A study on methods for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) on in vivo- and in vitro-produced equine embryos, with emphasis on embryonic sex determination.
Abstract: Two methods for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) have been described for equine embryos: trophoblast cell biopsy (TCB) or blastocoele fluid aspiration (BFA). While TCB is widely applied for both in vivo- and in vitro-produced embryos, BFA has been mostly utilized for in vivo-produced embryos. Alternative methods for PGT, including analysis of cell-free DNA (CFD) in the medium where in vitro-produced embryos are cultured, have been reported in humans but not for equine embryos. In Experiment 1, in vivo- (n = 10) and in vitro-produced (n = 13) equine embryos were subjected to BFA, cultured for 24 h, then subjected to TCB, and cultured for additional 24 h. No detrimental effect on embryonic diameter or re-expansion rates was observed for either embryo group (P > 0.05). In Experiment 2, the concordance (i.e., agreement on detecting the same embryonic sex using two techniques) among BFA, TCB, and the whole embryo (Whole) was studied by detecting the sex-determining region Y (SRY) or testis-specific y-encoded protein 1 (TSPY) (Y-chromosome), and androgen receptor (AR; X-chromosome) genes using PCR. Overall, a higher concordance for detecting embryonic sex was observed among techniques for in vivo-produced embryos (67-100 %; n = 14 embryos) than for in vitro-produced embryos (31-92 %; n = 13 embryos). The concordance between sample types increased when utilizing TSPY (77-100 %) instead of SRY (31-100 %) as target gene. In Experiment 3, CFD analysis was performed on in vitro-produced embryos to determine embryonic sex via PCR (SRY [Y-chromosome] and amelogenin - AMEL [X- and Y-chromosomes]). Overall, CFD was detected in all medium samples, and the concordance between CFD sample and the whole embryo was 60 % when utilizing SRY and AMEL genes. In conclusion, equine embryos can be subjected to two biopsy procedures (24 h apart) without apparent detrimental effects on embryonic size. For in vivo-, but not for in vitro-produced equine embryos, BFA can be considered a potential alternative to TCB for PGT. Finally, CFD can be further explored as a non-invasive method for PGT in in vitro produced equine embryos.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-07-11 PubMed ID: 39013286DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.07.009Google Scholar: Lookup The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Animal Science
- Animal Species
- Animal Study
- Assisted Reproductive Techniques
- Biopsy
- DNA
- Embryo
- Equids
- Equine Health
- Equine Medicine
- Equine Research
- Equine Science
- Experimental Methods
- Genetics
- Genomics
- In Vitro Research
- In Vivo
- Laboratory Methods
- Molecular biology
- Noninvasive Procedures
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Reproduction
- Reproductive Technology
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
- This study investigates various methods for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of equine embryos produced both in vivo and in vitro, focusing on determining the embryo’s sex.
- The research compares traditional biopsy methods with less invasive techniques and explores the potential for non-invasive analysis of genetic material shed by embryos into their culture medium.
Background and Objectives
- Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is commonly used in equine reproduction to determine genetic traits, including sex, before embryo implantation.
- Two primary PGT methods have been established for horse embryos:
- Trophoblast Cell Biopsy (TCB) – extracting cells from the outer layer of the embryo (trophoblast).
- Blastocoele Fluid Aspiration (BFA) – collecting fluid from the blastocoele cavity inside the embryo.
- While TCB is used for embryos produced both in vivo (inside the mare) and in vitro (in the lab), BFA has mainly been applied to in vivo-produced embryos.
- Newer, less invasive techniques such as analyzing cell-free DNA (CFD) released into the culture medium have been described in human PGT but have not yet been explored in horses.
- The study aims to evaluate and compare these methods for accuracy and safety in equine embryos, particularly for sex determination.
Experiment 1: Effects of Sequential Biopsy Procedures
- Objective: Assess if performing BFA followed by TCB 24 hours later impacts embryo development.
- Method:
- Embryos produced in vivo (n=10) and in vitro (n=13) were first subjected to BFA.
- They were cultured for 24 hours, then underwent TCB.
- Post-biopsy, embryos were cultured an additional 24 hours.
- Results:
- No significant changes in embryo size or ability to re-expand were observed following these procedures for either embryo group (p > 0.05).
- This indicates that performing two biopsies one day apart does not harm embryo viability.
Experiment 2: Concordance of Sex Determination Among Techniques
- Objective: Evaluate the agreement in sex determination results using BFA, TCB, and analysis of the whole embryo.
- Method:
- Performed PCR targeting sex-determining genes:
- SRY and TSPY – genes on the Y chromosome indicating male sex.
- Androgen receptor (AR) gene – present on the X chromosome.
- Samples included those taken via BFA, TCB, and whole embryo lysates.
- Analyzed concordance—the consistency of sex detection across methods.
- Performed PCR targeting sex-determining genes:
- Results:
- In vivo-produced embryos showed higher concordance (67-100%) among methods compared to in vitro-produced embryos (31-92%).
- The target gene influenced concordance:
- TSPY yielded better agreement rates (77-100%) than SRY (31-100%), suggesting TSPY is more reliable for sexing in this context.
Experiment 3: Analysis of Cell-Free DNA (CFD) in Culture Medium
- Objective: Test the feasibility of non-invasive sex determination using CFD present in the culture medium of in vitro-produced embryos.
- Method:
- Collected culture medium samples surrounding in vitro-produced embryos.
- Performed PCR targeting SRY (Y chromosome) and amelogenin (AMEL, present on both X and Y chromosomes) genes.
- Compared results to sex determination from the whole embryo.
- Results:
- CFD was detected in the culture medium of all embryos tested.
- Concordance between CFD and whole embryo sex determination was 60% using these gene targets.
- This indicates potential for a non-invasive PGT method, but accuracy needs improvement.
Conclusions and Implications
- It is safe to perform two biopsy procedures (BFA followed by TCB) on equine embryos 24 hours apart without detrimental effects on embryo size or viability.
- For in vivo-produced embryos, BFA can serve as a viable alternative to TCB for PGT, offering possibly less invasive sampling.
- For in vitro-produced embryos, BFA showed lower concordance and may be less reliable, so TCB remains the preferred biopsy method currently.
- Analysis of cell-free DNA from embryo culture medium represents a promising non-invasive approach for PGT in equine embryos, but accuracy remains below that of biopsy techniques and requires further refinement.
- Overall, this research helps improve genetic testing strategies in equine reproduction, optimizing embryo handling to support breeding programs and reduce invasive interventions.
Cite This Article
APA
Ramírez-Agámez L, Castaneda C, Hernández-Avilés C, Grahn RA, Raudsepp T, Love CC.
(2024).
A study on methods for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) on in vivo- and in vitro-produced equine embryos, with emphasis on embryonic sex determination.
Theriogenology, 227, 41-48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.07.009 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Equine Fertility Laboratory, Departments of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4475, USA. Electronic address: luisa.ramirez.a@tamu.edu.
- Departments of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4475, USA.
- Equine Fertility Laboratory, Departments of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4475, USA.
- Veterinary Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95617-1102, USA.
- Departments of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4475, USA.
- Equine Fertility Laboratory, Departments of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4475, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horses / embryology
- Preimplantation Diagnosis / veterinary
- Preimplantation Diagnosis / methods
- Sex Determination Analysis / veterinary
- Sex Determination Analysis / methods
- Female
- Embryo Culture Techniques / veterinary
- Embryo, Mammalian
- Fertilization in Vitro / veterinary
- Male
- Genetic Testing / methods
- Genetic Testing / veterinary
- Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
- Pregnancy
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists