Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2025; 58(2); 591-600; doi: 10.1111/evj.70090

Adjuvant combination enhances immune response of equine influenza virus vaccine in horses.

Abstract: Despite routine vaccination, equine influenza outbreaks occur due to disparities of virus strains between vaccine and field, and immunity gaps between vaccinations. Objective: To evaluate whether a combination of adjuvants can enhance immune responses to equine influenza virus (EIV) vaccines. Methods: In vivo experimental study. Methods: Eight mixed-breed horses were immunised intramuscularly with a recombinant canarypox-based EIV vaccine, either alone or in combination with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C). A single vaccine dose was administered, and serum samples were collected before immunisation and at 2, 8, and 24 weeks post-immunisation to assess the humoral immune response. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated to evaluate immunomodulatory cytokine expression and characterise recall cellular immune responses. Additionally, bone marrow and lymph node cells were analysed to assess memory cell responses. Results: The combination of MPL and poly I:C significantly enhanced serum IgG antibody concentrations and haemagglutination inhibition (HI) titres against H3N8 A/equine/Kyonggi/SA01/2011 (Florida sub-lineage clade 1) and maintained these for up to 24 weeks post-immunisation. This combination led to increased cytokine mRNA expression and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) responses in PBMCs. Enhanced memory B cell responses were also observed in the bone marrow and lymph nodes at 8 weeks post-immunisation. MPL and poly I:C induced higher frequencies of CD4 and CD8 T cells following in vitro restimulation with H3N8 EIV. Conclusions: A viral challenge experiment was not included. Conclusions: The use of MPL and poly I:C as adjuvants in EIV vaccines significantly improved immune responses by enhancing humoral immunity, memory cell responses, and antigen-specific cellular immunity. 背景:马流感(Equine influenza,EI)是一种由甲型流感病毒H3N8亚型引起的高度传染性呼吸系统疾病。尽管进行常规疫苗接种,但由于疫苗株与野外毒株之间的差异,以及疫苗接种间的免疫空窗期,马流感(EI)仍有爆发的风险。 目的:评估佐剂组合能否增强马流感病毒(EIV)疫苗的免疫反应。 研究设计:体内实验研究。 方法:8匹混种马通过肌肉注射免疫重组金丝雀痘病毒载体的EIV疫苗,接种方式为单独接种疫苗或与单磷酰脂A(MPL)和聚肌胞酸(poly I:C)联合使用。疫苗接种仅进行一次,血清样本在接种前、以及接种后第2、8和24周采集,用于评估体液免疫反应。从外周血分离的单核细胞(Peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PBMCs)中检测免疫调节细胞因子表达并评估细胞免疫记忆反应。此外,本研究还采样骨髓和淋巴结细胞以评估记忆细胞反应。 结果:MPL与poly I:C的组合显著增强了针对H3N8 A/equine/Kyonggi/SA01/2011(佛罗里达支系1型分支)的血清IgG抗体水平和血凝抑制(HI)滴度,并在接种后维持该水平长达24周。此外,该佐剂组合还提高了PBMC细胞因子mRNA的表达和γ干扰素(IFN‐γ)的反应。在免疫后第8周时,在骨髓和淋巴结中也观察到了增强的记忆B细胞反应。而且,在体外使用H3N8 EIV再刺激后,该佐剂组合诱导了更高频率的CD4⁺和CD8⁺ T细胞反应。 主要局限:本研究未进行攻毒实验。 结论:使用MPL和poly I:C作为EIV疫苗的佐剂可通过提升体液免疫、记忆细胞反应及抗原特异性细胞免疫,从而显著提高整体免疫反应。.
Publication Date: 2025-09-02 PubMed ID: 40898646DOI: 10.1111/evj.70090Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated whether combining two adjuvants—monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C)—with an equine influenza virus (EIV) vaccine enhances the immune response in horses.
  • The research demonstrated that this adjuvant combination significantly improved both humoral and cellular immunity, including long-lasting antibody levels and memory cell responses.

