Analyze Diet
Veterinary research communications2024; 49(1); 43; doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10584-w

A new smartphone-based digital stethoscope featuring phonocardiography and electrocardiography in adult horses.

Abstract: Smartphone-based technology is increasingly used in veterinary medicine as a complementary tool for cardiac auscultation and ECG recording. This prospective observational study evaluates a digital stethoscope (DS) that consists of simultaneous phonocardiographic and one-lead ECG recording (dECG) in adult horses, comparing it with auscultation using a conventional stethoscope (CS) and reference base-apex ECG (rECG). A total of 104 horses underwent cardiac auscultation using CSs and DSs to detect arrhythmias and murmurs. Audio and dECG were acquired using the DS. The rECG tracings were also recorded. All ECG tracings were blindly evaluated for interpretability, measurements, and diagnosis. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the data distribution. Weighted Cohen's κ and Bland Altman plot analysis were applied to verify the agreement between reference vs. smartphone-based methods. Almost perfect agreement was found in detecting murmurs and/or arrhythmias between auscultation with the CS and DS, and between CS auscultation and re-listening to DS audio. Perfect agreement was observed between re-listening to DS audio and DS auscultation and in detecting murmur timing between CS and DS auscultation. Almost perfect agreement was found between rECG and dECG in detecting bradycardia, tachycardia, or normal heart rate (HR) and for P-wave polarity. The lack of variability with both methods for QRS polarity prevented statistical analyses from being performed. Fair agreement was found in the assessment of the presence of artifact. In conclusion, the DS reliably detected heart murmurs and arrhythmias through direct auscultation and re-listening to recordings, and accurately evaluated HR, wave and interval measurements, P-wave and QRS-complex polarities in adult horses.
Publication Date: 2024-11-27 PubMed ID: 39601957PubMed Central: 7754639DOI: 10.1007/s11259-024-10584-wGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores the effectiveness and reliability of a smartphone-based digital stethoscope in detecting cardiac conditions in horses, comparing its performance with a conventional stethoscope and a standard electrocardiograph.

Objective of the Research

The research aims to evaluate the efficiency and reliability of a digital stethoscope (DS) and a one-lead digital electrocardiography (dECG) tool in diagnosing murmurs and arrhythmias in horses. These tools are compared to traditional auscultation using a conventional stethoscope (CS) and benchmark electrocardiographic (rECG) methods.

Methodology of the Research

  • The study involved 104 adult horses that were put through cardiac auscultation using both conventional and digital stethoscopes to identify murmurs and arrhythmias.
  • Sounds and one-lead digital ECG (dECG) data were recorded using the digital stethoscope (DS).
  • Reference ECG (rECG) data were also obtained for comparison.
  • All ECG data were then evaluated independently without knowledge of the device used, to determine interpretability, measurements, and diagnosis.
  • Statistical methods used to analyze data and agreement between the digital and reference methods included the Shapiro-Wilk test, weighted Cohen’s κ, and Bland Altman plot analysis.

Results of the Research

  • The study found high consistency in detecting murmurs and arrhythmias between conventional and digital auscultation methods.
  • There was also high agreement between conventional auscultations and re-listening to recorded audio from the digital stethoscope.
  • Perfect agreement was noted in two instances: when re-listening to the digital stethoscope’s audio and during DS auscultation, and in detecting the timing of murmurs using both stethoscope types.
  • Strong agreement was found between reference ECG and digital ECG in detecting variances in heart rate (bradycardia, tachycardia), and P-wave polarity. However, statistical analyses for QRS polarity were not feasible due to lack of variation with both methods.
  • There was a fair agreement in assessing the presence of artefacts.

Conclusion of the Research

Led by the findings, the study concludes that the digital stethoscope reliably detects murmurs and arrhythmias in horses, both during direct auscultation and when re-listening to recordings. It also accurately measures heart rate, wave and interval measurements, and P-wave and QRS-complex polarities..

Cite This Article

APA
Bindi F, Bozzola C, Vezzosi T, Zucca E, Caivano D, Freccero F, Sala G, Sgorbini M. (2024). A new smartphone-based digital stethoscope featuring phonocardiography and electrocardiography in adult horses. Vet Res Commun, 49(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10584-w

Publication

ISSN: 1573-7446
NlmUniqueID: 8100520
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 49
Issue: 1
Pages: 43

Researcher Affiliations

Bindi, Francesca
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Bozzola, Chiara
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Vezzosi, Tommaso
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. tommaso.vezzosi@unipi.it.
Zucca, Enrica
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Caivano, Domenico
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Freccero, Francesca
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sala, Giulia
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Sgorbini, Micaela
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Smartphone
  • Stethoscopes / veterinary
  • Electrocardiography / veterinary
  • Electrocardiography / instrumentation
  • Electrocardiography / methods
  • Phonocardiography / veterinary
  • Phonocardiography / instrumentation
  • Phonocardiography / methods
  • Male
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Heart Auscultation / veterinary
  • Heart Auscultation / instrumentation
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / veterinary
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / physiopathology

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: The experiments were conducted following the Guide for the Care and Use of Animals in Research and Teaching, after the approval of the Ethic Committee of the University of Pisa (OPBA n. 53/2020). Consent to participate: All authors consent to participation in this publication. Consent to publish: All authors consent to publication of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Alberti E, Stucchi L, Pesce V, Stancari G, Ferro E, Ferrucci F, Zucca E. Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device accuracy in field and in hospital conditions in horses. Vet Rec Open 7(1):e000441.
    doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000441pubmed: 33381302pmc: 7754639google scholar: lookup
  2. Alibrandi L, Tognetti R, Domenech O, Croce M, Giuntoli M, Grosso G, Vezzosi T. Smartphone-based six-lead ECG: a new device for electrocardiographic recording in dogs. Vet J 303:106043.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.106043pubmed: 37992801google scholar: lookup
  3. Balogh M, Koch F, Siver L, Krima A, Vörös K. Digital phonocardiography of cardiac arrhythmias in dogs– preliminary experiences. Acta Vet Hung 69:116–124.
    doi: 10.1556/004.2021.00024pubmed: 34270460google scholar: lookup
  4. Bindi F, Vezzosi T, Sala G, Freccero F, Marmorini P, Bonelli F, Sgorbini M. Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy foals and comparison to standard base-apex electrocardiography. Vet Res Commun 48(2):227–1232.
  5. Bonelli F, Vezzosi T, Meylan M, Nocera I, Ferrulli V, Buralli C, Meucci V, Tognetti R. Comparison of smartphone-based and standard base‐apex electrocardiography in healthy dairy cows. J Vet Intern Med 33:981–986.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15396pubmed: 30592089google scholar: lookup
  6. Bowen IM. Ambulatory electrocardiography and hear rate variability. In: Marr CM, Bowen IM (eds) Cardiology of the horse, 2nd edn. Saunders Elsevier, United Kingdom, pp 127–137.
  7. Bozzola C, Ortolina A, Guffanti I, Alberti E, Bronzo V, Zucca E. Evaluation of a digital stethoscope for electrocardiographic recording in donkeys: preliminary results. J Equine Vet Sci 135:105048.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105048pubmed: 38494096google scholar: lookup
  8. Brloznik M, Kos VK, Kramaric P. Electromechanical events in exercise-induced remodeling of the Equine Heart. In: 2021 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO). IEEE, pp 352–356.
  9. Giusto G, Pagliara E, Gandini M. Effects of bit chewing on right upper quadrant intestinal sound frequency in adult horses. J Equine Vet Sci 34:520–523.
  10. Greim E, Naef J, Mainguy-Seers S. Breath characteristics and adventitious lung sounds in healthy and asthmatic horses. J Vet Intern Med 38:495–504.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16980pubmed: 38192117pmc: 10800186google scholar: lookup
  11. King A, Rolph KE, Dzikiti L, Cavanaugh SM. Overall good agreement of smartphone-based and standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy sheep. J Am Vet Med Assoc 261(9):1–5.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.23.02.0126pubmed: 37217175google scholar: lookup
  12. Kos VK, Brloznik M, Petric AD, Avbelj V. Simultaneous phonocardiography and electrocardiography using smartphone in dogs, cats and horses. In: 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO). IEEE, pp 327–331.
  13. Kraus MS, Gelzer AR, Rishniw M. Detection of heart rate and rhythm with a smartphone-based electrocardiograph versus a reference standard electrocardiograph in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 249:189–194.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.249.2.189pubmed: 27379594google scholar: lookup
  14. Kraus MS, Rishniw M, Divers TJ, Reef VB, Gelzer AR. Utility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base-apex electrocardiogram in the horse. Res Vet Sci 125:141–147.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.018pubmed: 31228737google scholar: lookup
  15. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363.
    doi: 10.2307/2529786pubmed: 884196google scholar: lookup
  16. Naylor JM, Poirier KL, Hamilton DL, Dowling PM. The effects of Feeding and Fasting on Gastrointestinal sounds in adult horses. J Vet Intern Med 20:1408–1413.
  17. Smith JS, Ward JL, Schneider BK, Smith FL, Mueller MS, Heller MC. Comparison of standard electrocardiography and smartphone-based electrocardiography recorded at two different anatomic locations in healthy meat and dairy breed does. Front Vet Sci 7:416.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00416pubmed: 32903541pmc: 7438445google scholar: lookup
  18. Spitale D, Cicogna M, Porciello F, Colonnelli M, Caivano D. Use of a novel smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram device in clinical practice to evaluate heart rhythm in horses– a case series. Pferdeheilkunde Equine Med 40:149–153.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20240207google scholar: lookup
  19. Van Loon G, Patteson M. Electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis. In: Marr CM, Bowen IM (eds) Cardiology of the horse, 2nd edn. Saunders Elsevier, United Kingdom, pp 51-69.
  20. Vezzosi T, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Porporato F, Tognetti R, Zini E, Domenech O. Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiograph in dogs: comparison with standard 6-lead electrocardiography. Vet J 216:33–37.
  21. Vezzosi T, Sgorbini M, Bonelli F, Buralli C, Pillotti M, Meucci V, Tognetti R. Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy horses: comparison with standard base-apex electrocardiography. J Equine Vet Sci 67:61–65.
  22. Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Patata V, Zini E, Domenech O. Home monitoring of heart rate and heart rhythm with a smartphone-based ECG in dogs. Vet Rec 184:96–96.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.104917pubmed: 30559174google scholar: lookup
  23. Vezzosi T, Alibrandi L, Grosso G, Tognetti R. Evaluation of a new smartphone-based digital stethoscope featuring phonocardiography and electrocardiography in dogs and cats. Vet J 295:105987.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.105987pubmed: 37141934google scholar: lookup
  24. Vitale V, Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Fraschetti C, Sgorbini M. Evaluation of a new portable 1-lead digital cardiac monitor (eKuore) compared with standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy horses. PLoS ONE 16:e0255247.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255247pubmed: 34343184pmc: 8330948google scholar: lookup
  25. Vörös K, Bonnevie LA, Reiczigel MJ. Comparison of conventional and sensor-based electronic stethoscopes in detecting cardiac murmurs of dogs. Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe K: Kleintiere / Heimtiere 40:103–111.
    doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1623629pubmed: 22526814google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.