A horse’s eye view: size and shape discrimination compared with other mammals.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
The study investigated horses’ ability to differentiate in terms of size and shape, using a computer-controlled touchscreen system. The findings were compared with similar studies on chimpanzees, humans, and dolphins. It was discovered that horses could distinguish a 14% difference in circle size, but their discrimination abilities were less accurate than those of chimpanzees and humans. It was deduced that all species, including horses, use length cues instead of area cues in size discrimination. While observing shape discrimination, horses displayed perceptual similarities among shapes with curvatures, vertical/horizontal lines, and diagonal lines, distinctly different from chimpanzees, humans, and dolphins. The study concluded that horses were more attentive to local components compared to the overall shape.
Study Methodology
- The researchers used a computer-controlled touchscreen system to investigate how well horses could perceive and distinguish between different sizes and shapes.
- This study method involved training the animals to differentiate between shapes and sizes displayed on the touchscreen. It required the horses to respond accurately to the visual stimuli provided.
- The resulting data collected from horses was compared with pre-existing data from studies on other species, including chimpanzees, humans, and dolphins.
Findings
- Horses demonstrated the capacity to notice a 14% difference in the size of circles. Notwithstanding, their overall discrimination capacity was worse than that of chimpanzees and humans.
- When observing size discrimination, the researchers discovered that all species, including horses, use length cues. This implies they judge the size of an object based on how long it appears rather than the area it encompasses.
- In examining shape discrimination, horses exhibited perceivable similarities among shapes with different attributes like curvatures, vertical/horizontal lines, and diagonal lines.
Conclusion
- Horses’ perception and cognitive abilities showed variations compared to other studied mammals. These differences are significant when considering local components and overall shape as horses gave more attention to local components.
- The study provides deeper insight into the cognitive abilities of horses, which are different from other mammals. These findings could prove beneficial in understanding and improving procedures involving handling, training, and caring for horses.
Cite This Article
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, 484-8506, Japan tomonaga.masaki.4m@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
- Horseman Kakamigahara, Kakamigahara, 509-0145, Japan.
- Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaires, 54505, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
- L'institut du Cheval et de l'Équitation Portugaise, 93600, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France.
- L'institut du Cheval et de l'Équitation Portugaise, 93600, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique, 75338, Paris, France Université Paris III Sorbonne Nouvelle, 75231, Paris, France.
- Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, 484-8506, Japan.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Discrimination, Psychological / physiology
- Form Perception / physiology
- Horses / physiology
- Humans
- Pan troglodytes
- Size Perception / physiology
- Visual Acuity
References
- Wilson DE, Reeder DAM (eds). 2005. Wilson and Reeder‘s mammal species of the world (3rd edn). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M. The domestication of social cognition in dogs.. Science 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1634-6.
- Plotnik JM, Lair R, Suphachoksahakun W, de Waal FB. Elephants know when they need a helping trunk in a cooperative task.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 Mar 22;108(12):5116-21.
- Takimoto A, Hori Y, Fujita K. The present situation and future prospects of studies on horse cognition. Jpn. J. Anim. Psychol. 61, 141–153.
- Timney B, Keil K. Visual acuity in the horse.. Vision Res 1992 Dec;32(12):2289-93.
- Timney B, Keil K. Horses are sensitive to pictorial depth cues.. Perception 1996;25(9):1121-8.
- Hanggi EB. Discrimination learning based on relative size concepts in horses (Equus caballus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 83, 201–213.
- Hanggi EB. Equine cognition and perception: understanding the horse. In Diversity of cognition: evolution, development, domestication, and pathology (eds Fujita K, Itakura S), pp. 86–118. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Press.
- Tomonaga M, Uwano Y, Saito T. How dolphins see the world: a comparison with chimpanzees and humans.. Sci Rep 2014 Jan 16;4:3717.
- Matsuzawa T. Sociocognitive development in chimpanzees: a synthesis of laboratory work and field work. In Cognitive development in chimpanzees (eds Matsuzawa T, Tomonaga M, Tanaka M), pp. 3–33. Tokyo, Japan: Springer.
- Nachmias J. Shape and size discrimination compared.. Vision Res 2011 Feb 23;51(4):400-7.
- Fujita K. Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species.. Percept Psychophys 1997 Feb;59(2):284-92.
- Levitt HCCH. Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467–477.
- Tomonaga M, Matsuzawa T. Perception of complex geometric figures in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens): analyses of visual similarity on the basis of choice reaction time.. J Comp Psychol 1992 Mar;106(1):43-52.
- Fagot J, Tomonaga M. Global and local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): use of a visual search task with compound stimuli. J. Comp. Psychol. 113, 3–12.
- Cavoto KK, Cook RG. Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons.. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2001 Jan;27(1):3-16.