Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(21); doi: 10.3390/ani14213105

Towards the Identification of New Biomarkers in Saliva and Serum for Treatment Monitoring of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: A Liquid Proteomic Approach.

Abstract: Equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) is a common condition in horses. This study explores the use of liquid proteomics to identify new biomarkers in saliva and serum to monitor EGUS treatment. The proteomes of horses with EGUS before and after a successful treatment with omeprazole were analysed. In saliva, 503 proteins were identified, with 7 upregulated and 6 downregulated post-treatment. Among the proteins that changed, there was an increase in vimentin, linked to wound healing, and a decrease in podocalyxin, associated with tissue damage. In serum, 206 proteins were found, with significant changes in 5. Keratin type I increased, supporting epithelial integrity, whereas immunoglobulin lambda decreased, indicating a reduced immune response. Gene ontology analysis revealed a decrease in immune-related pathways after successful treatment. Overall, 13 proteins in saliva and 5 in serum showed significant changes after treatment, highlighting the differential responses of saliva and serum in EGUS. This report creates new avenues for discovering potential biomarkers to monitor EGUS treatment, which is of high importance for the management of this prevalent disease.
Publication Date: 2024-10-28 PubMed ID: 39518828PubMed Central: PMC11545413DOI: 10.3390/ani14213105Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates new biomarkers in horse saliva and serum for monitoring the treatment of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome (EGUS) using a liquid proteomic approach. The study identifies significant changes in certain proteins in both saliva and serum after treatment, providing useful insights for potential future EGUS treatment monitoring.

Explanation of Research

  • The researchers focused on EGUS, a prevalent condition in horses. Their approach involved monitoring EGUS treatment via new biomarkers discovered in saliva and serum through a technique called liquid proteomics.
  • Liquid proteomics is a process that explores protein substance within a liquid sample, such as serum or saliva. Using this approach, the team hoped to identify new biomarkers relatively unique or distinctive biological indicators that can be used to monitor the development and treatment of the disease.
  • The study used horses with EGUS and analysed their proteomes, the entire set of their proteins, before and after successful treatment with omeprazole, a medication commonly used for EGUS treatment.

Saliva and Serum Analysis

  • From the saliva samples, 503 proteins were identified. Of these, 7 were found to be upregulated (their expression levels increased) and 6 were downregulated (their expression levels decreased) after treatment.
  • In particular, the protein vimentin, which has been linked to wound healing, showed an increase. Conversely, podocalyxin, which is typically associated with tissue damage, decreased.
  • From the serum samples, 206 proteins were identified with significant changes observed in 5 of these after treatment. Keratin type I, a protein that supports the integrity of the epithelium, showed an increase. The immunoglobulin lambda, associated with the immune response, showed a decrease. These changes indicate a shift in the biological environment within the horse that is correlated with successful treatment of EGUS.
  • Furthermore, a gene ontology analysis, a study of how genes behave, revealed a decrease in immune-related pathways following effective treatment. This suggests that the horse’s immune response changes significantly after successful treatment.

Implications for Management of EGUS

  • Overall, the study found that 13 proteins in saliva and 5 in serum showed significant changes following treatment. This is important because it shows that saliva and serum can have different responses to EGUS, highlighting the need for differential treatment strategies.
  • The identification of potential biomarkers could help veterinarians and researchers better monitor the treatment of EGUS, a common equine condition.
  • By revealing how proteins behave in relation to EGUS and its treatment, this study contributes valuable knowledge to the current understanding of the disease and offers potential strategies for its successful management.

Cite This Article

APA
Muñoz-Prieto A, Rubić I, Rešetar Maslov D, González-Sánchez JC, Mrljak V, Cerón JJ, Hansen S. (2024). Towards the Identification of New Biomarkers in Saliva and Serum for Treatment Monitoring of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: A Liquid Proteomic Approach. Animals (Basel), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213105

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 21

Researcher Affiliations

Muñoz-Prieto, Alberto
  • Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo s/n, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Rubić, Ivana
  • Laboratory of Proteomics, Internal Diseases Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Rešetar Maslov, Dina
  • Laboratory of Proteomics, Internal Diseases Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
González-Sánchez, Juan Carlos
  • BioQuant, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Mrljak, Vladimir
  • Laboratory of Proteomics, Internal Diseases Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Cerón, Jose Joaquín
  • Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo s/n, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Hansen, Sanni
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Section Medicine and Surgery, University of Copenhagen, Agrovej 8, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.

Grant Funding

  • RYC2021-033660-I / Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), Spain, and The Euro-pean Next Generation Funds (NextgenerationEU)

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 41 references
  1. van den Boom R. Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Adult Horses. Vet. J. 2022;283–284:105830.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105830pubmed: 35472513google scholar: lookup
  2. Tamzali Y, Marguet C, Priymenko N, Lyazrhi F. Prevalence of Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in High-Level Endurance Horses. Equine Vet. J. 2011;43:141–144.
  3. Ward S, Sykes B.W, Brown H, Bishop A, Penaluna L.A. A Comparison of the Prevalence of Gastric Ulceration in Feral and Domesticated Horses in the UK. Equine Vet. Educ. 2015;27:655–657.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12491google scholar: lookup
  4. Vokes J, Lovett A, Sykes B. Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: An Update on Current Knowledge. Animals 2023;13:1261.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071261pmc: PMC10093336pubmed: 37048517google scholar: lookup
  5. Julliand S, Martin A, Julliand V. Effect of Live Yeast Supplementation on Gastric Ecosystem in Horses Fed a High-Starch Diet. Livest. Sci. 2018;215:25–29.
  6. Lorenzo-Figueras M, Merritt A.M. Effects of Exercise on Gastric Volume and PH in the Proximal Portion of the Stomach of Horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2002;63:1481–1487.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1481pubmed: 12428654google scholar: lookup
  7. Vatistas N.J, Snyder J.R, Carlson G, Johnson B, Arthu R.M, Thurmond M, Zhou H, Lloyd K.L.K. Cross-sectional Study of Gastric Ulcers of the Squamous Mucosa in Thoroughbred Racehorses. Equine Vet. J. 1999;31:34–39.
  8. Luthersson N, Nielsen K.H, Harris P, Parkin T.D.H. Risk Factors Associated with Equine Gastric Ulceration Syndrome (EGUS) in 201 Horses in Denmark. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:625–630.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X441929pubmed: 19927579google scholar: lookup
  9. Banse H.E, Andrews F.M. Equine Glandular Gastric Disease: Prevalence, Impact and Management Strategies. Vet. Med. Res. Rep. 2019;10:69–76.
    doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S174427pmc: PMC6642651pubmed: 31406687google scholar: lookup
  10. Muñoz-Prieto A, Contreras-Aguilar M.D, Cerón J.J, Ayala I, Martin-Cuervo M, Gonzalez-Sanchez J.C, Jacobsen S, Kuleš J, Beletić A, Rubić I. Changes in Proteins in Saliva and Serum in Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome Using a Proteomic Approach. Animals 2022;12:1169.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091169pmc: PMC9103582pubmed: 35565595google scholar: lookup
  11. Cerón J.J, Contreras-Aguilar M.D, Escribano D, Martínez-Miró S, López-Martínez M.J, Ortín-Bustillo A, Franco-Martínez L, Rubio C.P, Muñoz-Prieto A, Tvarijonaviciute A. Basics for the Potential Use of Saliva to Evaluate Stress, Inflammation, Immune System, and Redox Homeostasis in Pigs. BMC Vet. Res. 2022;18:81.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03176-wpmc: PMC8883734pubmed: 35227252google scholar: lookup
  12. López-Martínez M.J, Lamy E, Cerón J.J, Ayala I, Contreras-Aguilar M.D, Henriksen I.-M.H, Muñoz-Prieto A, Hansen S. Changes in the Saliva Proteome Analysed by Gel-Proteomics in Horses Diagnosed with Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome (EGUS) at Diagnosis and after Successful Treatment. Res. Vet. Sci. 2024;167:105112.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.105112pubmed: 38176208google scholar: lookup
  13. Muñoz-Prieto A, Cerón J.J, Rubio C.P, Contreras-Aguilar M.D, Pardo-Marín L, la Peña I.A, Martín-Cuervo M, Henriksen I.-M.H, Arense-Gonzalo J.J, Tecles F. Evaluation of a Comprehensive Profile of Salivary Analytes for the Diagnosis of the Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome. Animals 2022;12:3261.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12233261pmc: PMC9740180pubmed: 36496782google scholar: lookup
