FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Transcriptomic sequencing and differential analysis of Kazak...
Frontiers in veterinary science2025; 12; 1633786; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1633786

Transcriptomic sequencing and differential analysis of Kazakh horse muscles from various anatomical locations.

Abstract: Kazakh horses, a distinguished breed in China known for their dual-purpose use in milk and meat production, exhibit early maturation, tolerance to coarse feeding, and strong resistance to environmental stress. However, the gene expression differences across various muscle tissues of Kazakh horses have yet to be elucidated. In this study, transcriptomic sequencing was performed on muscle tissues from three anatomical regions of Kazakh horses, including the longissimus dorsi (Gb), external oblique (Gf), and diaphragm (Gg) muscles. In the Gb and Gf groups, 426 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, including , and , of which 147 were upregulated and 279 downregulated. In the Gf and Gg groups, 1,762 DEGs were detected, including , and , with 1,391 upregulated and 371 downregulated. Additionally, 644 DEGs were identified between the Gg and Gb groups, including , and , with 172 upregulated and 472 downregulated. GO annotation and KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the DEGs, such as , and , were primarily involved in System Development, Extracellular Space, and Protein-Arginine Deiminase Activity. Furthermore, pathways related to skeletal muscle growth, including Cytoskeleton in Muscle Cells, Cytokine-Cytokine Receptor Interaction, and Motor Proteins, were significantly enriched. RT-qPCR analysis validated the accuracy of the transcriptomic sequencing data. This study provides valuable insights into the differential expression of genes and related signaling pathways in various muscle tissues of Kazakh horses, rendering a theoretical foundation and data references for understanding skeletal muscle growth and improving meat production in equines.
Copyright © 2025 Wubulikasimu, Liu, Yao, Meng, Wang, Zeng, Li and Ren.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-07-24 PubMed ID: 40777832PubMed Central: PMC12330291DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1633786Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores the differences in gene expressions across various muscle tissues in Kazakh horses, a unique breed from China known for its dual-purpose use in milk and meat production. Researchers used transcriptomic sequencing on muscle tissues from three different regions, identifying numerous differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The study provides valuable new perspectives on gene expression and associated pathways in various muscle tissues of Kazakh horses, offering a theoretical basis for understanding skeletal muscle growth and improving meat production in equines.

Method and Analysis

  • Researchers carried out transcriptomic sequencing on muscle tissues from three diverse anatomical areas in Kazakh horses — the longissimus dorsi (Gb), external oblique (Gf), and diaphragm (Gg) muscles.
  • they identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using bioinformatic tools between the groups mentioned above. The number of identified DEGs varied greatly between the groups, indicating distinct gene expression patterns in different muscle tissues.
  • Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis allowed researchers to categorize these DEGs into various biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions. This process helped identify the primary roles these DEGs had like System Development, Extracellular Space, and Protein-Arginine Deiminase Activity.
  • Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) was implemented to validate the accuracy of the transcriptomic sequencing data.

Findings and Significance

  • Various differentially expressed genes were identified across the different muscle tissues, providing a more in-depth understanding of the gene expression diversity in various muscle tissues of Kazakh horses.
  • The study revealed critical pathways significant in skeletal muscle growth, such as Cytoskeleton in Muscle Cells, Cytokine-Cytokine Receptor Interaction, and Motor Proteins.
  • The insights gathered in this study lay a theoretical foundation for understanding the growth of skeletal muscle.
  • The research also offers valuable data references to potentially improve meat production in equines, contributing to more efficient and sustainable farming practices.

Final Thoughts

  • This study marks a critical step in better understanding the intricate genetic architecture linked to the growth and quality of equine muscle tissue.
  • Further studies expanding on these results could lead to enhanced farming practices, and potentially, the production of higher quality equine meat.

