Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(4); 604; doi: 10.3390/ani14040604

A Relaxed Horse-A Relaxed Client? An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Therapy Horses’ Stress on Clients’ Stress, Mood, and Anxiety.

Abstract: Equine-assisted therapies are becoming increasingly popular for addressing physical and psychological disabilities in clients. The role of the horse's welfare in equine-assisted service receives increasing attention in research. Several studies have shown that horses are able to perceive human emotions and respond to human stress responses. However, no research has yet looked at the other side of the coin-whether and how humans perceive and react to equine stress levels during equine-assisted services. To fill this gap in the research, we employed a within-subjects design, in which horse-naïve participants had a standardized interaction with both an experimentally stressed horse and an experimentally relaxed horse. We assessed physiological indicators of stress (heart rate, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol) in participants and horses, as well as psychological indicators of stress (state anxiety and positive and negative affect) in participants. Although our stress and relaxation manipulations were successful (indicated by horses' physiological indicators of stress), we did not find any difference in the participants' physiological or psychological indicators of stress between the interaction with a stressed and the interaction with a relaxed horse. Together with results from previous studies, this suggests that humans cannot intuitively recognize the (physiological) stress level of horses, which has important implications for effective communication and bonding between humans and horses and for the safety of equine activities.
Publication Date: 2024-02-13 PubMed ID: 38396572PubMed Central: PMC10886220DOI: 10.3390/ani14040604Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated whether people can perceive and react to the stress levels of horses during equine-assisted therapy sessions.
  • Researchers measured both physiological and psychological stress indicators in people interacting with either stressed or relaxed horses.
  • Results showed no difference in human stress responses despite clear stress differences in the horses, suggesting humans may not intuitively detect equine stress.

Introduction and Background

  • Equine-assisted therapies are increasingly used to help individuals with physical and psychological challenges.
  • The welfare and emotional state of therapy horses are gaining research interest, recognizing that horses can sense human emotions.
  • Previous studies have demonstrated horses respond to human stress, but little attention has been given to whether humans perceive or respond to horse stress.
  • This study aims to fill this gap by experimentally testing if humans detect and react to equine stress during standardized interactions.

Methodology

  • A within-subjects design was used, involving horse-naïve participants to avoid prior horse experience bias.
  • Each participant interacted with two horses: one experimentally stressed and one experimentally relaxed.
  • Stress manipulations in horses were validated through physiological measures including heart rate, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol.
  • Participants’ stress was assessed through physiological indicators (heart rate, heart rate variability, salivary cortisol) and psychological indicators (state anxiety and positive/negative affect questionnaires).

Key Findings

  • Stress and relaxation states in horses were successfully induced and confirmed by their physiological data.
  • No significant differences were found in participants’ physiological stress markers when interacting with stressed versus relaxed horses.
  • Participants’ psychological measures such as anxiety and mood also did not differ based on whether the horse was stressed or relaxed.
  • This suggests participants were unable to detect or respond to the horses’ stress levels during the interaction.

Implications

  • The inability of humans to intuitively recognize physiological stress in horses could affect therapeutic outcomes and human-horse communication.
  • It may limit bonding between clients and therapy horses if human clients cannot perceive the horse’s emotional state.
  • This has safety implications for equine-assisted activities as stress in horses can alter behavior and potentially increase risk.
  • Highlights the importance of educating clients and professionals about interpreting equine stress signals better for improved welfare.
  • Future research could explore training or tools that help humans better recognize equine stress cues during therapy sessions.

Conclusion

  • While horses clearly exhibit detectable physiological stress responses, humans seem unable to perceive these stress signals during therapy interactions.
  • This research points to a critical area for improvement in equine-assisted therapy practices, emphasizing the need for heightened awareness of horse wellbeing by clients and practitioners.

