Analyze Diet
The Journal of veterinary medical science2012; 75(2); 165-172; doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0203

Anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of propofol, medetomidine, lidocaine and butorphanol total intravenous anesthesia in horses.

Abstract: Anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of medetomidine, lidocaine, butorphanol and propofol total intravenous anesthesia (MLBP-TIVA) were evaluated in horses undergoing an experimental surgery. Ten horses were premedicated with an intravenous injection (IV) of medetomidine (5 µg/kg) and butorphanol (20 µg/kg). Anesthesia was induced by administration of 1% propofol (3 mg/kg, IV) at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min (n=5, group-1) or 2% propofol administered at a rate of 6 mg/kg/min (n=5, group-2) following administration of lidocaine (1 mg/kg, IV) and then maintained by infusions of propofol, medetomidine (3.5 µg/kg/hr), lidocaine (3 mg/kg/hr) and butorphanol (24 µg/kg/hr). The mean durations of anesthesia and propofol infusion rate required for maintaining surgical anesthesia were 130 ± 17 min and 0.10 ± 0.01 mg/kg/min in group 1 and 129 ± 14 min and 0.10 ± 0.02 mg/kg/min in group 2. Four horses in group 1 and 2 horses in group 2 paddled following recumbency during induction of anesthesia. The median quality scores for induction (0-4: poor-excellent) and recovery (0-5: unable to stand-excellent) were 3 and 4 for both groups, respectively. Transition to anesthesia (the first 20-min period after induction) was uneventful in group 2, while all horses showed a light plane of anesthesia in group 1. The quality score (0-3: poor-excellent) for the transition to anesthesia in group 2 was significantly higher than in group 1 (median 3 versus 1, P=0.009). Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were maintained within acceptable ranges, but hypercapnia occurred during anesthesia in both groups. In conclusion, MLBP-TIVA may provide clinically useful surgical anesthesia in horses. A rapid induction with propofol may improve the qualities of induction and transition to MLBP-TIVA.
Publication Date: 2012-10-12 PubMed ID: 23059840DOI: 10.1292/jvms.12-0203Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the effects of a specific category of anesthetic drugs used on horses during surgery, focusing on their cardiorespiratory impact. It concludes that the drugs can provide effective surgical anesthesia with minimal side effects, although use of propofol, in particular, needs further investigation for its potential to enhance the transition to anesthesia.

Study Design and Procedure

  • The research team evaluated the anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of four drugs – propofol, medetomidine, lidocaine, and butorphanol – when used in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in horses undergoing experimental surgery. The four-drug mix is referred to as MLBP-TIVA.
  • Ten horses were premedicated with medetomidine and butorphanol via intravenous injection, then put under anesthesia using propofol, which was given at two different concentrations to create two study groups of five horses each.
  • Following propofol administration, lidocaine was administered. Anesthesia was then maintained by continuous infusions of all four drugs.

Anesthesia Duration and Quality

  • The mean duration of anesthesia and minimum required propofol infusion rate for maintaining surgical anesthesia were just over two hours. These measurements did not significantly vary across the two study groups.
  • The quality of anesthesia induction and recovery were both deemed satisfactory, with median quality scores of three and four on a scale of zero to four and zero to five, respectively.

Transition to Anesthesia and Cardiorespiratory Effects

  • The transition to anesthesia went more smoothly in the group given a higher concentration of propofol (Group 2), compared to the group that received the lower concentration (Group 1).
  • Group 2 also had a significantly higher quality score for the transition to anesthesia compared to Group 1.
  • Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were maintained within acceptable levels in both groups, though both experienced hypercapnia (excessive carbon dioxide in the bloodstream) during anesthesia.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that MLBP-TIVA can provide effective surgical anesthesia in horses.
  • However, the authors noted that rapid induction with propofol at a higher concentration might further improve the quality of anesthesia induction and the transition to sedation.

Cite This Article

APA
Ishizuka T, Itami T, Tamura J, Saitoh Y, Saitoh M, Umar MA, Miyoshi K, Yamashita K, Muir WW. (2012). Anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of propofol, medetomidine, lidocaine and butorphanol total intravenous anesthesia in horses. J Vet Med Sci, 75(2), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.12-0203

Publication

ISSN: 1347-7439
NlmUniqueID: 9105360
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 75
Issue: 2
Pages: 165-172

Researcher Affiliations

Ishizuka, Tomohito
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.
Itami, Takaharu
    Tamura, Jun
      Saitoh, Yasuo
        Saitoh, Motoaki
          Umar, Mohammed A
            Miyoshi, Kenjirou
              Yamashita, Kazuto
                Muir, William W

                  MeSH Terms

                  • Anesthesia Recovery Period
                  • Anesthesia, Intravenous / veterinary
                  • Animals
                  • Butorphanol / administration & dosage
                  • Butorphanol / pharmacology
                  • Horses / physiology
                  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage
                  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / pharmacology
                  • Lidocaine / administration & dosage
                  • Lidocaine / pharmacology
                  • Medetomidine / administration & dosage
                  • Medetomidine / pharmacology
                  • Propofol / administration & dosage
                  • Propofol / pharmacology

                  Citations

                  This article has been cited 3 times.
                  1. Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK. Recovery after General Anaesthesia in Adult Horses: A Structured Summary of the Literature.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 14;11(6).
                    doi: 10.3390/ani11061777pubmed: 34198637google scholar: lookup
                  2. Aoki M, Wakuno A, Kushiro A, Mae N, Kakizaki M, Nagata SI, Ohta M. Evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol-guaifenesin-medetomidine and alfaxalone-guaifenesin-medetomidine in Thoroughbred horses undergoing castration.. J Vet Med Sci 2017 Dec 22;79(12):2011-2018.
                    doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0658pubmed: 29057764google scholar: lookup
                  3. Ishizuka T, Tamura J, Nagaro T, Sudo K, Itami T, Umar MA, Miyoshi K, Sano T, Yamashita K. Effects of intermittent positive pressure ventilation on cardiopulmonary function in horses anesthetized with total intravenous anesthesia using combination of medetomidine, lidocaine, butorphanol and propofol (MLBP-TIVA).. J Vet Med Sci 2014 Dec;76(12):1577-82.
                    doi: 10.1292/jvms.14-0077pubmed: 25649938google scholar: lookup