Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1992; 24(6); 450-456; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1992.tb02875.x

Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 233 horses with musculoskeletal infection during 1979-1989.

Abstract: Bacterial culture and susceptibility results were analysed from 233 horses with septic arthritis/tenosynovitis or osteomyelitis that developed after fracture repair. Antibiotics were deemed highly effective, effective or ineffective if > or = 85%, 70-84.9% or < 70% of the isolates were susceptible respectively. In total, 424 bacterial types were isolated; 386 were aerobic or facultative and 38 were anaerobic. Enterobacteriaceae (28.8%) were the most common bacterial group isolated, followed by non-beta-haemolytic streptococci (13.0%), coagulase-positive staphylococci (11.8%), beta-haemolytic streptococci (9.4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (7.3%). The remainder of the organisms were other Gram-negative (15.8%), other Gram-positive (2.3%) and miscellaneous (2.6%) bacteria. Penicillin and ampicillin were highly effective against beta-haemolytic streptococci, but were ineffective against other bacteria. Ampicillin was no more effective than penicillin against most bacteria. Amikacin was the most effective antibiotic against the wide range of bacteria isolated in this study. Amikacin was highly effective against coagulase-positive staphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas and was effective against coagulase-negative staphylococci and Actinobacillus. Gentamycin was not highly effective against any bacterial group; but was effective against coagulase-positive and negative staphylococci, Pseudomonas, Salmonella and Actinobacillus. Kanamycin was ineffective against all bacteria with the exception of Actinobacillus. Cephalothin was highly effective against beta-haemolytic streptococci, coagulase-positive staphylococci and Actinobacillus and was effective against coagulase-negative staphylococci.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Date: 1992-11-01 PubMed ID: 1459058DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1992.tb02875.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial infections in horses, specifically musculoskeletal infections resulting from fracture repair. The study found that Amikacin was the most effective antibiotic against the wide range of bacteria isolated.

Study Purpose and Methodology

  • The researchers analyzed bacterial culture and susceptibility results obtained from 233 horses that had developed septic arthritis/tenosynovitis or osteomyelitis following fracture repair.
  • The effectiveness of antibiotics was assessed based on their ability to render a certain percentage of the bacterial isolates susceptible — antibiotics were deemed ‘highly effective’ if they could make 85% or more of the isolates susceptible, ‘effective’ if they could affect 70-84.9% of isolates, and ‘ineffective’ if they worked on less than 70% of the isolates.

Findings of the Study

  • The study documented the occurrence of 424 types of bacterial isolates. The majority of these were aerobic or facultative bacteria, while a small percentage was anaerobic bacteria.
  • Enterobacteriaceae were the most common type of bacteria identified, constituting 28.8% of the isolates. Other types of bacteria isolated included non-beta-haemolytic streptococci, coagulase-positive staphylococci, beta-haemolytic streptococci, and coagulase-negative staphylococci.
  • The study found that penicillin and ampicillin were highly effective against beta-haemolytic streptococci, but not against other types of bacteria, while ampicillin was proven to be no more effective than penicillin against most bacteria.
  • Overall, Amikacin emerged as the most effective antibiotic against the wide range of bacteria isolated in this study. It was highly effective against coagulase-positive staphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas and also showed effectiveness against coagulase-negative staphylococci and Actinobacillus.
  • Other antibiotics, such as gentamycin and kanamycin, had more limited effectiveness, and kanamycin was found to be ineffective against all bacteria with the exception of Actinobacillus.

Implications of the research

  • The results suggest that Amikacin could be a highly effective antibiotic for treating a wide range of post-operative musculoskeletal bacterial infections in horses. Other antibiotics like penicillin, ampicillin, and cephalothin also showed some effectiveness against certain types of bacteria.
  • The findings of this research could serve as a guide for veterinarians and animal health professionals in choosing the most effective antimicrobials for treating such infections in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Moore RM, Schneider RK, Kowalski J, Bramlage LR, Mecklenburg LM, Kohn CW. (1992). Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 233 horses with musculoskeletal infection during 1979-1989. Equine Vet J, 24(6), 450-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1992.tb02875.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 6
Pages: 450-456

Researcher Affiliations

Moore, R M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1089.
Schneider, R K
    Kowalski, J
      Bramlage, L R
        Mecklenburg, L M
          Kohn, C W

