Analyze Diet
Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde1989; 114(9); 493-498;

[Towards a veterinary-professional standard concerning castration in stallions].

Abstract: Complications following castration are increasingly often regarded as unacceptable by the owners of horses. A veterinary surgeon can only be held responsible for the consequences of his professional procedure when castration is not performed according to the rule (lege artis), i.e. if the surgeon failed to act in accordance with professional veterinary standards. So far, there is no consensus concerning the standard regarding the castration of stallions as various techniques are being used, and as some veterinary surgeons consider complications to be a normal risk in surgery. Visceral prolapse should be considered to be the most serious complication, particularly following 'open' castration. Although exact data are not available, it is the impression of the present authors that the incidence of intestinal evisceration and inguinal hernia in stallions is increasing in the Netherlands. When high priority is given to the prevention of evisceration, the 'open' method of castration should be abandoned. To reduce the hazard of evisceration to a minimum, the (half)closed technique, which involves crushing and ligation of the spermatic cord enclosed in the vaginal tunic, is recommended. This procedure enhances the risk of wound infection and scirrhous cord. However, these complications may be reduced when a high degree of asepsis is maintained during surgery.
Publication Date: 1989-05-01 PubMed ID: 2727976
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article looks into the standards surrounding the castration of stallions, which according to some horse owners, often lead to undesirable complications. The study particularly scrutinizes the ‘open’ method of castration which results in the highest rates of complications, and proposes the adoption of a ‘half-closed’ technique to reduce serious complications like evisceration (fallout of intestines), despite the slightly raised risk of infection.

Standards in Veterinary Castration Procedures

  • The study emphasizes that there is currently no consensus about professional standards when it comes to castrating stallions. This lack of uniformity can lead to varying degrees of complications, depending on the specific method employed.
  • Without standardized practices, it is difficult to hold veterinary surgeons accountable for complications, especially if they are deemed a normal risk of surgery.
  • However, the authors argue that there is growing concern among horse owners about these complications, and thus, there is a need for clearer professional standards.

Evaluating ‘Open’ Castration

  • Implicit within this conversation is a critique of what is known as ‘open’ castration. This method has a higher risk of visceral prolapse – or evisceration – a serious complication where part of the intestines fall out of the surgical site.
  • The authors suggest that, although exact data is not available, there appears to be an increase in such complications in the Netherlands.

Proposal for a More Safer Technique

  • To prevent the high incidences of evisceration, the article proposes abandoning the ‘open’ method of castration and instead, advocates for the (half)closed technique. Here, the spermatic cord is ligated and crushed within the vaginal tunic.
  • Though this procedure has a slightly increased risk of wound infection and scirrhous cord (hardening of the cord due to scarring), the authors argue that maintaining a high degree of asepsis during surgery can mitigate these risks.

Cite This Article

APA
Rutgers LJ, Kersjes AW. (1989). [Towards a veterinary-professional standard concerning castration in stallions]. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd, 114(9), 493-498.

Publication

ISSN: 0040-7453
NlmUniqueID: 0031550
Country: Netherlands
Language: dut
Volume: 114
Issue: 9
Pages: 493-498

Researcher Affiliations

Rutgers, L J
  • Vakgroep Algemene Heelkunde en Heelkunde der Grote Huisdieren, Faculteit Diergeneeskunde, Utrecht.
Kersjes, A W

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Castration / adverse effects
    • Castration / standards
    • Castration / veterinary
    • Hernia, Inguinal / etiology
    • Hernia, Inguinal / veterinary
    • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
    • Horses / surgery
    • Male
    • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
    • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
    • Surgical Wound Dehiscence / prevention & control
    • Surgical Wound Dehiscence / veterinary

    Citations

    This article has been cited 1 times.
    1. Robert MP, Chapuis RJJ, de Fourmestraux C, Geffroy OJ. Complications and risk factors of castration with primary wound closure: Retrospective study in 159 horses. Can Vet J 2017 May;58(5):466-471.
      pubmed: 28487590