Cite This Article

APA
Müller-Klein A, Braun MN, Ferreira de Sá DS, Michael T, Link-Dorner U, Lass-Hennemann J. (2024). A Relaxed Horse-A Relaxed Client? An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Therapy Horses’ Stress on Clients’ Stress, Mood, and Anxiety. Animals (Basel), 14(4), 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040604

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 4
PII: 604

Researcher Affiliations

Müller-Klein, Alicia
  • Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
  • Institut für Tiergestützte Ausbildung und Therapie (ITAT), Eschringerstraße 70, 66131 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Braun, Moritz Nicolai
  • Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Ferreira de Sá, Diana S
  • Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Michael, Tanja
  • Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Link-Dorner, Ulrike
  • Institut für Tiergestützte Ausbildung und Therapie (ITAT), Eschringerstraße 70, 66131 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Lass-Hennemann, Johanna
  • Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 82 references
  1. Wood W, Alm K, Benjamin J, Thomas L, Anderson D, Pohl L, Kane M. Optimal terminology for services in the United States that incorporate horses to benefit people: A consensus document.. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2021;27:88–95.
    doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0415pubmed: 33252244google scholar: lookup
  2. Stern C, Chur-Hansen A. An umbrella review of the evidence for equine-assisted interventions.. Aust. J. Psychol. 2019;71:361–374.
    doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12246google scholar: lookup
  3. McKinney C, Mueller M.K, Frank N. Effects of therapeutic riding on measures of stress in horses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015;35:922–928.
  4. Malinowski K, Yee C, Tevlin J.M, Birks E.K, Durando M.M, Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, Cavaiola A.A, McKeever K.H. The effects of equine assisted therapy on plasma cortisol and oxytocin concentrations and heart rate variability in horses and measures of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in veterans.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018;64:17–26.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.01.011pubmed: 30973147google scholar: lookup
  5. Contalbrigo L, Borgi M, De Santis M, Collacchi B, Tuozzi A, Toson M, Redaelli V, Odore R, Vercelli C, Stefani A. Equine-assisted services (EASs) for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): Behavioural and physiological indices of stress in domestic horses (Equus caballus) during riding sessions.. Animals 2021;11:1562.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061562pmc: PMC8227027pubmed: 34071859google scholar: lookup
  6. Ferlazzo A, Fazio E, Cravana C, Medica P. Equine-assisted services: An overview of current scientific contributions on efficacy and outcomes on humans and horses.. J. Vet. Behav. 2023;59:15–24.
  7. Hovey M.R, Davis A, Chen S, Godwin P, Porr C.S. Evaluating stress in riding horses: Part one—Behavior assessment and serum cortisol.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;96:103297.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103297pubmed: 33349400google scholar: lookup
  8. Potier J.F, Louzier V. Evaluation of stress markers in horses during hippotherapy sessions in comparison to being ridden by beginners.. Anim. Welf. 2023;32:e10.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.6pmc: PMC10936384pubmed: 38487430google scholar: lookup
  9. Arrazola A, Merkies K. Effect of human attachment style on horse behaviour and physiology during equine-assisted activities—A pilot study.. Animals 2020;10:1156.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10071156pmc: PMC7401529pubmed: 32650381google scholar: lookup
  10. Mendonça T, Bienboire-Frosini C, Menuge F, Leclercq J, Lafont-Lecuelle C, Arroub S, Pageat P. The impact of equine-assisted therapy on equine behavioral and physiological responses.. Animals 2019;9:409.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070409pmc: PMC6681086pubmed: 31266217google scholar: lookup
  11. Kaiser L, Heleski C, Siegford J, Smith K. Stress-related behaviors among horses used in a therapeutic riding program.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2006;288:39–45.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.228.1.39pubmed: 16426164google scholar: lookup
  12. Condon V.M, McGreevy P.D, McLean A.N, Williams J.M, Randle H. Associations between commonly used apparatus and conflict behaviors reported in the ridden horse in Australia.. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;49:1–14.
  13. Cook W.R. Bit-induced pain: A cause of fear, flight fight and facial neuralgia in the horse.. Pferdeheilkunde 2003;19:75–82.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20030111google scholar: lookup
  14. Cook W.R, Kibler M. Behavioural assesment of pain in 66 horses, with and without a bit.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2019;31:551–560.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12916google scholar: lookup
  15. Stehouwer A. Performance and Stress Levels of Horses in a L1 Dressage Competition Compared for a Cross-under Bitless Bridle and a Bridle Containing a Snaffle Bit.. Bachelor Thesis. University of Applied Sciences; Wageningen, The Netherlands: 2014.
  16. Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Crump L, Whittaker M, Tanner M, Stephen C. One Health: The Theory and Practice of Integrated Health Approaches.. 2nd ed. CABI Digital Library; Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: 2021.
  17. Chalmers D, Dell C.A. Applying one health to the study of animal-assisted interventions.. Ecohealth 2015;12:560–562.
    doi: 10.1007/s10393-015-1042-3pmc: PMC4703413pubmed: 26063040google scholar: lookup
  18. Hediger K, Meisser A, Zinsstag J. A one health research framework for animal-assisted interventions.. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019;16:640.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040640pmc: PMC6406415pubmed: 30795602google scholar: lookup
  19. Menna L.F, Santaniello A, Todisco M, Amato A, Borrelli L, Scandurra C, Fioretti A. The human–animal relationship as the focus of animal-assisted interventions: A one health approach.. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019;16:3660.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193660pmc: PMC6801464pubmed: 31569460google scholar: lookup
  20. Goldenberg A, Gross J.J. Digital emotion contagion.. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2020;24:316–328.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009pubmed: 32160568google scholar: lookup
  21. Herrando C, Constantinides E. Emotional contagion: A brief overview and future directions.. Front. Psychol. 2021;12:712606.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712606pmc: PMC8322226pubmed: 34335425google scholar: lookup
  22. Schachter S, Singer J. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.. Psychol. Rev. 1962;69:379–399.
    doi: 10.1037/h0046234pubmed: 14497895google scholar: lookup
  23. Hatfield E, Cacioppo J.T, Rapson R.L. Emotional Contagion.. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1994.
    doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174138google scholar: lookup
  24. Hatfield E, Cacioppo J.T, Rapson R.L. Primitive emotional contagion.. In: Clark M.S., editor. Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Emotions and Social Behavior. Sage; Newbury Park, CA, USA: 1992. pp. 151–177.
  25. Baba C, Kawai M, Takimoto-Inose A. Are horses (Equus caballus) sensitive to human emotional cues?. Animals 2019;9:630.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090630pmc: PMC6770165pubmed: 31470656google scholar: lookup
  26. Trösch M, Cuzol F, Parias C, Calandreau L, Nowak R, Lansade L. Horses categorize human emotions cross-modally based on facial expression and non-verbal vocalizations.. Animals 2019;9:862.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9110862pmc: PMC6912773pubmed: 31653088google scholar: lookup
  27. Trösch M, Pellon S, Cuzol F, Parias C, Nowak R, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Horses feel emotions when they watch positive and negative horse–human interactions in a video and transpose what they saw to real life.. Anim. Cogn. 2020;23:643–653.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01369-0pubmed: 32162112google scholar: lookup
  28. Keeling L.J, Jonare L, Lanneborn L. Investigating horse–human interactions: The effect of a nervous human.. Vet. J. 2009;181:70–71.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.013pubmed: 19394879google scholar: lookup
