Abstract: This study quantified the extent of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in ascarid and strongylid nematodes against commonly used anthelmintics in Australian Thoroughbred horses. Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs, n = 86) and egg reappearance period (ERP) tests were conducted on 22 farms across Australia. Faecal egg counts (FECs) were determined using the modified McMaster technique, and percent faecal egg count reduction (%FECR) was calculated using the Bayesian hierarchical model and hybrid Frequentist/Bayesian analysis method. The results were interpreted using old (published in 1992) and new (2023) research guidelines of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP). The species composition of strongylid nematodes was detected utilising a DNA-metabarcoding method using pre- and post-treatment samples. Resistance was observed in strongylid nematodes to commonly used single-active and combination anthelmintics, including ivermectin (IVM %FECR range: 82%-92%; 95% lower credible interval (LCI) range: 80%-90%), abamectin (ABM: 73%-92%; 65%-88%), moxidectin (MOX: 89%-91%; 84%-89%), oxfendazole (OFZ: 0%-56%; 0%-31%) and its combination with pyrantel (OFZ + PYR: 0%-82%; 0%-78%). Resistance in Parascaris spp. was observed to IVM (10%-43%; 0%-36%), ABM (0%; 0%) and MOX (0%; 0%). When the new thresholds recommended by the WAAVP were used, AR was detected in six additional FECRTs for strongylids and three more tests for Parascaris spp., introducing resistance to OFZ and OFZ + PYR in the latter. Shortened ERPs (4-6 weeks) of strongylids were observed in 31 FECRTs in which AR was not detected at 2 weeks post-treatment for all the anthelmintics tested. Among cyathostomins, Cylicocyclus nassatus, Cylicostephanus longibursatus and Coronocyclus coronatus were the most prevalent species at 2 weeks post-treatment, whereas the main species appearing at five weeks following treatments with macrocyclic lactones were Cylicocyclus nassatus, Cylicostephanus longibursatus and Cylicocyclus ashworthi. After treatment with OFZ + PYR, the latter three, plus Coronocyclus coronatus and Cyathostomum catinatum, were detected at 5 weeks post-treatment. Overall, the study highlights the prevalence of AR in both ascarids and strongylid nematodes against commonly used anthelmintic products to control worms in Australian horses. The results indicate that ML combination products provided acceptable efficacy at 2 weeks. However, ERP calculations suggest that products work less effectively than previously measured. It is suggested to regularly monitor the efficacy of the anthelmintics and consider changing the worm control practices to better manage worms and AR in Australian horses.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article discusses a study carried out to measure the resistance against certain kinds of deworming drugs (anthelmintics) in two types of parasitic worms (ascarid and strongylid nematodes) found in thoroughbred horses in Australia.
Overview of Study and Methodology
The study sought to provide insights into the extent of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in ascarid and strongylid nematodes, particularly against popular anthelmintics used in Australian Thoroughbred horses.
Across 22 farms in Australia, Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs, n = 86) and egg reappearance period (ERP) tests were conducted to understand the effects of these drugs on the worms.
Techniques like the modified McMaster technique were used to determine Faecal egg counts (FEC) while %FECR (percent faecal egg count reduction) was computed using the Bayesian hierarchical model and hybrid Frequentist/Bayesian analysis method.
Results were then interpreted using both old (1992) and new (2023) guidelines issued by the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP).
A DNA-metabarcoding method was used in determining the species composition of strongylid nematodes, using pre- and post-treatment samples.
Results and Analysis
Resistance was seen in strongylid nematodes against commonly used single-active and combination anthelmintics such as ivermectin, abamectin, moxidectin, oxfendazole, and its combination with pyrantel.
Resistance in Parascaris spp. worm species was observed to ivermectin, abamectin and moxidectin.
Using the newer thresholds recommended by the WAAVP led to AR being detected in more tests, implying that the resistance was more prevalent than previously thought.
Observations were also made on the decreased time (4-6 weeks) taken for eggs to reappear in tests where AR wasn’t detected at the fortnightly post-treatment mark. This suggests a potential speedier reproduction which could be due to AR.
Post-treatment, the more common worm species were Cylicocyclus nassatus, Cylicostephanus longibursatus, and Coronocyclus coronatus. Certain species had more prominent occurrences depending on the specific treatment administered.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The study brings to light the widespread issue of AR in ascarids and strongylid nematodes against familiar anthelmintic products used against horse worms in Australia.
While macrocyclic lactone combination products indicate satisfactory efficiency at two weeks, ERPs suggest that they might work less effectively than previously understood.
The paper concludes with a suggestion urging regular monitoring of anthelmintics’ effectiveness and reconsideration of worm control practices for better management of AR in Australian Equines.
Cite This Article
APA
Abbas G, Ghafar A, McConnell E, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes EJA, El-Hage C, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Hurley J, Gauci CG, Beveridge I, Ling E, Jacobson C, Stevenson MA, Nielsen MK, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A.
(2023).
A national survey of anthelmintic resistance in ascarid and strongylid nematodes in Australian Thoroughbred horses.
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 24, 100517.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2023.11.006
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
Ghafar, Abdul
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
McConnell, Emma
Centre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Beasley, Anne
School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia.
Bauquier, Jenni
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
Wilkes, Edwina J A
Racing Victoria, Flemington, Victoria 3031, Australia.
El-Hage, Charles
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
Carrigan, Peter
Scone Equine Hospital, Scone, New South Wales 2337, Australia.
Cudmore, Lucy
Scone Equine Hospital, Scone, New South Wales 2337, Australia.
Hurley, John
Swettenham Stud, Nagambie, Victoria 3608, Australia.
Gauci, Charles G
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
Beveridge, Ian
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
Ling, Elysia
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
Jacobson, Caroline
Centre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Stevenson, Mark A
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
Nielsen, Martin K
M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Hughes, Kristopher J
School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales 2650, Australia.
Jabbar, Abdul
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia. Electronic address: jabbara@unimelb.edu.au.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Anthelmintics / pharmacology
Australia / epidemiology
Bayes Theorem
Drug Resistance
Feces / parasitology
Horse Diseases / drug therapy
Horse Diseases / parasitology
Horses
Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
Strongyloidea / genetics
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript are members of the Australian Equine Parasitology Advisory Panel (AEPAP), including Abdul Jabbar, Ghazanfar Abbas, Jenni Bauquier, Charles El-Hage, Abdul Ghafar and Ian Beveridge (The University of Melbourne), Anne Beasley (University of Queensland), Kristopher Hughes (Charles Sturt University), Caroline Jacobson and Emma McConnell (Murdoch University), Edwina Wilkes (Racing Victoria), Peter Carrigan and Lucy Cudmore (Scone Equine Hospital) and John Hurley (Swettenham Stud). Boehringer Ingelheim supported the panel. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Abbas G, Ghafar A, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Ling E, Gauci CG, El-Hage C, Wilkes EJA, McConnell E, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Hurley J, Beveridge I, Nielsen MK, Stevenson MA, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. Prevalence and diversity of ascarid and strongylid nematodes in Australian Thoroughbred horses using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics tools.. Vet Parasitol 2023;323.
Bartram DJ, Leathwick DM, Taylor MA, Geurden T, Maeder SJ. The role of combination anthelmintic formulations in the sustainable control of sheep nematodes.. Vet Parasitol 2012;186:151–158.
Beasley AM, Kotze AC, Barnes TS, Coleman GT. Equine helminth prevalence and management practices on Australian properties as shown by coprological survey and written questionnaire.. Anim Prod Sci 2020;60:2131–2144.
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.. Nat Biotechnol 2019;37:852–857.
Courtot É, Boisseau M, Dhorne-Pollet S, Serreau D, Gesbert A, Reigner F, Basiaga M, Kuzmina T, Lluch J, Annonay G, Kuchly C, Diekmann I, Krücken J, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Mach N, Sallé G. Comparison of two molecular barcodes for the study of equine strongylid communities with amplicon sequencing.. PeerJ 2023;11.
Denwood MJ, Kaplan RM, McKendrick IJ, Thamsborg SM, Nielsen MK, Levecke B. A statistical framework for calculating prospective sample sizes and classifying efficacy results for faecal egg count reduction tests in ruminants, horses and swine.. Vet Parasitol 2023;314.
Dhariwal A, Chong J, Habib S, King IL, Agellon LB, Xia J. MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data.. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:W180–W188.
Gasser RB, Chilton NB, Hoste H, Beveridge I. Rapid sequencing of rDNA from single worms and eggs of parasitic helminths.. Nucleic Acids Res 1993;21:2525–2526.
Geary TG, Hosking BC, Skuce PJ, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Maeder S, Holdsworth P, Pomroy W, Vercruysse J. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) Guideline: anthelmintic combination products targeting nematode infections of ruminants and horses.. Vet Parasitol 2012;190:306–316.
Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. An evidence-based approach to equine parasite control: it ain't the 60s anymore.. Equine Vet Educ 2010;22:306–316.
Kaplan R, West EM, Norat‐Collazo LM, Vargas J. A combination treatment strategy using pyrantel pamoate and oxibendazole demonstrates additive effects for controlling equine cyathostomins.. Equine Vet Educ 2014;26:485–491.
Kooyman FNJ, Van Doorn D, Geurden T, Wagenaar J. Semi-quantitative differentiation of cyathostomin larval cultures by reverse line blot.. Vet Parasitol 2016;216:59–65.
Le Jambre L, Martin P, Johnston AJA PS. Efficacy of combination anthelmintics against multiple resistant strains of sheep nematodes.. Anim Prod Sci 2010;50:946–952.
Lignon JS, Gonçalves NF, Cunha LL, Antunes TA, Leão MS, Camassola JLT, Pellegrin TG, Ripoll PK, Pappen FG, Pinto DM. Anthelmintic resistance in creole horses in the South of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2021;73:598–604.
Martins NS, Pinto DM, da Cunha LL, Lignon JS, dos Santos TC, Evaristo TA, Pappen FG, Nizoli LQ. Assessment of the efficacy of commercial anthelmintics in horses naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes.. Med Vet (UFRPE) 2021;15:28–32.
Matthews JB. An update on cyathostomins: anthelmintic resistance and worm control.. Equine Vet Educ 2008;20:552–560.
Nielsen MK, Pfister K, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Selective therapy in equine parasite control—application and limitations.. Vet Parasitol 2014;202:95–103.
Nielsen MK, Kaplan RM, Abbas G, Jabbar A. Biological implications of long-term anthelmintic treatment: what else besides resistance are we selecting for?. Trends Parasitol 2023;39:945–953.
Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python.. J Mach Learn Res 2011;12:2825–2830.
Roeber F, Jex AR, Gasser RB. Comparative evaluation of two DNA isolation techniques for PCR-based diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep.. Mol Cell Probes 2013;27:153–157.
Torgerson PR, Paul M, Furrer R. Evaluating faecal egg count reduction using a specifically designed package “eggCounts” in R and a user friendly web interface.. Int J Parasitol 2014;44:299–303.
Wang C, Torgerson PR, Kaplan RM, George MM, Furrer R. Modelling anthelmintic resistance by extending eggCounts package to allow individual efficacy.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2018;8:386–393.