Analyze Diet
New Zealand veterinary journal1982; 30(6); 82-84; doi: 10.1080/00480169.1982.34889

Actinobacillus suis infection of horses.

Abstract: Nineteen isolates of Actinobacillus suis were recovered from horses during the period October 1978-December 1980. Animals varied in age from a full term foetus to 12 years. One isolate was obtained from the nose of an apparently healthy horse, the remainder were obtained from still-born foetuses (2), foals dying within a week of birth (5), older animals with respiratory (6) or genital infections (3) or abscesses in the jaw (1). One isolate was obtained from the lung of a 2-week-old foal which had shown diarrhoea. The bacteriological characteristics of the isolates and the pathological lesions present in eight cases are described. The organism has a wide geographical distribution in New Zealand, and in the northern part of the North Island appears to be more common than A. equuli.
Publication Date: 1982-06-01 PubMed ID: 16030875DOI: 10.1080/00480169.1982.34889Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research outlines a study that identified 19 instances of Actinobacillus suis infection in horses of varying ages, with most displaying severe health issues. The paper details the bacteriological characteristics of each case and their geographical distribution across New Zealand.

Subjects and Methodology

  • The study observed horses from October 1978 to December 1980 and managed to isolate nineteen instances where horses were infected with Actinobacillus suis.
  • The subjects varied in age from a full-term foetus to a 12-year-old horse, therefore covering a broad age spectrum.
  • The collection of data was not limited to symptomatic instances; one isolate was obtained from a seemingly healthy horse, indicating the potential for carriers of the bacterium.

Results and Findings

  • The majority of isolates were from horses displaying severe health complications; the researchers collected data from still-born foetuses, foals that died within their first week of life, and older horses with respiratory or genital infections.
  • A single isolate was obtained from a horse with jaw abscesses, and another from a two-week-old foal suffering from diarrhoea.
  • The researchers present a detailed account of the bacteriological characteristics of all isolates, providing an in-depth understanding of the pathology of Actinobacillus suis infection in horses.

Geographical Analysis

  • The study also maps the geographical distribution of the infection, showing that Actinobacillus suis is widely dispersed throughout New Zealand.
  • In the North Island’s northern region, the bacterium seems to be more prevalent than A. equuli, another bacterium known to infect equines. This indicates varying bacterial prevalence based on geographical regions, which may guide future research and prevention strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Carman MG, Hodges RT. (1982). Actinobacillus suis infection of horses. N Z Vet J, 30(6), 82-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.1982.34889

Publication

ISSN: 0048-0169
NlmUniqueID: 0021406
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 30
Issue: 6
Pages: 82-84

Researcher Affiliations

Carman, M G
  • Ruakura Animal Health Laboratory, Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Hamilton.
Hodges, R T

    Citations

    This article has been cited 2 times.
    1. Miniats OP, Spinato MT, Sanford SE. Actinobacillus suis septicemia in mature swine: two outbreaks resembling erysipelas. Can Vet J 1989 Dec;30(12):943-7.
      pubmed: 17423473
    2. Sternberg S. Specific immune response of mares and their newborn foals to Actinobacillus spp. present in the oral cavity. Acta Vet Scand 2001;42(2):237-42.
      doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-42-237pubmed: 11503368google scholar: lookup