Cite This Article

APA
Wubulikasimu M, Liu J, Yao X, Meng J, Wang J, Zeng Y, Li L, Ren W. (2025). Transcriptomic sequencing and differential analysis of Kazakh horse muscles from various anatomical locations. Front Vet Sci, 12, 1633786. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1633786

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Pages: 1633786
PII: 1633786

Researcher Affiliations

Wubulikasimu, Mierkadina
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Liu, Jiahao
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Yao, Xinkui
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Meng, Jun
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Wang, Jianwen
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Zeng, Yaqi
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Li, Linling
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Ren, Wanlu
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
  • Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 47 references
  1. Ren W, Wang J, Zeng Y, Wang T, Meng J, Yao X. Differential age-related transcriptomic analysis of ovarian granulosa cells in Kazakh horses. Front Endocrinol (2024) 15:1346260.
    doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1346260pmc: PMC10863452pubmed: 38352714google scholar: lookup
  2. Yu X, Fang C, Liu L, Zhao X, Liu W, Cao H. Transcriptome study underling difference of milk yield during peak lactation of Kazakh horse. J Equine Vet Sci (2021) 102:103424.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103424pubmed: 34119198google scholar: lookup
  3. Kyriakopoulou K, Keppler JK, van der Goot AJ, Boom RM. Alternatives to meat and dairy. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol (2021) 12:29–50.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-062520-101850pubmed: 33400559google scholar: lookup
  4. Canton H. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations—FAO. The Europa Directory of International Organizations London: Routledge; (2021). p. 297–305.
  5. Balji Y, Knicky M, Zamaratskaia G. Perspectives and safety of horsemeat consumption. Int J Food Sci Technol (2020) 55:942–52.
    doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14390google scholar: lookup
  6. Lorenzo JM, Sarriés MV, Tateo A, Polidori P, Franco D, Lanza M. Carcass characteristics, meat quality and nutritional value of horsemeat: a review. Meat Sci (2014) 96:1478–88.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.12.006pubmed: 24423453google scholar: lookup
  7. Šimon M, Bogićević S, Kaić A, Luštrek B, Potočnik K. Exploring genetic influences on equine meat quality: a bioinformatics approach. Foods (2025) 14:533.
    doi: 10.3390/foods14030533pmc: PMC11816967pubmed: 39942126google scholar: lookup
  8. Del Bó C, Simonetti P, Gardana C, Riso P, Lucchini G, Ciappellano S. Horse meat consumption affects iron status, lipid profile and fatty acid composition of red blood cells in healthy volunteers. Int J Food Sci Nutr (2013) 64:147–54.
    doi: 10.3109/09637486.2012.728198pubmed: 23025273google scholar: lookup
  9. Zhao Y, Xiang C, Roy BC, Bruce HL, Blecker C, Zhang Y. Apoptosis and its role in postmortem meat tenderness: a comprehensive review. Meat Sci (2024) 219:109652.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109652pubmed: 39265386google scholar: lookup
  10. Yu H, Yang Z, Wang J, Li H, Li X, Liang E. Identification of key genes and metabolites involved in meat quality performance in Qinchuan cattle by WGCNA. J Integr Agric (2024) 23:3923–37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.07.044google scholar: lookup
  11. Vishnuraj MR, Ajay G, Aravind Kumar N, Renuka J, Pollumahanti N, Anusha Chauhan H. Duplex real-time PCR assay with high-resolution melt analysis for the detection and quantification of Listeria species and Listeria monocytogenes in meat products. J Food Sci Technol (2023) 60:1541–50.
    doi: 10.1007/s13197-023-05695-2pmc: PMC10076466pubmed: 37033312google scholar: lookup
  12. Różycki M, Korpysa-Dzirba W, Bełcik A, Bilska-Zajac E, Gontarczyk A, Kochanowski M. Validation parameters of the magnetic stirrer method for pooled sample digestion for Trichinella Spp. in horse meat based on proficiency tests results. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2022) 19:14356.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114356pmc: PMC9655762pubmed: 36361233google scholar: lookup
  13. Mo M, Zhang Z, Wang X, Shen W, Zhang L, Lin S. Molecular mechanisms underlying the impact of muscle fiber types on meat quality in livestock and poultry. Front Vet Sci (2023) 10:1284551.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1284551pmc: PMC10702985pubmed: 38076559google scholar: lookup
  14. Ren W, Wang J, Zeng Y, Wang T, Sun Z, Meng J. Investigating age-related differences in muscles of Kazakh horse through transcriptome analysis. Gene (2024) 919:148483.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148483pubmed: 38670391google scholar: lookup
  15. Wei X, Zhu Y, Zhao X, Zhao Y, Jing Y, Liu G. Transcriptome profiling of mRNAs in muscle tissue of Pinan cattle and Nanyang cattle. Gene (2022) 825:146435.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146435pubmed: 35301069google scholar: lookup
  16. Yamakawa H, Kusumoto D, Hashimoto H, Yuasa S. Stem cell aging in skeletal muscle regeneration and disease. Int J Mol Sci (2020) 21:1830.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms21051830pmc: PMC7084237pubmed: 32155842google scholar: lookup
  17. Collins BC, Shapiro JB, Scheib MM, Musci RV, Verma M, Kardon G. Three-dimensional imaging studies in mice identify cellular dynamics of skeletal muscle regeneration. Dev Cell (2024) 59:1457–74. e5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.03.017pmc: PMC11153043pubmed: 38569550google scholar: lookup
  18. Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Bellon CR, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength: training considerations. Sports Med (2018) 48:765–85.
    doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0862-zpubmed: 29372481google scholar: lookup
  19. Fu J, Liu J, Zou X, Deng M, Liu G, Sun B. Transcriptome analysis of mRNA and miRNA in the development of LeiZhou goat muscles. Sci Rep (2024) 14:9858.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60521-9pmc: PMC11058254pubmed: 38684760google scholar: lookup
  20. Jin L, Tang Q, Hu S, Chen Z, Zhou X, Zeng B. A pig BodyMap transcriptome reveals diverse tissue physiologies and evolutionary dynamics of transcription. Nat Commun (2021) 12:3715.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23560-8pmc: PMC8211698pubmed: 34140474google scholar: lookup
  21. Wang J, Ren W, Sun Z, Han Z, Zeng Y, Meng J. Comparative transcriptome analysis of slow-twitch and fast-twitch muscles in Kazakh horses. Meat Sci (2024) 216:109582.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109582pubmed: 38991479google scholar: lookup
  22. López-Pedrouso M, Lorenzo JM, Cittadini A, Sarries MV, Gagaoua M, Franco D. A proteomic approach to identify biomarkers of foal meat quality: a focus on tenderness, color and intramuscular fat traits. Food Chem (2023) 405:134805.
    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134805pubmed: 36345099google scholar: lookup
  23. Gao Y. Transcriptomics Comparison of Testicular Development in Hornless and Horned Sheep. Yangling: Northwest A&F University; (2024).
  24. Zhu Y. Exploration of Key Regulators of Back Fat Deposition in Dahe Pigs Based on Whole Transcriptome Sequencing. Kunming: Yunnan Agricultural University; (2024).
  25. Brooks SV, Guzman SD, Ruiz LP. Skeletal muscle structure, physiology, and function. Handb Clin Neurol (2023) 195:3–16.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-98818-6.00013-3pubmed: 37562874google scholar: lookup
  26. Mierzejewski B, Archacka K, Grabowska I, Florkowska A, Ciemerych MA, Brzoska E. Human and mouse skeletal muscle stem and progenitor cells in health and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol (2020) 104:93–104.
    doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.01.004pubmed: 32005567google scholar: lookup
  27. Wang C, Matarneh SK, Gerrard D, Tan J. Modelling of energy metabolism and analysis of pH variations in postmortem muscle. Meat Sci (2021) 182:108634.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108634pubmed: 34284221google scholar: lookup
  28. Jia Z. Phenotype and Related Genes of Major Skeletal Muscles of Mongolian Horses. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; (2023).
  29. Claeyssen C, Bastide B, Cieniewski-Bernard C. Global O-GlcNAcylation changes impact desmin phosphorylation and its partition toward cytoskeleton in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells differentiated into myotubes. Sci Rep (2022) 12:9831.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14033-zpmc: PMC9198038pubmed: 35701470google scholar: lookup
  30. Wagers AJ, Conboy IM. Cellular and molecular signatures of muscle regeneration: current concepts and controversies in adult myogenesis. Cell (2005) 122:659–67.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.021pubmed: 16143100google scholar: lookup
  31. Ding J, Nie M, Liu J, Hu X, Ma L, Deng ZL. Trbp is required for differentiation of myoblasts and normal regeneration of skeletal muscle. PLoS ONE (2016) 11:e0155349.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155349pmc: PMC4861269pubmed: 27159388google scholar: lookup
