Analyze Diet
Drug testing and analysis2020; 12(7); 900-917; doi: 10.1002/dta.2799

A high-throughput and broad-spectrum screening method for analysing over 120 drugs in horse urine using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Abstract: A high-throughput method has been developed for the doping control analysis of 124 drug targets, processing up to 154 horse urine samples in as short as 4.5 h, from the time the samples arrive at the laboratory to the reporting deadline of 30 min before the first race, including sample receipt and registration, preparation and instrument analysis and data vetting time. Sample preparation involves a brief enzyme hydrolysis step (30 min) to detect both free and glucuronide-conjugated drug targets. This is followed by extraction using solid-supported liquid extraction (SLE) and analysis using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). The entire set-up comprised of four sets of Biotage Extrahera automation systems for conducting SLE and five to six sets of Orbitrap for instrumental screening using LC-HRMS. Suspicious samples flagged were subject to confirmatory analyses using liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. The method comprises 124 drug targets from a spectrum of 41 drug classes covering acidic, basic and neutral drugs. More than 85% of the targets had limits of detection at or below 5 ng/mL in horse urine, with the lowest at 0.02 ng/mL. The method was validated for qualitative identification, including specificity, sensitivity, extraction recovery and precision. Method applicability was demonstrated by the successful detection of different drugs, namely (a) butorphanol, (b) dexamethasone, (c) diclofenac, (d) flunixin and (e) phenylbutazone, in post-race or out-of-competition urine samples collected from racehorses. This method was developed for pre-race urine testing in Hong Kong; however, it is also suitable for testing post-race or out-of-competition urine samples, especially when a quick total analysis time is desired.
Publication Date: 2020-05-18 PubMed ID: 32267632DOI: 10.1002/dta.2799Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research presents a fast and all-inclusive method for detecting the use of over 120 drugs in horse urine, designed to maintain fair competition in horse racing.

Approach

The study presents a method to enable efficient and extensive screening of over 120 drugs used in doping in horse racing.

  • The method involves processing up to 154 horse urine samples in as short as 4.5 hours, from the time the samples enter the lab until 30 minutes before the start of the first race.
  • The process involves sample receipt and registration, preparation and instrument analysis, and data checking.

Procedure

The procedure involves several actions:

  • Initially, a brief enzyme hydrolysis step (30 min) is implemented to detect both free and glucuronide-conjugated drug targets.
  • Afterwards, extraction is executed using solid-supported liquid extraction (SLE).
  • Finally, analysis is carried out using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS).

Infrastructure

The research used a specific set-up that included:

  • Four sets of Biotage Extrahera automation systems for performing SLE.
  • Five to six sets of Orbitrap for instrumental screening using LC-HRMS.

Detection and Confirmation

Any suspicious samples were subjected to confirmatory analyses using liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Scope

The method targets 124 drugs from a spectrum of 41 drug classes, covering acidic, basic, and neutral drugs.

  • More than 85% of the targets had limits of detection at or below 5 ng/mL in horse urine, with the lowest at 0.02 ng/mL.
  • Successful detection of different drugs such as butorphanol, dexamethasone, diclofenac, flunixin, and phenylbutazone indicates the applicability of the method.

While the method was developed primarily for pre-race urine testing in Hong Kong, it is also adaptable for post-race or out-of-competition urine samples, especially when a quick total analysis time is needed.

Validation

This method was validated for qualitative identification, including specificity, sensitivity, extraction recovery, and precision. These factors ensure accurate and reliable results.

Cite This Article

APA
Wong JKY, Chan GHM, Choi TLS, Kwok KY, Lau MY, Leung GNW, Wan TSM, Ho ENM. (2020). A high-throughput and broad-spectrum screening method for analysing over 120 drugs in horse urine using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal, 12(7), 900-917. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2799

Publication

ISSN: 1942-7611
NlmUniqueID: 101483449
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 7
Pages: 900-917