Background

  • Equine influenza (EI) is a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the H3N8 subtype of the influenza A virus affecting horses.
  • Despite routine vaccination programs, outbreaks still occur. This is mainly due to two factors:
    • Mismatch between vaccine virus strains and the circulating field strains
    • Immunity gaps between vaccination intervals
  • Improving vaccine efficacy is essential to prevent EI outbreaks and protect horse health.
  • Adjuvants are substances added to vaccines to enhance the immune response; in this context, MPL and poly I:C are known immunostimulatory molecules.

Objective

  • To evaluate whether a combination of the two adjuvants, MPL and poly I:C, can enhance immune responses to a recombinant canarypox-based equine influenza virus vaccine in horses.

Methods

  • Study Design:
    • In vivo experimental study using eight mixed-breed horses.
    • Each horse received a single intramuscular immunization of the recombinant canarypox-based EIV vaccine either alone or combined with MPL and poly I:C adjuvants.
  • Sampling:
    • Serum samples collected pre-immunization and at 2, 8, and 24 weeks post-immunization to measure humoral immune responses.
    • Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated to assess cytokine gene expression and cellular immunity.
    • Bone marrow and lymph node cells sampled to evaluate memory B cell responses.
  • Immune Response Assessment:
    • Serum IgG antibody levels against the H3N8 EIV strain assessed.
    • Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays measured antibody functional activity.
    • Quantitative PCR used to evaluate expression of immunomodulatory cytokines, including interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), in PBMCs.
    • Cellular immunity measured by the frequency of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after in vitro antigen restimulation.

Results

  • The combination of MPL and poly I:C significantly:
    • Increased serum IgG antibody levels against the H3N8 A/equine/Kyonggi/SA01/2011 strain (Florida sub-lineage clade 1).
    • Raised hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titres, indicating better functional antibody response.
    • Maintained elevated antibody levels for up to 24 weeks post-immunization, suggesting durable immunity.
  • Enhanced cellular immune responses:
    • Increased mRNA expression levels of immunomodulatory cytokines including IFN-γ in PBMCs.
    • Higher frequencies of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were observed after in vitro restimulation with EIV antigen.
  • Memory B cell responses:
    • Stronger memory B cell activity was found in bone marrow and lymph nodes at 8 weeks post-immunization.

Limitations

  • The study did not include a viral challenge experiment to directly assess protection against EIV infection.
  • The sample size was limited to eight horses, which may affect the generalizability of findings.

Conclusions

  • The addition of MPL and poly I:C adjuvants to the recombinant canarypox-based EIV vaccine significantly improved the immune response in horses.
  • This enhancement was seen in:
    • Humoral immunity, via increased and lasting antibody titers.
    • Memory B cell responses in key immune tissues.
    • Antigen-specific cellular immunity, especially CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses and cytokine production.
  • These findings suggest that using MPL and poly I:C in combination may improve vaccine effectiveness and offer better protection against equine influenza outbreaks.
  • Further studies, including viral challenge experiments, are needed to confirm protective efficacy.

Cite This Article

APA
Dong-Ha L, Eun-Bee L, Jong-Pil S, Eun-Ju K. (2025). Adjuvant combination enhances immune response of equine influenza virus vaccine in horses. Equine Vet J, 58(2), 591-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70090

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 58
Issue: 2
Pages: 591-600

Researcher Affiliations

Dong-Ha, Lee
  • College of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Bee, Lee
  • College of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Pil, Seo
  • College of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Ju, Ko
  • College of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
  • Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Advanced Convergence Technology & Science, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Influenza Vaccines / immunology
  • Influenza Vaccines / administration & dosage
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horse Diseases / immunology
  • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
  • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / prevention & control
  • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / immunology
  • Poly I-C / administration & dosage
  • Poly I-C / pharmacology
  • Influenza A Virus, H3N8 Subtype / immunology
  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / pharmacology
  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / administration & dosage
  • Lipid A / analogs & derivatives
  • Lipid A / administration & dosage
  • Lipid A / pharmacology
  • Antibodies, Viral / blood
  • Female
  • Male

