Strip grazing: Changes in biomass, nutrient content and digestibility of temperate, midsummer pasture by strip-grazed or ‘free’-grazing ponies, over 4 weeks.
Abstract: The digestibility and nutritive values of pastures that were either freely or strip-grazed for 28 days were compared. Twelve ponies were individually grazed in adjacent, 10 m wide, rectangular paddocks. On day -1, each paddock length was adjusted to contain a 28-day supply of herbage DM at 1.5 % of pony BW/d. Ponies, (4/treatment) either accessed the entire 28-day supply from day 1 (TA), or gradually via strip-grazing treatments, SG1 and SG2. SG1 had a 'lead' fence spanning the paddock width that from day 3 was moved forward 1/26th of the paddock length daily, whereas SG2 had an additional 'back fence', that was advanced the same distance as the lead fence daily. Pasture nutrient contents and estimated nutrient digestibilities (eD) were determined weekly. From weeks 1-4, mean strip-grazed pasture contents (% DM) of water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein declined from 15.7-10.2 and 9.4-8.7, respectively, whereas neutral- and acid-detergent fibre increased from 53.6-60.5 and 35.2-38.0, respectively. Corresponding values for TA pastures were 17.7-5.2, 8.9-8.7, 54.6-69.2 and 35.7-43.6. Concomitantly, calculated digestible energy (cDE) (MJ/kg DM) of strip-grazed and TA pastures declined from 9.7-8.9 and 9.6-7.8, respectively and eDMD of all treatments declined (P<0.05). By week 4, TA pasture WSC, cDE and eDMD were lower and fibre contents higher (P<0.05) than the strip-grazed pastures. TA animal cDE intakes in weeks 1 and 2 exceeded requirements by 42 % vs. 8 % by strip-grazed animals. Strip-grazing delivered a steadier nutrient supply than TA, potentially conferring health benefits to animals prone to metabolic dysfunction.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-10-27 PubMed ID: 37890600DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104957Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article investigates the differences in the nutritional value and digestibility of grass in pastures grazed in two different ways: strip-grazing and free-grazing. The results of the study demonstrate that strip-grazing offers a more consistent nutrient supply over time, which could be beneficial to animals vulnerable to metabolic health issues.
Study Design
- The study monitored twelve ponies over a 28 day period.
- The ponies were grazed individually in adjacent paddocks, each sized 10 meters wide.
- Paddock lengths were adjusted to contain a 28-day supply of herbage biomass based on the individual weight of each pony.
- The ponies were divided into groups for two treatment methods: free-grazing (referred to as ‘TA’, with the full 28 days’ supply made accessible immediately) and strip-grazing (referred to as ‘SG1 and SG2’).
- SG1 used a ‘lead’ fence that moved forward by 1/26th of the total paddock length each day, while SG2 had the addition of a ‘back fence’, moved at the same pace as the lead.
Feed Inspection and Method of Evaluation
- Pasture nutrient contents and estimated nutrient digestibilities were determined weekly.
- Measurements were taken on the water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content, crude protein, neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), and acid-detergent fiber (ADF) values.
- The calculated digestible energy (cDE) of the pastures also factored into the study.
Findings
- Over weeks 1 through 4, the mean content of WSC and crude protein in strip-grazed pastures experienced a decline.
- In contrast, values for NDF and ADF increased.
- cDE of all pastures, regardless of grazing method, diminished over time.
- By week 4, fiber contents were higher and WSC, cDE, and estimated dry matter digestibility (eDMD) were lower in TA pastures than in strip-grazed pastures.
- cDE intake of ponies in the TA group exceeded requirements by 42% in the first two weeks, compared to a surplus of 8% seen in the strip-grazed groups.
- This indicates that strip-grazing provides a more balanced, steady supply of nutrients, potentially benefiting animals prone to metabolic syndrome or other health issues related to diet.
Cite This Article
APA
Longland AC, Barfoot C, Harris PA.
(2023).
Strip grazing: Changes in biomass, nutrient content and digestibility of temperate, midsummer pasture by strip-grazed or ‘free’-grazing ponies, over 4 weeks.
J Equine Vet Sci, 131, 104957.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104957 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Equine and Livestock Nutrition Services (ELNS) , Pantfallen Fach, Tregaron, Ceredigion, Wales, SY256NG, United Kingdom. Electronic address: elns.longland@btinternet.com.
- MARS Horse Care UK Ltd, Old Wolverton Road, Old Wolverton, Buckinghamshire, MK12 5PZ, United Kingdom.
- Waltham Petcare Science Institute, Waltham-on-the-Wolds, Leicestershire, UK.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horses
- Biomass
- Nutrients
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of Competing Interest Dr Harris & Clare Barfoot are employed by the study funder.
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Kirton R, Sandford I, Raffan E, Hallsworth S, Burman OHP, Morgan R. The impact of restricted grazing systems on the behaviour and welfare of ponies. Equine Vet J 2025 May;57(3):737-744.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists