Analyze Diet

Systemic distribution of blood flow in ponies during 1.45%, 1.96%, and 2.39% end-tidal isoflurane-O2 anesthesia.

Abstract: Effects of 1.1, 1.5, and 1.8 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) isoflurane-O2 (1.45%, 1.96%, and 2.39% end-tidal isoflurane, respectively) anesthesia on cardiac output, blood pressure, and blood flow to the brain, thyroid glands, adrenal glands, kidneys, and splanchnic organs were examined in 9 healthy isocapnic adult ponies. Tissue blood flows were studied using 15-micron diameter radionuclide-labeled microspheres that were injected into the left ventricle, and comparisons were made with data obtained from ponies in the conscious state. Isoflurane anesthesia caused dose-related reduction in cardiac output and arterial blood pressure, but total peripheral resistance was not significantly altered (P greater than 0.05). In the brain, vasodilation occurred with exposure to isoflurane that peaked at 1.5 MAC. Vasodilation was more pronounced in the cerebellum, pons, and medulla, compared with that in the cerebrum. Perfusion increased in cerebellar gray, as well as white, matter. However, in the cerebrum, blood flow increased in the white matter, whereas it decreased in caudate nuclei and was similar to value in the cortex of awake ponies. In thyroid glands and pancreas, intense vasoconstriction occurred during isoflurane anesthesia which caused precipitous reduction in blood flow in these organs. By contrast, adrenal gland blood flow was not affected during the 3 levels of isoflurane anesthesia because vasodilation occurred. The renal blood flow registered dose-dependent reductions during isoflurane-O2 anesthesia, but renal vasoconstriction occurred only during the deepest level (1.8 MAC) of anesthesia. Although the small intestine and and colon blood flow decreased with each concentration of isoflurane, the splenic blood flow remained unaffected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Date: 1987-10-01 PubMed ID: 3674561
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the effects of different concentrations of isoflurane-O2 anesthesia on blood flow to various organs in ponies. The findings reveal the anesthetic’s influence on the cardiovascular system and the extent of its impact on vital organs such as the brain, adrenal glands, and kidneys.

Study Design and Methodology

  • The research was conducted on nine healthy, adult ponies under isocapnic conditions (a state where the carbon dioxide level in the blood is within normal range).
  • Three different minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) levels of isoflurane-O2 anesthesia were studied: 1.1, 1.5, and 1.8 MAC, which are equivalent to 1.45%, 1.96%, and 2.39% end-tidal isoflurane, respectively.
  • Blood flow to several organs—brain, thyroid glands, adrenal glands, kidneys, and splanchnic organs—was examined under these anesthesia levels.
  • To monitor tissue blood flows, the researchers used 15-micron diameter radionuclide-labeled microspheres. These were injected into the left ventricle of the ponies’ hearts.
  • The findings under the different levels of anesthesia were then compared with data from ponies in a conscious state.

Findings

  • Isoflurane anesthesia led to a dose-related reduction in cardiac output and arterial blood pressure, but it did not significantly alter total peripheral resistance.
  • In the brain, vasodilation (widening of blood vessels) occurred with exposure to isoflurane that peaked at 1.5 MAC.
  • This vasodilation was more pronounced in certain areas of the brain (like the cerebellum, pons, and medulla) than in others (the cerebrum).
  • The anesthetic caused intense vasoconstriction (tightening of blood vessels) in the thyroid glands and pancreas, leading to a drastic reduction in blood flow to these organs.
  • However, adrenal gland blood flow remained unchanged during all three isoflurane anesthesia levels, owing to vasodilation.
  • Meanwhile, renal blood flow saw dose-dependent reductions under isoflurane-O2 anesthesia, but renal vasoconstriction only occurred at the highest level of anesthesia (1.8 MAC).
  • Despite blood flow in the small intestines and colon decreasing with each concentration of isoflurane, the splenic blood flow remained unaffected.

Conclusions

  • The study presents important insights into the cardiovascular effects of isoflurane anesthesia in ponies. It points to the importance of carefully monitoring and controlling the dosage of anesthesia, as different concentrations have distinct impacts on blood flow to various organs.
  • The findings are significant for veterinary medicine, providing a basis for safer anesthesia administration practices in ponies and potentially other large animals.

Cite This Article

APA
Manohar M, Gustafson R, Goetz TE, Nganwa D. (1987). Systemic distribution of blood flow in ponies during 1.45%, 1.96%, and 2.39% end-tidal isoflurane-O2 anesthesia. Am J Vet Res, 48(10), 1504-1510.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 10
Pages: 1504-1510

Researcher Affiliations

Manohar, M
  • Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign 61801.
Gustafson, R
    Goetz, T E
      Nganwa, D

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Blood Circulation / drug effects
        • Blood Pressure / drug effects
        • Brain Stem / blood supply
        • Cardiac Output / drug effects
        • Cerebellum / blood supply
        • Cerebrovascular Circulation / drug effects
        • Hemodynamics / drug effects
        • Horses / physiology
        • Isoflurane / administration & dosage
        • Isoflurane / pharmacology
        • Vascular Resistance / drug effects

        Citations

        This article has been cited 7 times.
        1. Kälin I, Henze IS, Ringer SK, Torgerson PR, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R. Comparison of Recovery Quality Following Medetomidine versus Xylazine Balanced Isoflurane Anaesthesia in Horses: A Retrospective Analysis.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 19;11(8).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11082440pubmed: 34438896google scholar: lookup
        2. Cerullo M, Driessen B, Douglas H, Hopster K. Changes in Arterial Blood Pressure and Oxygen Tension as a Result of Hoisting in Isoflurane Anesthetized Healthy Adult Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:601326.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.601326pubmed: 33324704google scholar: lookup
        3. Hopster K, Wittenberg-Voges L, Kästner SBR. Xylazine infusion in isoflurane-anesthetized and ventilated healthy horses: Effects on cardiovascular parameters and intestinal perfusion.. Can J Vet Res 2017 Oct;81(4):249-254.
          pubmed: 29081581
        4. Brosnan RJ. Inhaled anesthetics in horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2013 Apr;29(1):69-87.
          doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.11.006pubmed: 23498046google scholar: lookup
        5. Artz NS, Wentland AL, Sadowski EA, Djamali A, Grist TM, Seo S, Fain SB. Comparing kidney perfusion using noncontrast arterial spin labeling MRI and microsphere methods in an interventional swine model.. Invest Radiol 2011 Feb;46(2):124-31.
          doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f5e101pubmed: 22609830google scholar: lookup
        6. Edner AH, Essén-Gustavsson B, Nyman GC. Metabolism during anaesthesia and recovery in colic and healthy horses: a microdialysis study.. Acta Vet Scand 2009 Mar 10;51(1):10.
          doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-51-10pubmed: 19284560google scholar: lookup
        7. Knobloch M, Portier CJ, Levionnois OL, Theurillat R, Thormann W, Spadavecchia C, Mevissen M. Antinociceptive effects, metabolism and disposition of ketamine in ponies under target-controlled drug infusion.. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2006 Nov 1;216(3):373-86.
          doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.06.011pubmed: 16919695google scholar: lookup