FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Surg / Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 33 t...
Veterinary surgery : VS2020; 49(7); 1283-1291; doi: 10.1111/vsu.13474

Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 33 thoroughbred horses with arytenoid chondropathy (2005-2019).

Abstract: To describe the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates cultured from surgical specimens of infected arytenoid cartilage and granulomas. Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Thirty-three thoroughbred horses. Methods: Hospital records were retrieved for all horses admitted to a referral hospital for arytenoid chondropathy surgery that had samples submitted for culture and sensitivity between 2005 and 2019. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results: In total, 56 bacterial isolates were obtained. Gram-positive bacteria (58%), Gram-negative bacteria (54%), and anaerobes (33%) were cultured from samples. Fifty-eight percent of horses had multiple bacteria isolated. Streptococcus spp were the most common (32%), followed by Enterobacteriaceae (13%). Bacterial isolates were sensitive to ceftiofur (83%), followed by ampicillin (64%), tetracycline (48%), enrofloxacin (45%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (41%), and gentamicin (18%). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was present in 44% of bacterial isolates. Conclusions: A wide variety of bacteria was cultured, providing evidence that secondary opportunistic infection by common respiratory bacteria is likely a factor in arytenoid chondropathy. Multidrug resistance was higher than what has been previously reported in equine respiratory samples. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had low effectiveness. Conclusions: Because culture and sensitivity testing is not available in the diagnosis of mild to moderate arytenoid chondropathy, the information from this study may allow for more targeted broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment to limit disease progression when the disease is first identified. The antimicrobial susceptibilities and MDR found in this study emphasize the importance of following current antimicrobial guidelines and highlight the requirement for surgical intervention rather than continued medical treatment in cases that do not resolve with initial antimicrobial therapy.
© 2020 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-08-07 PubMed ID: 32767594DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13474Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper explores the types and prevalence of bacteria found in infected arytenoid cartilage in thoroughbred horses, as well as the effectiveness of different antibiotics on these bacteria. The paper also emphasizes the importance of targeted treatment to limit disease progression and suggests changes to the approach in medical care if initial treatment is unsuccessful.

Study Methodology

  • The study is retrospective and analyses hospital records of thoroughbred horses that were admitted for arytenoid chondropathy surgery and had samples submitted for culture and sensitivity from 2005 to 2019.
  • Descriptive analyses of the data were performed.
  • The report studied samples from 33 horses; from these samples, 56 bacterial isolates were obtained.

Results Analysis

  • The bacterial isolates included a mix of Gram-positive bacteria (58%), Gram-negative bacteria (54%), and anaerobes (33%).
  • More than half of the horses had multiple bacteria isolated.
  • The most common bacteria found were Streptococcus spp (32%), followed by Enterobacteriaceae (13%).
  • The bacterial isolates exhibited the highest sensitivity to the antibiotic ceftiofur (83%), followed by ampicillin (64%), tetracycline (48%), enrofloxacin (45%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (41%), and gentamicin (18%).
  • Significantly, Multidrug resistance (MDR) was observed in 44% of the bacterial isolates.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The wide variety of bacteria cultured gives evidence that secondary opportunistic infection by common respiratory bacteria are likely a factor to consider in arytenoid chondropathy.
  • The high level of multidrug resistance found in these bacteria was higher than what has been previously reported in equine respiratory samples.
  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had low effectiveness against the bacterial isolates in this study.
  • The findings of this study could potentially help in providing more targeted broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment, especially when the disease is first identified.
  • Results from this study emphasize the importance of adhering to current antimicrobial guidelines and also highlights the need for surgical intervention rather than continued medical treatment in cases that do not resolve with initial antimicrobial therapy.

Cite This Article

APA
Johnston GCA, Lumsden JM. (2020). Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 33 thoroughbred horses with arytenoid chondropathy (2005-2019). Vet Surg, 49(7), 1283-1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13474

Publication

Veterinary surgery : VS
ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 49
Issue: 7
Pages: 1283-1291

Researcher Affiliations

Johnston, Georgina C A
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
Lumsden, Jonathan M
  • Randwick Equine Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Arytenoid Cartilage / pathology
  • Bacteria / drug effects
  • Cartilage Diseases / drug therapy
  • Cartilage Diseases / microbiology
  • Cartilage Diseases / veterinary
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
  • Gram-Negative Bacteria
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
  • Retrospective Studies

References

This article includes 33 references
  1. Ducharme NG, Rossignol F. Larynx. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, eds. Equine Surgery. 5th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2019:734-769.
  2. Garrett KS, Embertson RM, Woodie JB, Cheetham J. Ultrasound features of arytenoid chondritis in Thoroughbred horses. Equine Vet J 2013;45:598-603.
  3. Kelly G, Lumsden JM, Dunkerly G, Williams T, Hutchins DR. Idiopathic mucosal lesions of the arytenoid cartilages of 21 Thoroughbred yearlings: 1997-2001. Equine Vet J 2003;35:276-281.
  4. Jensen R, Lauerman LH, Braddy PM. Laryngeal contact ulcers in feedlot cattle. Vet Pathol 1980;17:667-671.
  5. Feder RJ, Michell MJ. Hyperfunctional, hyperacidic and intubational granulomas. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:582-584.
  6. Smith RL, Perkins NR, Firth EC, Anderson BH. Arytenoid mucosal injury in young Thoroughbred horses-investigation of a proposed aetiology and clinical significance. N Z Vet J 2006;54(4):173-177.
  7. Wilson CS, Brookes VJ, Hughes KJ, Trope GD, Ip H, Gunn AJ. Oesophageal lumen pH in yearling horses and effects of management and administration of omeprazole. Equine Vet J 2017;49(3):389-394.
  8. Barnes AJ, Slone DE, Lynch TM. Performance after partial arytenoidectomy without mucosal closure in 27 Thoroughbred racehorses. Vet Surg 2004;33:398-403.
  9. Parente EJ, Tulleners EP, Southwood LL. Long-term study of partial arytenoidectomy with primary mucosal closure in 76 Thoroughbred racehorses (1992-2006). Equine Vet J 2008;40(3):214-218.
  10. Lumsden JM, Derksen FJ, Stick JA, Robinson NE, Nickols FA. Evaluation of partial arytenoidectomy as a treatment for equine laryngeal hemiplegia. Equine Vet J 1994;26(2):125-129.
  11. Weese JS, Giguère S, Guardabassi L. ACVIM consensus statement on therapeutic antimicrobial use in animals and antimicrobial resistance. J Vet Int Med 2015;29:487-498.
  12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals. Fifth Edition. 2018 (updated August 2019).
  13. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966;45:493-496.
  14. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18(3):268-281.
  15. Leclercq R, Canton R, Brown DF. EUCAST expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19(2):141-160.
  16. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2008.
  17. Bond SL, Timsit E, Workentine M, Alexander T, Leguillette R. Upper and lower respiratory tract microbiota in horses: bacterial communities associated with health and mild asthma (inflammatory airway disease) and effects of dexamethasone. BMC Microbiol 2017;17:184.
  18. Cardwell JM, Smith KC, Wood JLN. A longitudinal study of respiratory infections in British National Hunt racehorses. Vet Rec 2013;172:637.
  19. Sweeney CR, Holcombe SJ, Barningham SC. Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial isolates from horses with pneumonia or pleuropneumonia and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the aerobes. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;198(5):839-842.
  20. Bailey GD, Love DN. Oral associated bacterial infection in horses: studies on the normal anaerobic flora from the pharyngeal tonsillar surface and its association with lower respiratory tract and paraoral infections. Vet Microbiol 1991;26:367.
  21. Hoquet F, Higgins R, Lessard P. Comparison of the bacterial and fungal flora in the pharynx of normal horses and horses affected with pharyngitis. Can Vet J 1985;26:342.
  22. Reuss SM, Giguere S. Update on bacterial pneumonia and pleuropneumonia in the adult horse. Vet Clin Equine 2015;31:105-120.
  23. Toombs-Ruane LJ, Riley CB, Kendall AT, Bolwell CF, Benschop J, Rosanowski SM. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of aerobic isolates from respiratory samples of young New Zealand Horses. J Vet Intern Med 2015;29:1700-1706.
  24. Christley RM, Hodgson DR, Rose RJ. A case-control study of respiratory disease in Thoroughbred racehorses in Sydney. Australia. Equine Vet J 2001;33(3):256-264.
  25. Haggett EF, Giguere WD. Overview of the use of antimicrobials for the treatment of bacterial infections in horses. Equine Vet Educ 2008;20(8):433-448.
  26. Barr BS, Walridge BM, Morresey PR. Antimicrobial-associated diarrhea in three equine referral practices. Equine Vet J 2013;45:154-158.
  27. Clark C, Greenwood S, Boison JO, Chirino-Trejo M, Dowling PM. Bacterial isolates from equine infections in western Canada (1998-2003). Can Vet J 2008;49:153-160.
  28. Robinson CS, Timofte D, Singer ER, Rimmington L, Rubio-Martinez LM. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from horses with synovial sepsis: a cross-sectional study of 95 cases. Vet J 2016;216:117-121.
  29. Johns IC, Adams EL. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in equine bacterial isolates: 1999-2012. Vet Rec 2015;176:334-340.
  30. van Spijk JN, Schmitt S, Fuerst AE, Schoster A. A retrospective analysis of bacterial pathogens in hospitalized horses (1988-2014). Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 2016;153(6):433-442.
  31. Malo A, Cluzel C, Labrecque O, Beauchamp G, Lavoie JP, Leclere M. Evolution of in vitro antimicrobial resistance in an equine hospital over 3 decades. Can Vet J 2016;57:747-751.
  32. Tenover FC. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Am J Vet Med 2006;119:S3-S10.
  33. Brown JA, Hinchcliff KW, Jackson MA. Prevalence of pharyngeal and laryngeal abnormalities in Thoroughbreds racing in Australia, and their association with performance. Equine Vet J 2005;37:397-401.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Zhao Y, Zhu Y, Liu B, Mi J, Li N, Zhao W, Wu R, Holyoak GR, Li J, Liu D, Zeng S, Wang Y. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates from Donkey Uterine Infections, 2018-2021. Vet Sci 2022 Feb 5;9(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020067pubmed: 35202320google scholar: lookup
  2. Hardefeldt L, Thomas K, Page S, Norris J, Browning G, El Hage C, Stewart A, Gilkerson J, Muscatello G, Verwilghen D, van Galen G, Bauquier J, Cuming R, Reynolds B, Whittaker C, Wilkes E, Clulow J, Burden C, Begg L. Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for horses in Australia. Aust Vet J 2025 Dec;103(12):781-889.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.70003pubmed: 40903020google scholar: lookup
  3. Jasim SA, Mohammed JS, Roopashree R, Alshahrani MY, Sharma A, Sharma A, Asliddin S, Beig M. Unraveling the global landscape of Elizabethkingia antibiotic resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2025;20(5):e0323313.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323313pubmed: 40446068google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,001 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.