Grant Funding

  • RS-2019-NR040080 / Basic Science Research Program to the Research Institute for Basic Sciences (RIBS) of Jeju National University through the NRF, funded by the Ministry of Education
  • RS-2023-00211504 / National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT)

References

This article includes 46 references
  1. Sack A, Cullinane A, Daramragchaa U, Chuluunbaatar M, Gonchigoo B, Gray GC. Equine influenza virus—a neglected, reemergent disease threat.. Emerg Infect Dis 2019;25(6):1185–1191.
  2. Singh RK, Dhama K, Karthik K, Khandia R, Munjal A, Khurana SK. A comprehensive review on equine influenza virus: etiology, epidemiology, pathobiology, advances in developing diagnostics, vaccines, and control strategies.. Front Microbiol 2018;9:1941.
  3. Pavulraj S, Bergmann T, Trombetta CM, Marchi S, Montomoli E, Alami SSE. Immunogenicity of Calvenza‐03 EIV/EHV® vaccine in horses: comparative in vivo study.. Vaccine 2021;9(2):166.
    doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020166google scholar: lookup
  4. Dilai M, Piro M, El Harrak M, Fougerolle S, Dehhaoui M, Dikrallah A. Impact of mixed equine influenza vaccination on correlate of protection in horses.. Vaccine 2018;6(4):71.
    doi: 10.3390/vaccines6040071google scholar: lookup
  5. El‐Hage C, Savage C, Minke J, Ficorilli N, Watson J, Gilkerson J. Accelerated vaccination schedule provides protective levels of antibody and complete herd immunity to equine influenza.. Equine Vet J 2013;45(2):235–239.
  6. Lee D‐H, Lee J, Ahn SY, Ho TL, Kim K, Ko E‐J. Monophosphoryl lipid A and poly I: C combination enhances immune responses of equine influenza virus vaccine.. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2024;271:110743.
  7. Paillot R, Marcillaud Pitel C, D'ablon X, Pronost S. Equine vaccines: how, when and why? Report of the Vaccinology Session, French Equine Veterinarians Association, 2016, Reims.. Vaccine 2017;5(4):46.
    doi: 10.3390/vaccines5040046google scholar: lookup
  8. Barquero N, Daly JM, Newton JR. Risk factors for influenza infection in vaccinated racehorses: lessons from an outbreak in Newmarket, UK in 2003.. Vaccine 2007;25(43):7520–7529.
  9. Ko E‐J, Lee Y‐T, Lee Y, Kim K‐H, Kang S‐M. Distinct effects of monophosphoryl lipid A, oligodeoxynucleotide CpG, and combination adjuvants on modulating innate and adaptive immune responses to influenza vaccination.. Immune Netw 2017;17(5):326–342.
    doi: 10.4110/in.2017.17.5.326google scholar: lookup
  10. Carnet F, Perrin‐Cocon L, Paillot R, Lotteau V, Pronost S, Vidalain P‐O. An inventory of adjuvants used for vaccination in horses: the past, the present and the future.. Vet Res 2023;54(1):18.
  11. Jonsdottir S, Svansson V, Stefansdottir SB, Schüpbach G, Rhyner C, Marti E. A preventive immunization approach against insect bite hypersensitivity: intralymphatic injection with recombinant allergens in alum or alum and monophosphoryl lipid A.. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2016;172:14–20.
  12. Kundi M. New hepatitis B vaccine formulated with an improved adjuvant system.. Expert Rev Vaccines 2007;6(2):133–140.
    doi: 10.1586/14760584.6.2.133google scholar: lookup
  13. Lee D‐H, Lee E‐b, Seo J‐p, Ko E‐J. In vitro effects of monophosphoryl lipid A and poly I: C combination on equine cells.. J Vet Sci 2023;24(3):e37.
    doi: 10.4142/jvs.23007google scholar: lookup
  14. Komal A, Noreen M, El‐Kott AF. TLR3 agonists: RGC100, ARNAX, and poly‐IC: a comparative review.. Immunol Res 2021;69(4):312–322.
