Analyze Diet

Accuracy and precision of oscillometric blood pressure in standing conscious horses.

Abstract: Arterial blood pressure (BP) is a relevant clinical parameter that can be measured in standing conscious horses to assess tissue perfusion or pain. However, there are no validated oscillometric noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices for use in horses. Methods: Seven healthy horses from a teaching and research herd. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and precision of systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in conscious horses obtained with an oscillometric NIBP device when compared to invasively measured arterial BP. Methods: An arterial catheter was placed in the facial or transverse facial artery and connected to a pressure transducer. A cuff for NIBP was placed around the tail base. The BP was recorded during normotension, dobutamine-induced hypertension, and subnormal BP induced by acepromazine administration. Agreement analysis with replicate measures was utilized to calculate bias (accuracy) and standard deviation (SD) of bias (precision). Results: A total of 252 pairs of invasive arterial BP and NIBP measurements were analyzed. Compared to the direct BP measures, the NIBP MAP had an accuracy of -4 mm Hg and precision of 10 mm Hg. SAP had an accuracy of -8 mm Hg and a precision of 17 mm Hg and DAP had an accuracy of -7 mm Hg and a precision of 14 mm Hg. Conclusions: MAP from the evaluated NIBP monitor is accurate and precise in the adult horse across a range of BP, with higher variability during subnormal BP. MAP but not SAP or DAP can be used for clinical decision making in the conscious horse.
Publication Date: 2015-10-21 PubMed ID: 26488617DOI: 10.1111/vec.12411Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examined the accuracy and precision of a non-invasive blood pressure device for measuring arterial blood pressure levels in standing, conscious horses. The researchers found that the device provided accurate data for measuring mean arterial pressure but showed variability during subnormal blood pressure conditions.

Research Context

  • The researchers were studying the accuracy and precision of measuring arterial blood pressure (BP) in horses—relevant clinical data which can be used to assess factors such as tissue perfusion and pain.
  • This is particularly important as there are currently no validated oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices specifically designed for use in horses.

Methods

  • The research involved seven healthy horses from a teaching and research herd.
  • An arterial catheter was inserted into either the facial or transverse facial artery and connected to a pressure transducer, a device which converts pressure into an analog electrical signal.
  • A cuff for NIBP was placed around the base of the tail of each horse.
  • The researchers then recorded the BP during normal conditions, induced hypertension through dobutamine administration, and imposed subnormal BP via acepromazine administration.
  • To analyze the data, an agreement analysis with replicate measures was employed to calculate the bias (accuracy) and standard deviation of bias (precision).

Results

  • The study analyzed a total of 252 pairs of invasive arterial BP and NIBP measurements.
  • In comparison to the direct BP measures, the NIBP device showed a mean arterial pressure (MAP) accuracy of -4 mm Hg and a precision of 10 mm Hg.
  • The systolic arterial pressure (SAP) had an accuracy of -8 mm Hg and a precision of 17 mm Hg, while the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) had an accuracy of -7 mm Hg and a precision of 14 mm Hg.

Conclusion

  • The MAP measurements from the NIBP monitor were proven to be accurate and precise across a range of BP conditions in adult horses.
  • However, variability was detected during subnormal BP conditions.
  • Based on these findings, the researchers concluded that MAP, but not SAP or DAP, can be reliably used for making clinical decisions in conscious horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Olsen E, Pedersen TL, Robinson R, Haubro Andersen P. (2015). Accuracy and precision of oscillometric blood pressure in standing conscious horses. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio), 26(1), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12411

Publication

ISSN: 1476-4431
NlmUniqueID: 101152804
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 26
Issue: 1
Pages: 85-92

Researcher Affiliations

Olsen, Emil
  • Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Pedersen, Tilde Louise Skovgaard
  • Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Robinson, Rebecca
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London.
Haubro Andersen, Pia
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

MeSH Terms

  • Acepromazine / pharmacology
  • Animals
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects
  • Blood Pressure / physiology
  • Blood Pressure Determination / veterinary
  • Blood Pressure Monitors / veterinary
  • Dopamine Antagonists / pharmacology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Oscillometry / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Dufourni A, Buschmann E, Vernemmen I, Van Steenkiste G, van Loon G, Decloedt A. Effect of physiological and pharmacological stress on heart rate, blood pressure, and echocardiographic measurements in healthy Warmblood horses. J Vet Intern Med 2024 Jan-Feb;38(1):398-410.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16967pubmed: 38174810google scholar: lookup
  2. Vitale V, Vezzosi T, Di Franco C, Briganti A, Tognetti R, Conte G, Bucchioni E, Sgorbini M. Equine echocardiography: Can dobutamine infusion correct alterations due to sedation with alpha-2 agonists?. PLoS One 2022;17(10):e0276256.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276256pubmed: 36256667google scholar: lookup
  3. Meuffels J, Bertschinger H, Tindall B, Pohlin F, Luther-Binoir I, Trivedi S, Boshoff CR, Lueders I. Arterial Blood Gases and Cardiorespiratory Parameters in Etorphine-Medetomidine-Midazolam Immobilized Free-Ranging and Game-Farmed Southern White Rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum simum) Undergoing Electro-Ejaculation. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:862100.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.862100pubmed: 35573418google scholar: lookup
  4. Pratt S, Barnes TS, Cowling N, de Klerk K, Rainger J, Sole-Guitart A, Woldeyohannes S, Goodwin W. Bias Associated with Peripheral Non-Invasive Compared to Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring in Healthy Anaesthetised and Standing Horses Using the Bionet BM7Vet. Vet Sci 2022 Jan 28;9(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020052pubmed: 35202305google scholar: lookup
  5. Skelding A, Valverde A. Review of non-invasive blood pressure measurement in animals: Part 2 - Evaluation of the performance of non-invasive devices. Can Vet J 2020 May;61(5):481-498.
    pubmed: 32355347
  6. Boegli J, Schwarzwald CC, Mitchell KJ. Diagnostic value of noninvasive pulse pressure measurements in Warmblood horses with aortic regurgitation. J Vet Intern Med 2019 May;33(3):1446-1455.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15494pubmed: 30938891google scholar: lookup
  7. Tapio H, Raekallio MR, Mykkänen A, Männikkö S, Scheinin M, Bennett RC, Vainio O. Effects of vatinoxan on cardiorespiratory function and gastrointestinal motility during constant-rate medetomidine infusion in standing horses. Equine Vet J 2019 Sep;51(5):646-652.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13085pubmed: 30793362google scholar: lookup
  8. Szaluś-Jordanow O, Czopowicz M, Świerk A, Szpinda O, Garncarz M, Mickiewicz M, Moroz A, Bagnicka E, Kaba J. Oscillometric and Doppler arterial blood pressure measurement in conscious goats. Can J Vet Res 2018 Oct;82(4):244-248.
    pubmed: 30363283