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
            • Arthritis, Infectious / microbiology
            • Arthritis, Infectious / veterinary
            • Bacteria / drug effects
            • Bacteria / isolation & purification
            • Enterobacteriaceae / drug effects
            • Enterobacteriaceae / isolation & purification
            • Gram-Negative Bacteria / drug effects
            • Gram-Negative Bacteria / isolation & purification
            • Gram-Positive Bacteria / drug effects
            • Gram-Positive Bacteria / isolation & purification
            • Horse Diseases / microbiology
            • Horses
            • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
            • Osteomyelitis / microbiology
            • Osteomyelitis / veterinary
            • Retrospective Studies
            • Tenosynovitis / microbiology
            • Tenosynovitis / veterinary

            Citations

            This article has been cited 13 times.
            1. Kuroda T, Minamijima Y, Niwa H, Tamura N, Mita H, Fukuda K, Kaimachi M, Suzuki Y, Enoki Y, Taguchi K, Matsumoto K, Toutain PL, Bousquet-Melou A, Kasashima Y. Rational dosage regimens for cephalothin and cefazolin using pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics analysis in healthy horses. Equine Vet J 2021 Nov;53(6):1239-1249.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.13406pubmed: 33341979google scholar: lookup
            2. Dahan R, Oreff GL, Tatz AJ, Raz T, Britzi M, Kelmer G. Pharmacokinetics of regional limb perfusion using a combination of amikacin and penicillin in standing horses. Can Vet J 2019 Mar;60(3):294-299.
              pubmed: 30872853
            3. López C, Alvarez ME, Carmona JU. Temporal Bacteriostatic Effect and Growth Factor Loss in Equine Platelet Components and Plasma Cultured with Methicillin-Sensitive and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Vet Med Int 2014;2014:525826.
              doi: 10.1155/2014/525826pubmed: 25506468google scholar: lookup
            4. Berghaus LJ, Giguère S, Guldbech K, Warner E, Ugorji U, Berghaus RD. Comparison of Etest, disk diffusion, and broth macrodilution for in vitro susceptibility testing of Rhodococcus equi. J Clin Microbiol 2015 Jan;53(1):314-8.
              doi: 10.1128/JCM.02673-14pubmed: 25378571google scholar: lookup
            5. Hyde RM, Lynch TM, Clark CK, Slone DE, Hughes FE. The influence of perfusate volume on antimicrobial concentration in synovial fluid following intravenous regional limb perfusion in the standing horse. Can Vet J 2013 Apr;54(4):363-7.
              pubmed: 24082163
            6. Clark C, Greenwood S, Boison JO, Chirino-Trejo M, Dowling PM. Bacterial isolates from equine infections in western Canada (1998-2003). Can Vet J 2008 Feb;49(2):153-60.
              pubmed: 18309745
            7. Adams AR, Haines GR, Brown MP, Gronwall R, Merritt K. Pharmacokinetics of difloxacin and its concentration in body fluids and endometrial tissues of mares after repeated intragastric administration. Can J Vet Res 2005 Jul;69(3):229-35.
              pubmed: 16187554
            8. Mitchell C, Riley CB. Evaluation and treatment of an adult quarter horse with an unusual fracture of the humerus and septic arthritis. Can Vet J 2002 Feb;43(2):120-2.
              pubmed: 11842594
            9. Butt TD, Bailey JV, Dowling PM, Fretz PB. Comparison of 2 techniques for regional antibiotic delivery to the equine forelimb: intraosseous perfusion vs. intravenous perfusion. Can Vet J 2001 Aug;42(8):617-22.
              pubmed: 11519271
            10. Haines GR, Brown MP, Gronwall RR, Merritt KA, Baltzley LK. Pharmacokinetics of orbifloxacin and its concentration in body fluids and in endometrial tissues of mares. Can J Vet Res 2001 Jul;65(3):181-7.
              pubmed: 11480524
            11. Haines GR, Brown MP, Gronwall RR, Merritt KA. Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intragastric administration to mares. Can J Vet Res 2000 Jul;64(3):171-7.
              pubmed: 10935883
            12. Loppnow Z, Kersh K, Wang C, Spaethe S, Troy J. Clinical use of antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in adult horses diagnosed with synovial sepsis or penetrating synovial wounds at a single equine referral hospital in the Midwest United States-163 cases (2010-2020). Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1504486.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1504486pubmed: 40206250google scholar: lookup
            13. Kabir A, Lamichhane B, Habib T, Adams A, El-Sheikh Ali H, Slovis NM, Troedsson MHT, Helmy YA. Antimicrobial Resistance in Equines: A Growing Threat to Horse Health and Beyond-A Comprehensive Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024 Jul 29;13(8).
              doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080713pubmed: 39200013google scholar: lookup