FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Sci / A Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence and Their ...
Veterinary sciences2022; 9(11); 620; doi: 10.3390/vetsci9110620

A Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence and Their Application in Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging.

Abstract: Great advances have been made in human health care in the application of radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) in a variety of areas, ranging from hospital management and virtual assistants to remote patient monitoring and medical diagnostics and imaging. To improve accuracy and reproducibility, there has been a recent move to integrate radiomics and AI as tools to assist clinical decision making and to incorporate it into routine clinical workflows and diagnosis. Although lagging behind human medicine, the use of radiomics and AI in veterinary diagnostic imaging is becoming more frequent with an increasing number of reported applications. The goal of this paper is to provide an overview of current radiomic and AI applications in veterinary diagnostic imaging.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-11-08 PubMed ID: 36356097PubMed Central: PMC9693121DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9110620Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the advancements in radiomics and artificial intelligence and their growing application in veterinary diagnostic imaging. It compares the slower adoption rate within veterinary care to that in human healthcare and discusses the potential benefits of these technologies in the former.

Understanding Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence

Radiomics is the extraction of a large number of quantitative features from medical images such as CTs, MRIs, and Ultrasounds. These features, which can potentially reveal disease characteristics that are undetectable by the naked eye, can be used for prognosis or predicting treatment response.

AI, on the other hand, includes machine learning techniques that can integrate these high-dimensional data with clinical and genetic data for decision support. In the setting of medical imaging, AI can be used to automate repetitive tasks, assist in image interpretation and quantification, and integrate imaging with other data types for predictive modeling.

  • Radiomics provides quantitative features from medical images which can reveal undetectable characteristics of diseases
  • AI manages high-dimensional medical imaging data for decision support, image interpretation, and predictive modeling

Application of Radiomics and AI in Human Healthcare

In human health care, radiomics and AI have found use in hospital management, as virtual healthcare assistants, for remote patient monitoring, and notably, medical diagnostics and imaging. The integration of these technologies into routine clinical workflows and diagnostics has aimed to enhance accuracy and reproducibility.

  • Radiomics and AI are used for hospital management and virtual assistants
  • They aid in remote patient monitoring
  • These technologies are crucial tools in medical diagnostics and imaging

Application of Radiomics and AI in Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging

Despite being somewhat behind rate of adoption as compared to human medicine, the field of veterinary medicine is increasingly recognizing the benefits of and incorporating radiomics and AI in diagnostic imaging. The paper provides an overview of the recent application instances of these technologies in veterinary diagnostic imaging.

  • There’s increasing action towards adopting radiomics and AI in the veterinary field
  • The paper gives an overview of current applications of these technologies in veterinary diagnostic imaging

Cite This Article

APA
Bouhali O, Bensmail H, Sheharyar A, David F, Johnson JP. (2022). A Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence and Their Application in Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging. Vet Sci, 9(11), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9110620

Publication

Veterinary sciences
ISSN: 2306-7381
NlmUniqueID: 101680127
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 11
PII: 620

Researcher Affiliations

Bouhali, Othmane
  • High Energy and Medical Physics Group, Department of Engineering, Education City, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha P.O. Box 23874, Qatar.
Bensmail, Halima
  • Qatar Computing Research Institute, Department of Sciences, Education City, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha P.O. Box 34110, Qatar.
Sheharyar, Ali
  • High Energy and Medical Physics Group, Department of Engineering, Education City, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha P.O. Box 23874, Qatar.
David, Florent
  • Equine Veterinary Medical Center, A Member of Qatar Foundation, Al Shaqab Street, Al Rayyan, Doha P.O. Box 6788, Qatar.
Johnson, Jessica P
  • Equine Veterinary Medical Center, A Member of Qatar Foundation, Al Shaqab Street, Al Rayyan, Doha P.O. Box 6788, Qatar.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 75 references
  1. Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology.. Nat Rev Cancer 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510.
    doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5pmc: PMC6268174pubmed: 29777175google scholar: lookup
  2. Ker J, Wang L, Rao J, Lim T. Deep Learning Applications in Medical Image Analysis. IEEE Access 2017;6:9375–9389.
    doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2788044google scholar: lookup
  3. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.. Radiology 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77.
    doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169pmc: PMC4734157pubmed: 26579733google scholar: lookup
  4. Mannil M, von Spiczak J, Manka R, Alkadhi H. Texture Analysis and Machine Learning for Detecting Myocardial Infarction in Noncontrast Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Unveiling the Invisible.. Invest Radiol 2018 Jun;53(6):338-343.
    doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000448pubmed: 29420321google scholar: lookup
  5. Miles K. Radiomics for personalised medicine: the long road ahead.. Br J Cancer 2020 Mar;122(7):929-930.
    doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0699-8pmc: PMC7109132pubmed: 31937924google scholar: lookup
  6. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, Cendes F. Texture analysis of medical images.. Clin Radiol 2004 Dec;59(12):1061-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.008pubmed: 15556588google scholar: lookup
  7. Tourassi GD. Journey toward computer-aided diagnosis: role of image texture analysis.. Radiology 1999 Nov;213(2):317-20.
    doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv49317pubmed: 10551208google scholar: lookup
  8. Wang XH, Long LH, Cui Y, Jia AY, Zhu XG, Wang HZ, Wang Z, Zhan CM, Wang ZH, Wang WH. MRI-based radiomics model for preoperative prediction of 5-year survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.. Br J Cancer 2020 Mar;122(7):978-985.
    doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0706-0pmc: PMC7109104pubmed: 31937925google scholar: lookup
  9. Reuzé S, Schernberg A, Orlhac F, Sun R, Chargari C, Dercle L, Deutsch E, Buvat I, Robert C. Radiomics in Nuclear Medicine Applied to Radiation Therapy: Methods, Pitfalls, and Challenges.. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1117-1142.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.022pubmed: 30064704google scholar: lookup
  10. Li Y, Yu M, Wang G, Yang L, Ma C, Wang M, Yue M, Cong M, Ren J, Shi G. Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.. Front Oncol 2021;11:644165.
    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.644165pmc: PMC8162215pubmed: 34055613google scholar: lookup
  11. Qin H, Wu YQ, Lin P, Gao RZ, Li X, Wang XR, Chen G, He Y, Yang H. Ultrasound Image-Based Radiomics: An Innovative Method to Identify Primary Tumorous Sources of Liver Metastases.. J Ultrasound Med 2021 Jun;40(6):1229-1244.
    doi: 10.1002/jum.15506pubmed: 32951217google scholar: lookup
  12. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, Bussink J, Monshouwer R, Haibe-Kains B, Rietveld D, Hoebers F, Rietbergen MM, Leemans CR, Dekker A, Quackenbush J, Gillies RJ, Lambin P. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach.. Nat Commun 2014 Jun 3;5:4006.
    doi: 10.1038/ncomms5006pmc: PMC4059926pubmed: 24892406google scholar: lookup
  13. van Timmeren JE, Cester D, Tanadini-Lang S, Alkadhi H, Baessler B. Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection.. Insights Imaging 2020 Aug 12;11(1):91.
    doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00887-2pmc: PMC7423816pubmed: 32785796google scholar: lookup
  14. Wichtman BD, Attenberger UI, Harder FN, Schonberg SO, Maintz D, Weiss K, Pinto dos Santos D, Baessler B. Influence of Image Processing on the Robustness of Radiomic Features Derived from Magnetic Resonance Imaging—A Phantom Study. Proceedings of the ISMRM 27th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Montreal, QC, Canada. 27 May 2019.
  15. Altazi BA, Zhang GG, Fernandez DC, Montejo ME, Hunt D, Werner J, Biagioli MC, Moros EG. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017 Nov;18(6):32-48.
    doi: 10.1002/acm2.12170pmc: PMC5689938pubmed: 28891217google scholar: lookup
  16. Olabarriaga SD, Smeulders AW. Interaction in the segmentation of medical images: a survey.. Med Image Anal 2001 Jun;5(2):127-42.
    doi: 10.1016/S1361-8415(00)00041-4pubmed: 11516707google scholar: lookup
  17. Egger J, Colen RR, Freisleben B, Nimsky C. Manual refinement system for graph-based segmentation results in the medical domain.. J Med Syst 2012 Oct;36(5):2829-39.
    doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9761-7pmc: PMC3691109pubmed: 21826501google scholar: lookup
  18. Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, Aerts HJWL, Andrearczyk V, Apte A, Ashrafinia S, Bakas S, Beukinga RJ, Boellaard R, Bogowicz M, Boldrini L, Buvat I, Cook GJR, Davatzikos C, Depeursinge A, Desseroit MC, Dinapoli N, Dinh CV, Echegaray S, El Naqa I, Fedorov AY, Gatta R, Gillies RJ, Goh V, Götz M, Guckenberger M, Ha SM, Hatt M, Isensee F, Lambin P, Leger S, Leijenaar RTH, Lenkowicz J, Lippert F, Losnegård A, Maier-Hein KH, Morin O, Müller H, Napel S, Nioche C, Orlhac F, Pati S, Pfaehler EAG, Rahmim A, Rao AUK, Scherer J, Siddique MM, Sijtsema NM, Socarras Fernandez J, Spezi E, Steenbakkers RJHM, Tanadini-Lang S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC, Upadhaya T, Valentini V, van Dijk LV, van Griethuysen J, van Velden FHP, Whybra P, Richter C, Löck S. The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping.. Radiology 2020 May;295(2):328-338.
    doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145pmc: PMC7193906pubmed: 32154773google scholar: lookup
  19. Bovik AC. Handbook of Image and Video Processing (Communications, Networking and Multimedia). Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2005.
  20. Bernal J, Valdés-Hernández MDC, Escudero J, Viksne L, Heye AK, Armitage PA, Makin S, Touyz RM, Wardlaw JM. Analysis of dynamic texture and spatial spectral descriptors of dynamic contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance images for studying small vessel disease.. Magn Reson Imaging 2020 Feb;66:240-247.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.11.001pmc: PMC7049910pubmed: 31730881google scholar: lookup
  21. Huang K, Aviyente S. Wavelet feature selection for image classification.. IEEE Trans Image Process 2008 Sep;17(9):1709-20.
    doi: 10.1109/TIP.2008.2001050pubmed: 18713675google scholar: lookup
  22. Bernatz S, Zhdanovich Y, Ackermann J, Koch I, Wild PJ, Dos Santos DP, Vogl TJ, Kaltenbach B, Rosbach N. Impact of rescanning and repositioning on radiomic features employing a multi-object phantom in magnetic resonance imaging.. Sci Rep 2021 Jul 9;11(1):14248.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93756-xpmc: PMC8271025pubmed: 34244594google scholar: lookup
  23. Hira ZM, Gillies DF. A Review of Feature Selection and Feature Extraction Methods Applied on Microarray Data.. Adv Bioinformatics 2015;2015:198363.
    doi: 10.1155/2015/198363pmc: PMC4480804pubmed: 26170834google scholar: lookup
  24. Tibshirani R. Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1996;58:267–288.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  25. Leng C, Lin Y, Wahba G. A note on the lasso and related procedures in model selection. Stat. Sin. 2006;16:1273–1284.
  26. Fu W, Knight K. Asymptotics for Lasso-Type Estimators. Ann. Stat. 2000;28:1356–1378.
    doi: 10.1214/aos/1015957397google scholar: lookup
  27. Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and Variable Selection via the Elastic Net. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 2005;67:301–320.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  28. Fan J, Li R. Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and Its Oracle Properties. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2001;96:1348–1360.
    doi: 10.1198/016214501753382273google scholar: lookup
  29. Götz M, Nolden M, Maier-Hein K. MITK Phenotyping: An open-source toolchain for image-based personalized medicine with radiomics.. Radiother Oncol 2019 Feb;131:108-111.
    doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.021pubmed: 30773176google scholar: lookup
  30. Szczypiński PM, Strzelecki M, Materka A, Klepaczko A. MaZda--a software package for image texture analysis.. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009 Apr;94(1):66-76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.08.005pubmed: 18922598google scholar: lookup
  31. van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, Beets-Tan RGH, Fillion-Robin JC, Pieper S, Aerts HJWL. Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.. Cancer Res 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107.
    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339pmc: PMC5672828pubmed: 29092951google scholar: lookup
  32. Zhang L, Fried DV, Fave XJ, Hunter LA, Yang J, Court LE. IBEX: an open infrastructure software platform to facilitate collaborative work in radiomics.. Med Phys 2015 Mar;42(3):1341-53.
    doi: 10.1118/1.4908210pmc: PMC5148126pubmed: 25735289google scholar: lookup
  33. Apte AP, Iyer A, Crispin-Ortuzar M, Pandya R, van Dijk LV, Spezi E, Thor M, Um H, Veeraraghavan H, Oh JH, Shukla-Dave A, Deasy JO. Technical Note: Extension of CERR for computational radiomics: A comprehensive MATLAB platform for reproducible radiomics research.. Med Phys 2018 Jun 13;.
    doi: 10.1002/mp.13046pmc: PMC6597320pubmed: 29896896google scholar: lookup
  34. Erhan D, Bengio Y, Courville A, Manzagol P-A, Vincent P, Bengio S. Why Does Unsupervised Pre-Training Help Deep Learning?. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010;11:625–660.
  35. Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM. Generalized Linear Models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Gen. 1972;135:370.
    doi: 10.2307/2344614google scholar: lookup
  36. Jolliffe IT. Principle Component Analysis. 2nd ed. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2002.
  37. McLachlan GJ. Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 1992.
  38. Walker SH, Duncan DB. Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables.. Biometrika 1967 Jun;54(1):167-79.
    doi: 10.1093/biomet/54.1-2.167pubmed: 6049533google scholar: lookup
  39. Norvig P, Russell SJ. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Prentice Hall; Hoboken, NJ, USA.
  40. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. Boosting and Additive Trees. In: Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J., editors. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2009. pp. 337–387. (Springer Series in Statistics).
  41. Quinlan JR. Simplifying Decision Trees. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 1987;27:221–234.
    doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80053-6google scholar: lookup
  42. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-Vector Networks. Mach. Learn. 1995;20:273–297.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00994018google scholar: lookup
  43. Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining San Francisco, CA, USA,. 13 August 2016; 2016. pp. 785–794.
  44. Ho TK. The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998;20:832–844.
    doi: 10.1109/34.709601google scholar: lookup
  45. Kleene SC. Representation of Events in Nerve Nets and Finite Automata. RAND Corporation; Santa Monica, CA, USA: 1951.
  46. Fix E, Hodges JL. Discriminatory Analysis. Nonparametric Discrimination: Consistency Properties. Int. Stat. Rev. Rev. Int. Stat. 1989;57:238–247.
    doi: 10.2307/1403797google scholar: lookup
  47. . Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. .
  48. Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview.. Neural Netw 2015 Jan;61:85-117.
    doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003pubmed: 25462637google scholar: lookup
  49. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning.. Nature 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44.
    doi: 10.1038/nature14539pubmed: 26017442google scholar: lookup
  50. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning. MIT Press; Cambridge, UK: 2016.
  51. Alzubaidi L, Zhang J, Humaidi AJ, Al-Dujaili A, Duan Y, Al-Shamma O, Santamaría J, Fadhel MA, Al-Amidie M, Farhan L. Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions.. J Big Data 2021;8(1):53.
    doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8pmc: PMC8010506pubmed: 33816053google scholar: lookup
  52. Jonsson A. Deep Reinforcement Learning in Medicine.. Kidney Dis (Basel) 2019 Feb;5(1):18-22.
    doi: 10.1159/000492670pmc: PMC6388442pubmed: 30815460google scholar: lookup
  53. Sollini M, Antunovic L, Chiti A, Kirienko M. Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomics.. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019 Dec;46(13):2656-2672.
    doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04372-xpmc: PMC6879445pubmed: 31214791google scholar: lookup
  54. Bartholmai BJ, Koo CW, Johnson GB, White DB, Raghunath SM, Rajagopalan S, Moynagh MR, Lindell RM, Hartman TE. Pulmonary nodule characterization, including computer analysis and quantitative features.. J Thorac Imaging 2015 Mar;30(2):139-56.
    doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000137pubmed: 25658478google scholar: lookup
  55. Fukushima K. Neocognitron: a self organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position.. Biol Cybern 1980;36(4):193-202.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00344251pubmed: 7370364google scholar: lookup
  56. Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition. Volume 86. Scientific Research Publishing; Wuhan, China: 1998. pp. 2278–2324.
  57. Aerts HJ, Grossmann P, Tan Y, Oxnard GR, Rizvi N, Schwartz LH, Zhao B. Defining a Radiomic Response Phenotype: A Pilot Study using targeted therapy in NSCLC.. Sci Rep 2016 Sep 20;6:33860.
    doi: 10.1038/srep33860pmc: PMC5028716pubmed: 27645803google scholar: lookup
  58. Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Akkus Z, Kline TL. Machine Learning for Medical Imaging.. Radiographics 2017 Mar-Apr;37(2):505-515.
    doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160130pmc: PMC5375621pubmed: 28212054google scholar: lookup
  59. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In: Navab N., Hornegger J., Wells WM., Frangi AF., editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015. Volume 9351. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2015. pp. 234–241. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  60. Zhao B, James LP, Moskowitz CS, Guo P, Ginsberg MS, Lefkowitz RA, Qin Y, Riely GJ, Kris MG, Schwartz LH. Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.. Radiology 2009 Jul;252(1):263-72.
    doi: 10.1148/radiol.2522081593pmc: PMC2797680pubmed: 19561260google scholar: lookup
  61. Kalendralis P, Traverso A, Shi Z, Zhovannik I, Monshouwer R, Starmans MPA, Klein S, Pfaehler E, Boellaard R, Dekker A, Wee L. Multicenter CT phantoms public dataset for radiomics reproducibility tests.. Med Phys 2019 Mar;46(3):1512-1518.
    doi: 10.1002/mp.13385pmc: PMC6849778pubmed: 30629299google scholar: lookup
  62. McEvoy FJ, Amigo JM. Using machine learning to classify image features from canine pelvic radiographs: evaluation of partial least squares discriminant analysis and artificial neural network models.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013 Mar-Apr;54(2):122-6.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12003pubmed: 23228122google scholar: lookup
  63. Basran PS, Gao J, Palmer S, Reesink HL. A radiomics platform for computing imaging features from µCT images of Thoroughbred racehorse proximal sesamoid bones: Benchmark performance and evaluation.. Equine Vet J 2021 Mar;53(2):277-286.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13321pubmed: 32654167google scholar: lookup
  64. Becker AS, Schneider MA, Wurnig MC, Wagner M, Clavien PA, Boss A. Radiomics of liver MRI predict metastases in mice.. Eur Radiol Exp 2018;2(1):11.
    doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0044-7pmc: PMC5971192pubmed: 29882527google scholar: lookup
  65. Boissady E, de La Comble A, Zhu X, Hespel AM. Artificial intelligence evaluating primary thoracic lesions has an overall lower error rate compared to veterinarians or veterinarians in conjunction with the artificial intelligence.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2020 Nov;61(6):619-627.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12912pubmed: 32996208google scholar: lookup
  66. Yoon Y, Hwang T, Lee H. Prediction of radiographic abnormalities by the use of bag-of-features and convolutional neural networks.. Vet J 2018 Jul;237:43-48.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.05.009pubmed: 30089544google scholar: lookup
  67. Banzato T, Bernardini M, Cherubini GB, Zotti A. A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images.. BMC Vet Res 2018 Oct 22;14(1):317.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1638-2pmc: PMC6196418pubmed: 30348148google scholar: lookup
  68. D'Souza JC, Sultan LR, Hunt SJ, Schultz SM, Brice AK, Wood AKW, Sehgal CM. B-mode ultrasound for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a quantitative multiparametric analysis for a radiomics approach.. Sci Rep 2019 Jun 18;9(1):8708.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45043-zpmc: PMC6581954pubmed: 31213661google scholar: lookup
  69. Kim JY, Lee HE, Choi YH, Lee SJ, Jeon JS. CNN-based diagnosis models for canine ulcerative keratitis.. Sci Rep 2019 Oct 2;9(1):14209.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50437-0pmc: PMC6775068pubmed: 31578338google scholar: lookup
  70. Wanamaker MW, Vernau KM, Taylor SL, Cissell DD, Abdelhafez YG, Zwingenberger AL. Classification of neoplastic and inflammatory brain disease using MRI texture analysis in 119 dogs.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2021 Jul;62(4):445-454.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12962pubmed: 33634942google scholar: lookup
  71. Boddapati V, Petef A, Rasmusson J, Lundberg L. Classifying Environmental Sounds Using Image Recognition Networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017;112:2048–2056.
    doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.250google scholar: lookup
  72. McAllister P, Zheng H, Bond R, Moorhead A. Combining deep residual neural network features with supervised machine learning algorithms to classify diverse food image datasets.. Comput Biol Med 2018 Apr 1;95:217-233.
    doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.02.008pubmed: 29549733google scholar: lookup
  73. Jalali A, Mallipeddi R, Lee M. Sensitive Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Face Recognition at Large Standoffs with Small Dataset. Expert Syst. Appl. 2017;87:304–315.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.025google scholar: lookup
  74. Abuzaid MM, Elshami W, Tekin H, Issa B. Assessment of the Willingness of Radiologists and Radiographers to Accept the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Radiology Practice.. Acad Radiol 2022 Jan;29(1):87-94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.014pubmed: 33129659google scholar: lookup
  75. Bhandari A, Purchuri SN, Sharma C, Ibrahim M, Prior M. Knowledge and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in imaging: a look at the quantitative survey literature.. Clin Imaging 2021 Dec;80:413-419.
    doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.004pubmed: 34537484google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.