Analyze Diet

A comparison of electroejaculation and epididymal sperm collection techniques in stallions.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 2 methods of semen collection that could be used as terminal procedures in stallions with irreparable conditions, such as fractures or colic. Electroejaculation was attempted under general anesthesia. Forty-eight hours later, the ponies were castrated and 2 different epididymal sperm collection techniques were attempted by using a flushing or floating method. Additionally, the effect of supplemental seminal plasma was evaluated. Experimentally, electroejaculation was found to be a safe but ineffective method of terminal semen collection. Viable sperm cells were successfully recovered with both types of epididymal collection. The flotation method was least cumbersome and showed a tendency to be superior to flushing in terms of sperm motility and percentage of cells passing through glass wool/sephadex filtration, although differences did not reach significance. The addition of seminal plasma to epididymal spermatozoa prior to cryopreservation was of no value. In conclusion, either method of epididymal sperm collection is an acceptable method of terminal semen collection. Résumé — Comparaison entre l’électroéjaculation et les techniques de récolte de sperme épididymaire chez les étalons. Le but de cette étude était d’évaluer 2 méthodes de récolte de semence qui pourraient être utilisées comme techniques terminales chez des étalons atteints d’affections irrécupérables telles que fractures ou coliques. L’électroéjaculation a été tentée sous anesthésie générale. Quarante-huit heures plus tard, les poneys ont été castrés et 2 différentes techniques de récolte de sperme épidinymaire ont été essayées, soit une méthode de rinçage et une méthode de flottaison. De plus, l’effet d’une supplémentation en plasma séminal a été évalué. Expérimentalement, l’électroéjaculation s’est révélée une méthode sécuritaire mais inefficace de récolte terminale de sperme. Des spermatozoïdes viables ont été récupérés avec les 2 méthodes de prélèvement épididymaire. La méthode de flottaison était plus simple et avait tendance à être supérieure à celle du rinçage en terme de motilité et de pourcentage de cellules passant au travers d’un filtre de laine de verre/ séphadex. Cependant, les différences n’étaient pas significatives. L’addition de plasma séminal aux spermatozoïdes épididymaires avant la cryoconservation n’avait pas d’effet. En conclusion, les deux méthodes de récolte de sperme épididymal constituent une façon valide de prélèvement terminal de semence. (Traduit par Docteur André Blouin)
Publication Date: 2004-03-03 PubMed ID: 14992252PubMed Central: PMC539225
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research tested two methods of semen collection from stallions, electroejaculation and epididymal sperm collection, to find the best method for horses with terminal conditions. The study found that while electroejaculation was safe, it was not effective. Sperm cells were successfully collected using epididymal methods, with the floating method proving superior to flushing, and the addition of seminal plasma prior to preservation had no effect.

Introduction

In this study, two methods of semen collection – electroejaculation and epididymal sperm collection – were compared to determine which is more effective for stallions with terminal conditions such as fractures or colic. The research aimed to find a better solution for sperm collection from stallions who are unable to produce semen the conventional way due to health issues.

Methods

  • Electroejaculation was performed on stallions under general anesthesia.
  • After 48 hours, the stallions were castrated and two different epididymal sperm collection techniques were attempted: a flushing method and a floating method.
  • In addition, the researchers tested the effect of adding supplemental seminal plasma to the collected spermatozoa before cryopreservation (a process used to freeze and preserve cells).

Results

  • Electroejaculation was found to be a safe method. However, it was ineffective for terminal semen collection.
  • Both kinds of epididymal sperm collection methods successfully recovered viable sperm cells. The floating method was found to be less problematic and more efficient than the flushing method in terms of sperm motility and the percentage of cells that passed through glass wool/sephadex filtration. However, the differences weren’t statistically significant.
  • The addition of seminal plasma to the epididymal spermatozoa before cryopreservation was found to have no effect on the viability or quality of the sperm.

Conclusion

Based on the findings, the researchers concluded that both methods of epididymal sperm collection are valid for terminal sperm collection from stallions. However, although the differences weren’t statistically significant, the floating method appeared to be preferable due to its less cumbersome procedure and tendency towards better results in terms of sperm motility and filtration success. The study also concluded that adding seminal plasma to the sperm before cryopreservation doesn’t enhance the quality or effectiveness of sperm preservation.

Cite This Article

APA
Cary JA, Madill S, Farnsworth K, Hayna JT, Duoos L, Fahning ML. (2004). A comparison of electroejaculation and epididymal sperm collection techniques in stallions. Can Vet J, 45(1), 35-41.

Publication

ISSN: 0008-5286
NlmUniqueID: 0004653
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 45
Issue: 1
Pages: 35-41

Researcher Affiliations

Cary, Julie A
  • Clinical and Population Sciences, University of Minnesota, 1365 Gortner Avenue 225 VTH, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA.
Madill, Scott
    Farnsworth, Kelly
      Hayna, Justin T
        Duoos, Lisa
          Fahning, Mel L

            MeSH Terms

            • Anesthesia / veterinary
            • Animals
            • Cryopreservation / methods
            • Cryopreservation / veterinary
            • Ejaculation / physiology
            • Electric Stimulation
            • Epididymis / cytology
            • Horses / physiology
            • Male
            • Semen / cytology
            • Semen / physiology
            • Semen Preservation / methods
            • Semen Preservation / veterinary
            • Specimen Handling / instrumentation
            • Specimen Handling / methods
            • Specimen Handling / veterinary
            • Sperm Motility
            • Spermatozoa

            References

            This article includes 35 references
            1. Stover J, Seager SWJ, Dolensk EP, Doherty J, Wildt DF, Platz CC. Electroejaculation and semen evaluation of the Przewalski horse (Equus przewalski). Amer Assoc Zoo Vet 1981:144–145.
            2. Card CE, Manning SE, Bowman P, Leibel T. Pregnancies from imipramine and xylazine-induced ex copula ejaculation in a disabled stallion. Can Vet J 1997;38:171–174.
              pmc: PMC1576562pubmed: 9056069
            3. Turner RM, McDonnell SM, Hawkins JF. Use of pharmacologically induced ejaculation to obtain semen from a stallion with a fractured radius. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;206:1906–1908.
              pubmed: 7790305
            4. Roberts SJ. Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases (Theriogenology). Woodstock, Vermont: Stephen J. Roberts, 1986: 866.
            5. Blash S, Melican D, Gavin W. Cryopreservation of epididymal sperm obtained at necropsy from goats. Theriogenology 2002;54:899–905.
              pubmed: 11097043
            6. Zomborsky Z, Zubor T, Toth J, Horn P. Sperm collection from shot red deer stags (Cervus elaphus) and the utilization of sperm frozen and subsequently thawed. Acta Vet Hung 1999;47:263–270.
              pubmed: 10344086
            7. Marks SL, Dupius J, Mickelsen WD, Memon MA, Platz CC. Conception by use of postmortem epididymal semen extraction in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;204:1639–1640.
              pubmed: 8050945
            8. Hewitt DA, Leahy R, Sheldon IM, England GCW. Cryopreservation of epididymal dog sperm. Anim Reprod Sci 2001;67:101–111.
              pubmed: 11408118
            9. Sharma RK, Padron OF, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Factors associated with the quality before freezing and after thawing of sperm obtained by microsurgical epididymal aspiration. Fertil Steril 1997;68:626–631.
              pubmed: 9341600
            10. Barker CAV, Gandier JCC. Pregnancy in a mare resulting from frozen epididymal spermatozoa. Can J Comp Med 1957;21:47–51.
              pmc: PMC1614368pubmed: 17648942
            11. Morris L, Tiplady C, Allen WR. The in vivo fertility of cauda epididymal spermatozoa in the horse. Theriogenology 2002;58:643–646.
            12. Loomis PR. Artificial insemination of horses: Where is it Going?. Proc Annu Conf Soc Theriogenology 1999:325–336.
            13. Samper JC. Evaluation of membrane integrity of preserved stallion spermatozoa [PhD dissertation]. Saint Paul, Minnesota: University of Minnesota, 1990.
            14. Aurich JE, Kühne A, Hoppe H, Aurich C. Seminal plasma effects membrane integrity and motility of equine spermatozoa after cryopreservation. Theriogenology 1996;46:791–797.
              pubmed: 16727943
            15. Katila T. Sperm-uterine interactions: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 2001;68:267–272.
              pubmed: 11744270
            16. Pleasant RS. Castration of the normal horse. In: Wolfe DF, Moll DH, eds. Large Animal Urogenital Surgery. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1999:23–31.
            17. Martin JC, Klug E, Günzel-Apel AR. Centrifugation of stallion semen and its storage in large volume straws. J Reprod Fertil 1979;27:47–51.
              pubmed: 289825
            18. Kenney RM, Hurtgen J, Pierson R, Witherspoon D, Simons J. Theriogenology and the Equine, part II, The stallion. Society for Theriogenology 1983:88–90.
            19. Brinsko SP. Retrograde ejaculation in a stallion. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:551–553.
              pubmed: 11229508
            20. Dooley MP, Pineda MH, Maurer RR, Lunstra DD. Evidence for retrograde flow of spermatozoa into the urinary bladder of bulls during electroejaculation. Theriogenology 1986;26:101–109.
              pubmed: 16726174
            21. Dooley MP, Pineda MH, Hopper JG, Hsu WH. Retrograde flow of spermatozoa into the urinary bladder of cats during electroejaculation, collection of semen with an artificial vagina, and mating. Am J Vet Res 1991;52:687–691.
              pubmed: 1854092
            22. Pineda MH, Dooley MP. Effect of method of seminal collection on the retrograde flow of spermatozoa into the urinary bladder of rams. Am J Vet Res 1991;52:307–313.
              pubmed: 2012342
            23. Dooley MP, Pineda MH, Hopper JG, Hsu WH. Retrograde flow of spermatozoa into the urinary bladder of dogs during ejaculation or after sedation with xylazine. Am J Vet Res 1990;51:1574–1579.
              pubmed: 2240779
            24. McDonnell SM. Oral imipramine and intravenous xylazine for pharmacologically-induced ex copula ejaculation in stallions. Anim Reprod Sci 2001;68:153–159.
              pubmed: 11744260
            25. McDonnell SM. Ejaculation physiology and dysfunction. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1992;8:57–70.
              pubmed: 1576554
            26. Hoyos Sepulveda ML, Quiroz Rocha GF, Brumbaugh GW, Montiel J, Rodriguez S, Candanosa de Morales E. Lack of beneficial effects of bethanecol, imipramine, or furosemide on seminal plasma of three stallions with urospermia. Reprod Dom Anim 1999;34:489–493.
            27. Johnson L, Amann RP, Pickett BW. Maturation of equine epididymal spermatozoa. Am J Vet Res 1980;41:1190–1196.
              pubmed: 7447113
            28. James AN, Green H, Hoffman S, Landry AM, Paccamonti D, Godke RA. Preservation of equine sperm stored in the epididymis at 4°C for 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. Theriogenology 2002;58:401–404.
            29. Braun J, Sakai M, Hochi S, Oguri N. Preservation of ejaculated and epididymal stallion spermatozoa by cooling and freezing. Theriogenology 1994;41:809–818.
              pubmed: 16727435
            30. Magistrini M, Tinel C, Noue P, Palmer E. Correlations between characteristics of frozen spermatozoa from ejaculates or perfusates from epididymidis caudae and proximal deferent ducts in a group of stallions. Proc 11th Intern Cong Anim Reprod AI 1988:273.
            31. Volkmann DH, Gerber D, Erb HN. Comparison between freezability of ejaculated and epididymal stallion sperm (Abstract). Anim Reprod Sci 2001;68:340.
            32. Tiplady CA, Morris LH-A, Allen WR. Stallion epididymal spermatozoa: pre-freeze and post-thaw motility and viability after matozoa: three treatments (Astract). Theriogenology 2002;58:225–228.
            33. Schulman ML, Gerber D, Volkmann DH, Nurton J, Guthrie AJ, Joubert K. The effects of halothane anaesthesia on the cryopreservation of epididymal sperm in pony stallions (Abstract). Anim on Reprod Sci 2001;68:334–335.
              pubmed: 12553470
            34. Parks JE, Graham JK. Effects of cryopreservation procedures on sperm membranes. Theriogenology 1992;28:209–222.
              pubmed: 16727131
            35. Blottner S, Warnke C, Tuchscherer A, Heinen V, Torner H. Morphological and functional changes of stallion spermatozoa after phological cryopreservation during breeding and non-breeding season. Anim Reprod Sci 2001;65:75–88.
              pubmed: 11182510

            Citations

            This article has been cited 5 times.
            1. Aponte PM, Gutierrez-Reinoso MA, Garcia-Herreros M. Bridging the Gap: Animal Models in Next-Generation Reproductive Technologies for Male Fertility Preservation. Life (Basel) 2023 Dec 21;14(1).
              doi: 10.3390/life14010017pubmed: 38276265google scholar: lookup
            2. Bezerra LGP, Silva AM, Jurema AP, Dantas MRT, Pereira AG, Oliveira MF, Comizzoli P, Silva AR. Changes in Sperm Morphology, Morphometry, and Motility from the Epididymis to the Vas Deferens in Rheas (Rhea americana, Linnaeus, 1758). Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 27;13(9).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13091483pubmed: 37174520google scholar: lookup
            3. Ryu DY, Song WH, Pang WK, Yoon SJ, Rahman MS, Pang MG. Freezability biomarkers in bull epididymal spermatozoa. Sci Rep 2019 Sep 5;9(1):12797.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49378-5pubmed: 31488871google scholar: lookup
            4. Iswadi MI, Ann ZF, Hafiz MM, Hafiz MD, Fahrul FJ, Hajarian H, Wahid H, Zawawi I, Khairiah MS, Mazni OA. Collection, analysis and cryopreservation of semen from Malayan gaur (Bos gaurus hubbacki): A preliminary study. Open Vet J 2012;2(1):109-14.
              pubmed: 26623302
            5. Boersma A, Olszanska O, Walter I, Rülicke T. Microsurgical and Percutaneous Epididymal Sperm Aspiration for Sperm Collection from Live Mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2015 Sep;54(5):471-7.
              pubmed: 26424244