Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2014; 202(2); 297-302; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.025

A comparison of peritoneal fluid values in mares following bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy using a vessel sealing and dividing device versus placement of two ligating loops.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy on peritoneal fluid values in mares and compare how this effect was modified by the method of ovarian vessel hemostasis used. Ten mares undergoing standing bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy were used in a randomized clinical study. During surgery, blood vessels within the mesovarium were either: (1) sealed and transected with a vessel sealing and dividing device (VSDD), or (2) ligated using two loops placed proximal to each ovary and then the mesovarium transected using laparoscopic scissors. The ovaries were removed through the ipsilateral body wall. Abdominocentesis was performed before surgery and 24 h and 72 h after surgery. Markers of peritoneal inflammation, as measured by total nucleated cell count, total protein (TP) and red blood cell count via abdominocentesis, were consistently increased for all groups compared to pre-operative values. The mean (range) of TP for the VSDD group was 4.14 (3.9-4.5) g/dL, and that for the ligating loop group was 3.18 (2.7-3.5) g/dL. Use of the VSDD resulted in significantly greater TP concentrations in the abdominal fluid at 24 h and 72 h post-operatively when compared to a ligating loop (P <0.001 and 0.04, respectively).
Publication Date: 2014-09-03 PubMed ID: 25280800DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.025Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aims to look at the effect of a particular type of horse ovary removal surgery on peritoneal fluid values and compares the outcomes between two different approaches to the surgery. The findings indicate that both techniques resulted in increased values for inflammation markers, but the method using a vessel sealing and dividing device led to significantly higher protein concentrations in the abdominal fluid post-operation compared to using ligating loops.

Objective of the Study

  • The main purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy (a surgical procedure to remove both ovaries) on the peritoneal fluid values in mares (female horses). It also aimed to compare these effects between two different techniques of ovarian vessel hemostasis (stopping the flow of blood).

Study Design and Methodology

  • Ten mares were involved in this randomized clinical study. All of them were subjected to standing bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy.
  • During surgery, the blood vessels within the mesovarium (the connective tissue that carries vessels to the ovaries) were either sealed and separated using a vessel sealing and dividing device (VSDD) or tied off with two loops prior to having the mesovarium separated using laparoscopic scissors.
  • The ovaries were then removed through the horse’s body wall on the side corresponding to each ovary.
  • To measure the levels of peritoneal inflammation, abdominocentesis (a procedure to remove fluid from the abdomen) was carried out before the surgery and 24 and 72 hours afterward. The research team then analyzed the total nucleated cell count, total protein (TP), and red blood cell count.

Findings of the Study

  • Markers of inflammation in the peritoneal fluid, including total nucleated cell count, TP, and red blood cell count, were found to have increased across the board post-operation when compared to pre-operation levels.
  • The mean TP for the VSDD group was around 4.14 g/dL, while for the ligating loop group, it was slightly lower at approximately 3.18 g/dL.
  • When the VSDD was used, significantly higher TP concentrations were found in the abdominal fluid at 24 hours and 72 hours post-surgery compared to the ligating loop method. Hence, use of the VSDD was resulted with higher protein concentrations in the abdominal fluid after the operation.

Cite This Article

APA
Seabaugh KA, Goodrich LR, Bohn AA, Morley PS, Hendrickson DA. (2014). A comparison of peritoneal fluid values in mares following bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy using a vessel sealing and dividing device versus placement of two ligating loops. Vet J, 202(2), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.025

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 202
Issue: 2
Pages: 297-302
PII: S1090-0233(14)00362-1

Researcher Affiliations

Seabaugh, Kathryn A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Goodrich, Laurie R
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Electronic address: laurie.goodrich@colostate.edu.
Bohn, Andrea A
  • Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1619, USA.
Morley, Paul S
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Hendrickson, Dean A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Ascitic Fluid / chemistry
  • Ascitic Fluid / cytology
  • Cell Count / veterinary
  • Erythrocyte Count / veterinary
  • Female
  • Horses / metabolism
  • Horses / surgery
  • Laparoscopy / instrumentation
  • Laparoscopy / veterinary
  • Ovariectomy / instrumentation
  • Ovariectomy / veterinary
  • Postoperative Period
  • Proteins / metabolism
  • Random Allocation
  • Reference Values

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Straticò P, Guerri G, Palozzo A, Varasano V, Petrizzi L. Current Use of Equine Laparoscopy in Urogenital Disorders: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2000 to 2021. Vet Sci 2022 Jan 22;9(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020041pubmed: 35202295google scholar: lookup
  2. Devick IF, Hendrickson DA. Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 18;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010232pubmed: 33477730google scholar: lookup
  3. Devick IF, Leise BS, Rao S, Hendrickson DA. Evaluation of post-operative pain after active desufflation at completion of laparoscopy in mares undergoing ovariectomy. Can Vet J 2018 Mar;59(3):261-266.
    pubmed: 29599556