Researcher Affiliations

Wong, Jenny K Y
  • Racing Laboratory, The Hong Kong Jockey Club, Sha Tin Racecourse, Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong, China.
Chan, George H M
  • Racing Laboratory, The Hong Kong Jockey Club, Sha Tin Racecourse, Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong, China.
Choi, Timmy L S
  • Racing Laboratory, The Hong Kong Jockey Club, Sha Tin Racecourse, Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong, China.
Kwok, Karen Y
  • Racing Laboratory, The Hong Kong Jockey Club, Sha Tin Racecourse, Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong, China.
Lau, Ming Y
  • Racing Laboratory, The Hong Kong Jockey Club, Sha Tin Racecourse, Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong, China.
Leung, Gary N W
  • Racing Laboratory, The Hong Kong Jockey Club, Sha Tin Racecourse, Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong, China.
Wan, Terence S M
  • Racing Laboratory, The Hong Kong Jockey Club, Sha Tin Racecourse, Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong, China.
Ho, Emmie N M
  • Racing Laboratory, The Hong Kong Jockey Club, Sha Tin Racecourse, Sha Tin, N. T., Hong Kong, China.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Chromatography, Liquid / methods
  • Chromatography, Liquid / veterinary
  • Doping in Sports / prevention & control
  • High-Throughput Screening Assays / methods
  • High-Throughput Screening Assays / veterinary
  • Horses
  • Mass Spectrometry / methods
  • Mass Spectrometry / veterinary
  • Pharmaceutical Preparations / analysis
  • Pharmaceutical Preparations / chemistry
  • Pharmaceutical Preparations / urine
  • Substance Abuse Detection / methods
  • Substance Abuse Detection / veterinary
  • Time Factors

