Accuracy of diagnostic arthroscopy for the assessment of cartilage damage in the equine metacarpophalangeal joint.
Abstract: There are many noninvasive diagnostic methods used for evaluating chronic progressive joint disease, but each has severe limitations in the detection of early articular cartilage damage. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of arthroscopy as a diagnostic method for the assessment of the severity of cartilage surface damage on the proximal articular margin of the equine first phalanx (P1). Objective: That arthroscopic assessment of the visible cartilage provides 1) a good indication of the integrity of the cartilage surface and 2) a good estimation of the status of the cartilage surface of the entire articular area of P1. Methods: Arthroscopic examination of the dorsal pouch of the metacarpophalangeal joint was performed in the left front limbs of 74 slaughter horses (age 5 months to 23 years). The appearance of the visible cartilage of P1 was scored by 2 independent arthroscopists, using the SFA arthroscopic grading system. The joints were dissected after completion of the arthroscopic procedure. The cartilage degeneration index (CDIP1) was determined and used as a quantitative measure for the overall degree of cartilage surface deterioration on the articular area of P1. Further, CDI values were determined for the dorsal articular margin of P1 (CDIdam), i.e. the area that can be visualised with arthroscopy. The CDIdam values were classified into 3 groups (CDIdam<25%, minor lesions; 25%45%, severe lesions). Differences between the 2 arthroscopists were evaluated statistically in a nonparametric test and Pearson correlation coefficients (r) with matching P values were determined for the correlations between SFA and CDIdam and between CDIP1 and CDIdam. The level of significance was set at P<0.05. Results: Differences between SFA scores of the 2 arthroscopists were not significant (P = 0.22). In the group of joints with minor cartilage changes, there was no correlation between SFA and CDIdam (r = 0.12; P = 0.71), but there was a significant correlation between CDIP1 and CDIdam (r = 0.95; P<0.01). In the group with moderate cartilage damage, there was an increase in correlation between SFA and CDIdam (r = 0.27; P = 0.09) and a decrease in the correlation between CDIP1 and CDIdam (r = 0.48; P<0.01). In the group with severe cartilage changes, there was a significant correlation between SFA and CDIdam (r = 058; P<0.01), but no significant correlation between CDIP1 and CDIdam (r = 0.43; P = 0.06). Conclusions: Arthroscopic assessment of cartilage lesions on the proximal articular surface of P1 in joints with minor cartilage damage leads to an underestimation of the actual damage because proteoglycan depletion and light cartilage fibrillation cannot be detected arthroscopically. In cases with mild cartilage damage, the status of the cartilage surface of the visible area of P1 is a good representation of the status of the entire articular surface. In cases with severe cartilage lesions, there is an overestimation of real damage. In such joints, the arthroscopic scoring system provides reliable information, but the visible area is not representative of the entire articular surface. Conclusions: From a practical viewpoint, it can be stated that the arthroscopic grading of visible lesions on the equine P1 gives the best impression of overall cartilage damage in joints with moderately severe cartilage lesions. It should be realised, however, that this is the result of an underestimation due to the shortcomings of the grading system, which is neutralised by an overestimation due to the fact that the severity of lesions on the visible area of P1 is not representative for the entire articular surface.
Publication Date: 2004-05-28 PubMed ID: 15163040DOI: 10.2746/0425164044890544Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research article examines the effectiveness of using arthroscopy for diagnosing the severity of cartilage damage in horses’ metacarpophalangeal joint. The article suggests that the arthroscopic assessment of visible lesions gives the best indication of overall cartilage damage in cases with moderately severe damage.
Objective and Methodology
- The object of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of arthroscopy in detecting the extent of damage on the cartilage surface of the first phalanx, or P1, in horses.
- 74 slaughter horses, aged between 5 months and 23 years, were examined using arthroscopy of the metacarpophalangeal joint in their front limbs.
- Two independent arthroscopists scored the appearance of the visible cartilage using the SFA arthroscopic grading system, a scoring system that classifies the severity of blemishes detected during arthroscopy.
- After the arthroscopic examination, the joints were dissected, and cartilage degeneration index (CDI) values were determined for each joint to quantify the overall degree of cartilage surface degradation.
Results
- In horses with minor cartilage damage, there was no significant correlation between SFA scores and CDIdam, but a high correlation between CDIP1 and CDIdam, suggesting that arthroscopy may underestimate actual damage in cases of minor cartilage degradation.
- In cases with moderate damage, the correlation between SFA and CDIdam increased, indicating an increase in the accuracy of arthroscopy for detecting moderate cartilage damage.
- However, in cases of severe cartilage damage, there was a significant correlation between SFA scores and CDIdam, suggesting that arthroscopy tends to overestimate actual damage in cases of severe degradation.
Conclusion
- This study concludes that arthroscopy best represents the overall state of cartilage damage in joints with moderately severe lesions, despite shortcomings related to its ability to accurately examine the entirety of the cartilage (P1).
- The study also emphasizes that arthroscopy tends to underestimate less severe cases and overestimate severely damaged cases.
- This indicates a need for improved techniques or use of supplemental measures for an accurate evaluation of overall cartilage damage, particularly for minor and severe damages.
Cite This Article
APA
Brommer H, Rijkenhuizen AB, Brama PA, Barneveld A, van Weeren PR.
(2004).
Accuracy of diagnostic arthroscopy for the assessment of cartilage damage in the equine metacarpophalangeal joint.
Equine Vet J, 36(4), 331-335.
https://doi.org/10.2746/0425164044890544 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 12, 3584 CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Arthroscopy / methods
- Arthroscopy / standards
- Arthroscopy / veterinary
- Cartilage Diseases / diagnosis
- Cartilage Diseases / pathology
- Cartilage Diseases / veterinary
- Cartilage, Articular / injuries
- Cartilage, Articular / pathology
- Cartilage, Articular / surgery
- Forelimb
- Horse Diseases / diagnosis
- Horse Diseases / pathology
- Horses
- Joint Diseases / diagnosis
- Joint Diseases / pathology
- Joint Diseases / veterinary
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Reproducibility of Results
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Severity of Illness Index
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists
