Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 157; 105779; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105779

Antibiotics prescribing patterns and association with system-specific pathologies in equine veterinary practice: Insights from a 12-year study at a veterinary teaching hospital.

Abstract: Antibiotics are essential in veterinary medicine, enhancing animal health and welfare. However, widespread use contributes to resistance, increasing the risk of treatment failure and the transmission to humans. Objective: Analyze antibiotic prescribing practices in an equine internal medicine unit, focusing on factors influencing use, particularly Highest Priority Critically Important Antimicrobials (HPCIAs). Methods: 1315 adult equids, including horses, donkeys and mules, presented for different diseases to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital (VTH) of the University of Pisa from 2011 to 2023. Retrospective study focused on the prudent antibiotics use in equids. Medical records were reviewed, and data were extracted from the VTH management system, including antimicrobial class, patient characteristics, and body system/system-specific pathology. Results: Antibiotic use varied significantly across system-specific pathology (p < 0.001), with highest usage in integumentary, ocular, and respiratory conditions. Aminoglycosides were the most frequently administered class, followed by tetracyclines and fixed-dose combinations (preparations containing two or more antimicrobial active ingredients). Over time, antibiotic class usage shifted significantly (p < 0.001). Ceftiofur and gentamicin were used in pneumonia and pleuropneumonia, oxytetracycline was mainly used for piroplasmosis, and tobramycin for corneal ulcers. Combination therapy, particularly gentamicin-ceftiofur, was most commonly used for respiratory infections. Conclusions: Antibiotic prescribing patterns in equine practice are heterogeneous and directly linked to system-specific pathologies. The observed use of HPCIAs, coupled with the dominance of aminoglycosides and tetracyclines, highlights areas where prescribing practices could be optimized. These results suggest the relevance of developing and implementing targeted Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) strategies, focusing on evidence-based diagnostics and educational programs.
Publication Date: 2026-01-07 PubMed ID: 41513111DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105779Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Antibiotic prescribing in equine veterinary practice varies depending on the specific body system affected, with certain high-priority antibiotics used more commonly in treating particular diseases. A 12-year retrospective study at a veterinary teaching hospital analyzed these patterns to identify opportunities for more prudent and targeted antimicrobial use.

Study Overview and Objectives

  • The study reviewed 1315 cases of adult equids (horses, donkeys, and mules) treated at the University of Pisa Veterinary Teaching Hospital between 2011 and 2023.
  • The primary objective was to analyze antibiotic prescribing patterns in equine internal medicine, with a focus on usage of Highest Priority Critically Important Antimicrobials (HPCIAs).
  • It aimed to associate antibiotic use with specific system-level pathologies to understand factors influencing antimicrobial choice.

Methods

  • A retrospective review of medical records was conducted, extracting data including:
    • Antimicrobial classes prescribed
    • Characteristics of the patients (type of equid, condition)
    • Disease localization by body system and pathology type
  • Use of statistical analysis to examine associations between antibiotic class usage and system-specific diseases over the 12-year period.

Key Findings

  • Variation by Body System: Antibiotic use significantly varied by system-specific pathology (p < 0.001).
    • Highest antibiotic use was seen in integumentary (skin), ocular (eye), and respiratory conditions.
  • Antibiotic Classes:
    • Aminoglycosides were the most frequently used antibiotic class.
    • Tetracyclines and fixed-dose combinations (multi-antimicrobial preparations) were also commonly used.
    • Usage patterns of antibiotic classes shifted significantly over time (p < 0.001), indicating changes in prescribing behavior or disease trends.
  • Disease-Specific Usage Patterns:
    • Ceftiofur and gentamicin predominated in treating pneumonia and pleuropneumonia.
    • Oxytetracycline was mainly used for piroplasmosis, a tick-borne disease.
    • Tobramycin was primarily prescribed for corneal ulcers.
    • Combination therapy, especially gentamicin-ceftiofur, was commonly employed for respiratory infections.

Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship

  • The findings highlight variability in prescribing practices linked to specific diseases and body systems.
  • The frequent use of HPCIAs, particularly aminoglycosides and tetracyclines, signals a need for careful evaluation to balance effective treatment with antimicrobial resistance risks.
  • There is a clear opportunity to optimize antibiotic use through targeted Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) programs, which could include:
    • Implementation of evidence-based diagnostic tools to guide more precise antibiotic selection.
    • Educational initiatives to inform veterinarians about prudent antimicrobial use.
    • Regular monitoring and feedback on prescribing patterns to encourage best practices.

Conclusion

  • This comprehensive 12-year study provides valuable insights into the patterns of antibiotic use in equine veterinary practice.
  • It underscores the importance of tailoring antibiotic therapies according to the specific pathology and body system affected.
  • By focusing stewardship efforts on these findings, veterinary practices can improve treatment efficacy while mitigating the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Cite This Article

APA
Vernaccini M, de Marchi L, Bindi F, Meucci V, Sala G, Cingottini D, Sgorbini M. (2026). Antibiotics prescribing patterns and association with system-specific pathologies in equine veterinary practice: Insights from a 12-year study at a veterinary teaching hospital. J Equine Vet Sci, 157, 105779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105779

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 157
Pages: 105779
PII: S0737-0806(26)00015-8

Researcher Affiliations

Vernaccini, M
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa IT 56122, Italy.
de Marchi, L
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa IT 56122, Italy.
Bindi, F
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa IT 56122, Italy. Electronic address: francesca.bindi@phd.unipi.it.
Meucci, V
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa IT 56122, Italy.
Sala, G
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa IT 56122, Italy.
Cingottini, D
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa IT 56122, Italy.
Sgorbini, M
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa IT 56122, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Horses
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Hospitals, Animal
  • Hospitals, Teaching
  • Drug Prescriptions / veterinary
  • Equidae
  • Female
  • Male

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.