References

This article includes 28 references
  1. International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (IFHA). Available at: http://www.ifhaonline.org/home.asp. Accessed 20 March 2020.
  2. Reilly P, Duffield CJ, Vine J. The analysis of plasma total carbon dioxide in racehorses. Proc 11th Int Conf of Racing Anal Vet 1996; 238-240.
  3. Jeong ES, Kim SH, Cha EJ. Simultaneous analysis of 210 prohibited substances in human urine by ultrafast liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in doping control. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2015;29(4):367-384.
  4. Mazzarino M, Botrè F. A fast liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric screening method for the simultaneous detection of synthetic glucocorticoids, some stimulants, anti-oestrogen drugs and synthetic anabolic steroids. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2006;20(22):3465-3476.
  5. Ventura R, Roig M, Montfort N, Sáez P, Bergés R, Segura J. High-throughput and sensitive screening by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry of diuretics and other doping agents. Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester) 2008;14(3):191-200.
  6. Ho ENM, Leung DKK, Wan TSM, Yu NH. Comprehensive screening of anabolic steroids corticosteroids, and acidic drugs in horse urine by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2006;1120(1-2):38-53.
  7. Heffron B, Negrusz A. Equine urine screening for illicit and therapeutic drugs using solid phase extraction followed by triple quadrupole LC-MS. Proc 20th Int Conf of Racing Anal Vet 2014; 307-313.
  8. Thomas A, Sigmund G, Guddat S, Schänzer W, Thevis M. Determination of selected stimulants in urine for sports drug analysis by solid phase extraction via cation exchange and means of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester) 2008;14(3):135-143.
  9. Wong CHF, Tang FPW, Wan TSM. A broad-spectrum equine urine screening method for free and enzyme-hydrolysed conjugated drugs with ultra performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. AnalChim Acta 2011;697(1-2):48-60.
  10. Kwok WH, Leung DKK, Leung GNW, Wan TSM, Wong CHF, Wong JKY. Screening of drugs in equine plasma using automated on-line solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2010;1217(19):3289-3296.
  11. Kwok WH, Choi TLS, Tsoi YYK, Leung GNW, Wan TSM. Screening of over 100 drugs in horse urine using automated on-line solid-phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry for doping control. J Chromatogr A 2017;1490:89-101.
  12. Stanley SM, Foo HC. Screening for basic drugs in equine urine using direct-injection differential-gradient LC-LC coupled to hybrid tandem MS/MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2006;836(1-2):1-14.
  13. Beck O, Ericsson M. Methods for urine drug testing using one-step dilution and direct injection in combination with LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS. Bioanalysis 2014;6(17):2229-2244.
  14. Deventer K, Pozo OJ, Verstraete AG, Van Eenoo P. Dilute-and-shoot-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for urine analysis in doping control and analytical toxicology. Trends Anal Chem 2014;55:1-13.
  15. Dong Y, Yan K, Ma Y. A sensitive dilute-and-shoot approach for the simultaneous screening of 71 stimulants and 7 metabolites in human urine by LC-MS-MS with dynamic MRM. J Chromatogr Sci 2015;53(9):1528-1535.
  16. Görgens C, Guddat S, Orlovius AK. Dilute-and-inject multi target screening assay for highly polar doping agents using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography high resolution/high accuracy mass spectrometry for sports drug testing. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015;407(18):5365-5379.
  17. Guddat S, Solymos E, Orlovius A. High-throughput screening for various classes of doping agents using a new 'dilute-and-shoot' liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry multi-target approach. Drug Test Anal 2011;3(11-12):836-850.
  18. Kwok WH, Choi TLS, Kwok KY, Chan GHM, Wong JKY, Wan TSM. Doping control analysis of 46 polar drugs in horse plasma and urine using a 'dilute-and-shoot' ultra high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry approach. J Chromatogr a 2016;1451:41-49.
  19. Tudela E, Deventer K, Geldof L, Van Eenoo P. Urinary detection of conjugated and unconjugated anabolic steroids by dilute-and-shoot liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 2015;7(2):95-108.
  20. Wong J, Wan TSM. Doping control analyses in horseracing: a clinician's guide. Vet J 2014;200(1):8-16.
  21. Asian Racing Federation (ARF). Available at: http://www.asianracing.org/racingscreeninglimits. Accessed 20 March 2020.
  22. Han B, Min H, Jeon M, Kang B, Son J. A rapid non-target screening method for determining prohibited substances in human urine using liquid chromatography/high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 2019;11(3):382-391.
  23. Ho ENM, Kwok WH, Wong ASY, Wan TSM. High resolution accurate mass screening of prohibited substances in equine plasma using liquid chromatography-orbitrap mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 2013;5(7):509-528.
  24. Howitt RG, Pelzing M, Beresford G. Routine drug screening by accurate mass using liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Proc 16th Int Conf Racing Anal Vet 2006; 222-230.
  25. Moulard Y, Bailly-Chouriberry L, Boyer S, Garcia P, Popot MA, Bonnaire Y. Use of benchtop exactive high resolution and high mass accuracy orbitrap mass spectrometer for screening in horse doping control. Anal Chim Acta 2011;700(1-2):126-136.
  26. Ojanperä I, Kolmonen M, Pelander A. Current use of high-resolution mass spectrometry in drug screening relevant to clinical and forensic toxicology and doping control. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012;403(5):1203-1220.
  27. Thomas A, Guddat S, Kohler M. Comprehensive plasma-screening for known and unknown substances in doping controls. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2010;24(8):1124-1132.
  28. Association of the Official Racing Chemists, Guidelines for the Minimum Criteria for Identification by Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry. Available at: http://www.aorc-online.org/documents/aorc-ms-criteria-modified-23-aug-16/. Accessed 20 March 2020.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Nixon E, Mays TP, Routh PA, Yeatts JL, Fajt VR, Hairgrove T, Baynes RE. Plasma, urine and tissue concentrations of Flunixin and Meloxicam in Pigs. BMC Vet Res 2020 Sep 16;16(1):340.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02556-4pubmed: 32938437google scholar: lookup
  2. Zhou W, Pawliszyn J. Building a Bridge Between Ambient MS and LC-MS by Non-Exhaustive Microdesorption. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2025 Aug 18;64(34):e202504080.
    doi: 10.1002/anie.202504080pubmed: 40203020google scholar: lookup
  3. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Kikuchi M, Ishige T, Kakoi H, Hirota KI, Nagata SI. Construction of an individual identification panel for horses using insertion and deletion markers. J Equine Sci 2023 Sep;34(3):83-92.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.34.83pubmed: 37781568google scholar: lookup