Analyze Diet

A multicenter retrospective case-cohort study on the prevalence of incisional morbidities in late pregnant mares following exploratory celiotomy (2014-2019): 579 cases.

Abstract: To report the prevalence and risk factors for incisional morbidities in late pregnant and nonpregnant/early pregnant control mares following colic surgery. Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study from January 2014 to December 2019. Methods: Two university teaching hospitals and 1 private referral center. Methods: Five hundred and seventy-nine fillies and mares ≥2 years old that underwent celiotomy. Pregnant mares (n = 54) were >240 days in gestation from the last known breeding date and were compared to control females (n = 525) undergoing colic surgery. Methods: None. Results: Morbidity rates were not different between mare groups with 56% of pregnant mares and 51% of control mares reporting at least 1 morbidity. Incisional swelling was the most common reported complication in both groups. Incisional swelling was associated with shorter hospital stays (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; P < 0.01), and drainage was associated with a longer hospital stay (OR, 1.27; P ≤ 0.01) and with use of an abdominal bandage (OR, 4.4; P < 0.01). Herniation was associated with hypercapnia under anesthesia (OR, 1.1; P = 0.048), previous abdominal surgery (OR, 8.3; P = 0.003), and with use of an abdominal bandage (OR, 56; P = 0.006). Body wall dehiscence was associated with longer hospital stay (OR, 1.2; P < 0.01). Nonsurvival was higher in pregnant mares (13%) compared to control mares (5%; P = 0.02). Conclusions: The prevalence of incisional morbidities did not differ between pregnant and control mares undergoing colic surgery. Several factors were associated with incisional morbidities, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia, anesthetic variables, abdominal bandage use, previous ventral abdominal incision, and longer duration of hospitalization.
Publication Date: 2022-12-22 PubMed ID: 36468321DOI: 10.1111/vec.13228Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Multicenter Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigates the frequency and risk factors of surgical incision complications in late pregnant mares who have undergone abdominal (colic) surgery, comparing them with comparable non-pregnant or early pregnant control horses.

Study Overview

  • The study is a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study, performed from January 2014 to December 2019, involving two university teaching hospitals and a private referral center. It analyzes cases of 579 fillies and mares. Among these mares, 54 were late pregnant(more than 240 days into gestation), and were compared to 525 control mares who also underwent abdominal surgery.

Results

  • The study found that the rates of surgical incision complications were not significantly different between pregnant mares and non-pregnant control mares undergoing colic surgery, with 56% of pregnant mares and 51% of control mares reporting at least one such morbidity.
  • The most common complication reported was incisional swelling, which was linked with shorter hospital stays. In contrast, cases of fluids oozing from the incision were associated with longer hospital stays and the use of abdominal bandages.
  • Hernias were linked with high carbon dioxide levels during anesthesia, previous abdominal surgery, and the use of abdominal bandages. The breaking open of the surgical incision was also associated with longer hospital stays.
  • The study found higher instances of death in pregnant mares (13%) compared to the control mares (5%). This difference was statistically significant.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that the occurrence of complications from surgical incisions did not vary significantly between pregnant and control mares undergoing abdominal surgery.
  • Several factors significantly increased the chances of surgical incision complications, including the length of surgery and anesthesia, specific anesthetic variables, the use of abdominal bandages, previous ventral abdominal surgery, and an extended duration of hospitalization.

Cite This Article

APA
Klein CE, Stefanovski D, Gardner AK, Woodie JB, Embertson RM, Mudge MC, Hurcombe SD. (2022). A multicenter retrospective case-cohort study on the prevalence of incisional morbidities in late pregnant mares following exploratory celiotomy (2014-2019): 579 cases. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio), 33(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13228

Publication

ISSN: 1476-4431
NlmUniqueID: 101152804
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 33
Issue: 1
Pages: 59-69

Researcher Affiliations

Klein, Chelsea E
  • New Bolton Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Department of Clinical Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Stefanovski, Darko
  • New Bolton Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gardner, Alison K
  • Galbreath Equine Center, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Woodie, J Brett
  • Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Embertson, Rolf M
  • Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Mudge, Margaret C
  • Galbreath Equine Center, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Hurcombe, Samuel D
  • New Bolton Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Pregnancy
  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Female
  • Colic / epidemiology
  • Colic / surgery
  • Colic / veterinary
  • Prevalence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Cohort Studies
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Morbidity

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Drumm NJ, Embertson RM, Woodie JB. Factors influencing foaling rate following colic surgery in pregnant Thoroughbred mares in Central Kentucky. Equine Vet J 2013;45(3):346-349.
  2. Chenier T, Whitehead A. Foaling rates and risk factors for abortion in pregnant mares presented for medical or surgical treatment of colic: 153 cases (1993-2005). Can Vet J 2009;50:481-485.
  3. Boening KJ, Leendertse IP. Review of 115 cases of colic in the pregnant mare. Equine Vet J 1993;25(6):518-521.
  4. Macpherson M. Identification and management of the high-risk pregnant mare. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 2007, Orlando, FL, pp. 293-304.
  5. Ross J, Palmer JE, Wilkins PA. Body wall tears during late pregnancy in mares: 13 cases (1995-2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;232:257-261.
  6. Hanson RR, Todhunter RJ. Herniation of the abdominal wall in pregnant mares. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986;189:790-793.
  7. Auron M, Duran Castillo MY, Garcia OFD. Perioperative management of pregnant women undergoing nonobstetric surgery. Cleve Clin J Med 2020;88(1):27-34.
  8. Danawar NA, Mekaiel A, Raut S, Reddy I, Malik BH. How to treat hernias in pregnant women?. Cureus 2020;12(7):1-10.
  9. Kulacoglu H. Umbilical hernia repair and pregnancy: before, during and after. Front Surg 2018;5(1):1-7.
  10. Juhaz-Böss I, Solomayer E, Strik M, Raspé C. Abdominal surgery in pregnant - an interdisciplinary challenge. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014;111:465-472.
  11. . ACOG Committee Opinion No. 775 summary: nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133(4):844-845.
  12. Borghi C, Spadaro S, Lombana Mariño MG. Hypoxic events during non-obstetric abdominal surgery in pregnant women. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020;24(6):2795-2801.
  13. Andreassen T, Fogdestam I, Rundgren A. A biomechanical study of healing of skin incisions in rats during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;145(2):175-178.
  14. Localio S, Chassin J. The effect of pregnancy on the tensile strength of healing laparotomy wounds in rats. Surgery 1952;32(1):39-42.
  15. Isgren CM, Salem SE, Townsend NB, Timofte D, Maddox TW, Archer DC. Sequential bacterial sampling of the midline incision in horses undergoing exploratory laparotomy. Equine Vet J 2017;51(1):38-44.
  16. Torfs S, Levet T, Delesalle C. Risk factors for incisional complications after exploratory celiotomy in horses: do skin staples increase the risk?. Vet Surg 2010;39(5):616-620.
  17. Brown JA. Ventral midline celiotomy incision infections in the horse. Equine Vet Educ 2012;24(3):116-118.
  18. Shearer TR, Holcombe SJ, Valberg SJ. Incisional infections associated with ventral midline celiotomy in horses. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2020;30:136-148.
  19. Freeman DE, Rötting AK, Inoue OJ. Abdominal closure and complications. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2002;1(3):174-187.
  20. Klohnen A. New perspectives in postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2009;25(2):341-350.
  21. Honnas C, Cohen N. Risk factors for wound infection following celiotomy in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;210(1):78-81.
  22. Wilson DA, Baker GJ, Boero MJ. Complications of celiotomy incisions in horses. Vet Surg 1995;24:506-514.
  23. Freeman DE, Hammock P, Baker GJ. Short- and long-term survival and prevalence of postoperative ileus after small intestinal surgery in the horse. Equine Vet J Suppl 2000;32:42-51.
  24. Ingle-Fehr J, Baxter G, Howard R, Trotter G, Stashak T. Bacterial culturing of ventral median celiotomies for prediction of postoperative incisional complications in horses. Vet Surg 1997;26:7-13.
  25. Gibson KT, Curtis CR, Turner AS, McIlwraith CW, Aanes WA, Stashak TS. Incisional hernias in the horse incidence and predisposing factors. Vet Surg 1989;18(5):360-366.
  26. Proudman CJ, Smith JE, Edwards GB, French NP. Long-term survival of equine surgical colic cases. Part 1: patterns of mortality and morbidity. Equine Vet J 2010;34(5):432-437.
  27. Phillips TJ, Walmsley JP. Retrospective analysis of the results of 151 exploratory laparotomies in horses with gastrointestinal disease. Equine Vet J 1993;25(5):427-431.
  28. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 2: short-term complications. Equine Vet J 2005;37(4):303-309.
  29. French NP, Smith J, Edwards GB, Proudman CJ. Equine surgical colic: risk factors for postoperative complications. Equine Vet J 2002;34(5):444-449.
  30. Gardner AK, Mudge MC. Catastrophic dehiscence of ventral abdominal incisions: description of risk factors and factors for survival. Equine Vet Educ 2017;29:13.
  31. Talbot T, Schaffner W. Relationship between age and the risk of surgical site infection: a contemporary reexamination of a classic risk factor. J Infect Dis 2005;191:1032-1035.
  32. Tnibar A, Lin KG, Nielsen KT. Effect of a stent bandage on the likelihood of incisional infection following exploratory coeliotomy for colic in horses: a comparative retrospective study. Equine Vet J 2013;45(5):564-569.
  33. Smith LJ, Mellor DJ, Marr CM, Reid SW, Mair TS. Incisional complications following exploratory celiotomy: does an abdominal bandage reduce the risk?. Equine Vet J 2007;39(3):277-283.
  34. Kilcoyne I, Dechant JE, Kass PH, Nieto JE. Evaluation of the risk of incisional infection in horses following application of protective dressings after exploratory celiotomy for treatment of colic. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2019;254(12):1441-1447.
  35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical site infection (SSI) event. Accessed June 10, 2022.
  36. McCue PM, Ferris RA. Parturition, dystocia and foal survival: a retrospective study of 1047 births. Equine Vet J Suppl 2012;41:22-25.
  37. Santarosa BP, Lourenco MLG, Dantas GN. Effect of pregnancy and correlation of weight and heart rate with electrocardiographic parameters in the American Miniature horse. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2016;68:579-586.
  38. Hastie TR, Tibshirani R, Wainwright M. Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2015.
  39. Hardy J, Rakestraw PC. Postoperative care, complications, and reoperation. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, eds. Equine Surgery. 4th ed. Elsevier; 2012:522-526.
  40. Galuppo LD, Pascoe JR, Jang SS, Willits NH, Greenman SL. Evaluation of iodophor skin preparation techniques and factors influencing drainage from ventral midline incisions in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;215(7):963-969.
  41. Stone WC, Lindsay WA, Mason DE, Heisey DM. Factors associated with acute wound dehiscence following equine abdominal surgery. Proceedings of the 4th Equine Colic Research Symposium 1991, Athens; p. 52.
  42. Kobluk CN, Ducharme NG, Lumsden JH. Factors affecting incisional complication rates associated with colic surgery in horses: 78 cases (1983-1985). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989;195(5):639-642.
  43. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 3: long-term complications and survival. Equine Vet J 2010;37(4):310-314.
  44. Costa-Farré C, Prades M, Ribera T, Valero O, Taurà P. Does intraoperative low arterial partial pressure of oxygen increase the risk of surgical site infection following emergency exploratory laparotomy in horses?. Vet J 2014;200:175-180.
  45. Dória RGS, Freitas SH, Laskoski LM, Arruda LP, Shimano AC. Correlation between peritonitis and incisional infections in horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;87:1-8.
  46. Santschi EM, Slone DE, Gronwall R, Juzwiak JS, Moll HD. Types of colic and frequency of postcolic abortion in pregnant mares: 105 cases (1984-1988). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;199(3):374-377.
  47. Tibary A, Pearson LK. Mare problems in the last month of pregnancy. Am Assoc Equine Pract Anaheim 2012;58:350-358.
  48. Dziubinski N, Mählmann K, Lübke-Becker A, Lischer C. Retrospective identification of bacterial isolates from emergency laparotomy surgical site infections in horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;87:1-6.
  49. Kelleher ME, Brosnan RJ, Kass PH, le Jeune SS. Use of physiologic and arterial blood gas variables to predict short-term survival in horses with large colon volvulus. Vet Surg 2013;42:107-113.
  50. Nagel C, Trenk L, Aurich J, Wulf M, Aurich C. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate, and blood profile in mares during the last 3 months of gestation and the peripartum period. Theriogenology 2016;86:1856-1864.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.