Analyze Diet
PloS one2026; 21(1); e0341655; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341655

Aberrant skeletal muscle morphogenesis and myofiber differentiation characterize equine myotonic dystrophy.

Abstract: Equine myotonic dystrophy (eMD) is a rare neuromuscular disorder of undetermined origin marked by muscle hypertrophy and stiffness, dystrophic muscle histopathology, and myotonic discharges. In humans, myotonic dystrophy (DM) arises from trinucleotide repeat expansions in dystrophia myotonica protein kinase (DMPK) (DM1) or tetranucleotide expansions in cellular nucleic acid-binding protein (CNBP) (DM2), which disrupt mRNA processing and induce embryonic splicing patterns across multiple genes. In 6 eMD Quarter Horse types, (2-36 months-of-age) and 8 control Quarter Horses we determined: (1) fiber type composition of triceps, gluteal, and semimembranosus muscles; (2) differential gene (DEG) and protein (DEP) expression using transcriptomic and proteomic analyses; (3) presence of repeat expansions in transcripts of DMPK or CNBP and (4) exon 7 retention in CLCN1 or exon 22 splicing in ATP2A1. Predominance and clustering of type 1 fibers, expression of embryonic myosin, and upregulated mitochondrial and sarcomeric DEPs characterized eMD hindlimb musculature. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of 730 upregulated DEGs identified numerous GO terms related to morphogenesis of mesoderm-derived tissues and upregulated genes impacting myoD expression in eMD muscle. Top upregulated DEG involved myogenesis (MYOZ2, SBK2, SBK3, PAMR1), neurons, transcription/translation, cytoskeleton, basement/plasma membranes, and calcium binding/transport. Top upregulated proteins also impacted muscle morphogenesis (MUSTN1, CSRP3, TMSBX4, PDLIM, CALD1) as well as categories of mitochondria, sarcomere, extracellular matrix/ basement membrane, transcription, translation, cell cycle regulation, neurons amongst others. Downregulated DEP primarily impacted mitochondria, the sarcomere and glycogen metabolism. Notably, unlike human myotonic dystrophy, trinucleotide repeat expansions were not found in the DMPK 3'UTR (CTG)n nor tetranucleotide repeat expansions (CCTG)n in intron 1 of CNBP. Isoforms of CLCN1 containing fetal exon 7 were detected in equal frequency in eMD and control muscle and exon 22 was not alternatively spliced in ATP2A1 as has been found in DM1. Thus, distinct from DM1 and DM2, eMD is driven by unique molecular mechanisms impacting skeletal muscle morphogenesis, neurons and regulation of gene transcription/translation that alter fiber type composition, distribution and morphology. The origin of myotonia does not appear to be driven by a mutation in CLCN1 or retention of exon CLCN 7. Expanded splice site analysis and further research is warranted to elucidate the cause of myotonia and the distinct etiology of eMD.
Publication Date: 2026-01-29 PubMed ID: 41610137PubMed Central: PMC12854428DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341655Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research investigates equine myotonic dystrophy (eMD), a rare muscle disorder in horses, by examining muscle fiber composition, gene and protein expression, and genetic features to understand how it differs from human myotonic dystrophy at molecular and cellular levels.

Background and Objectives

  • Equine myotonic dystrophy (eMD) is a neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle hypertrophy (enlargement), stiffness, dystrophic muscle changes, and abnormal muscle electrical activity called myotonic discharges.
  • Human myotonic dystrophy (DM) arises from specific repeat expansions in genes DMPK (DM1) or CNBP (DM2), which cause mRNA processing defects and abnormal gene splicing resulting in disease symptoms.
  • The study focused on six young eMD-affected Quarter Horses and eight control Quarter Horses to explore differences in:
    • Muscle fiber types in various muscles (triceps, gluteal, semimembranosus)
    • Gene and protein expression patterns through transcriptomic and proteomic analyses
    • Presence of known repeat expansions in DMPK and CNBP genes typical of human DM
    • Specific alternative splicing events in muscle-related genes (exon 7 retention in CLCN1, exon 22 splicing in ATP2A1)

Key Findings: Muscle Fiber and Molecular Characteristics

  • Hindlimb muscles of eMD horses showed predominance and clustering of type 1 muscle fibers, which are slow-twitch fibers usually adapted for endurance.
  • Expression of embryonic myosin was observed, indicating abnormal muscle differentiation or regeneration processes.
  • Upregulation of numerous mitochondrial and sarcomeric proteins was detected, suggesting changes in energy metabolism and muscle contractile machinery.
  • Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of 730 upregulated genes revealed enrichment in processes related to the development (“morphogenesis”) of mesodermal tissues, which include skeletal muscle.
  • Some upregulated genes influence myoD expression, a critical regulator of muscle differentiation.

