Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2013; (45); 26-30; doi: 10.1111/evj.12158

An inertial sensor-based system can objectively assess diagnostic anaesthesia of the equine foot.

Abstract: In order for changes in lameness to be accurately and repeatably detected and recorded during diagnostic investigations, an objective measure of lameness is required. Objective: To ascertain whether an inertial sensor-based system can distinguish between a positive and negative response to diagnostic anaesthesia of the foot and objectively assess the effect of a positive response on the trot. Methods: Restrospective clinical study. Methods: Data obtained during lameness investigations undertaken between August 2011 and December 2012 in which either a palmar digital or abaxial sesamoid nerve block was performed were retrospectively reviewed. Response to diagnostic anaesthesia was categorised as positive (n = 14) or negative (n = 9) by one of 2 evaluators before analysis of kinematic data (i.e. blinded). Changes in maximum and minimum head difference (ΔHDMax and ΔHDMin) and change in head movement asymmetry/change in pelvic movement asymmetry (ΔHMA/PMA, measure of asymmetry) allocated to each limb were calculated. A Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for ΔHDMax, ΔHDMin and ΔHMA for the blocked limb to identify cut-off values to distinguish positive and negative responses to the block. Results: Median ΔHDMax and ΔHDMin were significantly greater after a positive response to diagnostic anaesthesia (P<0.01). Change in head movement asymmetry allocated to the blocked limb and contralateral forelimb and ΔPMA allocated to the contralateral hindlimb were significantly greater in the positive response group (P<0.05). Change in head movement asymmetry allocated to the blocked limb and ΔHDMax and ΔHDMin are useful diagnostic tests for identifying positive response to anaesthesia (area under the curve = 0.98, 0.83 and 0.96 respectively). Conclusions: An inertial sensor-based system can identify a positive response to diagnostic anaesthesia of the foot. Symmetry of movement allocated to the blocked limb, contralateral forelimb and contralateral hindlimb significantly improve, and head movement significantly decreases in horses with a positive response to the block. Cut-off values for a positive response have been identified with good sensitivity and specificity. Forelimb lameness significantly affects contralateral hindlimb movement, which has implications for the investigation of multi-limb lameness.
Publication Date: 2013-12-01 PubMed ID: 24304400DOI: 10.1111/evj.12158Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research presents evidence pointing to the effective use of an inertial sensor-based system to differentiate between positive and negative responses in horses subjected to diagnostic anaesthesia of the foot.

Objective of the Research

The primary aim of this research was to establish whether an inertial sensor-based system can:

  • Distinguish between a positive and negative response from horses subjected to diagnostic anaesthesia of the foot.
  • Objectively measure the effect of the positive reaction during trotting.

Methodology

The approach taken to carry out the testing involved a retrospective clinical study, utilizing:

  • Data obtained from lameness investigations carried out between August 2011 and December 2012.
  • In these investigations, either a palmar digital or abaxial sesamoid nerve block had been implemented.
  • A response to diagnostic anaesthesia was classified as either positive or negative by blind evaluators.
  • The alterations in maximum and minimum head difference (ΔHDMax and ΔHDMin) and change in head movement asymmetry/change in pelvic movement asymmetry (ΔHMA/PMA, measure of asymmetry) allocated to each limb were measured.
  • Finally, to identify cut-off values that would separate positive and negative responses to the block, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated.

Results

The results of the study confirmed that:

  • The Median ΔHDMax and ΔHDMin recorded were significantly greater after a positive response to diagnostic anaesthesia.
  • Change in head movement asymmetry allocated to the blocked limb and contralateral forelimb and ΔPMA allocated to the contralateral hindlimb was significantly greater in the positive response group.
  • Change in head movement asymmetry was found useful in identifying positive responses to anaesthesia, proving it to be very reliable.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the research determined that:

  • An inertial sensor-based system effectively identifies a positive response to diagnostic anaesthesia of the foot in horses.
  • In horses demonstrating a positive response, symmetry of movement allocated to the blocked limb, contralateral forelimb and contralateral hindlimb significantly improved, and head movement significantly decreased.
  • The research provided cut-off values for a positive response which were identified to have high sensitivity and specificity.
  • The study also found that forelimb lameness significantly affects contralateral hindlimb movement – a finding that has implications for the investigation of multi-limb lameness.

Cite This Article

APA
Maliye S, Voute L, Lund D, Marshall JF. (2013). An inertial sensor-based system can objectively assess diagnostic anaesthesia of the equine foot. Equine Vet J Suppl(45), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12158

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 45
Pages: 26-30

Researcher Affiliations

Maliye, S
  • Weipers Centre Equine Hospital, University of Glasgow, UK.
Voute, L
    Lund, D
      Marshall, J F

        MeSH Terms

        • Anesthesia
        • Animals
        • Biomechanical Phenomena
        • Forelimb
        • Hindlimb
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horses
        • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis

        Citations

        This article has been cited 10 times.
        1. Pfau T, Scott WM, Sternberg Allen T. Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Reining Quarter Horses during Trot In-Hand, on the Lunge and during Ridden Exercise. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 27;12(5).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12050596pubmed: 35268165google scholar: lookup
        2. Steinke SL, Montgomery JB, Barden JM. Accelerometry-Based Step Count Validation for Horse Movement Analysis During Stall Confinement. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:681213.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.681213pubmed: 34239913google scholar: lookup
        3. Marunova E, Dod L, Witte S, Pfau T. Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 3;11(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11061665pubmed: 34204921google scholar: lookup
        4. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral Spine in High-Level Dressage Horses Ridden in a Straight Line, in Sitting Trot and Seated Canter Compared to In-Hand Trot. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 20;11(3).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
        5. Vertz J, Deblanc D, Rhodin M, Pfau T. Effect of a unilateral hind limb orthotic lift on upper body movement symmetry in the trotting horse. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0199447.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199447pubmed: 29928020google scholar: lookup
        6. Pfau T, Noordwijk K, Sepulveda Caviedes MF, Persson-Sjodin E, Barstow A, Forbes B, Rhodin M. Head, withers and pelvic movement asymmetry and their relative timing in trot in racing Thoroughbreds in training. Equine Vet J 2018 Jan;50(1):117-124.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.12705pubmed: 28548349google scholar: lookup
        7. Zhang Z, Yang Y, Ma Y, Mai Z, Fu H, Wang X, Cao X, Li T, Li J, Guo Q. Clinical Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome Analysis of a Horse with Proximal Sesamoid Bone Fracture Complicated by Flexor Tendinitis. Vet Sci 2026 Jan 2;13(1).
          doi: 10.3390/vetsci13010040pubmed: 41600695google scholar: lookup
        8. Zhang Z, Li J, Mai Z, Yang Y, Fu H, Cao X, Li T, Guo Q, Ma Y. Clinical study on the effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on healing of proximal sesamoid bone fractures in Yili horses. Sci Rep 2025 Aug 28;15(1):31697.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17424-0pubmed: 40877380google scholar: lookup
        9. Kallerud AS, Marques-Smith P, Bendiksen HK, Fjordbakk CT. Objective movement asymmetry in horses is comparable between markerless technology and sensor-based systems. Equine Vet J 2025 Jan;57(1):115-125.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.14089pubmed: 38566453google scholar: lookup
        10. Pfau T, Clark KS, Bolt DM, Lai JS, Perrier M, Rhodes JB, Smith RK, Fiske-Jackson A. Changes in Head and Pelvic Movement Symmetry after Diagnostic Anaesthesia: Interactions between Subjective Judgement Categories and Commonly Applied Blocks. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 6;13(24).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13243769pubmed: 38136806google scholar: lookup