FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Commun Biol / A dominant missense variant within LMBR1 related to equine p...
Communications biology2024; 7(1); 1420; doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07065-w

A dominant missense variant within LMBR1 related to equine polydactyly.

Abstract: Polydactyly was recorded before 100 BCE and attracted widespread interest because of its relationship to limb health and ancestral traits in horses. However, the underlying reasons for the development of polydactyly remain unclear. To search for polydactyly-related genes, we utilize a paternal half-sib family and screen for variants that match the mode of inheritance. Through this screening process, 77 variants in 65 genes are filtered. A missense variant (EqCab3.0 chr4: <107353368> A > G) (rs1138485164) in the 3rd exon of LMBR1 is identified as a source of amino acid sequence variation. Gene editing confirms that the variant down-regulates LMBR1expression, increases the proliferative viability of mutant cells, and inhibits apoptosis. This study suggests that LMBR1 might play a role in the development of polydactyly and that the variant detected in this study is related to polydactyly in horses. However, further research is needed to determine whether a direct relationship exists.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-10-31 PubMed ID: 39482424PubMed Central: PMC11527984DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07065-wGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates a potential genetic cause for polydactyly (extra digits) among horses. Researchers identified a specific gene variant in LMBR1 that is suspected of playing a role in the condition’s development.

Research Objective

  • The researchers sought to better understand the potential genetic causes behind the occurrence of polydactyly in horses, a condition known since 100 BCE. While this condition has significance for horse limb health and ancestral traits, its basis and development are not yet clear.

Methods and Approach

  • To identify potential genes relevant to polydactyly, the researchers used a paternal half-sib family of horses for screening. They were searching for gene variants that matched the mode of inheritance in the horses.
  • A total of 77 variants from 65 genes were screened as part of this study.

Findings

  • The study identified a missense variant that is, a variant that causes changes in the amino acid sequence inthe LMBR1 gene. This variant in question is denoted as EqCab3.0 chr4: <107353368> A > G or rs1138485164.
  • According to the findings, this particular variant in LMBR1 caused a down-regulation of LMBR1 expression. This implies that the gene’s normal function was inhibited, changing the behaviour of cells carrying this variant.
  • This change in cell behaviour included an increase in the proliferative viability of mutant cells (i.e., the cells’ ability to replicate increased), and an associated decrease in apoptosis or programmed cell death.

Conclusion and Future Directions

  • The study suggests that the LMBR1 gene plays a potentially significant role in the development of polydactyly in horses. The specific variant identified in the gene is suspected to be connected with the occurrence of the condition.
  • However, the authors note that further research is necessary to confidently establish a direct relationship between this gene variant and polydactyly in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Luan Y, Zhong L, Li C, Yue X, Ye M, Wang J, Zhu Y, Wang Q. (2024). A dominant missense variant within LMBR1 related to equine polydactyly. Commun Biol, 7(1), 1420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07065-w

Publication

Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
NlmUniqueID: 101719179
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 7
Issue: 1
Pages: 1420
PII: 1420

Researcher Affiliations

Luan, Yue
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Zhong, Ling
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Li, Cao
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yue, Xiaoyu
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Ye, Mengyan
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Wang, Jianpeng
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Zhu, Yiping
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Wang, Qin
  • State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. wangqin@cau.edu.cn.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / genetics
  • Animals
  • Polydactyly / genetics
  • Polydactyly / veterinary
  • Mutation, Missense
  • Male
  • Horse Diseases / genetics
  • Genes, Dominant
  • Female
  • Apoptosis / genetics