Specific Genes and Proteins Impacted

  • Top upregulated genes involved in:
    • Myogenesis: MYOZ2, SBK2, SBK3, PAMR1 (genes regulating muscle formation and growth)
    • Neuronal functions, transcription and translation mechanisms, cytoskeletal structure, cell membranes, and calcium regulation
  • Top upregulated proteins included MUSTN1, CSRP3, TMSBX4, PDLIM, and CALD1, which play roles in muscle morphogenesis, mitochondrial function, sarcomere structure, extracellular matrix and basement membrane organization, transcription, translation, cell cycle, and neuron-related functions.
  • Downregulated proteins mainly affected mitochondria, sarcomere components, and glycogen metabolism, indicating possible energy utilization issues and structural muscle defects.

Genetic and Splicing Analyses

  • Unlike human DM, no trinucleotide (CTG)n repeat expansions were found in the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of the DMPK gene in eMD horses.
  • No tetranucleotide (CCTG)n repeat expansions were detected in intron 1 of CNBP, another gene linked to human myotonic dystrophy.
  • Alternative splicing analysis showed that the fetal isoform of the chloride channel gene CLCN1, containing exon 7, appeared equally in eMD and control horses, suggesting no abnormal splicing there.
  • Similarly, exon 22 of the calcium ATPase gene ATP2A1 was not alternatively spliced in eMD horses, a contrast to human DM1 where it is commonly affected.

Conclusions and Implications

  • eMD is molecularly distinct from human DM1 and DM2, indicating different underlying mechanisms beyond the known repeat expansions.
  • The disease involves abnormal skeletal muscle development, altered fiber composition and distribution, and changes in neuronal and gene regulatory pathways.
  • The cause of myotonia (muscle stiffness) in eMD does not appear to result from mutations or abnormal splicing of CLCN1 or ATP2A1 genes, which are implicated in human myotonia.
  • Further investigations, including expanded splice site analyses and molecular studies, are needed to identify the specific genetic or molecular triggers of eMD.

Significance

  • This study enhances understanding of equine myotonic dystrophy by differentiating it from human forms at the molecular level.
  • It highlights unique molecular signatures affecting muscle morphogenesis and neuronal functions in horses.
  • The findings encourage further research into novel molecular pathways that may contribute to muscle diseases in animals and possibly provide comparative insights for human muscle disorders.

Cite This Article

APA
Valberg SJ, Williams ZJ, Ames EG, Mickelson JR, Nout-Lomas YS, Landolt G, Sanz M, Gardner K. (2026). Aberrant skeletal muscle morphogenesis and myofiber differentiation characterize equine myotonic dystrophy. PLoS One, 21(1), e0341655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341655

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
Pages: e0341655
PII: e0341655

Researcher Affiliations

Valberg, Stephanie J
  • Michigan State University, Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Williams, Zoë J
  • Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Ames, Elizabeth G
  • Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Mickelson, James R
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Washington, United States of America.
Nout-Lomas, Yvette S
  • Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Landolt, Gabriele
  • Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Sanz, Macarena
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Washington, United States of America.
Gardner, Keri
  • Michigan State University, Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Myotonic Dystrophy / pathology
  • Myotonic Dystrophy / genetics
  • Myotonic Dystrophy / veterinary
  • Myotonic Dystrophy / metabolism
  • Horses
  • Muscle, Skeletal / pathology
  • Muscle, Skeletal / metabolism
  • Muscle Fibers, Skeletal / pathology
  • Muscle Fibers, Skeletal / metabolism
  • Cell Differentiation
  • Horse Diseases / genetics
  • Horse Diseases / pathology
  • Horse Diseases / metabolism
  • Myotonin-Protein Kinase / genetics
  • Morphogenesis / genetics
  • Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion

Conflict of Interest Statement

Dr. Valberg directs the Neuromuscular Diagnostic Laboratory and receives financial remuneration for interpreting muscle biopsies. She also received royalties for genetic tests PSSM1 and GBED and feed products for horses. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

References

This article includes 83 references
  1. Valberg SJ. Disorders of the musculoskeletal system. 2018. 542–79.
  2. Hehir MK, Logigian EL. Electrodiagnosis of myotonic disorders. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2013;24(1):209–20.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2012.08.015pubmed: 23177040google scholar: lookup
  3. Jamison JM, Baird JD, Smith-Maxie LL, Hulland TJ. A congenital form of myotonia with dystrophic changes in a quarterhorse. Equine Vet J 1987;19(4):353–8.
  4. Reed SM, Hegreberg GA, Bayly WM, Brown CM, Paradis MR, Clemmons RM. Progressive myotonia in foals resembling human dystrophia myotonica. Muscle Nerve 1988;11(4):291–6.
    doi: 10.1002/mus.880110403pubmed: 3398875google scholar: lookup
  5. Hegreberg GA, Reed SM. Skeletal muscle changes associated with equine myotonic dystrophy. Acta Neuropathol 1990;80(4):426–31.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00307698pubmed: 2239155google scholar: lookup
  6. Sarli G, Della Salda L, Marcato PS. Dystrophy-like myopathy in a foal. Vet Rec 1994;135(7):156–60.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.135.7.156pubmed: 7985345google scholar: lookup
  7. Shirakawa T, Ide M, Taniyama H, Tobiwatari K, Senba H, Oishi H. Muscular dystrophy-like disease in a thoroughbred foal. J Comp Pathol 1989;100(3):287–94.
    doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(89)90106-0pubmed: 2524508google scholar: lookup
  8. Ludvikova E, Lukas Z, Vondracek P, Jahn P. Histopathological features in subsequent muscle biopsies in a warmblood mare with myotonic dystrophy. Vet Q 2012;32(3–4):187–92.
    doi: 10.1080/01652176.2012.749548pubmed: 23215836google scholar: lookup
  9. Montagna P, Liguori R, Monari L, Strong PN, Riva R, Di Stasi V. Equine muscular dystrophy with myotonia. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112(2):294–9.
    doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00511-3pubmed: 11165532google scholar: lookup
  10. Andrews FM, Spurgeon TL, Reed SM. Histochemical changes in skeletal muscles of four male horses with neuromuscular disease. Am J Vet Res 1986;47(9):2078–83.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1986.47.09.2078pubmed: 3767116google scholar: lookup
  11. Lee JE, Cooper TA. Pathogenic mechanisms of myotonic dystrophy. Biochem Soc Trans 2009;37(Pt 6):1281–6.
    doi: 10.1042/BST0371281pmc: PMC3873089pubmed: 19909263google scholar: lookup
  12. Lin X, Miller JW, Mankodi A, Kanadia RN, Yuan Y, Moxley RT. Failure of MBNL1-dependent post-natal splicing transitions in myotonic dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15(13):2087–97.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl132pubmed: 16717059google scholar: lookup
  13. López-Martínez A, Soblechero-Martín P, de-la-Puente-Ovejero L, Nogales-Gadea G, Arechavala-Gomeza V. An overview of alternative splicing defects implicated in myotonic dystrophy type I. Genes (Basel) 2020;11(9):1109.
    doi: 10.3390/genes11091109pmc: PMC7564762pubmed: 32971903google scholar: lookup
  14. Furling D, Lam LT, Agbulut O, Butler-Browne GS, Morris GE. Changes in myotonic dystrophy protein kinase levels and muscle development in congenital myotonic dystrophy. Am J Pathol 2003;162(3):1001–9.
  15. Frey N, Barrientos T, Shelton JM, Frank D, Rütten H, Gehring D. Mice lacking calsarcin-1 are sensitized to calcineurin signaling and show accelerated cardiomyopathy in response to pathological biomechanical stress. Nat Med 2004;10(12):1336–43.
    doi: 10.1038/nm1132pubmed: 15543153google scholar: lookup
  16. van Gorp PRR, Zhang J, Liu J, Tsonaka R, Mei H, Dekker SO. Sbk2, a newly discovered atrium-enriched regulator of sarcomere integrity.. Circ Res 2022;131(1):24–41.
    doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319300pubmed: 35587025google scholar: lookup