  15. Trumpfheller C, Caskey M, Nchinda G, Longhi MP, Mizenina O, Huang Y. The microbial mimic poly IC induces durable and protective CD4+ T cell immunity together with a dendritic cell targeted vaccine.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105(7):2574–2579.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711976105google scholar: lookup
  16. Kumar H, Koyama S, Ishii KJ, Kawai T, Akira S. Cutting edge: cooperation of IPS‐1‐and TRIF‐dependent pathways in poly IC‐enhanced antibody production and cytotoxic T cell responses.. J Immunol 2008;180(2):683–687.
  17. Longhi MP, Trumpfheller C, Idoyaga J, Caskey M, Matos I, Kluger C. Dendritic cells require a systemic type I interferon response to mature and induce CD4+ Th1 immunity with poly IC as adjuvant.. J Exp Med 2009;206(7):1589–1602.
    doi: 10.1084/jem.20090247google scholar: lookup
  18. Stephen E, Hilmas D, Mangiafico J, Levy H. Swine influenza virus vaccine: potentiation of antibody responses in rhesus monkeys.. Science 1977;197(4310):1289–1290.
    doi: 10.1126/science.408923google scholar: lookup
  19. Houston WE, Crabbs CL, Stephen EL, Levy HB. Modified polyriboinosinic‐polyribocytidylic acid, an immunological adjuvant.. Infect Immun 1976;14(1):318–319.
  20. Ichinohe T, Ainai A, Ami Y, Nagata N, Iwata N, Kawaguchi A. Intranasal administration of adjuvant‐combined vaccine protects monkeys from challenge with the highly pathogenic influenza A H5N1 virus.. J Med Virol 2010;82(10):1754–1761.
    doi: 10.1002/jmv.21824google scholar: lookup
  21. Le CTT, Ahn SY, Ho TL, Lee J, Lee D‐H, Hwang HS. Adjuvant effects of combination monophosphoryl lipid A and poly I: C on antigen‐specific immune responses and protective efficacy of influenza vaccines.. Sci Rep 2023;13(1):12231.
  22. Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints.. Am J Public Hygiene 1938;27:493–497.
  23. Paillot R, Kydd J, Sindle T, Hannant D, Toulemonde CE, Audonnet J. Antibody and IFN‐γ responses induced by a recombinant canarypox vaccine and challenge infection with equine influenza virus.. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2006;112(3–4):225–233.
  24. Lee D‐H, Lee E‐B, Seo J‐P, Ko E‐J. Evaluation of concurrent vaccinations with recombinant canarypox equine influenza virus and inactivated equine herpesvirus vaccines.. J Anim Sci Technol 2022;64(3):588–598.
    doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e30google scholar: lookup
  25. Nolan MB, Bertschinger HJ, Roth R, Crampton M, Martins IS, Fosgate GT. Ovarian function following immunocontraceptive vaccination of mares using native porcine and recombinant zona pellucida vaccines formulated with a non‐Freund's adjuvant and anti‐GnRH vaccines.. Theriogenology 2018;120:111–116.
  26. Krashias G, Simon A‐K, Wegmann F, Kok W‐L, Ho L‐P, Stevens D. Potent adaptive immune responses induced against HIV‐1 gp140 and influenza virus HA by a polyanionic carbomer.. Vaccine 2010;28(13):2482–2489.
  27. Lee W, Kingstad‐Bakke B, Paulson B, Larsen A, Overmyer K, Marinaik CB. Carbomer‐based adjuvant elicits CD8 T‐cell immunity by inducing a distinct metabolic state in cross‐presenting dendritic cells.. PLoS Pathog 2021;17(1):e1009168.
  28. Eriksson JC, Cox RJ, Szyszko E, Davidsson Å, Brokstad KA. Local and systemic cytokine and chemokine responses after parenteral influenza vaccination.. Influenza Other Respi Viruses 2007;1(4):139–146.
  29. Quinlivan M, Nelly M, Prendergast M, Breathnach C, Horohov D, Arkins S. Pro‐inflammatory and antiviral cytokine expression in vaccinated and unvaccinated horses exposed to equine influenza virus.. Vaccine 2007;25(41):7056–7064.
  30. Tizard IR. Veterinary immunology.. 10th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
  31. Vinuesa CG, Linterman MA, Yu D, MacLennan IC. Follicular helper T cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2016;34(1):335–368.
  32. Kumar R, Gupta R, Bera B, Anand T, Bhatia S, Kumar N. Pathological and immunological protection induced by inactivated reverse genetics‐based H3N8 equine influenza vaccine candidate in murine model. Acta Virol 2020;64(3):359–374.
    doi: 10.4149/av_2020_314google scholar: lookup
  33. Kopf M, Herren S, Wiles MV, Pepys MB, Kosco‐Vilbois MH. Interleukin 6 influences germinal center development and antibody production via a contribution of C3 complement component. J Exp Med 1998;188(10):1895–1906.
    doi: 10.1084/jem.188.10.1895google scholar: lookup
  34. Rojas JM, Avia M, Martín V, Sevilla N. IL‐10: a multifunctional cytokine in viral infections. J Immunol Res 2017;2017(1):6104054.
    doi: 10.1155/2017/6104054google scholar: lookup
  35. Jiang L, Yao S, Huang S, Wright J, Braciale TJ, Sun J. Type I IFN signaling facilitates the development of IL‐10‐producing effector CD8+ T cells during murine influenza virus infection. Eur J Immunol 2016;46(12):2778–2788.
    doi: 10.1002/eji.201646548google scholar: lookup
  36. Sun J, Madan R, Karp CL, Braciale TJ. Effector T cells control lung inflammation during acute influenza virus infection by producing IL‐10. Nat Med 2009;15(3):277–284.
    doi: 10.1038/nm.1929google scholar: lookup
  37. Sangster MY, Nguyen PQ, Topham DJ. Role of memory B cells in hemagglutinin‐specific antibody production following human influenza A virus infection. Pathogens 2019;8(4):167.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens8040167google scholar: lookup
  38. Cyster JG, Allen CD. B cell responses: cell interaction dynamics and decisions. Cell 2019;177(3):524–540.
  39. Cyster JG. B cell follicles and antigen encounters of the third kind. Nat Immunol 2010;11(11):989–996.
    doi: 10.1038/ni.1946google scholar: lookup
  40. El‐Hage C, Hartley C, Savage C, Watson J, Gilkerson J, Paillot R. Assessment of humoral and long‐term cell‐mediated immune responses to recombinant canarypox‐vectored equine influenza virus vaccination in horses using conventional and accelerated regimens respectively. Vaccine 2022;10(6):855.
    doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060855google scholar: lookup
  41. Paillot R, Kydd J, MacRae S, Minke J, Hannant D, Daly J. New assays to measure equine influenza virus‐specific type 1 immunity in horses. Vaccine 2007;25(42):7385–7398.
  42. Bryant NA, Paillot R, Rash AS, Medcalf E, Montesso F, Ross J. Comparison of two modern vaccines and previous influenza infection against challenge with an equine influenza virus from the Australian 2007 outbreak. Vet Res 2009;41(2):19.
    doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009067google scholar: lookup
  43. Jansen JM, Gerlach T, Elbahesh H, Rimmelzwaan GF, Saletti G. Influenza virus‐specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell‐mediated immunity induced by infection and vaccination. J Clin Virol 2019;119:44–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.08.009google scholar: lookup
  44. Zens KD, Farber DL. Memory CD4 T cells in influenza. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2014;386:399–421.
    doi: 10.1007/82_2014_401google scholar: lookup
  45. Yewdell JW, Bennink JR, Smith GL, Moss B. Influenza A virus nucleoprotein is a major target antigen for cross‐reactive anti‐influenza A virus cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1985;82(6):1785–1789.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.6.1785google scholar: lookup
  46. Elbahesh H, Saletti G, Gerlach T, Rimmelzwaan GF. Broadly protective influenza vaccines: design and production platforms. Curr Opin Virol 2019;34:1–9.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.