FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Anim Behav / Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions.
Animal behaviour1999; 57(3); 705-713; doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1009

Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions.

Abstract: A study of a herd of Camargue horses Equus caballus, showed that while the majority of high-ranking stallions held single-male harems, some sons of low-ranking mares, being low ranking themselves, formed alliances that could last a lifetime. The two stallions were each other's closest associate and preferential grooming partner. Alliances were based on coalitions in which either both partners confronted an intruder synchronously or the dominant of the pair tended the female(s) while the subordinate simultaneously displayed towards the rival. Alliance partners were of similar age but were not more closely related to each other than to other stallions in the herd. Long-term paternity data revealed that subordinates sired close to a quarter of the foals born into the alliance group, and significantly more foals than low-ranking stallions in the herd adopting a 'sneak'-mating strategy. The dominant appeared to benefit from the presence of his subordinate partner. Fights occurred all year round, and the subordinate stallion of each alliance pair fought outside competitors more than twice as often as the dominant. Forming short-term alliances before defending mares on their own may enhance long-term reproductive success for both partners. Other benefits to both partners include higher survivorship of their foals and increased access to proven reproductive mares. These results suggest that the relationship between alliance partners is based on mutualism, but several conditions for reciprocity seem to be fulfilled: the benefit to the dominant (assistance in fights), and the benefit to the subordinate (access to reproduction), are both costly to the other partner and delayed in time. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 1999-02-06 PubMed ID: 10196062DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1009Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the social behaviour of Camargue horses, specifically how low-ranking stallions form alliances leading to increased reproductive success. By adopting coalition-based alliances, these horses can hold harems, resulting in greater paternity rates than those using covert mating tactics.

Objectives and Methodology of the Research

  • The primary objective was to explore the social dynamics and reproductive strategies of Camargue horses. The scientists focused on how lower-ranking stallions establish alliances thus achieving higher reproductive success.
  • To accomplish this, they studied a herd of Camargue horses, observing their behaviour and associations.
  • They used long-term paternity data to evaluate the extent of the subordinate stallions’ reproductive successes.

Key Findings of the Study

  • The majority of the high-ranking stallions maintained single-male harems. However, low-ranking stallions, usually the offspring of low-ranking mares, created lasting alliances.
  • These alliances were established on coalitions in which both partners confronted an intruder together, or the superior stallion guarded the females while the subordinate stallion exhibited towards the rival.
  • Stallions in a coalition were of similar age but were not more closely related to each other than to other stallions in the herd. This fact rules out the possibility of kin selection playing a role in the establishment of these alliances.
  • Long-term paternity data revealed that subordinate stallions in alliances sired nearly a quarter of the foals born within the group.
  • The subordinate stallions had significantly more offspring than lower-ranking stallions in the herd who did not establish alliances but instead attempted stealthy mating.

Benefits and Implications of Alliance Formation

  • Forming alliances before guarding mares individually can increase long-term reproductive success for both partners.
  • The dominant stallion likely benefits from the presence of a subordinate partner, who aids in combat against outside competitors.
  • Other advantages include enhanced survival rate of their foals and improved access to proven reproductive mares.
  • The relationship between alliance partners appears to be based on reciprocal benefits, such as assistance in fights for the dominant and access to reproduction for the subordinate.
  • These benefits, albeit costly for the provider and delayed in time, fulfil the conditions for reciprocity, which may hint at sophisticated social strategies within the herd of horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Feh C. (1999). Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions. Anim Behav, 57(3), 705-713. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.1009

Publication

Animal behaviour
ISSN: 0003-3472
NlmUniqueID: 0376746
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 57
Issue: 3
Pages: 705-713

Researcher Affiliations

Feh, C
  • Station biologique de la Tour du Valat, Camargue

Citations

This article has been cited 29 times.
  1. Medill SA, Janz DM, McLoughlin PD. Hair Cortisol Concentrations in Feral Horses and the Influence of Physiological and Social Factors.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 27;13(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13132133pubmed: 37443930google scholar: lookup
  2. Medill SA, Janz DM, McLoughlin PD. Hair Cortisol and Testosterone Concentrations in Relation to Maturity and Breeding Status of Male Feral Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 27;13(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13132129pubmed: 37443926google scholar: lookup
  3. Bigiani S, Pilenga C. Cooperation increases bottlenose dolphins' (Tursiops truncatus) social affiliation.. Anim Cogn 2023 Jul;26(4):1319-1333.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01781-2pubmed: 37140723google scholar: lookup
  4. Zollinger A, Wyss C, Bardou D, Bachmann I. Social Box: A New Housing System Increases Social Interactions among Stallions.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 20;13(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13081408pubmed: 37106974google scholar: lookup
  5. Górecka-Bruzda A, Jaworska J, Stanley CR. The Social and Reproductive Challenges Faced by Free-Roaming Horse (Equus caballus) Stallions.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 24;13(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071151pubmed: 37048406google scholar: lookup
  6. Harvey AM, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 1;12(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12233385pubmed: 36496906google scholar: lookup
  7. Smith JE, Jaeggi AV, Holmes RK, Silk JB. Sex differences in cooperative coalitions: a mammalian perspective.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2023 Jan 16;378(1868):20210426.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0426pubmed: 36440559google scholar: lookup
  8. Fox SA, Muller MN, González NT, Enigk DK, Machanda ZP, Otali E, Wrangham R, Thompson ME. Weak, but not strong, ties support coalition formation among wild female chimpanzees.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2023 Jan 16;378(1868):20210427.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0427pubmed: 36440557google scholar: lookup
  9. Pavez-Fox MA, Kimock CM, Rivera-Barreto N, Negron-Del Valle JE, Phillips D, Ruiz-Lambides A, Snyder-Mackler N, Higham JP, Siracusa ER, Brent LJN. Reduced injury risk links sociality to survival in a group-living primate.. iScience 2022 Nov 18;25(11):105454.
    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105454pubmed: 36405777google scholar: lookup
  10. Spezie G, Fusani L. Male-male associations in spotted bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus maculatus) exhibit attributes of courtship coalitions.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2022;76(7):97.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-022-03200-xpubmed: 35818498google scholar: lookup
  11. Dal Pesco F, Trede F, Zinner D, Fischer J. Male-male social bonding, coalitionary support and reproductive success in wild Guinea baboons.. Proc Biol Sci 2022 May 25;289(1975):20220347.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0347pubmed: 35611539google scholar: lookup
  12. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom.. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  13. Shimada M, Suzuki N. The Contribution of Mutual Grooming to Affiliative Relationships in a Feral Misaki Horse Herd.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 3;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091564pubmed: 32899116google scholar: lookup
  14. Bowyer RT, McCullough DR, Rachlow JL, Ciuti S, Whiting JC. Evolution of ungulate mating systems: Integrating social and environmental factors.. Ecol Evol 2020 Jun;10(11):5160-5178.
    doi: 10.1002/ece3.6246pubmed: 32551090google scholar: lookup
  15. Nuñez CMV, Rubenstein DI. Communication is key: Mother-offspring signaling can affect behavioral responses and offspring survival in feral horses (Equus caballus).. PLoS One 2020;15(4):e0231343.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231343pubmed: 32302348google scholar: lookup
  16. King SL, Allen SJ, Krützen M, Connor RC. Vocal behaviour of allied male dolphins during cooperative mate guarding.. Anim Cogn 2019 Nov;22(6):991-1000.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01290-1pubmed: 31317352google scholar: lookup
  17. Chakrabarti S, Jhala YV. Selfish partners: resource partitioning in male coalitions of Asiatic lions.. Behav Ecol 2017 Nov-Dec;28(6):1532-1539.
    doi: 10.1093/beheco/arx118pubmed: 29622932google scholar: lookup
  18. Thompson NA, Cords M. Stronger social bonds do not always predict greater longevity in a gregarious primate.. Ecol Evol 2018 Feb;8(3):1604-1614.
    doi: 10.1002/ece3.3781pubmed: 29435236google scholar: lookup
  19. Greenbaum G, Renan S, Templeton AR, Bouskila A, Saltz D, Rubenstein DI, Bar-David S. Revealing life-history traits by contrasting genetic estimations with predictions of effective population size.. Conserv Biol 2018 Aug;32(4):817-827.
    doi: 10.1111/cobi.13068pubmed: 29270998google scholar: lookup
  20. Allen SJ, King SL, Krützen M, Brown AM. Multi-modal sexual displays in Australian humpback dolphins.. Sci Rep 2017 Oct 20;7(1):13644.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13898-9pubmed: 29057901google scholar: lookup
  21. Watkins CD, Jones BC. Competition-related factors directly influence preferences for facial cues of dominance in allies.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2016;70(12):2071-2079.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2211-2pubmed: 27881894google scholar: lookup
  22. Goffe AS, Zinner D, Fischer J. Sex and friendship in a multilevel society: behavioural patterns and associations between female and male Guinea baboons.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2016;70:323-336.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-2050-6pubmed: 26900211google scholar: lookup
  23. Wilkinson GS, Carter GG, Bohn KM, Adams DM. Non-kin cooperation in bats.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150095.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0095pubmed: 26729934google scholar: lookup
  24. Wittig RM, Crockford C, Langergraber KE, Zuberbühler K. Triadic social interactions operate across time: a field experiment with wild chimpanzees.. Proc Biol Sci 2014 Mar 22;281(1779):20133155.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3155pubmed: 24500174google scholar: lookup
  25. Clutton-Brock TH, Huchard E. Social competition and selection in males and females.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013;368(1631):20130074.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0074pubmed: 24167304google scholar: lookup
  26. Gilby IC, Brent LJ, Wroblewski EE, Rudicell RS, Hahn BH, Goodall J, Pusey AE. FITNESS BENEFITS OF COALITIONARY AGGRESSION IN MALE CHIMPANZEES.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2013 Mar 1;67(3):373-381.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-012-1457-6pubmed: 23459197google scholar: lookup
  27. Nuñez CM, Adelman JS, Rubenstein DI. Immunocontraception in wild horses (Equus caballus) extends reproductive cycling beyond the normal breeding season.. PLoS One 2010 Oct 26;5(10):e13635.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013635pubmed: 21049017google scholar: lookup
  28. Cameron EZ, Setsaas TH, Linklater WL. Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13850-3.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900639106pubmed: 19667179google scholar: lookup
  29. Grange S, Duncan P, Gaillard JM. Poor horse traders: large mammals trade survival for reproduction during the process of feralization.. Proc Biol Sci 2009 May 22;276(1663):1911-9.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1828pubmed: 19324787google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.