  17. Liu Y, Shang Y, Yan Z, Li H, Wang Z, Liu Z. Pim1 kinase positively regulates myoblast behaviors and skeletal muscle regeneration.. Cell Death Dis 2019;10(10):773.
    doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1993-3pmc: PMC6787030pubmed: 31601787google scholar: lookup
  18. Nakayama Y, Nara N, Kawakita Y, Takeshima Y, Arakawa M, Katoh M. Cloning of cDNA encoding a regeneration-associated muscle protease whose expression is attenuated in cell lines derived from Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients.. Am J Pathol 2004;164(5):1773–82.
  19. Xu Z, Liu Z, He X, Shu H, Wang X, Liu T. Investigation of the transcriptome and metabolome of the cerebral cortex and testes in Cntnap4-deficient mice.. J Psychiatr Res 2025;186:252–62.
  20. Heinz LX, Rebsamen M, Rossi DC, Staehli F, Schroder K, Quadroni M. The death domain-containing protein Unc5CL is a novel MyD88-independent activator of the pro-inflammatory IRAK signaling cascade.. Cell Death Differ 2012;19(4):722–31.
    doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.147pmc: PMC3307986pubmed: 22158417google scholar: lookup
  21. Manterola M, Brown TM, Oh MY, Garyn C, Gonzalez BJ, Wolgemuth DJ. BRDT is an essential epigenetic regulator for proper chromatin organization, silencing of sex chromosomes and crossover formation in male meiosis.. PLoS Genet 2018;14(3):e1007209.
  22. Kim S-D, Liu JL, Roscioli T, Buckley MF, Yagnik G, Boyadjiev SA. Leucine-rich repeat, immunoglobulin-like and transmembrane domain 3 (LRIT3) is a modulator of FGFR1.. FEBS Lett 2012;586(10):1516–21.
  23. Hatzfeld M, Wolf A, Keil R. Plakophilins in desmosomal adhesion and signaling.. Cell Commun Adhes 2014;21(1):25–42.
    doi: 10.3109/15419061.2013.876017pubmed: 24460199google scholar: lookup
  24. Tajbakhsh S, Borello U, Vivarelli E, Kelly R, Papkoff J, Duprez D. Differential activation of Myf5 and MyoD by different Wnts in explants of mouse paraxial mesoderm and the later activation of myogenesis in the absence of Myf5.. Development 1998;125(21):4155–62.
    doi: 10.1242/dev.125.21.4155pubmed: 9753670google scholar: lookup
  25. Nagakura R, Yamamoto M, Jeong J, Hinata N, Katori Y, Chang W-J. Switching of Sox9 expression during musculoskeletal system development.. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):8425.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65339-9pmc: PMC7242482pubmed: 32439983google scholar: lookup
  26. Parakati R, DiMario JX. Repression of myoblast proliferation and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 promoter activity by KLF10 protein.. J Biol Chem 2013;288(19):13876–84.
    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.457648pmc: PMC3650423pubmed: 23569208google scholar: lookup
  27. Han D, Zhao H, Parada C, Hacia JG, Bringas P Jr, Chai Y. A TGFβ-Smad4-Fgf6 signaling cascade controls myogenic differentiation and myoblast fusion during tongue development.. Development 2012;139(9):1640–50.
    doi: 10.1242/dev.076653pmc: PMC3317969pubmed: 22438570google scholar: lookup
  28. McDermott A, Gustafsson M, Elsam T, Hui C-C, Emerson CP, Borycki AGl. Gli2 and Gli3 have redundant and context-dependent function in skeletal muscle formation.. 2005.
    pubmed: 15604102
  29. Vafiadaki E, Arvanitis DA, Sanoudou D. Muscle LIM Protein: Master regulator of cardiac and skeletal muscle functions.. Gene 2015;566(1):1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.04.077pmc: PMC6660132pubmed: 25936993google scholar: lookup
  30. Jang S-M, Kim J-W, Kim D, Kim C-H, An J-H, Choi K-H. Sox4-mediated caldesmon expression facilitates differentiation of skeletal myoblasts.. J Cell Sci 2013;126(Pt 22):5178–88.
    doi: 10.1242/jcs.131581pubmed: 24046453google scholar: lookup
  31. Kröger S, Watkins B. Muscle spindle function in healthy and diseased muscle.. Skelet Muscle 2021;11(1):3.
    doi: 10.1186/s13395-020-00258-xpmc: PMC7788844pubmed: 33407830google scholar: lookup
  32. Butera G, Vecellio Reane D, Canato M, Pietrangelo L, Boncompagni S, Protasi F. Parvalbumin affects skeletal muscle trophism through modulation of mitochondrial calcium uptake.. Cell Rep 2021;35(5):109087.
  33. Pan Z, Du G, Li G, Wu D, Chen X, Geng Z. Apolipoprotein H: a novel regulator of fat accumulation in duck myoblasts.. J Anim Sci Technol 2022;64(6):1199–214.
    doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e60pmc: PMC9890340pubmed: 36812035google scholar: lookup
  34. Cannon SC. Sodium channelopathies of skeletal muscle.. 2017:309–30.
  35. Schiaffino S, Rossi AC, Smerdu V, Leinwand LA, Reggiani C. Developmental myosins: expression patterns and functional significance.. Skelet Muscle 2015;5:22.
    doi: 10.1186/s13395-015-0046-6pmc: PMC4502549pubmed: 26180627google scholar: lookup
  36. Kline KH, Bechtel PJ. Changes in the metabolic profile of equine muscle from birth through 1 yr of age.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1990;68(4):1399–404.
    doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.4.1399pubmed: 2347782google scholar: lookup
  37. Dingboom EG, van Oudheusden H, Eizema K, Weijs WA. Changes in fibre type composition of gluteus medius and semitendinosus muscles of Dutch Warmblood foals and the effect of exercise during the first year postpartum.. Equine Vet J 2002;34(2):177–83.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776767312pubmed: 11902760google scholar: lookup
  38. Sewry CA, Feng L, Chambers D, Matthews E, Phadke R. Importance of immunohistochemical evaluation of developmentally regulated myosin heavy chains in human muscle biopsies.. Neuromuscul Disord 2021;31(5):371–84.
    doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2021.02.007pubmed: 33685841google scholar: lookup
  39. Bentzinger CF, Wang YX, Rudnicki MA. Building muscle: Molecular regulation of myogenesis.. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2012;4(2):a008342.
    doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008342pmc: PMC3281568pubmed: 22300977google scholar: lookup
  40. Law C, Cheung P. Expression of Non-acetylatable H2A.Z in myoblast cells blocks myoblast differentiation through disruption of MyoD Expression.. J Biol Chem 2015;290(21):13234–49.
    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.595462pmc: PMC4505577pubmed: 25839232google scholar: lookup
  41. Rajam SM, Varghese PC, Dutta D. Histone chaperones as cardinal players in development.. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;10:767773.
    doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.767773pmc: PMC9014011pubmed: 35445016google scholar: lookup
  42. Karthik N, Taneja R. Histone variants in skeletal myogenesis.. Epigenetics 2021;16(3):243–62.
  43. Du SJ, Tan X, Zhang J. SMYD proteins: key regulators in skeletal and cardiac muscle development and function.. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2014;297(9):1650–62.
    doi: 10.1002/ar.22972pubmed: 25125178google scholar: lookup
  44. Goldstein AL, Hannappel E, Sosne G, Kleinman HK. Thymosin β4: A multi-functional regenerative peptide. Basic properties and clinical applications.. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2012;12(1):37–51.
    doi: 10.1517/14712598.2012.634793pubmed: 22074294google scholar: lookup
  45. Liu C, Gersch RP, Hawke TJ, Hadjiargyrou M. Silencing of Mustn1 inhibits myogenic fusion and differentiation.. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010;298(5):C1100-8.
    doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00553.2009pmc: PMC2867393pubmed: 20130207google scholar: lookup
  46. Kong Y, Flick MJ, Kudla AJ, Konieczny SF. Muscle LIM protein promotes myogenesis by enhancing the activity of MyoD.. Mol Cell Biol 1997;17(8):4750–60.
    doi: 10.1128/MCB.17.8.4750pmc: PMC232327pubmed: 9234731google scholar: lookup
  47. Brack AS, Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Shen J, Rando TA. A temporal switch from notch to Wnt signaling in muscle stem cells is necessary for normal adult myogenesis.. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2(1):50–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.006pubmed: 18371421google scholar: lookup
  48. Kuroda K, Tani S, Tamura K, Minoguchi S, Kurooka H, Honjo T. Delta-induced Notch signaling mediated by RBP-J inhibits MyoD expression and myogenesis.. J Biol Chem 1999;274(11):7238–44.
    doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.11.7238pubmed: 10066785google scholar: lookup
  49. Wang M-Y, Yang J-M, Wu Y, Li H, Zhong Y-B, Luo Y. Curcumin-activated Wnt5a pathway mediates Ca2+ channel opening to affect myoblast differentiation and skeletal muscle regeneration.. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2024;15(5):1834–49.
    doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13535pmc: PMC11446719pubmed: 38982896google scholar: lookup
  50. Sun Q, Zhang Y, Yang G, Chen X, Zhang Y, Cao G. Transforming growth factor-beta-regulated miR-24 promotes skeletal muscle differentiation.. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36(8):2690–9.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn032pmc: PMC2377434pubmed: 18353861google scholar: lookup
  51. Liu D, Black BL, Derynck R. TGF-beta inhibits muscle differentiation through functional repression of myogenic transcription factors by Smad3.. Genes Dev 2001;15(22):2950–66.
    doi: 10.1101/gad.925901pmc: PMC312830pubmed: 11711431google scholar: lookup
  52. Burks TN, Cohn RD. Role of TGF-β signaling in inherited and acquired myopathies.. Skelet Muscle 2011;1(1):19.
    doi: 10.1186/2044-5040-1-19pmc: PMC3156642pubmed: 21798096google scholar: lookup
  53. Dubowitz V, Sewry CA, Oldfors A. Muscle biopsy: a practical approach. 2020.
  54. Stark DA, Coffey NJ, Pancoast HR, Arnold LL, Walker JPD, Vallée J. Ephrin-A3 promotes and maintains slow muscle fiber identity during postnatal development and reinnervation.. J Cell Biol 2015;211(5):1077–91.
    doi: 10.1083/jcb.201502036pmc: PMC4674275pubmed: 26644518google scholar: lookup
  55. Nozawa K, Lin Y, Kubodera R, Shimizu Y, Tanaka H, Ohshima T. Zebrafish Mecp2 is required for proper axonal elongation of motor neurons and synapse formation.. Dev Neurobiol 2017;77(9):1101–13.
    doi: 10.1002/dneu.22498pubmed: 28371371google scholar: lookup
  56. Yang J, Dominguez B, de Winter F, Gould TW, Eriksson JE, Lee K-F. Nestin negatively regulates postsynaptic differentiation of the neuromuscular synapse.. Nat Neurosci 2011;14(3):324–30.
    doi: 10.1038/nn.2747pmc: PMC3069133pubmed: 21278733google scholar: lookup
  57. Vihola A, Bachinski LL, Sirito M, Olufemi S-E, Hajibashi S, Baggerly KA. Differences in aberrant expression and splicing of sarcomeric proteins in the myotonic dystrophies DM1 and DM2.. Acta Neuropathol 2010;119(4):465–79.
    doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0637-6pmc: PMC4199327pubmed: 20066428google scholar: lookup
  58. Osborne RJ, Lin X, Welle S, Sobczak K, O’Rourke JR, Swanson MS. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional impact of toxic RNA in myotonic dystrophy.. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18(8):1471–81.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp058pmc: PMC2664149pubmed: 19223393google scholar: lookup
  59. Wijnberg ID, Owczarek-Lipska M, Sacchetto R, Mascarello F, Pascoli F, Grünberg W. A missense mutation in the skeletal muscle chloride channel 1 (CLCN1) as candidate causal mutation for congenital myotonia in a New Forest pony.. Neuromuscul Disord 2012;22(4):361–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2011.10.001pubmed: 22197188google scholar: lookup
  60. Bardouille C, Vullhorst D, Jockusch H. Expression of chloride channel 1 mRNA in cultured myogenic cells: a marker of myotube maturation.. FEBS Lett 1996;396(2–3):177–80.
    doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01098-8pubmed: 8914983google scholar: lookup
  61. Aldrich K, Velez-Irizarry D, Fenger C, Schott M, Valberg SJ. Pathways of calcium regulation, electron transport, and mitochondrial protein translation are molecular signatures of susceptibility to recurrent exertional rhabdomyolysis in Thoroughbred racehorses.. PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0244556.
  62. Valberg SJ, Velez-Irizarry D, Williams ZJ, Henry ML, Iglewski H, Herrick K. Enriched pathways of calcium regulation, cellular/oxidative stress, inflammation, and cell proliferation characterize gluteal muscle of standardbred horses between episodes of recurrent exertional rhabdomyolysis.. Genes (Basel) 2022;13(10):1853.
    doi: 10.3390/genes13101853pmc: PMC9601720pubmed: 36292738google scholar: lookup
  63. Williams ZJ, Velez-Irizarry D, Gardner K, Valberg SJ. Integrated proteomic and transcriptomic profiling identifies aberrant gene and protein expression in the sarcomere, mitochondrial complex I, and the extracellular matrix in Warmblood horses with myofibrillar myopathy.. BMC Genomics 2021;22(1):438.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07758-0pmc: PMC8194174pubmed: 34112090google scholar: lookup
  64. Spier SJ, Carlson GP, Holliday TA, Cardinet GH, Pickar JG. Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;197(8):1009–17.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1990.197.08.1009pubmed: 2243032google scholar: lookup
  65. Thornton CA. Myotonic dystrophy.. Neurol Clin 2014;32(3):705–19, viii.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.04.011pmc: PMC4105852pubmed: 25037086google scholar: lookup
  66. Kline K, Albert W. Investigation of a glycogen loading program for Standardbred Horses. Proc 7 th Equine Nutr Physiol Symp; 1981.
  67. Valberg SJ, Iglewski H, Henry ML, Schultz AE, McKenzie EC. Skeletal muscle fiber type composition and citrate synthase activity in fit and unfit warmbloods and quarter horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;118:104123.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104123pubmed: 36096315google scholar: lookup
  68. Valberg SJ, Porter A. Skeletal muscle biopsy. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2025;41(1):31–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2024.10.003pubmed: 39609140google scholar: lookup
  69. Tulloch LK, Perkins JD, Piercy RJ. Multiple immunofluorescence labelling enables simultaneous identification of all mature fibre types in a single equine skeletal muscle cryosection. Equine Vet J 2011;43(4):500–3.
  70. Andrews SF, Segonds-Pichon A, Biggins L, Krueger C, Wingett S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010.
  71. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30(15):2114–20.
  72. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol 2019;37(8):907–15.
    doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4pmc: PMC7605509pubmed: 31375807google scholar: lookup
  73. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang T-C, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33(3):290–5.
    doi: 10.1038/nbt.3122pmc: PMC4643835pubmed: 25690850google scholar: lookup
  74. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2015;31(2):166–9.
  75. Hoffman GE, Roussos P. Dream: powerful differential expression analysis for repeated measures designs. Bioinformatics 2021;37(2):192–201.
  76. Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol 2014;15(2):R29.
    doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29pmc: PMC4053721pubmed: 24485249google scholar: lookup
  77. Carlson MFS, Pages H, Li N. Genome Wide Annotation for Human. 2019.
  78. Yu G, He Q-Y. ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization. Mol Biosyst 2016;12(2):477–9.
    doi: 10.1039/c5mb00663epubmed: 26661513google scholar: lookup
  79. Yu G, Wang L-G, Han Y, He Q-Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 2012;16(5):284–7.
    doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118pmc: PMC3339379pubmed: 22455463google scholar: lookup
  80. Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc 2007;2(8):1896–906.
    doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261pubmed: 17703201google scholar: lookup
  81. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003;75(17):4646–58.
    doi: 10.1021/ac0341261pubmed: 14632076google scholar: lookup
  82. Shadforth IP, Dunkley TPJ, Lilley KS, Bessant C. i-Tracker: For quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ. BMC Genomics 2005;6:145.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-145pmc: PMC1276793pubmed: 16242023google scholar: lookup
  83. Oberg AL, Mahoney DW, Eckel-Passow JE, Malone CJ, Wolfinger RD, Hill EG. Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA. J Proteome Res 2008;7(1):225–33.
    doi: 10.1021/pr700734fpmc: PMC2528956pubmed: 18173221google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.