Analyze Diet
Journal of equine science2019; 30(1); 1-5; doi: 10.1294/jes.30.1

Using next-generation sequencing to determine diversity of horse intestinal worms: identifying the equine ‘nemabiome’.

Abstract: Next-generation sequencing of DNA from nematode eggs has been utilised to give the first account of the equine 'nemabiome'. In all equine faecal samples investigated, multiple species of Strongylidae were detected, ranging from 7.5 (SEM 0.79) with 99+% identity to sequences in the NCBI database to 13.3 (SEM 0.80) with 90+% identity. This range is typical of the number of species described previously in morphological studies using large quantities of digesta per animal. However, the current method is non-invasive; relies on DNA analysis, avoiding the need for specialist microscopy identification; and can be carried out with small samples, providing significant advantages over current methods.
Publication Date: 2019-04-03 PubMed ID: 30944540PubMed Central: PMC6445754DOI: 10.1294/jes.30.1Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article presents a study on using next-generation sequencing to investigate the diversity of intestinal worms in horses. The work has led to the first overview of the equine ‘nemabiome’, establishing this new method as a significant improvement over existing ones in terms of invasiveness, sample size and reliance on special microscopy.

Objective and Methodology

The objective of the research was to analyze the diversity of nematodes in the gut of horses using a method based on next-generation sequencing. This technique involves sequencing the DNA of nematode eggs found in equine fecal samples. Such a method was adopted to provide a non-invasive way of studying these parasites and to get around limitations of the traditional methods, including their reliance on large quantities of sample and specialist microscopy for identification.

  • Next-generation sequencing allows for broad scale analysis and accurate identification of species.
  • Using DNA sequencing, the researchers were able to identify multiple species of the Strongylidae family in horse fecal samples.

Results

The research team found several different species of the Strongylidae family in all equine stool samples through the DNA analysis. The counts ranged from 7.5 to 13.3 species. These counts align with previous results obtained through traditional morphological studies that often need large quantities of samples.

  • Instances where the identity of the worms matched 99+% of sequences in the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database occurred with a mean of 7.5 (SEM 0.79) species.
  • When a 90+% match was accepted, the mean number of species identified was a bit higher – 13.3 (SEM 0.80).

Conclusion

The study successfully established next-generation sequencing as an effective and non-invasive method for studying the horse ‘nemabiome’. With DNA analysis, the research bypassed having to gather copious amounts of samples and negated the need for specialist microscopy. The results from this analysis found their methods were consistent with previous studies using morphological data, providing another level of validation to the usefulness of this approach.

Cite This Article

APA
Mitchell CJ, O'Sullivan CM, Pinloche E, Wilkinson T, Morphew RM, McEwan NR. (2019). Using next-generation sequencing to determine diversity of horse intestinal worms: identifying the equine ‘nemabiome’. J Equine Sci, 30(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.30.1

Publication

ISSN: 1340-3516
NlmUniqueID: 9503751
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-5

Researcher Affiliations

Mitchell, Catriona J
  • Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
O'Sullivan, Catherine M
  • Ystwyth Veterinary Group, SY23 3QU Wales, U.K.
Pinloche, Eric
  • Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
Wilkinson, Toby
  • Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
Morphew, Russell M
  • Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
McEwan, Neil R
  • Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA Wales, U.K.
  • School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Garthdee Campus, Robert Gordon University, AB10 7GJ Scotland, U.K.

References

This article includes 19 references
  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool.. J Mol Biol 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10.
    pubmed: 2231712doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2google scholar: lookup
  2. Andersen UV, Howe DK, Olsen SN, Nielsen MK. Recent advances in diagnosing pathogenic equine gastrointestinal helminths: the challenge of prepatent detection.. Vet Parasitol 2013 Feb 18;192(1-3):1-9.
    pubmed: 23199789doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.11.003google scholar: lookup
  3. Archie EA, Ezenwa VO. Population genetic structure and history of a generalist parasite infecting multiple sympatric host species.. Int J Parasitol 2011 Jan;41(1):89-98.
    pubmed: 20828576doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.07.014google scholar: lookup
  4. Avramenko RW, Redman EM, Lewis R, Yazwinski TA, Wasmuth JD, Gilleard JS. Exploring the Gastrointestinal "Nemabiome": Deep Amplicon Sequencing to Quantify the Species Composition of Parasitic Nematode Communities.. PLoS One 2015;10(12):e0143559.
  5. Chapman MR, Kearney MT, Klei TR. Equine cyathostome populations: accuracy of species composition estimations.. Vet Parasitol 2003 Aug 29;116(1):15-21.
    pubmed: 14519323doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(03)00239-5google scholar: lookup
  6. Edmunds JL, Worgan HJ, Dougal K, Girdwood SE, Douglas JL, McEwan NR. In vitro analysis of the effect of supplementation with activated charcoal on the equine hindgut.. J Equine Sci 2016;27(2):49-55.
    pmc: PMC4914397pubmed: 27330398doi: 10.1294/jes.27.49google scholar: lookup
  7. Gasser RB, Chilton NB, Hoste H, Beveridge I. Rapid sequencing of rDNA from single worms and eggs of parasitic helminths.. Nucleic Acids Res 1993 May 25;21(10):2525-6.
    pmc: PMC309567pubmed: 8506152doi: 10.1093/nar/21.10.2525google scholar: lookup
  8. Lester HE, Matthews JB. Faecal worm egg count analysis for targeting anthelmintic treatment in horses: points to consider.. Equine Vet J 2014 Mar;46(2):139-45.
    pubmed: 24131301doi: 10.1111/evj.12199google scholar: lookup
  9. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences.. Bioinformatics 2006 Jul 1;22(13):1658-9.
    pubmed: 16731699doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158google scholar: lookup
  10. Lichtenfels JR, Kharchenko VA, Dvojnos GM. Illustrated identification keys to strongylid parasites (Strongylidae: Nematoda) of horses, zebras and asses (Equidae).. Vet Parasitol 2008 Sep 15;156(1-2):4-161.
    pubmed: 18603375doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.026google scholar: lookup
  11. Nielsen MK, Baptiste KE, Tolliver SC, Collins SS, Lyons ET. Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present.. Vet Parasitol 2010 Nov 24;174(1-2):77-84.
    pubmed: 20850927doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.007google scholar: lookup
  12. Nielsen MK, Reinemeyer CR, Donecker JM, Leathwick DM, Marchiondo AA, Kaplan RM. Anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites--current evidence and knowledge gaps.. Vet Parasitol 2014 Jul 30;204(1-2):55-63.
    pubmed: 24433852doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.030google scholar: lookup
  13. Palcy C, Silvestre A, Sauve C, Cortet J, Cabaret J. Benzimidazole resistance in Trichostrongylus axei in sheep: long-term monitoring of affected sheep and genotypic evaluation of the parasite.. Vet J 2010 Jan;183(1):68-74.
    pubmed: 18980850doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.012google scholar: lookup
  14. Pilotte N, Papaiakovou M, Grant JR, Bierwert LA, Llewellyn S, McCarthy JS, Williams SA. Improved PCR-Based Detection of Soil Transmitted Helminth Infections Using a Next-Generation Sequencing Approach to Assay Design.. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016 Mar;10(3):e0004578.
  15. Proudman C, Matthews J. Control of intestinal parasites in horses. In Pract 22: 90–97.
  16. Rehbein S, Visser M, Winter R. Prevalence, intensity and seasonality of gastrointestinal parasites in abattoir horses in Germany.. Parasitol Res 2013 Jan;112(1):407-13.
    pubmed: 23052780doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3150-0google scholar: lookup
  17. Roepstorff A, Nansen P. Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of helminth parasites of swine. FAO Animal Health Manual Number 3, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  18. Stratford CH, Lester HE, Pickles KJ, McGorum BC, Matthews JB. An investigation of anthelmintic efficacy against strongyles on equine yards in Scotland.. Equine Vet J 2014 Jan;46(1):17-24.
    pubmed: 23662803doi: 10.1111/evj.12079google scholar: lookup
  19. Supali T, Verweij JJ, Wiria AE, Djuardi Y, Hamid F, Kaisar MM, Wammes LJ, van Lieshout L, Luty AJ, Sartono E, Yazdanbakhsh M. Polyparasitism and its impact on the immune system.. Int J Parasitol 2010 Aug 15;40(10):1171-6.
    pubmed: 20580905doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.05.003google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Fitri LE, Candradikusuma D, Setia YD, Wibawa PA, Iskandar A, Winaris N, Pawestri AR. Diagnostic Methods of Common Intestinal Protozoa: Current and Future Immunological and Molecular Methods.. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022 Sep 21;7(10).
    doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7100253pubmed: 36287994google scholar: lookup
  2. Malsa J, Courtot É, Boisseau M, Dumont B, Gombault P, Kuzmina TA, Basiaga M, Lluch J, Annonay G, Dhorne-Pollet S, Mach N, Sutra JF, Wimel L, Dubois C, Guégnard F, Serreau D, Lespine A, Sallé G, Fleurance G. Effect of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on cyathostomin eggs excretion, larval development, larval community structure and efficacy of ivermectin treatment in horses.. Parasitology 2022 Sep;149(11):1439-1449.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182022000853pubmed: 35929352google scholar: lookup
  3. Tombak KJ, Hansen CB, Kinsella JM, Pansu J, Pringle RM, Rubenstein DI. The gastrointestinal nematodes of plains and Grevy's zebras: Phylogenetic relationships and host specificity.. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2021 Dec;16:228-235.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.10.007pubmed: 34712556google scholar: lookup
  4. Davey ML, Utaaker KS, Fossøy F. Characterizing parasitic nematode faunas in faeces and soil using DNA metabarcoding.. Parasit Vectors 2021 Aug 21;14(1):422.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04935-8pubmed: 34419166google scholar: lookup
  5. Queiroz C, Levy M, Avramenko R, Redman E, Kearns K, Swain L, Silas H, Uehlinger F, Gilleard JS. The use of ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome metabarcoding to enhance anthelmintic resistance diagnosis and surveillance of ovine gastrointestinal nematodes.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2020 Dec;14:105-117.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2020.09.003pubmed: 33027723google scholar: lookup
  6. McVeigh P. Post-genomic progress in helminth parasitology.. Parasitology 2020 Jul;147(8):835-840.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182020000591pubmed: 32252832google scholar: lookup