FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Conserv Genet Resour / Targeted genome-wide SNP genotyping in feral horses using no...
Conservation genetics resources2022; 14(2); 203-213; doi: 10.1007/s12686-022-01259-2

Targeted genome-wide SNP genotyping in feral horses using non-invasive fecal swabs.

Abstract: The development of high-throughput sequencing has prompted a transition in wildlife genetics from using microsatellites toward sets of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). However, genotyping large numbers of targeted SNPs using non-invasive samples remains challenging due to relatively large DNA input requirements. Recently, target enrichment has emerged as a promising approach requiring little template DNA. We assessed the efficacy of Tecan Genomics' Allegro Targeted Genotyping (ATG) for generating genome-wide SNP data in feral horses using DNA isolated from fecal swabs. Total and host-specific DNA were quantified for 989 samples collected as part of a long-term individual-based study of feral horses on Sable Island, Nova Scotia, Canada, using dsDNA fluorescence and a host-specific qPCR assay, respectively. Forty-eight samples representing 44 individuals containing at least 10 ng of host DNA (ATG's recommended minimum input) were genotyped using a custom multiplex panel targeting 279 SNPs. Genotyping accuracy and consistency were assessed by contrasting ATG genotypes with those obtained from the same individuals with SNP microarrays, and from multiple samples from the same horse, respectively. 62% of swabs yielded the minimum recommended amount of host DNA for ATG. Ignoring samples that failed to amplify, ATG recovered an average of 88.8% targeted sites per sample, while genotype concordance between ATG and SNP microarrays was 98.5%. The repeatability of genotypes from the same individual approached unity with an average of 99.9%. This study demonstrates the suitability of ATG for genome-wide, non-invasive targeted SNP genotyping, and will facilitate further ecological and conservation genetics research in equids and related species. Unassigned: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12686-022-01259-2.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-03-16 PubMed ID: 35673611PubMed Central: PMC9162989DOI: 10.1007/s12686-022-01259-2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on a new technique in wildlife genetics involving targeted genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyping, specifically in feral horses via non-invasive fecal swabs. This approach, using the Tecan Genomics’ Allegro Targeted Genotyping (ATG) method, is effective at generating SNP data, and offers a promising and versatile method that can be adopted for ecological and conservation genetics research.

Research Objectives and Methodology

  • The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Tecan Genomics’ Allegro Targeted Genotyping (ATG) method for generating genome-wide SNP data using non-invasive fecal swabs.
  • The researchers collected 989 samples from a long-term individual-based study of feral horses on Sable Island, Nova Scotia, Canada. Specific DNA fluorescence and qPCR assays were used to quantify total and host-specific DNA in these samples.
  • Then, a custom multiplex panel targeting 279 SNPs was used to genotype 48 samples, each containing at least 10ng of host DNA, representing 44 individuals. This amount of host DNA is the recommended minimum input for the ATG method.

Results and Findings

  • The study found that 62% of the swabs yielded the minimum recommended amount of host DNA necessary for the ATG method.
  • Disregarding samples that failed to amplify, ATG recovered an average of 88.8% targeted sites per sample.
  • The genotype concordance (agreement) between ATG and SNP microarrays was notably high at 98.5%.
  • The repeatability of genotypes from the same individual was also extremely high, with an average of 99.9%.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The ATG method demonstrated a high level of suitability for non-invasive targeted SNP genotyping. This suggests a promising future for the application of ATG in wildlife genetics research, particularly in ecological and conservation studies.
  • Therefore, the researchers conclude that the ATG method could be adopted for further genetic research in equids and related species, showcasing the potential and versatility of the approach.

Cite This Article

APA
Gavriliuc S, Reza S, Jeong C, Getachew F, McLoughlin PD, Poissant J. (2022). Targeted genome-wide SNP genotyping in feral horses using non-invasive fecal swabs. Conserv Genet Resour, 14(2), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-022-01259-2

Publication

Conservation genetics resources
ISSN: 1877-7252
NlmUniqueID: 101505405
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 2
Pages: 203-213

Researcher Affiliations

Gavriliuc, Stefan
  • Department of Ecosystem and Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada.
Reza, Salman
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada.
Jeong, Chanwoori
  • Department of Ecosystem and Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada.
Getachew, Fitsum
  • Department of Ecosystem and Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada.
McLoughlin, Philip D
  • Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2 Canada.
Poissant, Jocelyn
  • Department of Ecosystem and Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of interestNA.

