Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2020; 52(4); 547-555; doi: 10.1111/evj.13207

A questionnaire study of parasite control in Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses in Australia.

Abstract: Information regarding parasite control practices currently used on Thoroughbred and Standardbred studs in Australia is lacking. Anthelmintic resistance (AR) is a global problem which has implications for equine health and welfare. Objective: To identify parasite control practices currently used on horse studs in Australia and investigate the frequency of use of management factors that have been associated with the likelihood of promoting or delaying AR. Methods: Questionnaire study of equine parasite control on Thoroughbred and Standardbred studs in Australia. Methods: An online questionnaire was emailed to 300 studs in Australia. Information obtained included property details, grazing management, anthelmintic use, non-chemotherapeutic parasite control practices, use of faecal egg counts (FECs) and perceptions of AR. Results: Seventy-five completed questionnaires were received (25% response rate). Macrocyclic lactones (MLs) were the most commonly administered anthelmintics in mares and foals and less than 5% of respondents used targeted treatment regimens. The implementation of pasture hygiene practices was variable. The majority of respondents (97%) considered AR to be important; however, few respondents were aware of the use of FEC reduction tests for monitoring of drug efficacy. Conclusions: The potential for nonresponse bias was the main limitation of this study. Conclusions: Parasite control strategies on Australian stud farms remain over-reliant on anthelmintic use. The frequent use of MLs is of concern for the increased selection pressure for AR. There is a lack of awareness of the importance of non-chemotherapeutic strategies in integrated approaches to parasite control aimed at delaying the development of AR. This study highlights the need for greater veterinary involvement in the implementation of more sustainable parasite control practices with greater emphasis placed on surveillance through FEC testing.
Publication Date: 2020-02-07 PubMed ID: 31725925DOI: 10.1111/evj.13207Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focuses on the current practices used in treating parasites in Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses in Australia. It reveals an over-reliance on anthelmintic use and a lack of awareness on non-chemical parasite control methods. The study underscores the need for greater veterinary involvement and more sustainable parasite control practices.

Objective and Methodology

  • The study aimed to identify parasite control practices currently used on studs in Australia and to evaluate the impact and frequency of these practices that have influences on Anthelmintic resistance (AR).
  • A survey questionnaire was employed in the study. Via email, the questionnaire was sent to 300 horse stud farms across Australia.
  • The online questionnaire sought information about property details, grazing management, anthelmintic use, non-chemotherapeutic parasite control practices, faecal egg counts (FECs) use and the respondents’ perceptions regarding AR.

Results

  • From the 300 emailed questionnaires, only 75 were completed and returned, representing a 25% response rate.
  • The most commonly used antihelminthics were Macrocyclic lactones (MLs), particularly in foals and mares.
  • Less than 5% of the respondents utilized targeted treatment regimens.
  • There was inconsistency in implementing pasture hygiene practices, with some farms implementing them well while others did not.
  • Majority of the respondents (97%) indicated that they consider AR to be a significant concern. However, only a few were informed about the use of FEC reduction tests as a way to monitor drug efficiency.

Conclusions

  • The major limitation of the study was the potential for non-response bias given the 25% response rate.
  • The study concludes that current parasite control strategies on Australian farms predominantly rely on the use of anthelmintic drugs, leading to selection pressure for AR.
  • There is a noticeable lack of awareness among the respondents regarding non-chemotherapeutic strategies for parasite control, which could delay the onset of AR.
  • In light of these findings, the study advocates for increased veterinary involvement in implementing more sustainable parasite control strategies and an emphasis on surveillance through FEC testing.

Cite This Article

APA
Wilkes EJA, Heller J, Raidal SL, Woodgate RG, Hughes KJ. (2020). A questionnaire study of parasite control in Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses in Australia. Equine Vet J, 52(4), 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13207

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 52
Issue: 4
Pages: 547-555

Researcher Affiliations

Wilkes, Edwina J A
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Heller, Jane
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Raidal, Sharanne L
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Woodgate, Robert G
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Hughes, Kristopher J
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Husbandry
  • Animals
  • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
  • Australia
  • Drug Resistance / drug effects
  • Feces
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horses
  • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
  • Parasites / drug effects
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Grant Funding

  • CEVA Animal Health
  • Faculty of Science, CSU

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Love S, Murphy D, Mellor D. Pathogenicity of cyathostome infection.. Vet Parasitol 1999;85:113-22.
  2. Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN. An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance.. Vet Parasitol 2012;186:70-8.
  3. Proudman C, Matthews J. Control of intestinal parasites in horses.. Practice 2000;22:90-7.
  4. Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. An evidence-based approach to equine parasite control: it ain't the 60s anymore.. Equine Vet Educ 2010;22:306-16.
  5. Kaplan RM. Anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of horses.. Vet Res 2002;33:491-507.
  6. Kaplan RM. Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report.. Trends Parasitol 2004;20:477-81.
  7. Matthews JB. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2014;4:310-5.
  8. Robert M, Hu W, Nielsen MK, Stowe CJ. Attitudes towards implementation of surveillance-based parasite control on Kentucky Thoroughbred farms - current strategies, awareness and willingness-to-pay.. Equine Vet J 2015;47:694-700.
  9. Relf VE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. A questionnaire study on parasite control practices on UK breeding Thoroughbred studs.. Equine Vet J 2012;44:466-71.
  10. Bolwell CF, Rosanowski SM, Scott I, Sells PD, Rogers CW. Questionnaire study on parasite control practices on Thoroughbred and Standardbred breeding farms in New Zealand.. Vet Parasitol 2015;209:62-9.
  11. Lloyd S, Smith J, Connan RM, Hatcher MA, Hedges TR, Humphrey DJ. Parasite control methods used by horse owners: factors predisposing to the development of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes.. Vet Rec 2000;146:487-92.
  12. Rosanowski SM, Scott I, Sells PD, Rogers CW, Bolwell CF. Cross-sectional survey of parasite control practices on Thoroughbred and Standardbred training yards in New Zealand.. Equine Vet J 2016;48:387-93.
  13. Chapman MR, French DD, Monahan CM, Klei TR. Identification and characterization of a pyrantel pamoate resistant cyathostome population.. Vet Parasitol 1996;66:205-12.
  14. Molento M, Antunes J, Bentes R, Coles G. Anthelmintic resistant nematodes in Brazilian horses.. Vet Rec 2008;162:384-5.
  15. Peregrine AS, Molento MB, Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in important parasites of horses: does it really matter?. Vet Parasitol 2014;201:1-8.
  16. Beasley AM, Kotze AC, Allen K, Coleman GT. A survey of macrocyclic lactone efficacy in Australian cyathostomin populations.. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 2017;8:127-32.
  17. Bishop R, Scott I, Gee E, Rogers C, Pomroy W, Mayhew I. Sub-optimal efficacy of ivermectin against Parascaris equorum in foals on three Thoroughbred stud farms in the Manawatu region of New Zealand.. N Z Vet J 2014;62:91-5.
  18. Veronesi F, Moretta I, Moretti A, Fioretti DP, Genchi C. Field effectiveness of pyrantel and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment in Italian horse farms.. Vet Parasitol 2009;161:138-41.
  19. Beasley A, Coleman G, Kotze AC. Suspected ivermectin resistance in a South-East Queensland Parascaris equorum population.. Aust Vet J 2015;93:305-7.
  20. Armstrong SK, Woodgate RG, Gough S, Heller J, Sangster NC, Hughes KJ. The efficacy of ivermectin, pyrantel and fenbendazole against Parascaris equorum infection in foals on farms in Australia.. Vet Parasitol 2014;205:575-80.
  21. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Kuzmina TA, Collins SS. Further evaluation in field tests of the activity of three anthelmintics (fenbendazole, oxibendazole, and pyrantel pamoate) against the ascarid Parascaris equorum in horse foals on eight farms in Central Kentucky (2009-2010).. Parasitol Res 2011;109:1193-7.
  22. Duncan JL, Love S. Preliminary observations on an alternative strategy for the control of horse strongyles.. Equine Vet J 1991;23:226-8.
  23. Gomez HH, Georgi JR. Equine helminth infections: control by selective chemotherapy.. Equine Vet J 1991;23:198-200.
  24. Nielsen MK, Mittel L, Grice A, Michael E, Graves E, Vaala W. AAEP Parasite Control Guidelines.. (2013) Ed: A.I.D. Committee, AAEP, Kentucky, USA.
  25. Bucknell DG, Gasser RB, Beveridge I. The prevalence and epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites of horses in Victoria, Australia.. Int J Parasitol 1995;25:711-24.
  26. Boxell AC, Gibson KT, Hobbs RP, Thompson RC. Occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites in horses in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia.. Aust Vet J 2004;82:91-5.
  27. Flanagan KL, Morton JM, Sandeman RM. Prevalence of infestation with gastrointestinal nematodes in Pony Club horses in Victoria.. Aust Vet J 2013;91:241-5.
  28. Mfitilodze MW, Hutchinson GW. Prevalence and intensity of non-strongyle intestinal parasites of horses in northern Queensland.. Aust Vet J 1989;66:23-6.
  29. Rogers CW, Gee EK, Firth EC. A cross-sectional survey of Thoroughbred stud farm management in the North Island of New Zealand.. N Z Vet J 2007;55:302-7.
  30. Matthews JB. An update on cyathostomins: anthelmintic resistance and worm control.. Equine Vet Educ 2008;20:552-60.
  31. Lester HE, Bartley DJ, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Stratford CH, Matthews JB. A cost comparison of faecal egg count-directed anthelmintic delivery versus interval programme treatments in horses.. Vet Rec 2013;173:15.
  32. Sangster N. A practical approach to anthelmintic resistance.. Equine Vet J 2003;35:218-9.
  33. Reinemeyer CR, Nielsen MK. Control of helminth parasites in juvenile horses.. Equine Vet Educ 2017;29:225-32.
  34. Leathwick DM, Sauermann CW, Geurden T, Nielsen MK. Managing anthelmintic resistance in Parascaris spp.: a modelling exercise.. Vet Parasitol 2017;240:75-81.
  35. Wilkes EJA, McConaghy FF, Thompson RL, Dawson K, Sangster NC, Hughes KJ. Efficacy of a morantel-abamectin combination for the treatment of resistant ascarids in foals.. Aust Vet J 2017;95:85-8.
  36. O'Meara B, Mulcahy G. A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland.. Vet Parasitol 2002;109:101-10.
  37. Allison K, Taylor NM, Wilsmore AJ, Garforth C. Equine anthelmintics: survey of the patterns of use, beliefs and attitudes among horse owners in the UK.. Vet Rec 2011;168:483.
  38. Uhlinger C, Kristula M. Effects of alternation of drug classes on the development of oxibendazole resistance in a herd of horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992;201:51-5.
  39. Lendal S, Larsen MM, Bjorn H, Craven J, Chriel M, Olsen SN. A questionnaire survey on nematode control practices on horse farms in Denmark and the existence of risk factors for the development of anthelmintic resistance.. Vet Parasitol 1998;78:49-63.
  40. Stratford CH, Lester HE, Morgan ER, Pickles KJ, Relf V, McGorum BC. A questionnaire study of equine gastrointestinal parasite control in Scotland.. Equine Vet J 2014;46:25-31.
  41. Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin KH, Clausen PH. A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management.. Parasitol Res 2011;109:1625-35.
  42. van Doorn DCK, Ploeger HW, Eysker M, Geurden T, Wagenaar JA, Kooyman FNJ. Cylicocyclus species predominate during shortened egg reappearance period in horses after treatment with ivermectin and moxidectin.. Vet Parasitol 2014;206:246-52.
  43. Molento MB, Nielsen MK, Kaplan RM. Resistance to avermectin/milbemycin anthelmintics in equine cyathostomins - current situation.. Vet Parasitol 2012;185:16-24.
  44. Nielsen MK, Branan MA, Wiedenheft AM, Digianantonio R, Garber LP, Kopral CA. Parasite control strategies used by equine owners in the United States: a national survey.. Vet Parasitol 2018;250:45-51.
  45. Nielsen MK, Reist M, Kaplan RM, Pfister K, van Doorn DC, Becher A. Equine parasite control under prescription-only conditions in Denmark-awareness, knowledge, perception, and strategies applied.. Vet Parasitol 2014;204:64-72.
  46. Lind EO, Rautalinko E, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Morrison DA, Hoglund J. Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms.. Acta Vet Scand 2007;49:25.
  47. Earle CG, Kington HA, Coles GC. Helminth control used by trainers of thoroughbreds in England.. Vet Rec 2002;150:405-8.
  48. Proudman CJ, French NP, Trees AJ. Tapeworm infection is a significant risk factor for spasmodic colic and ileal impaction colic in the horse.. Equine Vet J 1998;30:194-9.
  49. Herd RP, Coles GC. Slowing the spread of anthelmintic resistant nematodes of horses in the United Kingdom.. Vet Rec 1995;136:481-5.
  50. Herd RP. Epidemiology and control of equine strongylosis at Newmarket.. Equine Vet J 1986;18:447-52.

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Abbas G, Nielsen MK, E-Hage C, Ghafar A, Beveridge I, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Wilkes EJA, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. Recent advances in intestinal helminth parasites of horses in the Asia-Pacific region: Current trends, challenges and future directions. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2025 Dec;29:100622.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100622pubmed: 41135277google scholar: lookup
  2. Abbas G, Stevenson MA, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Jacobson C, El-Hage C, Wilkes EJA, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Hurley J, Beveridge I, Nielsen MK, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. Assessment of worm control practices recommended by equine veterinarians in Australia. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1305360.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1305360pubmed: 38026649google scholar: lookup
  3. Elghandour MMMY, Maggiolino A, Vázquez-Mendoza P, Alvarado-Ramírez ER, Cedillo-Monroy J, De Palo P, Salem AZM. Moringa oleifera as a Natural Alternative for the Control of Gastrointestinal Parasites in Equines: A Review. Plants (Basel) 2023 May 8;12(9).
    doi: 10.3390/plants12091921pubmed: 37176979google scholar: lookup
  4. Hou B, Yong R, Wuen J, Zhang Y, Buyin B, Subu D, Zha H, Li H, Hasi S. Positivity Rate Investigation and Anthelmintic Resistance Analysis of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Sheep and Cattle in Ordos, China. Animals (Basel) 2022 Mar 31;12(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12070891pubmed: 35405881google scholar: lookup
  5. Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, Hoglund J, Petkevičius S. A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania. Helminthologia 2021 Sep;58(3):225-232.
    doi: 10.2478/helm-2021-0031pubmed: 34934386google scholar: lookup