An equine protozoal myeloencephalitis challenge model testing a second transport after inoculation with Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts.
Abstract: Previous challenge studies performed at Ohio State University involved a transport-stress model where the study animals were dosed with Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts on the day of arrival. This study was to test a second transportation of horses after oral inoculation with S. neurona sporocysts. Horses were assigned randomly to groups: group 1, transported 4 days after inoculation (DAI); group 2, at 11 DAI; group 3, at 18 DAI; and group 4, horses were not transported a second time (controls). An overall neurologic score was determined on the basis of a standard numbering system used by veterinarians. All scores are out of 5, which is the most severely affected animal. The mean score for the group 1 horses was 2.42; group 2 horses was 2.5; group 3 horses was 2.75; and group 4 horses was 3.25. Because the group 4 horses did not have a second transport, they were compared with all other groups. Statistically different scores were present between group 4 and groups 1 and 2. There was no difference in the time of seroconversion between groups. There was a difference between the time of onset of first clinical signs between groups 1 and 4. This difference was likely because of the different examination days. Differences in housing and handling were likely the reason for the differences in severity of clinical signs. This model results in consistent, significant clinical signs in all horses at approximately the same time period after inoculation but was most severe in horses that did not experience a second transport.
Publication Date: 2005-02-18 PubMed ID: 15715237DOI: 10.1645/GE-128RGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
- Animal Health
- Animal Studies
- Clinical Signs
- Clinical Study
- Comparative Study
- Diagnosis
- Disease Diagnosis
- Disease Treatment
- Epidemiology
- Equine Diseases
- Equine Health
- Equine Protozoal Myeloencephalitis
- Experimental Methods
- Horse Transport
- Horses
- Neurological Diseases
- Pathology
- Sarcocystis
- Veterinary Care
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Research
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study evaluates the impact of a second transportation on horses infected with Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts, a parasite causing equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM). The research shows that horses subjected to a second transport exhibited less severe symptoms compared to those not transported a second time.
Research Methodology
- The researchers used a transport-stress model that was previously conducted at Ohio State University. In this model, study animals were exposed to the parasite Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts immediately upon arrival.
- In this study, the horses were subjected to a second transportation event after being infected with the parasite.
- The horses were arbitrarily divided into four groups. Group 1 was transported 4 days after infection, Group 2 at 11 DAI, Group 3 at 18 DAI, and Group 4 served as a control group and did not undergo a second transport.
Results and Analysis
- A neurological score was used to assess the severity of the disease in the horses, with 5 being the most severely affected.
- The mean scores for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 2.42, 2.5, 2.75, and 3.25 respectively. Given that Group 4 did not experience a second transport, its score was compared with scores of the other groups.
- Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between Group 4 and Groups 1 and 2, with Group 4 exhibiting more acute symptoms.
- No significant differences were identified in the time of seroconversion (the period from infection to the presence of detectable antibodies in the blood) between the groups.
- However, differences were seen in the onset of the first clinical signs between Group 1 and Group 4, which was likely due to varying examination days.
- Differences in housing and handling were proposed as potential contributing factors to the variations in symptom severity.
Conclusions
- The study found that the model resulted in consistent, significant clinical signs in all horses around the same period post-infection.
- The most severe symptoms were seen in horses that did not undergo a second transport, implying that stress from multiple transports may mitigate the severity of the parasitic infection to some extent.
Cite This Article
APA
Saville WJ, Sofaly CD, Reed SM, Dubey JP, Oglesbee MJ, Lacombe VA, Keene RO, Gugisberg KM, Swensen SW, Shipley RD, Chiang YW, Chu HJ, Ng T.
(2005).
An equine protozoal myeloencephalitis challenge model testing a second transport after inoculation with Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts.
J Parasitol, 90(6), 1406-1410.
https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-128R Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1092, USA. saville.4@osu.edu
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Autopsy / veterinary
- Biological Assay / veterinary
- Encephalomyelitis / parasitology
- Encephalomyelitis / pathology
- Encephalomyelitis / physiopathology
- Encephalomyelitis / veterinary
- Female
- Horse Diseases / parasitology
- Horse Diseases / pathology
- Horse Diseases / physiopathology
- Horses
- Male
- Mice
- Mice, Knockout
- Neurologic Examination / veterinary
- Random Allocation
- Sarcocystis / pathogenicity
- Sarcocystosis / pathology
- Sarcocystosis / physiopathology
- Sarcocystosis / veterinary
- Stress, Physiological / complications
- Stress, Physiological / immunology
- Stress, Physiological / veterinary
- Time Factors
- Transportation
Citations
This article has been cited 3 times.- Reed SM, Furr M, Howe DK, Johnson AL, MacKay RJ, Morrow JK, Pusterla N, Witonsky S. Equine Protozoal Myeloencephalitis: An Updated Consensus Statement with a Focus on Parasite Biology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention. J Vet Intern Med 2016 Mar-Apr;30(2):491-502.
- Dubey JP, Howe DK, Furr M, Saville WJ, Marsh AE, Reed SM, Grigg ME. An update on Sarcocystis neurona infections in animals and equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM). Vet Parasitol 2015 Apr 15;209(1-2):1-42.
- Ellison S, Witonsky S. Evidence that antibodies against recombinant SnSAG1 of Sarcocystis neurona merozoites are involved in infection and immunity in equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. Can J Vet Res 2009 Jul;73(3):176-83.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists