Analyze Diet

Ultrastructural comparison of Oncovirinae (type C), Spumavirinae, and Lentivirinae: three subfamilies of Retroviridae found in farm animals.

Abstract: The successive steps of maturation of seven retroviruses from five species of farm animals and one retrovirus from a mouse were compared in cell cultures. The viruses included three type C oncoviruses, one spumavirus, and three lentiviruses. Although members of the 3 subfamilies shared some gross morphologic features such as budding on plasma membranes, core, and surface projections, differences were noted in the ultrastructural detail of these features. Type C oncoviruses did not show any structural differentiation in identifiable form in the cytoplasm as opposed to characteristic features observed in the spumavirus and lentivirus subfamilies, respectively. Budding viruses were distinct among the 3 subfamilies. The type C bovine leukemia virus budding on vacuole membranes differed from the two other type C viruses by lacking an electron-lucent intermediate layer as did the lentiviruses. Differentiation between type C oncoviruses and lentiviruses could be confusing because of the similarity of the fully mature virions appearing in the intercellular space. However, each subfamily of retroviruses can be readily differentiated from one another when each morphologic stage of virus replication is examined by electron microscopy.
Publication Date: 1984-05-01 PubMed ID: 6325793
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article primarily deals with the study of the maturation process of seven different retroviruses found in five types of farm animals and a mouse. These retroviruses belong to three subfamilies: Oncovirinae (type C), Spumavirinae, and Lentivirinae. Despite sharing some general characteristics, distinct differences among these subfamilies were observed in their detailed ultrastructure.

Research Methodology and Findings

  • The researchers conducted a comparative analysis of the morphological features of different retroviruses during the various stages of maturation. The retroviruses studied include three type C oncoviruses, one spumavirus, and three lentiviruses. All these viruses were cultured in cells.
  • While the viruses across the three subfamilies had some common structural features, such as budding on cell membranes, the core, and surface projections, there were distinct differences in the detail of these features.
  • The type C oncoviruses did not show any discernible structural changes in the cytoplasm, a feature where it differed from the spumavirus and lentivirus subfamilies.

Observations on Virus Budding

  • Virus budding varied across the three subfamilies. An interesting feature was the type C bovine leukemia virus, which was observed to bud on vacuole membranes.
  • This specific type C virus differed from the other two type C viruses studied by the absence of an electron-lucent intermediate layer, similar to the lentiviruses.
  • The fully mature versions of the type C oncoviruses and lentiviruses were similar in appearance, causing potential confusion in differentiation.

Conclusion

  • Despite a few similarities, the research posits that each subfamily of retroviruses can be differentiated from one another quite readily. The key lies in closely examining each morphological stage of virus replication through electron microscopy.

Cite This Article

APA
Bouillant AM, Becker SA. (1984). Ultrastructural comparison of Oncovirinae (type C), Spumavirinae, and Lentivirinae: three subfamilies of Retroviridae found in farm animals. J Natl Cancer Inst, 72(5), 1075-1084.

Publication

ISSN: 0027-8874
NlmUniqueID: 7503089
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 72
Issue: 5
Pages: 1075-1084

Researcher Affiliations

Bouillant, A M
    Becker, S A

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Cattle
      • Goats / microbiology
      • Horses / microbiology
      • Leukemia Virus, Bovine / ultrastructure
      • Microscopy, Electron
      • Retroviridae / ultrastructure
      • Sheep / microbiology
      • Swine / microbiology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 6 times.
      1. Bouillant AM. Analogy between lymphotropic human retroviruses and large animal retroviruses.. Can Vet J 1986 Nov;27(11):448-54.
        pubmed: 17422719
      2. Bouillant AM. Analogie entre les rétrovirus humains lymphotropes et les rétrovirus des grands animaux.. Can Vet J 1986 May;27(5):195-203.
        pubmed: 17422654
      3. Orenstein JM, Meltzer MS, Phipps T, Gendelman HE. Cytoplasmic assembly and accumulation of human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 in recombinant human colony-stimulating factor-1-treated human monocytes: an ultrastructural study.. J Virol 1988 Aug;62(8):2578-86.
      4. Gelderblom HR, Ozel M, Pauli G. Morphogenesis and morphology of HIV. Structure-function relations.. Arch Virol 1989;106(1-2):1-13.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01311033pubmed: 2669684google scholar: lookup
      5. Wyatt CR, Wingett D, White JS, Buck CD, Knowles D, Reeves R, Magnuson NS. Persistent infection of rabbits with bovine leukemia virus associated with development of immune dysfunction.. J Virol 1989 Nov;63(11):4498-506.
      6. Nara PL, Robey WG, Arthur LO, Gonda MA, Asher DM, Yanagihara R, Gibbs CJ Jr, Gajdusek DC, Fischinger PJ. Simultaneous isolation of simian foamy virus and HTLV-III/LAV from chimpanzee lymphocytes following HTLV-III or LAV inoculation.. Arch Virol 1987;92(1-2):183-6.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01310072pubmed: 2432853google scholar: lookup