  29. Greenall J.S, Cornu L, Maigrot A.L, De La Torre M.P, Briefer E.F. Age, empathy, familiarity, domestication and call features enhance human perception of animal emotion expressions.. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2022;9:221138.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.221138pmc: PMC9727503pubmed: 36483756google scholar: lookup
  30. Merkies K, Crouchman E, Belliveau H. Human ability to determine affective states in domestic horse whinnies.. Anthrozoös 2022;35:483–494.
  31. Bell C, Rogers S, Taylor J, Busby D. Improving the recognition of equine affective states.. Animals 2019;9:1124.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121124pmc: PMC6941154pubmed: 31835886google scholar: lookup
  32. Gronqvist G, Rogers C, Gee E, Martinez A, Bolwell C. Veterinary and equine science students’ interpretation of horse behaviour.. Animals 2017;7:63.
    doi: 10.3390/ani7080063pmc: PMC5575575pubmed: 28809810google scholar: lookup
  33. Guinnefollau L, Gee E.K, Bolwell C.F, Norman E.J, Rogers C.W. Benefits of animal exposure on veterinary students’ understanding of equine behaviour and self-assessed equine handling skills.. Animals 2019;9:620.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090620pmc: PMC6769774pubmed: 31466298google scholar: lookup
  34. Braun M.N, Müller-Klein A, Sopp M.R, Michael T, Link-Dorner U, Lass-Hennemann J. The human ability to interpret horses’ expressive behavior: The role of emotion recognition ability and previous experience with horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2024;271:106171.
  35. Kim H.G, Cheon E.J, Bai D.S, Lee Y.H, Koo B.H. Stress and heart rate variability: A meta-analysis and review of the literature.. Psychiatry Investig. 2018;15:235–245.
    doi: 10.30773/pi.2017.08.17pmc: PMC5900369pubmed: 29486547google scholar: lookup
  36. Rietmann T.R, Stuart A.E.A, Bernasconi P, Stauffacher M, Auer J.A, Weishaupt M.A. Assessment of mental stress in warmblood horses: Heart rate variability in comparison to heart rate and selected behavioural parameters.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;88:121–136.
  37. Schmidt A, Hödl S, Möstl E, Aurich J, Müller J, Aurich C. Cortisol release, heart rate, and heart rate variability in transport-naive horses during repeated road transport.. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2010;39:205–213.
  38. von Lewinski M, Biau S, Erber R, Ille N, Aurich J, Faure J.M, Möstl E, Aurich C. Cortisol release, heart rate and heart rate variability in the horse and its rider: Different responses to training and performance.. Vet. J. 2013;197:229–232.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.025pubmed: 23380228google scholar: lookup
  39. Peeters M, Closson C, Beckers J.F, Vandenheede M. Rider and horse salivary cortisol levels during competition and impact on performance.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:155–160.
  40. Sikorska U, Maśko M, Ciesielska A, Zdrojkowski Ł, Domino M. Role of Cortisol in Horse’s Welfare and Health.. Agriculture 2023;13:2219.
  41. Russell G, Lightman S. The human stress response.. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019;15:525–534.
    doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0228-0pubmed: 31249398google scholar: lookup
  42. Lass-Hennemann J, Peyk P, Streb M, Holz E, Michael T. Presence of a dog reduces subjective but not physiological stress responses to an analog trauma.. Front. Psychol. 2014;5:1010.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01010pmc: PMC4158977pubmed: 25250009google scholar: lookup
  43. Lass-Hennemann J, Schäfer S.K, Römer S, Holz E, Streb M, Michael T. Therapy dogs as a crisis intervention after traumatic events? An experimental study.. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:1627.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01627pmc: PMC6132135pubmed: 30233464google scholar: lookup
  44. Matijczak A, Yates M.S, Ruiz M.C, Santos L.R, Kazdin A.E, Raila H. The influence of interactions with pet dogs on psychological distress.. Emotion 2023;24:384–396.
    doi: 10.1037/emo0001256pubmed: 37561519google scholar: lookup
  45. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A.-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.. Behav. Res. Methods. 2007;39:175–191.
