google scholar: lookup
  37. Markey B, Finola L, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D (2013) Clinical veterinary microbiology, second edn. Elsevier, Edinburgh
  38. Quinn P, Markey B, Leonard F, FitzPatrick E (2011) Veterinary microbiology and microbial disease, second edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, UK. 10.1017/CB09781107415324.004
  39. Grant ST, Efstratiou A, Chanter N (1993) Laboratory diagnosis of strangles and the isolation of atypical . Vet Rec 133:215–216. 10.1136/vr.133.9.215n
    doi: 10.1136/vr.133.9.215pubmed: 8236725google scholar: lookup
  40. Bannister MF, Benson CE, Sweeney CR (1985) Rapid species identification of group C Streptococci isolated from horses. J Clin Microbiol 21:524–526. 10.1128/jcm.21.4.524-526.1985
    doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.524-526.1985pmc: PMC271711pubmed: 3988897google scholar: lookup
  41. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322. 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318
    doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318pubmed: 10334980google scholar: lookup
  42. Yi L, Wang Y, Ma Z, Lin HX, Xu B, Grenier D, Fan HJ, Lu CP (2016) Identification and characterization of a ssp. Immunogenic GroEL protein involved in biofilm formation. Vet Res 18:4750. 10.1186/s13567-016-0334-0
    doi: 10.1186/s13567-016-0334-0pmc: PMC4834820pubmed: 27089967google scholar: lookup
  43. McDougall S, Parkinson TJ, Leyland M, Anniss FM, Fenwick SG (2004) Duration of infection and strain variation in isolated from cows’ milk. J Dairy Sci 87:2062–2072. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70024-7n
  44. Kaur H, Kumar P, Ray P, Kaur J, Chakraborti A (2009) Biofilm formation in clinical isolates of group B Streptococci from North India. Microb Pathog 46:321–327. 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.04.004
    doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.04.004pubmed: 19376218google scholar: lookup
  45. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR (2018) infections in horses: guidelines for treatment, control, and prevention of strangles-revised consensus statement. J Vet Intern Med 32:633–647. 10.1111/jvim.15043n
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15043pmc: PMC5867011pubmed: 29424487google scholar: lookup
  46. Johns IC, Adams EL (2015) Trends in antimicrobial resistance in equine bacterial isolates: 1999–2012. Vet Rec 176:334. Doi: 10.1136/vr.102708. Erratum in: Vet Rec (2016) 179:330. 10.1136/vr.102708corr1
    pubmed: 25628448
  47. Giguère S, Prescott J, Dowling PM (2013) Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine, fifth ed. Wiley
  48. Wajima T, Hagimoto A, Tanaka E, Kawamura Y, Nakaminami H (2022) Identification and characterization of a novel multidrug-resistant , sp. nov., from a blood sample. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 29:316–322. 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.04.018n
    doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.04.018pubmed: 35500839google scholar: lookup
  49. Arafa AA, Hedia RH, Ata NS, Ibrahim ES (2021) Vancomycin resistant subsp. isolated from Equines suffering from respiratory manifestation in Egypt. Vet World 14:1808–1814. 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1808-1814n
  50. Bekele D, Dessalegn B, Tadesse B, Abey SL (2024) subspecies from strangles suspected equines: molecular detection, antibiogram profiles and risk factors. BMC Vet Res 20:377. 10.1186/s12917-024-04236-zn
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04236-zpmc: PMC11342554pubmed: 39180060google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.