Grant Funding

  • 202303010411070 / National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 79 references
  1. Hall BK. Atavisms and atavistic mutations. Nat. Genet. 10, 126–127 (1995).
    pubmed: 7663504
  2. Marsh OC. Polydactyl horses, recent and extinct. Sci. Am. 8, 2983–2985 (1879).
  3. Gadow H, Gegenbaur C, Garson JG. Critical remarks on polydactyly as atavism. J. Anat. Physiol. 16, 615 (1882).
    pmc: PMC1310041pubmed: 17231447
  4. Hamelin A. Genetic heterogeneity of polydactyly in Maine Coon cats. J. Feline Med. Surg. 22, 1103–1113 (2020).
    pmc: PMC10814362pubmed: 32067556
  5. Zhang Z. Parallel evolution of polydactyly traits in Chinese and European chickens. PLoS ONE 11, e0149010 (2016).
    pmc: PMC4747547pubmed: 26859147
  6. Foster M. Wright’s studies of effects of maternal age on spotting and polydactyly in the guinea pig. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 57, 491–493 (1954).
    pubmed: 13189284
  7. Leipold HW, Dennis SM, Huston K. Polydactyly in cattle. Cornell Vet. 62, 337–345 (1972).
    pubmed: 5023998
  8. Warburton NM, Cake MA, Kelman KR. Extreme bilateral polydactyly in a wild-caught western grey kangaroo. Anat. Rec. 304, 1361–1374 (2021).
    pubmed: 33034115
  9. Whittington RJ, Unger DB, Wilson JM. Multiple congenital malformations of the face, nervous system and musculoskeletal system of pigs. Aust. Vet. J. 63, 48–50 (1986).
    pubmed: 3964144
  10. Qu S. Mutations in mouse Aristaless-like4 cause Strong’s luxoid polydactyly. Development 125, 2711–2721 (1998).
    pubmed: 9636085
  11. Bani-Ismail Z, Hawkins JF, Siems JJ. Surgical correction of polydactyly in a camel (Camelus dromedarius). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 30, 301–304 (1999).
    pubmed: 10484151
  12. Villagómez DA, Alonso RA. A distinct Mendelian autosomal recessive syndrome involving the association of anotia, palate agenesis, bifid tongue, and polydactyly in the dog. Can. Vet. J. 39, 642–643 (1998).
    pmc: PMC1539452pubmed: 9789676
  13. Kelly DM, Mahmoud K, Mauck BM. Polydactyly of the foot: a review. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 29, 361–369 (2021).
    pubmed: 33443388
  14. Sananta P, Sahdiniar FF, Siahaan LD. The management of mirror foot polydactyly: a case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 91, 106780 (2022).
    pmc: PMC8784335pubmed: 35065400
  15. He C. Genetic pattern and gene localization of polydactyly in Beijing fatty chicken. PLoS ONE 12, e0176113 (2017).
    pmc: PMC5425009pubmed: 28489934
  16. Pitel F. Mapping the naked neck (NA) and polydactyly (PO) mutants of the chicken with microsatellite molecular markers. Genet. Sel. Evol. 32, 73–86 (2000).
    pmc: PMC2706862pubmed: 14736408
  17. Danforth CH. Heredity of polydactyly in the cat. J. Hered. 38, 107–112 (1947).
    pubmed: 20242531
  18. Browning RJ, Hayes EG, Lear AS. Spontaneous appearance and transmission of polydactyly in dexter cattle. Case Rep. Vet. Med. 2020, 6407847 (2020).
    pmc: PMC6985930pubmed: 32015928
  19. Gorbach D, Mote B, Totir L, Fernando R, Rothschild M. Polydactyly inheritance in the pig. J. Hered. 101, 469–475 (2010).
    pubmed: 20308080
  20. Wettke-Schäfer R, Kantner G. X-linked dominant inherited diseases with lethality in hemizygous males. Hum. Genet. 64, 1–23 (1983).
    pubmed: 6873941
  21. Kang S. Linkage mapping and phenotypic analysis of autosomal dominant Pallister-Hall syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 34, 441–446 (1997).
    pmc: PMC1050964pubmed: 9192261
  22. Castilla EE, Paz JE, Orioli-Parreiras IM. Syndactyly: frequency of specific types. Am. J. Med. Genet. 5, 357–364 (1980).
    pubmed: 6249121
  23. Budny B. A novel X-linked recessive mental retardation syndrome comprising macrocephaly and ciliary dysfunction is allelic to oral-facial-digital type I syndrome. Hum. Genet. 120, 171–178 (2006).
    pubmed: 16783569
  24. Kano H, Kurahashi H, Toda T. Genetically regulated epigenetic transcriptional activation of retrotransposon insertion confers mouse dactylaplasia phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19034–19039 (2007).
    pmc: PMC2141903pubmed: 17984064
  25. Cooper KL. Patterning and post-patterning modes of evolutionary digit loss in mammals. Nature 511, 41–45 (2014).
    pmc: PMC4228958pubmed: 24990742
  26. Brewer JR, Mazot P, Soriano P. Genetic insights into the mechanisms of Fgf signaling. Genes Dev. 30, 751–771 (2016).
    pmc: PMC4826393pubmed: 27036966
  27. Dahn RD, Davis MC, Pappano WN, Shubin NH. Sonic hedgehog function in chondrichthyan fins and the evolution of appendage patterning. Nature. 445, 311–314 (2007).
    pubmed: 17187056
  28. Skoda AM. The role of the Hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer: A comprehensive review. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 18, 8–20 (2018).
    pmc: PMC5826678pubmed: 29274272
  29. Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 20, 781–810 (2004).
    pubmed: 15473860
  30. Amerongen R, Berns A. Knockout mouse models to study Wnt signal transduction. Trends Genet. 22, 678–689 (2006).
    pubmed: 17045694
  31. Zhang Z, Verheyden JM, Hassell JA, Sun X. FGF-regulated Etv genes are essential for repressing Shh expression in mouse limb buds. Dev. Cell 16, 607–613 (2009).
    pmc: PMC3541528pubmed: 19386269
  32. Zhu J, Patel R, Trofka A, Harfe BD, Mackem S. Sonic hedgehog is not a limb morphogen but acts as a trigger to specify all digits in mice. Dev. Cell 57, 2048–2062.e4 (2022).
    pmc: PMC9709693pubmed: 35977544
  33. Potuijt JWP. The pZRS non-coding regulatory mutation resulting in triphalangeal thumb-polysyndactyly syndrome changes the pattern of local interactions. Mol. Genet. Genomics 297, 1343–1352 (2022).
    pubmed: 35821352
  34. Huangfu D, Anderson KV. Signaling from Smo to Ci/Gli: conservation and divergence of hedgehog pathways from Drosophila to vertebrates. Development 133, 3–14 (2006).
    pubmed: 16339192
  35. Lopez-Rios J. Attenuated sensing of SHH by Ptch1 underlies evolution of bovine limbs. Nature 511, 46–51 (2014).
    pubmed: 24990743
  36. Ullah A. A novel homozygous sequence variant in GLI1 underlies first case of autosomal recessive pre-axial polydactyly. Clin. Genet. 95, 540–541 (2019).
    pubmed: 30620395
  37. Umair M. A novel homozygous missense mutation in the zinc finger DNA binding domain of GLI1 causes recessive post-axial polydactyly. Front. Genet. 12, 746949 (2021).
    pmc: PMC8554680pubmed: 34721536
  38. Lopez-Rios J. The many lives of SHH in limb development and evolution. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 49, 116–124 (2016).
    pubmed: 26762695
  39. Alvarez-Medina R, Cayuso J, Okubo T, Takada S, Martí E. Wnt canonical pathway restricts graded Shh/Gli patterning activity through the regulation of Gli3 expression. Development 135, 237–247 (2008).
    pubmed: 18057099
  40. Sagai T, Hosoya M, Mizushina Y, Tamura M, Shiroishi T. Elimination of a long-range cis-regulatory module causes complete loss of limb-specific Shh expression and truncation of the mouse limb. Development 132, 797–803 (2005).
    pubmed: 15677727
  41. Hars GofflotF. Molecular mechanisms underlying limb anomalies associated with cholesterol deficiency during gestation: implications of hedgehog signaling. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1187–1198 (2003).
    pubmed: 12719383
  42. Dunn IC. The chicken polydactyly (Po) locus causes allelic imbalance and ectopic expression of Shh during limb development. Dev. Dyn. 240, 1163–1172 (2011).
    pubmed: 21465618
  43. Schrauwen I. De novo variants in GREB1L are associated with non-syndromic inner ear malformations and deafness. Hum. Genet. 137, 459–470 (2018).
    pmc: PMC6082420pubmed: 29955957
  44. Kalsoom UE. Whole exome sequencing identified a novel zinc-finger gene ZNF141 associated with autosomal recessive postaxial polydactyly type A. J. Med. Genet. 50, 47–53 (2013).
    pubmed: 23160277
  45. Umair M. Biallelic variant in DACH1, encoding Dachshund Homolog 1, defines a novel candidate locus for recessive postaxial polydactyly type A. Genomics 113, 2495–2502 (2021).
    pubmed: 34022343
  46. Umair M. Exome sequencing revealed a splice site variant in the IQCE gene underlying post-axial polydactyly type A restricted to lower limb. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 25, 960–965 (2017).
    pmc: PMC5567151pubmed: 28488682
  47. Schrauwen I. FAM92A underlies nonsyndromic postaxial polydactyly in humans and an abnormal limb and digit skeletal phenotype in mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 34, 375–386 (2019).
    pmc: PMC6489482pubmed: 30395363
  48. Ullah I. Variants in KIAA0825 underlie autosomal recessive postaxial polydactyly. Hum. Genet. 138, 593–600 (2019).
    pmc: PMC6724712pubmed: 30982135
  49. Stanek C, Hantak E. Bilateral atavistic polydactyly in a colt and its dam. Equine Vet. J. 18, 76–79 (1986).
    pubmed: 3948838
  50. Evans LH, Jenny J, Raker CW. Surgical correction of polydactylism in the horse. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 146, 1405–1408 (1965).
    pubmed: 14291039
  51. Manichaikul A. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867–2873 (2010).
    pmc: PMC3025716pubmed: 20926424
  52. Betts MJ, Russell RB. Amino‐acid properties and consequences of substitutions. 10.1002/9780470059180.ch13 (2007).
  53. Clark RM. Reciprocal mouse and human limb phenotypes caused by gain- and loss-of-function mutations affecting Lmbr1. Genetics 159, 715–726 (2001).
    pmc: PMC1461845pubmed: 11606546
  54. Laurell T. A novel 13 base pair insertion in the Sonic hedgehog ZRS limb enhancer (ZRS/LMBR1) causes preaxial polydactyly with triphalangeal thumb. Hum. Mutat. 33, 1063–1066 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3370115pubmed: 22495965
  55. Huang YQ. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the chicken Lmbr1 gene are associated with chicken polydactyly. Gene 374, 10–18 (2006).
    pubmed: 16650944
  56. Kavanagh KD, Bailey CS, Sears KE. Evidence of five digits in embryonic horses and developmental stabilization of tetrapod digit number. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287, 20192756 (2020).
    pmc: PMC7031666pubmed: 32019446
  57. Tickle C, Barker H. The Sonic hedgehog gradient in the developing limb. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2, 275–290 (2013).
    pubmed: 24009037
  58. Dessaud E, McMahon AP, Briscoe J. Pattern formation in the vertebrate neural tube: a Sonic hedgehog morphogen-regulated transcriptional network. Development 135, 2489–2503 (2008).
    pubmed: 18621990
  59. Gan S. Equine science. Agric. Press 1990, 22–27 (1990).
  60. Solounias N. The evolution and anatomy of the horse manus with an emphasis on digit reduction. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171782 (2018).
    pmc: PMC5792948pubmed: 29410871
  61. Towers M. Evolution of antero-posterior patterning of the limb: Insights from the chick. Genesis 56, e23047 (2018).
    pmc: PMC5811799pubmed: 28734068
  62. Sears KE. Developmental basis of mammalian digit reduction: a case study in pigs. Evol. Dev. 13, 533–541 (2011).
    pubmed: 23016937
  63. Williamson I. Developmentally regulated Shh expression is robust to TAD perturbations. Development 146, dev179523 (2019).
    pmc: PMC7212092pubmed: 31511252
  64. Lettice LA. Disruption of a long-range cis-acting regulator for Shh causes preaxial polydactyly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7548–7553 (2002).
    pmc: PMC124279pubmed: 12032320
  65. Tickle C, Towers M. Sonic hedgehog signaling in limb development. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 5, 14 (2017).
    pmc: PMC5328949pubmed: 28293554
  66. Ushiki A. Deletion of CTCF sites in the SHH locus alters enhancer-promoter interactions and leads to acheiropodia. Nat. Commun. 12, 2282 (2021).
    pmc: PMC8052326pubmed: 33863876
  67. Kelsey JS, Fastman NM, Blumberg DD. Evidence of an evolutionarily conserved LMBR1 domain-containing protein that associates with endocytic cups and plays a role in cell migration in dictyostelium discoideum. Eukaryot. Cell 11, 401–416 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3318307pubmed: 22307974
  68. Chiang C. SpeedSeq: ultra-fast personal genome analysis and interpretation. Nat. Methods 12, 966–968 (2015).
    pmc: PMC4589466pubmed: 26258291
  69. Xu J. Large duplication in LMBR1 gene in a large Chinese pedigree with triphalangeal thumb polysyndactyly syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 182, 2117–2123 (2020).
    pubmed: 32662247
  70. Huang Y. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in chicken lmbr1 gene were associated with chicken growth and carcass traits. Sci. China C Life Sci. 50, 62–69 (2007).
    pubmed: 17393084
  71. Tamura K, Yonei-Tamura S, Yano T, Yokoyama H, Ide H. The autopod: its formation during limb development. Dev. Growth Differ. 50, S177–S187 (2008) Suppl 1.
    pubmed: 18459983
  72. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725–2729 (2013).
    pmc: PMC3840312pubmed: 24132122
  73. Pasquier J. Gene evolution and gene expression after whole genome duplication in fish: the PhyloFish database. BMC Genomics 17, 368 (2016).
    pmc: PMC4870732pubmed: 27189481
  74. Zimin AV. A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus. Genome Biol. 10, R42 (2009).
    pmc: PMC2688933pubmed: 19393038
  75. Uenishi H. PEDE (Pig EST Data Explorer): construction of a database for ESTs derived from porcine full-length cDNA libraries. Nucleic acids Res. 32, D484–D488 (2004).
    pmc: PMC308771pubmed: 14681463
  76. Potuijt JWP. A point mutation in the pre-ZRS disrupts Sonic hedgehog expression in the limb bud and results in triphalangeal thumb-polysyndactyly syndrome. Genet. Med. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 20, 1405–1413 (2018).
    pubmed: 29543231
  77. Kim S. Transposable element-mediated structural variation analysis in dog breeds using whole-genome sequencing. Mamm. Genome Off. J. Int. Mamm. Genome Soc. 30, 289–300 (2019).
    pubmed: 31414176
  78. Khalkhali-Evrigh R, Hedayat-Evrigh N, Hafezian SH, Farhadi A, Bakhtiarizadeh MR. Genome-wide identification of microsatellites and transposable elements in the dromedary camel genome using whole-genome sequencing data. Front. Genet. 10, 692 (2019).
    pmc: PMC6675863pubmed: 31404266
  79. Gao J. Sequencing, de novo assembling, and annotating the genome of the endangered Chinese crocodile lizard Shinisaurus crocodilurus. GigaScience 6, 1–6 (2017).
    pmc: PMC5569961pubmed: 28595343

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.