    doi: 10.3758/BF03193146pubmed: 17695343google scholar: lookup
  46. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses.. Behav. Res. Methods. 2009;41:1149–1160.
    doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149pubmed: 19897823google scholar: lookup
  47. Krohne H.W, Egloff B, Kohlmann C.W, Tausch A. Untersuchung mit einer deutschen Form der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica 1996;42:139–156.
    doi: 10.1037/t49650-000google scholar: lookup
  48. Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P, Spielberger C.D. Das State-Trait-Angstinventar. Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisungen.. Beltz Test GmbH; Weinheim, Germany: 1981.
  49. Spielberger C.D, Gorsuch R.L, Lushene R.E, Vagg P.R, Jacobs G.A. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for Adults-Manual.. Mind Garden Inc.; Menlo Park, CA, USA: 1970.
  50. Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C. Beck Depressions-Inventar (BDI-II). Harcourt Test Services; Frankfurt am Main, Germany: 2006.
  51. Franke G.H.. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) von LR Derogatis:(Kurzform der SCL-90-R). Beltz Test; Weinheim, Germany: 2000.
  52. Römpke A.K.. Adaptation of the Pet Attitude Scale to German. Soc. Anim. 2019;27:11–24.
    doi: 10.1163/15685306-12341595google scholar: lookup
  53. Templer D., Arikawa H., Canfield M., Munsell K., Tangan K.. Modification of the pet attitude scale. Soc. Anim. 2004;12:137–142.
    doi: 10.1163/1568530041446580google scholar: lookup
  54. Templer D.I., Salter C.A., Dickey S., Baldwin R., Veleber D.M.. The construction of a pet attitude scale. Psychol. Rec. 1981;31:343–348.
    doi: 10.1007/BF03394747google scholar: lookup
  55. Templer D.I., Arikawa H.. The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond: A Resource for Clinicians and Researchers. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2011. The pet attitude scale; pp. 335–359.
  56. Johnson T.P., Garrity T.F., Stallones L.. Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington attachment to pets scale (LAPS). Anthrozoös 1992;5:160–175.
  57. Paulus C.. Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF(IRI) zur Messung von Empathie: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Interpersonal Reactivity Index. 2009.
  58. Davis M.H.. Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). APA PsycTests Washington, DC, USA: 1980.
    doi: 10.1037/t01093-000google scholar: lookup
  59. Ille N., Erber R., Aurich C., Aurich J.. Comparison of heart rate and heart rate variability obtained by heart rate monitors and simultaneously recorded electrocardiogram signals in nonexercising horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2014;9:341–346.
  60. Squibb K., Griffin K., Favier R., Ijichi C.. Poker Face: Discrepancies in behaviour and affective states in horses during stressful handling procedures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;202:34–38.
  61. Blechert J., Peyk P., Liedlgruber M., Wilhelm F.H.. ANSLAB: Integrated multichannel peripheral biosignal processing in psychophysiological science. Behav. Res. Methods 2016;48:1528–1545.
    doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0665-1pubmed: 26511369google scholar: lookup
  62. Bourdillon N., Schmitt L., Yazdani S., Vesin J.M., Millet G.P.. Minimal window duration for accurate HRV recording in athletes. Front. Neurosci. 2017;11:456.
    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00456pmc: PMC5554345pubmed: 28848382google scholar: lookup
  63. Munoz M.L., van Roon A., Riese H., Thio C., Oostenbroek E., Westrik I., de Geus E.J., Gansevoort R., Lefrandt J., Nolte I.M.. Validity of (ultra-)short recordings for heart rate variability measurements. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0138921.
  64. Dressendörfer R.A., Kirschbaum C., Rohde W., Stahl F., Strasburger C.J.. Synthesis of a cortisol-biotin conjugate and evaluation as a tracer in an immunoassay for salivary cortisol measurement. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1992;43:683–692.
    doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(92)90294-Spubmed: 1472460google scholar: lookup
  65. Lovallo W.R., Al'Absi M., Blick K., Whitsett T.L., Wilson M.F.. Stress-like adrenocorticotropin responses to caffeine in young healthy men. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1996;55:365–369.
    doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(96)00105-0pubmed: 8951977google scholar: lookup
  66. Rudolph D.L., McAuley E.. Cortisol and affective responses to exercise. J. Sports Sci. 1998;16:121–128.
    doi: 10.1080/026404198366830pubmed: 9531001google scholar: lookup
  67. Schrieks I.C., Joosten M.M., Klöpping-Ketelaars W.A.A., Witkamp R.F., Hendriks H.F.. Moderate alcohol consumption after a mental stressor attenuates the endocrine stress response. Alcohol 2016;57:29–34.
    doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2016.10.006pubmed: 27916140google scholar: lookup
  68. Smiet E., Van Dierendonck M.C., Sleutjens J., Menheere P.P.C.A., Van Breda E., De Boer D., Back W., Wijnberg I.D., Van der Kolk J.H.. Effect of different head and neck positions on behaviour, heart rate variability and cortisol levels in lunged Royal Dutch Sport horses. Vet. J. 2014;202:26–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.07.005pubmed: 25127376google scholar: lookup
  69. Krueger K., Esch L., Farmer K., Marr I.. Basic needs in horses?—A literature review. Animals 2021;11:1798.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061798pmc: PMC8235049pubmed: 34208615google scholar: lookup
  70. Tierärztliche Vereinigung für Tierschutz: Tiere im Sozialen Einsatz. [(accessed on 22 December 2023)]. Available online: https://www.tierschutz-tvt.de/alle-merkblaetter-und-stellungnahmen/#c304.
  71. Hama H., Yogo M., Matsuyama Y.. Effects of stroking horses on both humans’ and horses’ heart rate responses. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 1996;38:66–73.
  72. Thorbergson Z.W., Nielsen S.G., Beaulieu R.J., Doyle R.E.. Physiological and behavioral responses of horses to wither scratching and patting the neck when under saddle. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2016;19:245–259.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1130630pubmed: 26958705google scholar: lookup
  73. Aurich J., Wulf M., Ille N., Erber R., von Lewinski M., Palme R., Aurich C.. Effects of season, age, sex, and housing on salivary cortisol concentrations in horses. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2015;52:11–16.
  74. Bohák Z.S., Szabó F., Beckers J.F., de Sousa N.M., Kutasi O., Nagy K., Szenci O.. Monitoring the circadian rhythm of serum and salivary cortisol concentrations in the horse. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2013;45:38–42.
  75. O’Brien R.G., Kaiser M.K.. MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychol. Bull. 1985;97:316–333.
    doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.316pubmed: 3983301google scholar: lookup
  76. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2021.
  77. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC; Boston, MA, USA: 2021.
  78. Katayama M., Kubo T., Yamakawa T., Fujiwara K., Nomoto K., Ikeda K., Mogi K., Nagasawa M., Kikusui T.. Emotional contagion from humans to dogs is facilitated by duration of ownership. Front. Psychol. 2019;10:1678.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01678pmc: PMC6658615pubmed: 31379690google scholar: lookup
  79. Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship (PATH) International. [(accessed on 22 January 2024)]. Available online: https://pathintl.org/publications/2022-fact-sheet/
  80. Beetz A., Uvnäs-Moberg K., Julius H., Kotrschal K.. Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: The possible role of oxytocin. Front. Psychol. 2012;3:234.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234pmc: PMC3408111pubmed: 22866043google scholar: lookup
  81. Ein N., Li L., Vickers K.. The effect of pet therapy on the physiological and subjective stress response: A meta-analysis. Stress Health 2018;34:477–489.
    doi: 10.1002/smi.2812pubmed: 29882342google scholar: lookup
  82. Anderson M.K., Friend T.H., Evans J.W., Bushong D.M.. Behavioral assessment of horses in therapeutic riding programs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;63:11–24.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Wells A, Hiney KM, Brady CM, Anderson KP. Enhancing equine welfare: a qualitative study on the impact of RAiSE (Recognizing Affective States in Equine) as an educational tool.. Transl Anim Sci 2025;9:txaf033.
    doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf033pubmed: 40242489google scholar: lookup