  32. Chal J, Pourquié O. Making muscle: skeletal myogenesis and . Development (2017) 144:2104–22.
    doi: 10.1242/dev.151035pubmed: 28634270google scholar: lookup
  33. Langlois S, Cowan KN. Regulation of skeletal muscle myoblast differentiation and proliferation by pannexins. Adv Exp Med Biol (2017) 17:57–73.
    doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_53pubmed: 27518505google scholar: lookup
  34. Fu X, Zhang F, Dong X, Pu L, Feng Y, Xu Y. Adapting cytoskeleton-mitochondria patterning with myocyte differentiation by promyogenic PRR33. Cell Death Differ (2025) 32:177–93.
    doi: 10.1038/s41418-024-01363-wpmc: PMC11742405pubmed: 39147882google scholar: lookup
  35. Song X, Jiang H, Qi Z, Shen X, Xue M, Hu J. APEC infection affects cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction and cell cycle pathways in chicken trachea. Res Vet Sci (2020) 130:144–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.03.016pubmed: 32179292google scholar: lookup
  36. Chen Q, Wang D, Chen Z, Lin L, Shao Q, Zhang H. Predicting biomarkers in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma based on the cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction pathway. Heliyon (2024) 10:e37738.
    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37738pmc: PMC11416252pubmed: 39309795google scholar: lookup
  37. Huang H, Liu L, Li C, Liang Z, Huang Z, Wang Q. Fat mass-and obesity-associated (FTO) gene promoted myoblast differentiation through the focal adhesion pathway in chicken. 3 Biotech (2020) 10:403.
    doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02386-zpmc: PMC7447686pubmed: 32903970google scholar: lookup
  38. Gao X, Shin YH, Li M, Wang F, Tong Q, Zhang P. The fat mass and obesity associated gene FTO functions in the brain to regulate postnatal growth in mice. PLoS ONE (2010) 5:e14005.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014005pmc: PMC2982835pubmed: 21103374google scholar: lookup
  39. Wang Z, He Y, Tan Z. Transcription analysis of liver and muscle tissues from Landrace finishing pigs with different feed conversion ratios. Genes (2022) 13:2067.
    doi: 10.3390/genes13112067pmc: PMC9690258pubmed: 36360304google scholar: lookup
  40. Zhang G, Wu P, Zhou K, He M, Zhang X, Qiu C. Study on the transcriptome for breast muscle of chickens and the function of key gene RAC2 on fibroblasts proliferation. BMC Genomics (2021) 22:1–15.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07453-0pmc: PMC7937270pubmed: 33676413google scholar: lookup
  41. Diniz WJS, Mazzoni G, Coutinho LL, Banerjee P, Geistlinger L, Cesar ASM. Detection of co-expressed pathway modules associated with mineral concentration and meat quality in nelore cattle. Front Genet (2019) 10:210.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00210pmc: PMC6424907pubmed: 30930938google scholar: lookup
  42. Silva-Vignato B, Coutinho LL, Poleti MD, Cesar ASM, Moncau CT, Regitano LCA. Gene co-expression networks associated with carcass traits reveal new pathways for muscle and fat deposition in Nelore cattle. BMC Genomics (2019) 20:1–13.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5345-ypmc: PMC6329100pubmed: 30630417google scholar: lookup
  43. Bordini M, Zappaterra M, Soglia F, Petracci M, Davoli R. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis identifies molecular pathways and hub genes involved in broiler White Striping and Wooden Breast myopathies. Sci Rep (2021) 11:1776.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81303-7pmc: PMC7815844pubmed: 33469097google scholar: lookup
  44. Zhang T, Wang T, Niu Q, Zheng X, Li H, Gao X. Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals region-specific expression patterns in different beef cuts. BMC Genomics (2022) 23:387.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08527-3pmc: PMC9123670pubmed: 35596128google scholar: lookup
  45. Chai W, Qu H, Ma Q, Zhu M, Li M, Zhan Y. RNA-seq analysis identifies differentially expressed gene in different types of donkey skeletal muscles. Anim Biotechnol (2023) 34:1786–95.
    doi: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2050920pubmed: 35302433google scholar: lookup
  46. Kumar A, Kaur M, Ahlawat S, Sharma U, Singh MK, Singh KV. Transcriptomic diversity in longissimus thoracis muscles of Barbari and Changthangi goat breeds of India. Genomics (2021) 113:1639–46.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.04.019pubmed: 33862183google scholar: lookup
  47. Li C, Wang Y, Sun X, Yang J, Ren Y, Jia J. Identification of different myofiber types in pigs muscles and construction of regulatory networks. BMC Genomics (2024) 25:400.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10271-9pmc: PMC11040794pubmed: 38658807google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.