References

This article includes 47 references
  1. Allendorf FW. Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes.. Mol Ecol 2017 Jan;26(2):420-430.
    doi: 10.1111/mec.13948pubmed: 27933683google scholar: lookup
  2. Andrews KR, De Barba M, Russello MA, Waits LP. Advances in using non-invasive, archival, and environmental samples for population genomic studies. .
  3. Barchi L, Acquadro A, Alonso D, Aprea G, Bassolino L, Demurtas O, Ferrante P, Gramazio P, Mini P, Portis E, Scaglione D, Toppino L, Vilanova S, Díez MJ, Rotino GL, Lanteri S, Prohens J, Giuliano G. Single Primer Enrichment Technology (SPET) for High-Throughput Genotyping in Tomato and Eggplant Germplasm.. Front Plant Sci 2019;10:1005.
    pmc: PMC6693525pubmed: 31440267doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01005google scholar: lookup
  4. Bourgeois S, Kaden J, Senn H, Bunnefeld N, Jeffery KJ, Akomo-Okoue EF, Ogden R, McEwing R. Improving cost-efficiency of faecal genotyping: New tools for elephant species.. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0210811.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210811pmc: PMC6353156pubmed: 30699177google scholar: lookup
  5. Brinkman TJ, Person DK, Chapin FS, Smith W, Hundertmark KJ. Estimating abundance of Sitka black-tailed deer using DNA from fecal pellets. J Wildl Manag 2011;75(1):232–242.
    doi: 10.1002/jwmg.22google scholar: lookup
  6. Carlson CS, Smith JD, Stanaway IB, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA. Direct detection of null alleles in SNP genotyping data.. Hum Mol Genet 2006 Jun 15;15(12):1931-7.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl115pubmed: 16644863google scholar: lookup
  7. Carroll EL, Bruford MW, DeWoody JA, Leroy G, Strand A, Waits L, Wang J. Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods.. Evol Appl 2018 Aug;11(7):1094-1119.
    doi: 10.1111/eva.12600pmc: PMC6050181pubmed: 30026800google scholar: lookup
  8. Chiou KL, Bergey CM. Methylation-based enrichment facilitates low-cost, noninvasive genomic scale sequencing of populations from feces.. Sci Rep 2018 Jan 31;8(1):1975.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20427-9pmc: PMC5792461pubmed: 29386638google scholar: lookup
  9. Christie BJ. The horses of Sable Island. .
  10. Costa V, Rosenbom S, Monteiro R, O’Rourke SM, Beja-Pereira A. Improving DNA quality extracted from fecal samples—a method to improve DNA yield. Eur J Wildl Res 2016;63(1):3.
    doi: 10.1007/s10344-016-1058-1google scholar: lookup
  11. De R, Kumar V, Ankit K, Khan KA, Kumar H, Kumar N, Habib B, Goyal SP. Cross-amplification of ungulate microsatellite markers in the endemic Indian antelope or blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) for population monitoring and conservation genetics studies in south Asia.. Mol Biol Rep 2021 Jun;48(6):5151-5160.
    doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06514-7pubmed: 34213708google scholar: lookup
  12. Deakin S, Gorrell JC, Kneteman J, Hik DS, Jobin RM, Coltman DW. Spatial genetic structure of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis) at the northern limit of their native range. Can J Zool 2020;98(5):317–330.
    doi: 10.1139/cjz-2019-0183google scholar: lookup
  13. Ferreira CM, Sabino-Marques H, Barbosa S, Costa P, Encarnação C, Alpizar-Jara R, Pita R, Beja P, Mira A, Searle JB, Paupério J, Alves PC. Genetic non-invasive sampling (gNIS) as a cost-effective tool for monitoring elusive small mammals. Eur J Wildl Res 2018;64(4):46.
    doi: 10.1007/s10344-018-1188-8google scholar: lookup
  14. Floren C, Wiedemann I, Brenig B, Schütz E, Beck J. Species identification and quantification in meat and meat products using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).. Food Chem 2015 Apr 15;173:1054-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.138pubmed: 25466124google scholar: lookup
