Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2012; 193(1); 240-245; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.11.004

Antinociceptive effects of low dose lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine in healthy ponies.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low dose lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine in ponies. Antinociceptive effects of epidural ropivacaine were evaluated by means of mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) at several spinal levels in conscious ponies. The effects of ropivacaine on nociceptive afferent transmission to the spinal cord were also assessed by measuring spinal cord somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in anaesthetised ponies. Ataxia scores were determined in conscious ponies to assess the effects on motor function. A randomised, placebo controlled, double blind cross-over design was used. Low dose lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine led to increases in MNTs at various anatomical locations with a maximum effect at the lumbosacral and sacrococcygeal regions, both with respect to increase in threshold and duration of effect. Analysis of SSEPs showed that epidural ropivacaine influenced both Aβ- and Aδ-mediated afferent transmission to the spinal cord at the level of the lumbosacral junction. Ponies showed mild ataxia after low dose lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine, but all ponies remained standing. Application of low dose lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine provided safe and efficacious antinociceptive effects in conscious and anaesthetised ponies, and could therefore be a valuable addition to multimodal analgesic protocols in Equidae.
Publication Date: 2012-03-06 PubMed ID: 22398129DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.11.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigates the effectiveness and safety of using a low dose of lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine, a local anesthetic, in ponies. Its main finding is that this method could serve as a reliable pain relief solution for ponies, exerting maximum impact on lumbosacral and sacrococcygeal regions.

Objective of the Research

  • The primary goal of this study was to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of applying a mild dose of lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine in ponies. Ropivacaine, being a local anesthetic, was expected to alleviate pain in ponies.

Methodology

  • The pain-relieving (antinociceptive) effects of this anesthetic were assessed using mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) across different spinal levels in conscious ponies. These measurements helped determine any increase in tolerance to mechanical strain.
  • The impact of the anesthetic on transmitting pain signals to the spinal cord was gauged by evaluating spinal cord somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in anesthetized ponies. This was crucial in understanding how the anesthetic impacted the sensory response to nerve stimulations.
  • The impairment of motor functions, specifically coordination, was measured via ataxia scores collected from conscious ponies.
  • The design of this study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover.

Main Findings

  • The application of mild lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine resulted in a threshold increase for MNTs at several anatomical points, exhibiting a maximum effect at the lumbosacral and sacrococcygeal regions, both with respect to threshold elevation and duration of the impact.
  • Investigating the SSEPs indicated that ropivacaine influenced both Aβ- and Aδ-mediated transmission of nociceptive afferent transmission to the spinal cord at the lumbosacral junction.
  • While mild ataxia was observed following the application of ropivacaine, all ponies remained standing, suggesting that the motor function was mildly but not critically affected.

Conclusion

  • The use of low dose lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine was deemed safe and effective in providing antinociceptive effects in both conscious and anaesthetised ponies. Thus, its inclusion could bring substantial value to multimodal analgesic protocols in Equidae.

Cite This Article

APA
van Loon JP, Menke ES, Doornenbal A, Back W, Hellebrekers LJ. (2012). Antinociceptive effects of low dose lumbosacral epidural ropivacaine in healthy ponies. Vet J, 193(1), 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.11.004

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 193
Issue: 1
Pages: 240-245

Researcher Affiliations

van Loon, Johannes P A M
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.p.a.m.vanloon@uu.nl
Menke, Eveline S
    Doornenbal, Arie
      Back, Willem
        Hellebrekers, Ludo J

          MeSH Terms

          • Amides / adverse effects
          • Analgesia, Epidural / veterinary
          • Anesthetics, Local / adverse effects
          • Animals
          • Cross-Over Studies
          • Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
          • Horses / physiology
          • Injections, Epidural / veterinary
          • Lumbosacral Region / physiology
          • Male
          • Nociception
          • Pain Measurement / veterinary
          • Ropivacaine
          • Spinal Cord / physiology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 2 times.
          1. Mühlemann S, Leandri M, Risberg ÅI, Spadavecchia C. Comparison of Threshold and Tolerance Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflexes in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Nov 26;11(12).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11123380pubmed: 34944157google scholar: lookup
          2. Haussler KK. Pressure Algometry for the Detection of Mechanical Nociceptive Thresholds in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 24;10(12).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10122195pubmed: 33255216google scholar: lookup