  14. Contreras-Aguilar M.D, Rubio C.P, González-Arostegui L.G, Martín-Cuervo M, Cerón J.J, Ayala I, Henriksen I.M.H, Jacobsen S, Hansen S. Changes in Oxidative Status Biomarkers in Saliva and Serum in the Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome and Colic of Intestinal Aetiology: A Pilot Study. Animals 2022;12:667.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12050667pmc: PMC8909870pubmed: 35268236google scholar: lookup
  15. Murray M.J, Schusser G.R, Pipers F.S, Gross S.J. Factors Associated with Gastric Lesions in Thoroughbred Racehorses. Equine Vet. J. 1996;28:368–374.
  16. Andrews F, Bernard W, Byars N, Cohen N, Divers T, MacAllister C, McGladdery A, Merrit A, Murray M, Orsini J. Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome (EGUS): The Equine Gastric Ulcer Council. Equine Vet. Educ. 1999;11:262–272.
  17. Sykes B.W, Sykes K.M, Hallowell G.D. A Comparison of Three Doses of Omeprazole in the Treatment of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: A Blinded, Randomised, Dose–Response Clinical Trial. Equine Vet. J. 2015;47:285–290.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12287pubmed: 24761780google scholar: lookup
  18. Pratt S.L, Bowen M, Hallowell G.H, Shipman E, Bailey J, Redpath A. Does Lesion Type or Severity Predict Outcome of Therapy for Horses with Equine Glandular Gastric Disease?—A Retrospective Study. Vet. Med. Sci. 2023;9:150–157.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.1034pmc: PMC9857143pubmed: 36495212google scholar: lookup
  19. Pratt S, Bowen I, Hallowell G, Shipman E, Redpath A. Assessment of Agreement Using the Equine Glandular Gastric Disease Grading System in 84 Cases. Vet. Med. Sci. 2022;8:1472–1477.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.807pmc: PMC9297748pubmed: 35412651google scholar: lookup
  20. Rendle D, Bowen M, Brazil T, Conwell R, Hallowell G, Hepburn R, Hewetson M, Sykes B. Recommendations for the Management of Equine Glandular Gastric Disease. UK-Vet. Equine. 2018;2:2–11.
    doi: 10.12968/ukve.2018.2.S1.3google scholar: lookup
  21. Sykes B.W, Hewetson M, Hepburn R.J, Luthersson N, Tamzali Y. European College of Equine Internal Medicine Consensus Statement-Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Adult Horses. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015;29:1288–1299.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13578pmc: PMC4858038pubmed: 26340142google scholar: lookup
  22. Muñoz-Prieto A, Llamas-Amor E, Cerón J.J, Hansen S. Changes in Saliva Analytes in Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome (EGUS) after Treatment: A Pilot Study. Res. Vet. Sci. 2024;176:105346.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105346pubmed: 38968646google scholar: lookup
  23. Henneke D.R, Potter G.D, Kreider J.L, Yeates B.F. Relationship between Condition Score, Physical Measurements and Body Fat Percentage in Mares. Equine Vet. J. 1983;15:371–372.
  24. Shawaf T, El-Deeb W.M, Elgioushy M. The Contribution of Specific and Nonspecific Biomarkers in Diagnosis of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome (EGUS) Under Field Condition. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;84:102853.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102853pubmed: 31864460google scholar: lookup
  25. Kopstein J, Wrong O.M. The Origin and Fate of Salivary Urea and Ammonia in Man. Clin. Sci. 1977;52:9–17.
    doi: 10.1042/cs0520009pubmed: 23916google scholar: lookup
  26. Wise J.C, Wilkes E.J.A, Raidal S.L, Xie G, Crosby D.E, Hale J.N, Hughes K.J. Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability for 2 Grading Systems for Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Horses. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2021;35:571–579.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15987pmc: PMC7848314pubmed: 33284465google scholar: lookup
  27. Rešetar Maslov D, Rubić I, Farkaš V, Kuleš J, Beer Ljubić B, Beletić A, Samardžija M, Kovačić M, Jurkić Krsteska G, Mrljak V. Characterization and LC-MS/MS Based Proteomic Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles Separated from Blood Serum of Healthy and Dogs Naturally Infected by Babesia Canis. A Preliminary Study. Vet. Parasitol. 2024;328:110188.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110188pubmed: 38653059google scholar: lookup
  28. Hendriks M.M.W.B, Smit S, Akkermans W.L.M.W, Reijmers T.H, Eilers P.H.C, Hoefsloot H.C.J, Rubingh C.M, de Koster C.G, Aerts J.M, Smilde A.K. How to Distinguish Healthy from Diseased? Classification Strategy for Mass Spectrometry-based Clinical Proteomics. Proteomics 2007;7:3672–3680.
    doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700046pubmed: 17880000google scholar: lookup
  29. Scherp P, Ku G, Coleman L, Kheterpal I. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells: Methods and Protocols. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2011. Gel-Based and Gel-Free Proteomic Technologies; pp. 163–190.
    pubmed: 21082402
  30. Franco-Martínez L, Gelemanović A, Horvatić A, Contreras-Aguilar M.D, Dąbrowski R, Mrljak V, Cerón J.J, Martínez-Subiela S, Tvarijonaviciute A. Changes in Serum and Salivary Proteins in Canine Mammary Tumors. Animals 2020;10:741.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10040741pmc: PMC7222850pubmed: 32344524google scholar: lookup
  31. Franco-Martínez L, Muñoz-Prieto A, Contreras-Aguilar M.D, Želvytė R, Monkevičienė I, Horvatić A, Kuleš J, Mrljak V, Cerón J.J, Escribano D. Changes in Saliva Proteins in Cows with Mastitis: A Proteomic Approach. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021;140:91–99.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.08.008pubmed: 34418789google scholar: lookup
  32. Wang L, Mohanasundaram P, Lindström M, Asghar M.N, Sultana G, Misiorek J.O, Jiu Y, Chen H, Chen Z, Toivola D.M. Vimentin Suppresses Inflammation and Tumorigenesis in the Mouse Intestine. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022;10:862237.
    doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.862237pmc: PMC8993042pubmed: 35399505google scholar: lookup
  33. Cheng F, Shen Y, Mohanasundaram P, Lindström M, Ivaska J, Ny T, Eriksson J.E. Vimentin Coordinates Fibroblast Proliferation and Keratinocyte Differentiation in Wound Healing via TGF-β–Slug Signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E4320–E4327.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519197113pmc: PMC4968728pubmed: 27466403google scholar: lookup
  34. Eckes B, Dogic D, Colucci-Guyon E, Wang N, Maniotis A, Ingber D, Merckling A, Langa F, Aumailley M, Delouvée A. Impaired Mechanical Stability, Migration and Contractile Capacity in Vimentin Deficient Fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 1998;111:1897–1907.
    doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.13.1897pubmed: 9625752google scholar: lookup
  35. Zaigraev M.M, Lyukmanova E.N, Paramonov A.S, Shenkarev Z.O, Chugunov A.O. Orientational Preferences of GPI-Anchored Ly6/UPAR Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;24:11.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms24010011pmc: PMC9819746pubmed: 36613456google scholar: lookup
  36. Kong H.K, Park J.H. Characterization and Function of Human Ly-6/UPAR Molecules. BMB Rep. 2012;45:595–603.
  37. Le Tran N, Wang Y, Nie G. Podocalyxin in Normal Tissue and Epithelial Cancer. Cancers 2021;13:2863.
    doi: 10.3390/cancers13122863pmc: PMC8227556pubmed: 34201212google scholar: lookup
  38. Borg D, Hedner C, Nodin B, Larsson A, Johnsson A, Eberhard J, Jirström K. Expression of Podocalyxin-like Protein Is an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Resected Esophageal and Gastric Adenocarcinoma. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2016;16:13.
    doi: 10.1186/s12907-016-0034-8pmc: PMC4966733pubmed: 27478410google scholar: lookup
  39. Wu N, Du X, Peng Z, Zhang Z, Cui L, Li D, Wang R, Ma M. Silencing of Peroxiredoxin 1 Expression Ameliorates Ulcerative Colitis in a Rat Model. J. Int. Med. Res. 2021;49:030006052098631.
    doi: 10.1177/0300060520986313pmc: PMC7944532pubmed: 33682513google scholar: lookup
  40. Roth W, Kumar V, Beer H.-D, Richter M, Wohlenberg C, Reuter U, Thiering S, Staratschek-Jox A, Hofmann A, Kreusch F. Keratin 1 Maintains Skin Integrity and Participates in an Inflammatory Network in Skin via Interleukin-18. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:5269–5279.
    doi: 10.1242/jcs.116574pubmed: 23132931google scholar: lookup
  41. Vergnes L, Baroukh N, Léhy T, Moizo L, Bado A, Baralle M, Baralle F.E, Zakin M.M, Ochoa A. Human Apolipoprotein A-IV Reduces Gastric Acid Secretion and Diminishes Ulcer Formation in Transgenic Mice. FEBS Lett. 1999;460:178–181.
    doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01332-0pubmed: 10571083google scholar: lookup