  15. Gold S, Regan CE, McLoughlin PD, Gilleard JS, Wilson AJ, Poissant J. Quantitative genetics of gastrointestinal strongyle burden and associated body condition in feral horses.. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2019 Aug;9:104-111.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.03.010pmc: PMC6462499pubmed: 31011533google scholar: lookup
  16. Gramazio P, Jaén-Molina R, Vilanova S, Prohens J, Marrero Á, Caujapé-Castells J, Anderson GJ. Fostering Conservation via an Integrated Use of Conventional Approaches and High-Throughput SPET Genotyping: A Case Study Using the Endangered Canarian Endemics Solanum lidii and S. vespertilio (Solanaceae).. Front Plant Sci 2020;11:757.
    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00757pmc: PMC7381301pubmed: 32754166google scholar: lookup
  17. Gurgul A, Semik E, Pawlina K, Szmatoła T, Jasielczuk I, Bugno-Poniewierska M. The application of genome-wide SNP genotyping methods in studies on livestock genomes.. J Appl Genet 2014 May;55(2):197-208.
    doi: 10.1007/s13353-014-0202-4pubmed: 24566962google scholar: lookup
  18. Hagen IJ, Billing AM, Rønning B, Pedersen SA, Pärn H, Slate J, Jensen H. The easy road to genome-wide medium density SNP screening in a non-model species: development and application of a 10 K SNP-chip for the house sparrow (Passer domesticus).. Mol Ecol Resour 2013 May;13(3):429-39.
    doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12088pubmed: 23480404google scholar: lookup
  19. Herrero J, Santika B, Herrán A, Erika P, Sarimana U, Wendra F, Sembiring Z, Asmono D, Ritter E. Construction of a high density linkage map in Oil Palm using SPET markers.. Sci Rep 2020 Jun 19;10(1):9998.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67118-ypmc: PMC7305113pubmed: 32561804google scholar: lookup
  20. Hohenlohe PA, Funk WC, Rajora OP. Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management.. Mol Ecol 2021 Jan;30(1):62-82.
    doi: 10.1111/mec.15720pmc: PMC7894518pubmed: 33145846google scholar: lookup
  21. Kierepka EM, Unger SD, Keiter DA, Beasley JC, Rhodes OE, Cunningham FL, Piaggio AJ. Identification of robust microsatellite markers for wild pig fecal DNA. J Wildl Manag 2016;80(6):1120–1128.
    doi: 10.1002/jwmg.21102google scholar: lookup
  22. Kim S, Misra A. SNP genotyping: technologies and biomedical applications.. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007;9:289-320.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.152037pubmed: 17391067google scholar: lookup
  23. Kim JM, Santure AW, Barton HJ, Quinn JL, Cole EF, Visser ME, Sheldon BC, Groenen MAM, van Oers K, Slate J. A high-density SNP chip for genotyping great tit (Parus major) populations and its application to studying the genetic architecture of exploration behaviour.. Mol Ecol Resour 2018 Jul;18(4):877-891.
    doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12778pubmed: 29573186google scholar: lookup
  24. King SRB, Schoenecker KA, Fike JA, Oyler-McCance SJ. Long-term persistence of horse fecal DNA in the environment makes equids particularly good candidates for noninvasive sampling.. Ecol Evol 2018 Apr;8(8):4053-4064.
    doi: 10.1002/ece3.3956pmc: PMC5916305pubmed: 29721279google scholar: lookup
  25. King SRB, Schoenecker KA, Fike JA, Oyler-McCance SJ. Feral horse space use and genetic characteristics from fecal DNA. J Wildl Manag 2021;85(6):1074–1083.
    doi: 10.1002/jwmg.21974google scholar: lookup
  26. Kozarewa I, Armisen J, Gardner AF, Slatko BE, Hendrickson CL. Overview of Target Enrichment Strategies.. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2015 Oct 1;112:7.21.1-7.21.23.
    doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0721s112pubmed: 26423591google scholar: lookup
  27. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.. Nat Methods 2012 Mar 4;9(4):357-9.
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923pmc: PMC3322381pubmed: 22388286google scholar: lookup
  28. Latorre-Cardenas MC, Gutiérrez-Rodríguez C, Lance SL. Isolation and characterization of 13 microsatellite loci for the Neotropical otter, Lontra longicaudis, by next generation sequencing.. Mol Biol Rep 2020 Jan;47(1):731-736.
    doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-05165-zpubmed: 31696429google scholar: lookup
  29. Li H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data.. Bioinformatics 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2987-93.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509pmc: PMC3198575pubmed: 21903627google scholar: lookup
  30. Malenfant RM, Coltman DW, Davis CS. Design of a 9K illumina BeadChip for polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from RAD and transcriptome sequencing.. Mol Ecol Resour 2015 May;15(3):587-600.
    doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12327pubmed: 25187336google scholar: lookup
  31. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Embnet J 2011;17(1):10–12.
    doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200google scholar: lookup
  32. Meek MH, Larson WA. The future is now: Amplicon sequencing and sequence capture usher in the conservation genomics era.. Mol Ecol Resour 2019 Jul;19(4):795-803.
    doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12998pubmed: 30681776google scholar: lookup
  33. Mengüllüoğlu D, Fickel J, Hofer H, Förster DW. Non-invasive faecal sampling reveals spatial organization and improves measures of genetic diversity for the conservation assessment of territorial species: Caucasian lynx as a case species.. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216549.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216549pmc: PMC6510455pubmed: 31075125google scholar: lookup
  34. Multitarget Pharmaceuticals. AquaStool User Manual. .
  35. Nairismägi ML, Tan J, Lim JQ, Nagarajan S, Ng CC, Rajasegaran V, Huang D, Lim WK, Laurensia Y, Wijaya GC, Li ZM, Cutcutache I, Pang WL, Thangaraju S, Ha J, Khoo LP, Chin ST, Dey S, Poore G, Tan LH, Koh HK, Sabai K, Rao HL, Chuah KL, Ho YH, Ng SB, Chuang SS, Zhang F, Liu YH, Pongpruttipan T, Ko YH, Cheah PL, Karim N, Chng WJ, Tang T, Tao M, Tay K, Farid M, Quek R, Rozen SG, Tan P, Teh BT, Lim ST, Tan SY, Ong CK. JAK-STAT and G-protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways are frequently altered in epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma.. Leukemia 2016 Jun;30(6):1311-9.
    doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.13pmc: PMC4895162pubmed: 26854024google scholar: lookup
  36. Poole KG, Reynolds DM, Mowat G, Paetkau D. Estimating mountain goat abundance using DNA from fecal pellets. J Wildl Manag 2011;75(6):1527–1534.
    doi: 10.1002/jwmg.184google scholar: lookup
  37. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.. Am J Hum Genet 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75.
    doi: 10.1086/519795pmc: PMC1950838pubmed: 17701901google scholar: lookup
  38. Regan CE, Medill SA, Poissant J, McLoughlin PD. Causes and consequences of an unusually male-biased adult sex ratio in an unmanaged feral horse population.. J Anim Ecol 2020 Dec;89(12):2909-2921.
    pubmed: 32996590doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13349google scholar: lookup
  39. Saber A, Hiltermann TJN, Kok K, Terpstra MM, de Lange K, Timens W, Groen HJM, van den Berg A. Mutation patterns in small cell and non-small cell lung cancer patients suggest a different level of heterogeneity between primary and metastatic tumors.. Carcinogenesis 2017 Feb 1;38(2):144-151.
    doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgw128pubmed: 27993895google scholar: lookup
  40. Scaglione D, Pinosio S, Marroni F, Di Centa E, Fornasiero A, Magris G, Scalabrin S, Cattonaro F, Taylor G, Morgante M. Single primer enrichment technology as a tool for massive genotyping: a benchmark on black poplar and maize.. Ann Bot 2019 Oct 29;124(4):543-552.
    pmc: PMC6821380pubmed: 30932149doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz054google scholar: lookup
  41. Schoenecker KA, King SRB, Ekernas LS, Oyler-McCance SJ. Using fecal DNA and closed-capture models to estimate feral horse population size. J Wildl Manag 2021;85(6):1150–1161.
    doi: 10.1002/jwmg.22056google scholar: lookup
  42. Scolnick JA, Dimon M, Wang IC, Huelga SC, Amorese DA. An Efficient Method for Identifying Gene Fusions by Targeted RNA Sequencing from Fresh Frozen and FFPE Samples.. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0128916.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128916pmc: PMC4488430pubmed: 26132974google scholar: lookup
  43. Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers.. Ecol Lett 2006 May;9(5):615-29.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00889.xpubmed: 16643306google scholar: lookup
  44. Shafer AB, Wolf JB, Alves PC, Bergström L, Bruford MW, Brännström I, Colling G, Dalén L, De Meester L, Ekblom R, Fawcett KD, Fior S, Hajibabaei M, Hill JA, Hoezel AR, Höglund J, Jensen EL, Krause J, Kristensen TN, Krützen M, McKay JK, Norman AJ, Ogden R, Österling EM, Ouborg NJ, Piccolo J, Popović D, Primmer CR, Reed FA, Roumet M, Salmona J, Schenekar T, Schwartz MK, Segelbacher G, Senn H, Thaulow J, Valtonen M, Veale A, Vergeer P, Vijay N, Vilà C, Weissensteiner M, Wennerström L, Wheat CW, Zieliński P. Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice.. Trends Ecol Evol 2015 Feb;30(2):78-87.
    pubmed: 25534246doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.009google scholar: lookup
  45. Wade CM, Giulotto E, Sigurdsson S, Zoli M, Gnerre S, Imsland F, Lear TL, Adelson DL, Bailey E, Bellone RR, Blöcker H, Distl O, Edgar RC, Garber M, Leeb T, Mauceli E, MacLeod JN, Penedo MC, Raison JM, Sharpe T, Vogel J, Andersson L, Antczak DF, Biagi T, Binns MM, Chowdhary BP, Coleman SJ, Della Valle G, Fryc S, Guérin G, Hasegawa T, Hill EW, Jurka J, Kiialainen A, Lindgren G, Liu J, Magnani E, Mickelson JR, Murray J, Nergadze SG, Onofrio R, Pedroni S, Piras MF, Raudsepp T, Rocchi M, Røed KH, Ryder OA, Searle S, Skow L, Swinburne JE, Syvänen AC, Tozaki T, Valberg SJ, Vaudin M, White JR, Zody MC, Lander ES, Lindblad-Toh K. Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and population genetics of the domestic horse.. Science 2009 Nov 6;326(5954):865-7.
    pmc: PMC3785132pubmed: 19892987doi: 10.1126/science.1178158google scholar: lookup
  46. White LC, Fontsere C, Lizano E, Hughes DA, Angedakin S, Arandjelovic M, Granjon AC, Hans JB, Lester JD, Rabanus-Wallace MT, Rowney C, Städele V, Marques-Bonet T, Langergraber KE, Vigilant L. A roadmap for high-throughput sequencing studies of wild animal populations using noninvasive samples and hybridization capture.. Mol Ecol Resour 2019 May;19(3):609-622.
    doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12993pubmed: 30637963google scholar: lookup
  47. Zhang X, Xu Y, Liu H, Jiang G. Risks involved in fecal DNA-based genotyping of microsatellite loci in the Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica: a pilot study. J for Res 2018;29(2):525–531.
    doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0447-ygoogle scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Rhodes E, Jerry D, Jones DB, Goldsbury J, Vu N. Swift SNPs: Evaluating Rapid DNA Extraction Methods for Scalable Genotyping in Aquaculture. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 2026 Jan 9;28(1):15.
    doi: 10.1007/s10126-025-10561-7pubmed: 41511667google scholar: lookup
  2. Lovász L, Sommer-Trembo C, Barth JMI, Scasta JD, Grancharova-Hill R, Lemoine RT, Kerekes V, Merckling L, Bouskila A, Svenning JC, Fages A. Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2025 Feb;100(1):407-427.
    doi: 10.1111/brv.13146pubmed: 39279124google scholar: lookup
  3. Deakin S, Coltman DW. Development of a high-density sub-species-specific targeted SNP assay for Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis). PeerJ 2024;12:e16946.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.16946pubmed: 38426129google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.