An overview of the benefits of animal-assisted interventions in medical and therapeutic contexts for human health: cognitive mechanisms, sensory perception and welfare considerations.
Abstract: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are programs that incorporate animals as a therapeutic factor to improve human well-being. To date, these programs have been associated with significant physical and physiological benefits to human health. Animals have been incorporated as monitoring companions, such as diabetes-alert and seizure-alert dogs. Moreover, animal therapy for people with mental health issues, physical impairments, or autism spectrum disorders has shown social and communicative benefits. Although AAIs are proposed as a complementary treatment approach to humans with mental health issues or to individuals with autism spectrum disorder, further research is needed to address the benefits of AAIs in other medical issues or the instances where animal therapy might not provide a positive effect to patients. This paper provides an overview of the diverse ways in which animals (particularly dogs and horses) can support people, with a special focus on the health benefits they provide. The objective further incorporates the cognitive processes and the ontogenetic development of sensory systems relevant to animal-assisted therapy (AAT).
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) use animals to improve human health and well-being.
These interventions have shown various physical, physiological, social, and cognitive benefits.
The paper reviews how animals, especially dogs and horses, support human health, focusing on cognitive mechanisms, sensory perception, and welfare considerations.
Introduction to Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs)
AAIs are structured programs integrating animals as therapeutic agents to enhance human well-being.
Animals in AAIs act as both companions and therapeutic facilitators.
Common animals used in AAIs include dogs and horses due to their social and perceptual abilities.
These programs are used in multiple medical and therapeutic contexts to complement traditional treatments.
Health Benefits Associated with AAIs
Physical and Physiological Benefits:
Reduction in blood pressure and heart rate.
Improvement in motor skills and physical rehabilitation, especially in therapies involving horses (equine-assisted therapy).
Enhanced mobility and physical activity encouragement, sometimes motivated by the presence of animals.
Monitoring and Assistance Roles:
Dogs trained as diabetes-alert animals, detecting blood sugar changes.
Seizure-alert dogs provide advance warning for seizure-prone individuals.
Mental Health Benefits:
Reduction in anxiety and depression symptoms through companionship and interaction.
Improved mood and social engagement in individuals with mental health conditions.
Enhancement of communication skills and social behavior, particularly in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Cognitive Mechanisms and Sensory Perception in AAIs
Animals stimulate multiple cognitive processes via sensory engagement including touch, sight, and sound.
Interaction with animals can activate neural pathways associated with emotional regulation and stress reduction.
Sensory systems involved in therapy include:
Tactile stimulation through petting or grooming.
Visual and auditory engagement, such as observing animal behavior or listening to sounds of movement.
Ontogenetic development (development of sensory systems over lifespan) is considered for tailoring interventions effectively, especially for children or individuals with sensory processing differences.
Special Focus on Dogs and Horses
Dogs:
Highly social and attuned to human emotions, making them effective for mental health interventions.
Can be trained for specific support roles like alerting medical conditions.
Widely used due to ease of access and strong human-animal bond potential.
Horses:
Used in equine-assisted therapies which provide both psychological and physical benefits.
Movement of horses helps improve motor skills and sensory integration.
Interaction promotes confidence, emotional regulation, and social skills.
Considerations and Limitations
While many benefits are documented, the effectiveness of AAIs can depend on:
Patient condition and individual variability.
Type of animal and training quality.
Specific therapeutic goals and duration of intervention.
Further research is needed to:
Explore benefits beyond mental health and ASD, including broader medical issues.
Identify situations where animal therapy might be ineffective or potentially adverse.
Develop standardized protocols and assessment methods for AAI efficacy.
Ethical and welfare considerations for animals involved must be addressed to ensure humane treatment and sustainable programs.
Conclusion
AAIs represent a promising complementary approach in medical and therapeutic contexts to promote human well-being.
Dogs and horses are primary animal candidates offering a range of sensory and cognitive benefits.
Balancing benefits with welfare considerations and further investigative research will optimize the use of AAIs across diverse populations and conditions.
Cite This Article
APA
Mota-Rojas D, Nannoni E, Strappini AC, Hernández-Avalos I, Martínez-Burnes J, Domínguez-Oliva A, Mora-Medina P, Abd El-Aziz AH, Olmos-Hernández A, Miranda-Cortes A, Casas-Alvarado A, Torres-Bernal F, Grandin T.
(2026).
An overview of the benefits of animal-assisted interventions in medical and therapeutic contexts for human health: cognitive mechanisms, sensory perception and welfare considerations.
Front Vet Sci, 13, 1757427.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1757427
Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Nannoni, Eleonora
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, DIMEVET, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Strappini, Ana C
Animal Health & Welfare, Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Hernández-Avalos, Ismael
Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, FESC, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuautitlán, Mexico.
Martínez-Burnes, Julio
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Instituto de Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Victoria City, Mexico.
Domínguez-Oliva, Adriana
Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Mora-Medina, Patricia
Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, FESC, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuautitlán, Mexico.
Abd El-Aziz, Ayman H
Department of Animal Husbandry and Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt.
Olmos-Hernández, Adriana
Department Bioterio and Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, Mexico.
Miranda-Cortes, Agatha
Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, FESC, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuautitlán, Mexico.
Casas-Alvarado, Alejandro
Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, FESC, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuautitlán, Mexico.
Torres-Bernal, Fabiola
Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Grandin, Temple
Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author DM-R declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.