Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2022; 83(6); ajvr.21.10.0165; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.21.10.0165

A randomized clinical trial to compare ketamine-butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine and detomidine-etorphine-acepromazine for anesthesia of captive Przewalski horses (Equus przewalskii).

Abstract: To compare ketamine-butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine (KBAM) to detomidine-etorphine-acepromazine (DEA) for field anesthesia in captive Przewalski horses (Equus przewalskii). Methods: 10 adult Przewalski horses. Methods: A prospective randomized crossover trial was conducted. Each horse was immobilized once with KBAM (200 mg ketamine, 109.2 mg butorphanol, 36.4 mg azaperone, and 43.6 mg medetomidine) and once with DEA (40 mg detomidine premedication, followed 20 minutes later by 3.9 to 4.4 mg etorphine and 16 to 18 mg acepromazine). Both protocols were administered by IM remote dart injection with a washout period of 6 months between treatments. Selected cardiorespiratory variables and quality of anesthesia were recorded. Antagonists were administered IM (KBAM, 215 mg atipamezole and 50 mg naltrexone; DEA, 4 mg RX821002 and 100 mg naltrexone). Results: All horses were anesthetized and recovered uneventfully. Inductions (DEA, 6.8 min; KBAM, 11.6 min; P = 0.04) and recoveries (DEA, 3.2 min; KBAM, 19.6 min; P < 0.01) were faster with DEA compared with KBAM. Quality scores for induction and recovery did not differ between protocols, but maintenance quality was poorer for DEA (P < 0.01). Clinical concerns during DEA immobilizations included apnea, severe hypoxemia (arterial partial pressure of oxygen < 60 mm Hg), muscle rigidity, and tremors. Horses treated with KBAM were moderately hypoxemic, but arterial partial pressures of oxygen were higher compared with DEA (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Captive Przewalski horses are effectively immobilized with KBAM, and this protocol results in superior muscle relaxation and less marked hypoxemia during the maintenance phase, but slower inductions and recoveries, compared with DEA.
Publication Date: 2022-05-08 PubMed ID: 35524961DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.21.10.0165Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Veterinary

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research evaluates the effectiveness of two anesthesia protocols, KBAM and DEA, on captive Przewalski horses. The results suggest that although DEA allows for faster induction and recovery, KBAM provides superior muscle relaxation and has less of an impact on oxygen levels during the maintenance phase.

Research Objective

The primary aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two anesthesia protocols, ketamine-butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine (KBAM) and detomidine-etorphine-acepromazine (DEA), in Przewalski horses, a rare and endangered wild horse species. The key outcomes observed during the course of the research were the cardiorespiratory variables, quality of anesthesia, and recovery patterns.

Methodology

  • A prospective randomized crossover trial was performed on ten adult Przewalski horses.
  • Each horse was immobilized once with KBAM and once with DEA via remote dart injection. The anesthesia sessions were six months apart to avoid any overlap effect.
  • The KBAM regimen included 200 mg of ketamine, 109.2 mg of butorphanol, 36.4 mg of azaperone, and 43.6 mg of medetomidine.
  • The DEA regimen began with a 40 mg detomidine premedication, followed by 3.9 to 4.4 mg etorphine and 16 to 18 mg acepromazine 20 minutes later.
  • Antagonists were administered for each protocol to reverse the effects of the anesthesia – for KBAM, 215 mg atipamezole and 50 mg naltrexone were used, whereas for DEA, 4 mg RX821002 and 100 mg naltrexone were utilized.

Results

  • All horses were successfully anesthetized and recovered without any problems.
  • Induction and recovery times were faster with the DEA protocol, but the quality of anesthesia during the maintenance phase was poorer compared to the KBAM protocol.
  • Severe hypoxemia (low blood oxygen level), apnea (suspension of breathing), muscle rigidity, and tremors were observed in the horses anesthesia with DEA.
  • In contrast, horses administered KBAM showed moderate hypoxemia, but the arterial oxygen pressures were higher compared to those treated with DEA protocol.

Conclusion

The study concluded that while DEA works faster in both the onset and recovery from anesthesia, KBAM offers superior muscle relaxation and less disturbance to oxygen levels, making it a potentially more suitable protocol for captive Przewalski horses. However, KBAM’s slower induction and recovery periods should be taken into consideration.

Cite This Article

APA
Milnes EL, Skelding AM, Larouche CB, Ferro A, Delnatte P, Dutton C, Anderson NE. (2022). A randomized clinical trial to compare ketamine-butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine and detomidine-etorphine-acepromazine for anesthesia of captive Przewalski horses (Equus przewalskii). Am J Vet Res, 83(6), ajvr.21.10.0165. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.21.10.0165

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 83
Issue: 6
PII: ajvr.21.10.0165

Researcher Affiliations

Milnes, Ellie L
  • Toronto Zoo, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Skelding, Alicia M
  • Toronto Animal Health Partners Emergency and Specialty Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Larouche, Cédric B
  • Toronto Zoo, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ferro, Angelica
  • The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Delnatte, Pauline
  • Toronto Zoo, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dutton, Christopher
  • Toronto Zoo, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anderson, Neil E
  • The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Acepromazine / pharmacology
  • Anesthesia / veterinary
  • Animals
  • Azaperone / pharmacology
  • Butorphanol / pharmacology
  • Etorphine / pharmacology
  • Heart Rate
  • Horses
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / pharmacology
  • Hypoxia / drug therapy
  • Hypoxia / veterinary
  • Imidazoles
  • Immobilization / methods
  • Immobilization / veterinary
  • Ketamine / pharmacology
  • Medetomidine / pharmacology
  • Naltrexone / pharmacology
  • Oxygen / pharmacology
  • Prospective Studies

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.